Andhra Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Aman Vs. the Asst. Engineer Electric Department and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in CC No. 12/2013 on the file of Dist. Forum, Ranga Reddy, the complainant preferred this appeal. 2) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant is a tenant of H.No. 1-12-71, Right Portion, Public Sector Colony, New Bowenpally, Secunderabad for which S.C. No. BZ-60133 was provided in the name of owner i.e., Md. Ikramullah. The complainant alleges that on 28.1.2012 the Assistant Engineer along with four others visited the premises at about 3.00 to 4.00 p.m. pulled the seal of the electricity meter and put the same in her bag and left the place. Later they informed that the meter was tampered and she has to pay Rs. 60,000/- to Rs. 80,000/- for tampering the electricity meter. The complainant submits that the meter was sent to MRT lab for testing which revealed that the meter is functioning normally. The opposite parties lodged a complaint against her stating that she is running a hospital in H.No. 1-...
Vavilapalli Ratnamala and Others Vs. Dr. Madan Mohan and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Dis-satisfied with the order in C.C. No. 61/2009 on the file of the Dist. Forum, Srikakulam, the complainants preferred FA No. 751/2012, while the opposite parties preferred FA No. 287/2012 against the very order. 2) Since both the appeals arise out of same C.D. the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint for felicity of expression and to avoid confusion. 3) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant No. 1 is the wife and complainant Nos. 2 and 3 are children of late Dr. V. Bhujanga Rao. During his life time Dr. Bhujanga Rao by submitting Ex. B1 application form dt. 10.4.2006 had obtained FBS AIOS Membership by paying Rs. 30,000/- evidenced under receipt Ex. A3 dt. 10.4.2006 and that the opposite parties issued Ex. A7 certificate covering the complainants as beneficiaries under the Family Benefit Scheme of All India Ophthalmological Society from 10.4.2006. The complainants submit that Dr. Bhujanga Rao also pai...
The Union of India, Rep. by Its Secretar Vs. D.N.N. Kumar and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.24874 of 2013 dated:04-10-2013 The Union of India, rep. by its Secretary,Ministry of Defence, South Block,New Delhi-110 011 and others .Petitioners D.N.N.Kumar and another.Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sr.Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned Asst.Solicitor General of India Counsel for 1st respondent : Sr.Siva HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : 1. 1993(4) SCC727THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.24874 of 2013 ORDER : (Per LNR,,J.The 1st respondent (for short 'the respondent') was working as Store Keeper in the Indian Navy at Visakhapatnam. A charge memo was issued to him on 29.12.2000, framing three articles of charges. He submitted an explanation denying the charges. Not satisfied with that, the disciplinary authority i.e., the 3rd petitioner herein, appointed Sr.D. Muni, CTO (A&E).CINA (V) as an Inquiry Officer. After...
Sri Mohan Singhand Others Vs. Sri R.Venkatramana and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI APPEAL SUIT No.759 of 2013 Dated:04. 10-2013 Sri Mohan Singh & others......Appellants Sri R.Venkatramana & others......Respondents CounselFor appellants : Sri G.K.Deshpandey, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Sri E.Manohar, Senior Counsel, appearing for Sri R.A.Achuthanand, Advocate. or Respondents 3 to 39 :Parties shown as not necessary. : ?.CITATIONS:1. AIR1960SC3352. AIR2010SC32403. AIR2008SC3634. 2008 (2) PLR7145. AIR1980P & H256. ILR1991KARNATAKA15007. 2003 (5) ALT4038. 2009 (2) ALD2129. 1997 (6) ALT65410. AIR1971SC44211. (2013) 3 SCC18212. (2011) 9 SCC12613. (2007) 5 SCC61414. AIR1961SC80815. AIR1930PC270APPEAL SUIT No.759 of 2013 JUDGMENT : (Per R.Subhash Reddy, J) This appeal suit is filed by the plaintiffs in O.S.No.782 of 2013, aggrieved by order dated 20.06.2013, passed by the learned Special Judge for Trial of S.C. & S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act-cum-Additional District and Sessio...
J.Chinna Vs. the Deputy General Manager, Canara Bank
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT APPEAL No.1012 OF2009dated:04-10-2013. W.A..NO.1012 of 2009 J.CHINNA RAO.. APPELLANT/WRIT PETITIONER THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK CIRCLE OFFICE, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Siva Counsel for the respondents: Sri Deepak Bhattachargee : ?.CITATIONS:1. (2006) 5 SCC4462 (1993( 4 SCC7273.(1999) 3 SCC679THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT APPEAL NO.1012 OF2009WRIT APPEAL NO.102 OF2009JUDGMENT (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice A.Rajasheker Reddy) This Writ Appeal is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.27031 of 1996, dated 14-02-2007 whereby writ petition is dismissed.1. The appellant/writ petitioner joined in the respondent bank as a Peon in March, 1977 and he was promoted as a Clerk in 1982 and while so working at Gandhinagar Branch, Vijayawada, he was placed under s...
Apsrtc, Rep.by Its Managing Director, M Vs. T. Venkataiah,and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Writ Petition No.28335 of 2009 dated:04-10-2013 APSRTC, rep.by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad, and another... Petitioners T. Venkataiah,and another.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri C. Sunil Kumar Reddy SC for APSRTC Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V. Narasimha Goud for R-1. G.P. for Labour - for R-2. : ?.Cases referred:1. 2004(1) ALD4452. 1996 (1) ALD1069(D.B.) 3. AIR2007SC3100(1) HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Writ Petition No.28335 of 2009 ORDER: Would an order of reinstatement ".with all consequential benefits". entail an employee to seek for back wages is the question that arises for consideration in this writ petition.2. The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (the Corporation, for short) seeks for a Writ of Certiorari to set aside the orders dated 07.09.2009 in M.P.No.1 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum- Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad directing the petitioners ...
P.Anand Rao and OThe Vs. State of A.P.Represented by Its Public P
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2786 OF201304-10-2013 P.Anand Rao and others ...PETITIONERS State of A.P.represented by its Public Prosecutor, A.P.High Coiurt, Hyderabad and another ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitionerts:Sri.V.Hariharan Counsel for first Respondent : Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Second Respondent:SRI A.SatyaPrasad, Senior Counsel representing Sri Prakash Buddarapu :1. 2012(2) ALD (CRL) 288 2 AIR2011SC19053 2008(12) SCC5314 109(2004) DLT9155 ALLMR(CRI) 2006-0-3197 6 AIR2009SC19737 Unreported judgment of this court dt.26-4-2013 in WP No.13577/2012 8 (2004) 1 SCC6919 (1992) 3 SCC31710 AIR1992SC60411 AIR1960SC86612 (1976) 3 SCC73613 (1977) 2 SCC69914 2011 (5) SCC70815 1997 Crl.L.J.2036 16 2000(5) ALT60217 2003(1) ALD (CRL.)252 (AP) 18 2005(2) ALT (CRL) 401 (AP) 19 AIR2005SC9ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed by A-1 to A-5 under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ".the Code".) seeking quashing of investig...
Smt. Vijayalaks Vs. the Principal Chief Conservator of Fores
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.34875 of 2012 dated:04-10-2013 Smt. Vijaya Lakshmi.Petitioner The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and another.Respondents HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sr.K. Rama Koteswara Rao Counsel for respondents : The Government Pleader for Services-I ?.CASES REFERRED : --- THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.34875 of 2012 ORDER : (Per LNR,,J.The husband of the petitioner herein, by name, Sr.N. Srinivasan (for short 'the employee').was appointed as Forest Officer in 1966. He was promoted as Deputy Range Officer in 1992. The Forest Range Officer, Venkatapuram Range, Khammam District, gave a complaint against the employee to the Divisional Forest Officer, Bhadrachalam, on 31.01.1998, alleging that the employee committed certain irregularities, in execution of the works sponsored by the World...
B.K.Singhal Vs. M/S Suma Associates, Architects and Interior Designers ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint seeking the following reliefs; i) Declaration that there is defect in carrying out the interior work. ii) Refund of excess amount of Rs.7 lakh collected from the appellant. iii) Repair of the improper work carried out by the respondent or in the alternative for payment of Rs.5,00,000/- towards the expenses for rectification of the improper interior work. iv) Compensation and damages of Rs.5 lakh. 2. The case of the appellant as seen from the averments of the complaint is that the appellant purchased Flat bearing number 214 at Narayanaguda locality of Hyderabad city and on recommendation of one Manish Tiwari who is common friend to the appellant and the respondent, the appellant entrusted the interior work of the Flat to the respondent for a consideration of Rs.15,00,000/-. The appellant paid advance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- to the respondent. The completion of interior work...
Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell Bmrws (Regd) Bhel Mig 982 Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. The second complainant filed the complaint through the first complainant alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in regard to sale of plot bearing number 39 situated at Boduppal Residential, R.R.District. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the complaint. 2. The second complainant purchased plot bearing number 39 admeasuring 224 sq.yards comprised in survey number 64 situate at Boduppal village and Mandal of Rangareddi District by paying initial amount of `50,000/- on 24.11.2006 and a sum of `3,98,000/- total sale consideration of `4,48,000/-. The second complainant had borne registration charges and stamp duty to the tune of Rs.46,220/- for registration of the sale deed executed by the opposite party no.1 on 7.12.2006. 3. The second complainant submitted that in the month of February, 2007 he began to mark boundaries of the plot for the purpose o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »