Andhra Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Director Nizamâs Institute of Medical Sciences Panjagutta, Hy ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.1 is the Revision Petition, the Revision is directed against the order dated 12.12.2012 whereby the revision petitioner was set exparte. 2. The Revision Petitioner has submitted that the District Forum ought to have given some reasonable time to the revision petitioner before setting it exparte. Vakalat was given in time by the revision petitioner to its counsel at Adilabad to protect its interest and due to certain circumstances beyond the control of the Advocate he could not represent before the District Forum when the case was called on 12.12.2012 and for the lapse of the counsel to file vakalat in time the revision petitioner was set exparte. 3. The petitioner has submitted that the complainant in CC No.78 of 2012 filed a frivolous complaint alleging negligence on the part of the revision petitioner and claimed compensation of `18 lakhs and in order to elicit the truth the institute cannot be gone into unless th...
P.Balasubrahmanyam, S/O.Late Papaia Vs. Union of India,represented by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.21345 OF2010Dated:08-10-2013 P.Balasubrahmanyam, S/o.Late Papaiah ... Petitioner Union of India, represented by Secretary,Ministry of Communication and Information Technology,Department of Posts, New Delhi And others... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Party-in-person Counsel for respondents : Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Learned Assistant Solicitor General HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.21345 of 2010 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The petitioner was appointed as Postal Assistant, in the year 1991. Thereafter, he was promoted as Inspector of Post Offices, in the year 2000, on the basis of his performance in the written examination. He was also promoted to the post of Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices. 2 Promotion to the post of Superintendent of Post O...
P.V.Krishnaia Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its Cabinetsecr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.435 OF2013Dated 8-10-2013 P.V. Krishnaiah.....PETITIONER Union of India, rep. by its Cabinet Secretary, Central Secretariat, New Delhi and others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for Petitioner: P.V. Krishnaiah Counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 :Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, Assistant Solicitor General Counsel for Respondent No.4 : G.P. for G.A.D. Counsel for Respondent Nos. 5 to 15: None GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred : AIR1973SC1461AIR1996SC1627AIR1967SC1643AIR1975SC2299AIR1980SC1789AIR1987SC386AIR1997SC1125(2007) 2 SCC1AIR1960SC51AIR1979SC193IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.435 OF2013DATED:8.10.2013 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This public interest l...
Malampati Koteswara Ra Vs. Bank of Baroda, Nadendla Branch, Nadendl
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P.No.5717 OF2012dated:08-10-2013 Malampati Koteswara Rao ....Petitioner Bank of Baroda, Nadendla Branch, Nadendla and 3 others.Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.V.V Ramana Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sr.K. Mallikarjuna Rao Counsel for Respondent No.4: Sr.Ch.Srinivas : : ?.Cases referred: (2000).SCC655HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.5717 of 2012 ORDER: This C.R.P is filed against the Auction Sale conducted on 05.11.2012 in E.P.No.134 of 2005 in O.S.No.74 of 2002 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narasaraopet. Facts of the case, which are necessary for disposal of the C.R.P., are as under: The fiRs.respondent Bank filed O.S.No.74 of 2002 against the revision petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 herein on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet, for recovery of a sum of Rs.8,15,499/- due in respect of cash credit facility availed by 2nd respondent firm, for which 3rd re...
Md.SaiduddIn and Oth Vs. K.Venkatesam and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2013
HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAM WRIT PETITION Nos.21610 of 2007 and batch 08-10-2013 Md.Saiduddin and others...Petitioners K.Venkatesam and others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioneRs.Sr.C.Srinivasa Baba, Sr.G.Vidhyasagar Smt. M.Panduranga Rao Govt.Pleader for Services-II Counsel for respondents: Sr.M.Surender Rao, Smt. K.Rajyalaxmi, Sr.K.Siva, Sr.D.Balakishan Rao, Govt.Pleader for Services-I GIST HEAD NOTE ?.Cases referred HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDARAM WRIT PETITION Nos.21610, 24847 of 2007, 26765 of 2011, 31595,33217 of 2012 and 18254 of 2013 Common Order: (Per Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) In this batch of writ petitions, as common questions of fact and law are involved, they can be disposed of through common order. The genesis for these proceedings is an order dated 23.08.2007 passed by the A.P.Administrative Tribunal(for short, ".Tribunal".) in O.A.No....
Sarmanpalli Manjula Vs. the Sarpunch, Gramapanchayath, Kurikyala Villa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 01.03.2012 in CC 28/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Karimnagar. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to here under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of 2 Guntas of Plot in Sy.No.518/2 of Kurikyala Village, Gangadhara Mandal, Karimnagar District issued by the Government by way of Patta bearing No. B/954/1999 on 05.04.2001 to her by the State government under the Family Planning programme and hence she erected a hut in the said land and residing there from then onwards. As she wanted to construct a pucca house she submitted an application to grant construction permission to opposite party no.1, but did not receive any intimation, therefore it was sent by registered post on 29.11.2010 but even then the opposite party no.1 neither granted permission nor rejected the sa...
Boguta Sarakka and Others Vs. Asst. Engineer Apnpdcl, A. P. Transco Ko ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 7th November, 2012 in CC 41/2012 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Adilabad . For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to here under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that on 23.04.2012 at 23.00 hours one Bogula Pochamallu, who is the husband of the 1st complainant and son of the 2nd and 3rd complainants, died on the spot while charging his cell phone in his house due to electrocution of high tension power on account of improper maintenance of Ops. He is aged 28 years and hale and healthy at the time of his death and used to earn Rs.8000/- per month by doing coolie work as bread winner of the family and due to his sudden demise the entire family suffered a lot physically, mentally and monetarily. On a complaint, police of PS Kotapalli registered a case in Cr. No. 22/2012 U/s. 174 of Cr. P.C. The death of the ...
M/S Swarnandra-ijmii Intigrated Township Dev.Co.Pvt.Ltd., (a Joint Ven ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order of C.C.No.63/2009 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the absolute owner of Unit No.D11-E/06/03 in VI floor, Block VISTA Diu 1 admeasuring 1380 sq. ft. along with undivided share of land admeasuring 56 sq. yds. situated at Raintree park in Sy.No.1009/1 (part) adjacent to Phase V, KPHB Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72 having purchased the same from opposite parties vide sale deed dated 27-4-2007. The complainant submitted that he paid Rs.2,75,646/- to the opposite parties towards advance booking on 13-3-2006 and on 06-4-2006, the opposite parties issued a letter informing the complainant the mode of payment and the complainant accordingly paid the payments to the opposite party. The complainant submitted that he agreed to purchase Car Parking but the same was not mentioned in the letter dated 06...
Smt.Peddi Sailaja and Anot Vs. the State Rep.by the Principal Secretar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.19415 of 2013 Dated.07-10-2013 Smt.Peddi Sailaja and another...Petitioners The State rep.by the Principal Secretary to Govt.of A.P.Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ..Respondents ^Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.P.Vijaya Kiran !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.5: Smt.K.Sesharajyam Head note: ?.Cases referred: 2009 (1) ALD248THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.19415 of 2013 Dated 07th October, 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside proceedings in Rc.No.2026/11-D4, dated 15.01.2013, of respondent No.2, whereby he has confirmed the order, dated 31.03.2010, of respondent No.3. In the manner in which this Court is proposing to dispose of the writ petition, it is not necessary to record the facts in detail. It will suffice to note that in the family partition, Ac.0.88 cents of land fell to...
M/S.Nationalinsurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Vs. Sri Maheswari Lorrytranspo ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-07-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI APPEAL SUIT No.476 of 2002 Date: 07-10-2013 M/s.National Insurance Co.Ltd., rep. by its Branch Manager No.II, Mangalore, Karnataka & another....Appellants Sr.Maheswari Lorry Transport, Rajahmundry, rep. by its Proprietor....Respondent For the appellants:Sr.Kota Subba Rao, Advocate. For the Respondent:Sr.K.Venkatesh, Advocate. : ?.CITATIONS: 1. 2007 (2) ACJ13602. 2002 (2) ACJ12003. AIR1962SC17164. AIR2000SC3634HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI APPEAL SUIT No.476 of 2002 JUDGMENT : (Per R.Subhash Reddy, J.This appeal suit is filed under Section 96 of CPC, by the plaintiffs in the suit in O.S.No.69 of 1997 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 3rd October 2001, passed in the said suit. By the aforesaid judgment and decree, the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiffs for recovery of an amount of Rs.8,49,571/...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »