Andhra Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B. Venkateswara Reddy and Another Vs. M/S Kamineni Hospitals Rep. by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, I/C. President) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.84/2005 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District, the complainants preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants approached the opposite party hospital for treatment of their aged father for his illness as outpatient and were allotted OP No.20030600024 on 23-6-2003 and their father was advised to undergo necessary tests on the same day and on consecutive day also. The complainants submit that several tests like x-ray, Endoscopy, Ultrasonography, abdomen (male) Radiologist, diagnosis tests, CT Abdomen, Rectal I.V.Contrast, Gastroentrology (colonoscopy) etc., The complainant submitted that on 25th June, 2003, he discussed with opposite party No.3 but opposite party No.3 could not arrive any conclusion regarding the patients real problem even after conducting several tests in past 2 days. The complainant submitted that opposite party No.3 assured that there is no s...
Tata Sky Limited a Company Incorporated Under the Indian Companies Act ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
(M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.593/2009 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, opposite party No.1 preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant i.e. Dr.MCR Human Resources Development Institute, a Government institute with Chief Minister as the Chairperson of the Board of Governors and Director General as its C.E.O., The institute had contacted M/s Probes Consulting for provision of Tata sky connections to the Godavari Guest House where most of the VIP Guests of the institute stay and the above company on behalf of M/s Tata sky requested a formal order and a formal order was issued by the institute. The complainant submitted that as per the website of Tata sky, the company provides 3 add on connections to one main connection and as per its order, 16 rooms got to be provided with this facility at Godavari Guest House but the companys agent, M/s Probes consulting instead provided 16 main connections a...
Smt. Gangarapu Kalyani Vs. Narne Estates Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its Proprie ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. Dissatisfied with the relief granted by the District Forum, the complainant has filed the appeal. The case of the appellant filed complaint with the averments that after going through the brochure and advertisement issued by the respondent-company she entered into agreement with the respondent to purchase a plot admeasuring 250 sq.yards in Golden Heights, Phase-II situated at Ravalkol Village, Medchal Mandal R.R. District for consideration of Rs.3,75,000/-. The appellant submitted that the respondent assured her that it would develop the venture within one year and the appellant could construct house in the plot. The appellant paid and amount of Rs.2,00,000/- on and Rs.31,518/- + Rs.1,675/- on 23.04.2005 an a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- on 10.05.2006. The appellant paid a sum of Rs.65,000/- towards registration charges on 09.10.2009 and the respondent-company executed sale deed on 30.03.2010 in respect of the plot bearing number 132 and not in ...
Mohammed Jaffar and Anot Vs. the A.P. State Wakf Board, Represented B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-23-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.16183 of 2013 23-10-2013 Mohammed Jaffar and another.Petitioners The A.P.State Wakf Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, Nampally, Hyderabad and others .Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sr.E. Madan Mohan Rao Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sr.M.A.K.Mukheed, Standing Counsel Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sr.Mohd. Anwar Siddiqui Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sr.K. Venu Madhav HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: 1. (2003) 2 SCC1072. (1998) 8 SCC13. (1979) 3 SCC4894. (1986) 3 SCC3915. (1987) 2 SCC295HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.16183 of 2013 Date : 23-10-2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside proceedings in F.No.16/N1/Hyd/13/Z-1, dated 13-5-2013 of respondent No.1 whereby it has permitted respondent No.3 to construct mulgies over terrace of the second floor attached to the Wakf mulgi Nos.21-1-1036/63/67/E/1 to 26, adjacent to Misjid-e- Mirde Munnawar, Patherga...
M/S. Gayathri Muralidhar and Another Vs. Punjab National Bank Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the complainant as against the orders dated 17.01.2013 in CC 44/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Medak at Sanga Reddy . For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainants 1 and 2 who are the daughters and mother respectively are the customers of opposite party bank and they hold a joint locker facility bearing No. 103 in the Bank since October 2008, The said bank was chosen by the complainants as it was nearer to their previous residence at Chandanagar, Hyderabad. A sum of Rs.23,000/- was paid by the complainants as security deposit towards the said locker facility. The complainants kept gold and silver jewelry and antiquities worth nearly Rs.9 lakhs (present market value ) in the said locker for safety and used to operate the locker as and when felt necessity. The locker was last operated on 18.5.2009...
M/S. Illuru Auto, Hardwares Represented by Its Prorietor Illuru Venkat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. These two appeals are preferred by the same unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated05.06.2012 in CC 138/2011 and CC 139/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Kurnool .:Since in the above two Appeals, the appellant and the respondents are one and the same and as similar facts and law are involved this Commission intends to dispose of all the said appeals by a common order. FA 535/2012 pertaining to CC 138/2011 is taken as lead case. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to here-under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant is running the Auto Hardwares (Spare Parts) shop in the name and style of M/s Illuru Auto Hardware, D.No.25-426-B3, R.S. Road Near Municipal Office, Nandyal. He insured the shop along with stock with opposite party No.1 under the policy bearing No.611502/11/09/11/00000499 for a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- and it was in force from 28-07-2009 to 27-07-201...
Chennakesava Constructions Rep. by Its Asst. Manager Palnati Gopal Kri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) This is a complaint filed u/s 17 of the Consumer Protection Act for a direction to the opposite party to pay Rs. 35 lakhs towards damage caused to the excavator with interest @ 12% p.a., from 5.11.2012 till the date of payment together with costs of Rs. 50,000/-. 2) The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant is doing sub-contract works for formation of new B.G. Line between Obulavaripalli and Venkatachalam for South Central Railway and for execution of the said work he purchased a Volvo-290 excavator. The complainant obtained Commercial Vehicle Package Policy covering the risk of all own damage and third party risks for a total sum of Rs. 36 lakhs covering the period from 31.10.2011 to 30.10.2012 from the opposite party insurance company by paying the requisite premium. While so, on 5.11.2011 the said excavator was moving from one quarry to another quarry from Rajamma post- Kakarvari village, on a cliff road. The compla...
Central Bank of India Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. M/S. Svg Granites ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.1-bank is the appellant. The first respondent filed complaint seeking direction to the appellant to pay an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- covered under two cheqeus bearing nos.029442 and 029441 with @12% p.a. and an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- towards damages and costs. 2. The facts of the case of the first respondent as seen from the complaint are that the first respondent is the account holder of the second respondent-bank with current account bearing number 62041778174 and it deposited two cheques bearing number 029442 for Rs.2,00,000/- and another cheque bearing number 029441 for Rs.1,00,000/- on 16.06.2009 and the second respondent bank had sent the two cheques for clearance to the appellant-bank. On enquiry about the status of the cheques made by the first respondent, the second respondent bank informed it on 12.03.2010 that the appellant informed it that the two cheques were returned unpaid and the second respondent inf...
The Senior Manager, State Bank of Hyderabad Vidyanagar Branch and Anot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The State Bank of Hyderabad is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint seeking relief for payment of an amount of Rs.6,53,495/- with interest @18%p.a. from the date of maturity of deposit bonds and a sum of Rs.80,000/- towards damages and costs of Rs.20,000/-. 2. The first respondents husbands sisters, Gowri Kameshawari and Girija Kumari who were unmarried and died intestate deposited during their life time an amount of Rs.2,16,457/-, Rs.21,641/-, Rs.2155/-, Rs.1280/- Rs.1,00,000/-, Rs.1,65,000/-, Rs.1,00,000/- and Rs.1,027/- with the appellant-bank and after the death of the depositors the respondent requested the appellant-bank to pay the amount on maturity relating to the deposit receipts and the appellant-bank required her to submit succession certificate 3. The respondents submitted that they had submitted succession certificate to the appellant-bank and the appellant bank did not pay the amount on maturity. The respondents go...
K. Yadagiri and Oth Vs. the Ordinance Factory Board, Rep. by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-21-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Petition No.10128 of 2004 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Dt:21-10-2013 K. yadagiri and others ..petitioners The Ordinance Factory Board, rep. by its Secretary, Calcutta and others ..Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sr.S.Lakshma Reddy Counsel for respondents : Standing Counsel for RR1& 2 K. Rajyalaxmi, RR3to 6 GIST HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM Writ Petition No.10128 of 2004 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The petitioners feel aggrieved by the dismissal of O.A.No.534 of 2003, by the Hyderabad Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, through order dated 26- 04-2004. The petitioners filed the O.A., challenging the seniority list dated 13-01-2003, published by the respondents 1 and 2 for the post of Examiner (highly skill...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »