Andhra Pradesh Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Syed Noor Mohammed and Another Vs. the Manager Mg Brothers Automobiles ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
Oral Order: (R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the revision petitioner in R.P.No.57 of 2013 and the opposite party filed R.P.No.59 of 2013. The parties referred to as they are arrayed in the complaint. 2. The District Forum allowed the complaint in C.C.No.23 of 2012 and passed the following order: In the result, the complaint is allowed in part holding that the opposite party alone cannot be held responsible for the whole delay and the opposite party is liable to pay 50% of the claim upto 29.02.2012 and entire period from 01.03.2012 to 06.06.2012 (3 months). The opposite party is liable to pay a sum of Rs.2,55,000/- (Rupees two lakhs fifty five thousand only) (Rs.30,000 x 8 = 2,55,000) with interest at 12% from the date of complaint, till the date of payment. The opposite party is also liable to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) towards deficiency of service. At any rate the opposite party is directed to deliver the vehicle within 7 (Seven...
Ch.GopIn Vs. the District Collector, Visakhapatnam 53
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26917 of 2013 30-10-2013 Ch.Gopinath...Petitioner The District Collector, Visakhapatnam 530 017 and others ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.S.S.Bhatt Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : Nil THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.26917 of 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: The woes of the petitioner, an Ex-Serviceman (retired as Leading Seaman (CD-3) in Indian Navy) appeared to have started with his securing an assignment in respect of Ac.1.73 cents of dry land in Survey No.143/4 of Paradesipalem, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal in the year 1989. The petitioner approached respondent No.3 time and again for mutation of his name in the record of rights. As his request was not heeded to by the subordinate officials, he has approached respondent No.1 who vide his order, dated 03.05.2005, directed respondent No.3 to take necessary steps on the petitioner's re...
Narsing Pras Vs. Dinesh Mohanlal Pardhanan
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.5837 OF2008Date:30-10-2013 Narsing Prasad....Petitioner/Landlord Dinesh Mohanlal Pardhanani.... Respondent/tenant Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Laxman Rao Counsel for the Respondent: Smt. Manjari S.Ganu HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 (1998) 6 Supreme Court Cases 431 2 (2003) 1 Supreme Court Cases 672 3 2007 (3) ALD1494 (2009) 9 Supreme Court Cases 752 5 2012 (3) ALD1326 1992 (1) ALT5267 2008 (4) ALD586HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.5837 OF2008Date:30. 10-2013 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 24.09.2008 in R.A. No.327 of 2006 passed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, confirming the order dated 07.11.2006 in RC No.112 of 1998 passed by the IV Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad, wherein the petition filed by the revision petitioner for eviction of the respondent was dismissed.2. The revision petitioner/landlord filed R.C.No.112 of 1998 on the file of...
Veesarapu Pad Vs. Rangineni Anith
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.1013 OF2013Date:30-10-2013 Veesarapu Padma ...Petitioner Rangineni Anitha.... Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K.Raghuveer Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Mahipathi Rao HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 1999 (6) ALD160(DB) 2 2012 (6) ALT5493 2003 (2) ALD6404 (2008) 9 Supreme Court Cases 401 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.1013 OF2013Date:30. 10-2013 ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by order dated 11.02.2013 in O.S. No.90 of 2008 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Suryapet, wherein the Court below overruled the objection of the revision petitioner/defendant regarding the objection taken to mark Ex.A1, agreement of sale on the ground that it requires stamp duty and also registration, since Ex.A1 agreement of sale shows possession was delivered as on the date of execution to the respondent/plaintiff.2. Brief facts which are necessary for disposal of the Civil Revision Petition are as ...
Smt. G.Venkatamma (Died) Per L.R,g.Naras Vs. Dr. Vijay Chandra Mathu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.3439 OF2008Date:30-10-2013 Smt. G.Venkatamma (died) per L.R,G.Narasimha Reddy.... Petitioner Dr. Vijay Chandra Mathur.... Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri D.Seshashayana Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri K.S.Murthy HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1 ALD-2004-1-241 2 LAWS (SC)-1999-8-162 3 LAWS(APH)-2002-6-161/ALT-2002-5-710 4 LAWS (DLH)-1981-2-11/DRJ-1981-2-138 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY C.R.P. No.3439 OF2008ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is directed against order dated 05.02.2008 in R.A.No.180 of 2006 passed by the Chief Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, wherein the Appeal filed by the respondent herein under Section 20 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Act, 1960 (for brevity 'the Act') was allowed by setting aside order dated 06.04.2006 in R.C.No.333 of 2004 passed by the I Additional Rent Controller, Hyderabad.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be refe...
T.Madan Mohan Reddy,s/O Lalte T.Chandra Vs. the State of A.P., Reptd b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24089 of 2013 29-10-2013 T.Madan Mohan Reddy,S/o Lalte T.Chandra Sekhar Reddy and two others.....Petitioner The State of A.P., Reptd by its PrincipalSecretary, Revenue Department,Hyderabad and four others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.N.V.Rahava Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Revenue : ?.Cases Referred: NIL HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24089 of 2013 Date:29.10.2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is yet another round of litigation the family of the petitioners is subjected to. 'Unenviable' is indeed the apt word to describe the position of the petitioneRs.The brief facts, of the long drawn litigation, leading to the filing of this Writ Petition, are as follows:- The petitioners are the children of late T.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, a freedom fighter, (for short 'the assignee') who later served the Andhra Pradesh higher judiciary as a District Judge. In reco...
Shaik Sal Vs. Y.Srinivasa Rao and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.264 of 2005 29-10-2013 Shaik Salam ...Appellant Y.Srinivasa Rao and another .Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: Sri N.Subba Rao Counsel for respondent No.1 : None appeared Counsel for respondent No.2- The New India Assurance Company Limited : Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. 1965(1) All.E.R-563 2) 1963(2) All.E.R.432 3) 1969(1) All.E.R.555 4) 1995 ACJ366SC)-CA Nos.1799 & 1800 of1989 with SLP(Civil) 4586 of 1989 5) (2005) 6 SCC2366) 2009 ACJ12987) 2013(4) ALT35SC) HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.264 OF2005JUDGMENT: The injured-claimant filed this appeal, having been aggrieved by the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Vehicles Claims Tribunalcum-XI Additional District Judge, Guntur,(for short, Tribunal) in M.V.O.P.No.1139 of 2002 dated 30.07.2004, awarding compensation of Rs.11,700/-(Rupees Eleven thousand seven hundred only) as against the claim of Rs.1,00,000/...
J. P. Rao Vs. the Manager, Idea Cellular, Opp. Lb Stadium, Fateh Maida ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
Oral Order : (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 13.09.2013 in CC 1051/2011 on the file of the District Consumer Forum III, Hyderabad. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant who is a practicing advocate is having a pre-paid connection with Mobile No. 9848284738 for life time validity with opposite parties since long time. He left for US on 14.4.2011 and returned to India On 6.7.2011. On return from USA he tried to call his relatives and friends but services to his Mobile phone aforesaid were temporarily disconnected when he contacted the customer care centre of the opposite party personally he was informed that his phone number was released in the market and promised to get the same activated within one week but it was not so activated. Therefore he got issued a legal notice calling upon the OP to ...
Kasani Narasimhulu S/O Late K.Pochai Vs. Sathagowni Srinivas Goud S/O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI C.R.P.No.3310 OF201328-10-2013 Kasani Narasimhulu s/o Late K.Pochaiah....Petitioner Sathagowni Srinivas Goud S/o late Anantha Swamy and two others....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Palivela Satyarajababu. Counsel for the Respondent: Sri M.Vidyasagar. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1. (SLP (CIVIL) No.20366 of 2002) 2. AIR2006SUPREME COURT18283. 2008 (4) ALD24(SC) 24 4. 2007 (3) ALD433(DB) 5. 2007 (3) ALD720(DB) 6. 2007 (6) ALD388(DB) 7. 2005 (4) ALD2478. 2006 (1) ALD6079. 2008 (6) ALD63010. 2010 (1) ALD44711. 2010 (6) ALD38012. 2011 (4) ALD77513. 2011 (5) ALD381THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3310 of 2013 Dated 28th October, 2013 ORDER: This revision, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the defendant in O.S.No.25 of 2008, on the file the III Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) at Medak, against the order dated 28.06.2013 passed by the said Court, dismissing I....
Syed Ghouse Pas Vs. Smt. K.Rooplata and Anoth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-2013
HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A. No.162 of 2005 28-10-2013 Syed Ghouse Pasha ...Appellant Smt. K.Rooplata and another....Respondents Counsel for the Appellant :Sri V.Atchuta Ram Counsel for respondent No.1: None appeared Counsel for respondent No.2- United India Insurance Company Limited : Sri V.Sambasiva Rao HEAD NOTE: ?. Cases referred:1. 1965(1) All.E.R-563 2) 1963(2) All.E.R.432 3) 1969(1) All.E.R.555 4) 1995 ACJ366SC)-CA Nos.1799 & 1800 of1989 with SLP(Civil) 4586 of 1989 5) (2005) 6 SCC2366) 2009 ACJ12987) 2013(4) ALT35SC) HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE B.SIVA SANKARA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.162 OF2005JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the injured-claimant, having been aggrieved, against the Order/Award of the learned Chairman of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- V Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, (for short, 'Tribunal') in M.V.O.P.No.97 of 2001 dated 03.09.2004, awarding compensation of Rs.5,457/-(Rupees five thousand four hundred and fifty s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »