Andhra Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments

Head Car Product Group Tata Motors Ltd. and Another Vs. Kalimisetty Su ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 01. This is an appeal preferred by the opposite parties 1 and 2 as against the orders dated 30.09.2010 in CC 86/2010 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Ananthapur. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 02. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant purchased Nano LX car from the 4th opposite party on 18-03-2010 which was manufactured by Ops 1 and 2 which has OP. 3 branch at Kurnool after payment of Rs.77,193/- in cash and remaining amount of Rs.1,40,000/- was paid through 5th opposite party financer vide letter dt.26-08-2009 vide Registration No. AP-02-AE-4257 on 06-04-2010. The said car did not give assured mileage and there is manufacturing defect in the car in the said context so also defect in fuel gauge. In spite of repeated requests and correspondence, Ops 1 and 2 and 4 did not rectify the defects and hence the complaint claiming refund of Rs. .1,21,173/- along with int...