Andhra Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K. Raja Rao Vs. A.P. Industrial Development Corporation
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1309 OF 201.4-1-2013 K. Raja Rao A.P. Industrial Development Corporation Limited (State Government Undertaking) Rep. by its Managing Director Parishrama Bhavan, Fathemaidan Road Hyderabad and another COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Sri E. Manohar, Senior Counsel for Sri V. Kishore COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1: Sri S. Sreenivasa Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2: G.P. for Revenue GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 197.SC 10.2. AIR 197.AP 169.3. (2006) 9 SCC 61.4. AIR 199.SC 130.5. APLJ 1984 26. AIR 193.PC 6.7. AIR 197.SC 130.8.1993 SUPP.(1) SCC 49.9. (1979) 1 SCC 19.10. AIR 200.SC 187.11. 1939 AC 43.12. (1918) 2 KB 83.JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) This Writ Appeal by the appellant-writ petitioner is directed against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21.8.2012 in W.P.No.6842 of 2000 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant to declare the action of the M...
D. Kasaia Vs. Sunkara Srinivasulu and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE WRIT APPEAL NO.1586 OF 201.WRIT APPEAL NO.1587 OF 201.4-1-2013 W.A. NO.1586 OF 201.D. Kasaiah... Appellant Sunkara Srinivasulu & others... Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Sri Vinay Kamisetty COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 to 4: Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.5: G.P. for Home COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.6 : - COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.8 & 9: Sri J.Janikirami Reddy GIST HEAD NOTE: CITATIONS:1. AIR 194.PC 1.2. AIR 196.SC 86.3. 1992 Supp (1)SCC 33.:1992. SCC (Cri4. (2005) 13 SCC 54.5. (1998) 8 SCC 72.6. (1990) Supp. SCC 68.7. (1995) 2 SCC 37.8. 2004 (6) ALT 75.= 2004(6) ALD 85.9. (1992) 3 SC 31.10. (2001) 6 SCC 18.11. 3 (1979) 2 SCC 32.COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) 1. Whether, on the ground that there was manipulation of the First Information Report by Officer in charge of Police Station while registering a crime, the First Information Report as also the criminal proceedings commenc...
M/S. Sukhjika Industries Vs. National Insurance Company Limited
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
R. Lakshmi Narasimha Rao, Member: Oral: 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite party Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs. 63,97,020 besides Rs. 10 lakh towards compensation towards suffering mental agony as also costs. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant, a proprietary concern engaged in business of manufacturing and trading of cattle feed since 1963 and purchased the machine made in China for manufacturing feed packing material. The complainant firm insured the machine and building as also the packing material for the cattle feed under Insurance Policy bearing No. 551703/11/08/3100000716 for the period commencing from 20.12.2008 till 19.12.2009 for the sum assured Rs. 75 lakh. The complainant firm obtained the Insurance Policy basing on the representations of the opposite party Insurance Company. The proprietor of the complainant firm is an illiterate lady and the opposite party has obtained her signature on the blank proposal form. 3. On 2...
Automotive Manufacturers Pvt. Ltd., Hydernagar and Another Vs. M/S Tan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
Oral Order: (Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.192/2012 in C.C.No.102/2012 on the file of District Forum, Ranga Reddy District, the opposite parties preferred this revision petition. The complainant filed the I.A. seeking direction to the opposite parties to deliver the repaired vehicle while the C.C. was pending before the District Forum. The brief facts as set out in the complaint is that the complainants vehicle Mahendra Gio was taken to the workshop of opposite parties for repairs in the month of April, 2012 and the same was repaired but once again after travelling for 3 kms from the workshop, on 16-4-2012 the vehicle stopped on the road side and the vehicle was taken to the opposite parties who repaired the said vehicle. Thereafter once again the vehicle was handed over to the opposite parties for repairs and at present the vehicle is with the opposite parties and the complainant is seeking direction in the main complaint as follows: i) To...
K.Kireeti and Others Vs. the Union of India Rep. by Its Secretary
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32533 o03. 01.2013 K.Kireeti and others The Union of India rep. by its Secretary and others. Counsel for petitioners: Sri Sri Ram Counsel for Respondents: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioners are students of Second Year Intermediate studying in different institutions, in Hyderabad. They intend to seek admission in the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT), by taking part in the admission process. Conducting of entrance examination and selection of the candidates for admission into IITs, was entrusted by the Union of India, the 1st respondent herein, to the Central Board of Secondary Education, New Delhi, the 2nd respondent herein. The 2nd respondent issued a press note, dated 07.09.2012, furnishing the details of the Joint Entrance Examination that may be conducted in the forthcoming academic year. Substantial changes were introduced over the system, which was in vogue till the present academic...
Papisetty Samrajayam and Another Vs. the New India Assurance Co. Ltd., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-03-2013
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Honble Member) The complainant filed this appeal against the order dt.10.5.2011 of the District Forum, Guntur, made in C.C.No.228/2010, which is filed by the appellant/complainant seeking insured amount of Rs.1 lakh together with interest at 12% p.a. and for costs. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described in the manner they arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainants as set out in the complaint is that the complainants are wife and daughter of one late Raghavaiah. The said Raghavaiah insured his life under Janata Personal Accident Policy vide policy no.4761180104654, for a sum of Rs.1 lakh, for a period from 6.6.1997 to 5.6.2007. The said Raghavaiah died in a train accident at Mondigodalu at Tenali, on 15.9.2002. The said accident was registered as Crime no.116/2002 u/s.174 Cr.pc. at Tenali Railway Station. The death of Raghavaiah has been intimated to opp.party no.2 on the next day i.e. 16.9.2002 by the complainants and oppo...
Mir HussaIn Ali Khan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,rep. by Its Prin
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.30792 o02. 01.2013 Mir Hussain Ali Khan State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt.,Revenue Department at Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others. Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.K.Raghuveer Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 5: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.6: Mr.Mir Masood Khan ?Cases referred:1. 2011 (1) ALD 6.2 AIR 196.SC 68.3 AIR 197.SC 89.4 (1998) 2 SCC 64.5 AIR 196.SC 98.6 AIR 200.SC 445.7 2001 (6) ALD 39.(FB2001. (8) SCC 52.9 AIR 198.SC 68.10 AIR 195.Andhra Pradesh 280 (Vol.46, C.85) Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.5 in not receiving and registering the documents in respect of Acs.5-13 guntas of land in Survey No.373/1 and Acs.1-05 guntas of land in Survey No.373/3 total admeasuring Acs.6-18 guntas situated at Moula Ali Village, Malkajgiri Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as "the subject property"), a...
Kothamaram Nagi Reddy and 5 Others Vs. the Government of Andhra Prades ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION Nos.26957 o28110. of 2012, 28576 of 2012 and 29219 o02. 01-2013 Kothamaram Nagi Reddy and 5 others .... Petitioners The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise-II), Secretariat, Hyderabad and 8 others.... Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri D.Kodandarama Reddy Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Prohibition & Excise Sri A. Santosh Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?Citations:1. Judgment in Writ Petition No.16508 of 2006, dated 29.03.2007. 2) (2011) 5 SCC 43.3) AIR 199.SC 231.4) (1992) Supp (1) SCC 15.5) AIR 196.SC 191.6) (1987) 4 SCC 48.7) (2006) 6 SCC 395.8) AIR 196.SC 117.: (1961) 3 SCR 18.9) AIR 199.SC 223.10) AIR 196.SC 121.11) AIR 196.SC 83.: (1962) 1 SC12. (1980) 3 SCC 9.13) (2001) 3 SCC 63.14) (2006) 4 SCC 32.15) (2009) 14 SCC 8.16) 2004 (3) SCC 40.17) (1993) 1 SCC 44.18) (2011) 2 SCC 57.19) 48 L E20. (2008) 1 SCC 68.21) (1989) 1 SCC 8.22) (1911) 2 Ch.1 23) (2006) 3 SCC 62.24) (1995) 1 SCC ...
M/S. Hindustan Coco Cola Beverages P Lim Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh,r ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO TREVC Nos. 43, 44 AND 4.OF 2007.W.P.No.21115 of 2005, W.P.No. 856 of 2006 and W.P.No.25588 o02. 01.2013 TREVC No.43 of 2007 and batch:- M/s. Hindustan Coco Cola Beverages P Limited,44-69, Moulali, Hyderabad..... APPELLANT State of Andhra Pradesh,Rep. by its State Representative, before Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nampally, Hyderabad and another......RESPONDENTS Counsel for the appellants: Sri S. R. Ashok, Senior Advocate, Sri K. Raji Reddy and Sri S.Dwarakanath, Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri Balaji Varma, Special Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri M.V.J.K. Kumar. : ?Cases referred:1. 43 STC 1.(SC) 2. (2005) 41 APSTJ 11 3. 1986 (2) APSTJ 25 4. 108 STC 59.5. 2000(6) SCC 1.6. (2007) 7 VST 53.(SC) 7. (1973) 33 STC 53.(M.P) 8. (1968) 21 STC 1.(SC) T.R.E.V.C Nos.43, 44 & 45 OF 2007.W.P.No.21115 of 2005, W.P.No. 856 of 2006 AND W.P.No.25588 of 2007 COMMON ORDER...
ifco-tokio General Insurance Co.Ltd. and Another Vs. Dr. P.V. Ramana M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-02-2013
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The appeal is filed by IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd questioning the legality of the order directing it to pay an amount of `16,46,564/- with interest @9%p.a. and costs. 2. The respondent insured his Mercedes Benz car bearing number AP-16BK-7999 with the appellant-insurance company. The appellant insurance company issued insurance policy bearing number 610100/31/04/0640327330 for the period commencing from 20.11.2008 till 19.11.2009. The car met with an accident on 2.09.2009 when its driver could not control it as the Lorry behind which the car was proceeding suddenly ran over a rock in the middle of the road and the first respondents driver had no time to avert the mishap. The rock hit the bottom of the car as a result of which the car went off the road at Katur Medical College. The first respondent noticed display on the screen in the car to check oil level the next time the petrol is filled. The first respondent ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »