Andhra Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bogadi Haribabu and 3 Others Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public Pro ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.S. APPA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.803 OF 200.04.01.2013 Bogadi Haribabu and 3 others State of A.P., rep. By its Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri M.V.S. Prasad Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 201.Supreme Court 3718 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed against the judgment dated 29.12.2005 passed by the XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, (F.T.C), Guntur at Tenali in Criminal Appeal No.450 of 2004. The said Criminal Appeal was directed against the judgment dated 27.10.2004 passed in C.C.No.158 of 2002 on the file of the II Additional Munsif Magistrate at Repalle, wherein and whereby the learned Magistrate convicted the accused/appellants for the charge under Section 323 read with 34 IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default they should suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months each. It is further ordered that out of the...
Aila Upender and 51 Others. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR WRIT APPEAL Nos. 610, 611; 612 OF 201.04.01.2013 Aila Upender and 51 others. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Principal Secretary, School Education,Secretariat, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellants: Sri J.Ramachandra Rao Counsel for respondents 1 & 2: Addl.Advocate General ^Counsel for respondent No.3: None appeared. (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2006) 9 SC2. (2008) 3 SCC 43.3 AIR 195.SC 22.4 AIR 195.SC 56.5 (1992) 1 SCC 55.6 1995 Supp. (2) SCC 23.7 AIR 196.SC 70.8 (2010) 13 SCC 20.9 (2011) 4 SCC 60.10 AIR 196.SC 34.11 AIR 195.SC 7.12 2006) 8 SCC 39.13 (2008) 7 SCC 23.14 (2007) 1 SCC 73.15 (1974) 1 SCC 1.COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini, J) By common order dated 09.05.2012, a learned Single Judge dismissed a batch of writ petitions, including W.P.Nos.6833, 8015 and 8043 of 2012 filed by the appellants herein challenging the notification dated 06.02.2012 issued by the Commissioner and Direct...
Danduboina Madhava Rao Vs. Kandi Atchiraju (Died) and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO C.R.P.No.750 o04. 01.2013 Danduboina Madhava Rao Kandi Atchiraju (died) And others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri E.V.V.S Ravi Kumar, Counsel for respondent : Sri Jyosula Bhaskara Rao, Advocate : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 196.AP 220. 2. 2009(2) ALD 264. 3. 2000(1) ALD 627. 4. 1997(3) ALT 30.5. 1998(7) SCC 138. ORDER:1. This revision is filed by the landlord under Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short "the Act") challenging the order dated 08-11-2005 in R.C.A.No.16 of 1995 of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada (appellate authority under the Act) confirming the order dated 10-07-1995 in R.C.C No.17 of 1988 passed by the Principal Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Kakinada. 2) The petitioner herein is the owner of a shop room (hereinafter referred to as 'the RCC schedule shop') in a building bearing Municipal No.54-1-12 in Jagannaickpur, Kakinada. The resp...
Konda Muralidhar Vs. Dr. A. Chakrapani, Hon'ble Chairman,A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.25527 OF 201.04.01.2013 Konda Muralidhar Rao...Petitioner Dr. A. Chakrapani, Hon'ble Chairman,A.P. Legislative Council, Legislative Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, and 3 others. .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri A.T.M. Ranga Ramanujam,rep., Sri Mr. A.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for respondents 1 to 3: Sri A.Sudershan Reddy, Advocate General Counsel for respondent No.4: Sri P.Kesava Rao (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. 1992 Supp. (2) SCC 65.= AIR 199.SC 41.2 (2007) 3 SCC 18.3 AIR 196.SC 98.4 AIR 198.SC 127.5 AIR 199.SC 173.6 (2003) 8 SCC 75.7 AIR 195.SC 23.8 (2002) 2 SCC 25.9 (2006) 11 SC10. (2011) 7 SC11. IR 199.SC 155.12(1996) 2 SCC 35.13AIR 200.SC 69(1) ORDER: (Per G. Rohini, J) This writ petition is filed seeking a Certiorari to call for the records relating to the order dated 30.07.2012 in Disqualification Petition No.2 of 2012 on the file of the 2nd respondent and to quash the...
Md. Qhairunnisa Begum Vs. Shaik Kusheed Begum and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NOs.1333; 1354 OF 201.4-1-2013 Md. Qhairunnisa Begum Shaik Kusheed Begum and others COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Sri N. Subba Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1: Sri D.V. Seetharama Murthy,Senior Counselfor Sri P. Krishna Reddy ^COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.2 to 4 : G.P. for Revenue GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATION: AIR 200.SCW 83.COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) This case is a classic example where the Governmental Authorities right from the hierarchy of Commissioner and Director of Settlements to the lower rung of Mandal Revenue Officer has shown so much indifference and disobedience to the orders passed by this Court and settle the dispute pending for the last thirty years.2. Fourth respondent in WP.Nos.5038 of 2009 and 11428 of 2008 has filed these two separate appeals against the common order in the aforesaid writ petitions dated 29.08.2012.3. The writ petitioner i...
Md. Qhairunnisa Begu Vs. Shaik Kusheed Begum and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.1333 OF 201.WRIT APPEAL NO.1354 OF 201.4-1-2013 Md. Qhairunnisa Begum... Appellant Shaik Kusheed Begum and others... Respondents COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Sri N. Subba Rao COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1: Sri D.V. Seetharama Murthy,Senior Counsel for Sri P. Krishna Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.2 to 4 : G.P. for Revenue GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATION: AIR 200.SCW 83.COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) This case is a classic example where the Governmental Authorities right from the hierarchy of Commissioner and Director of Settlements to the lower rung of Mandal Revenue Officer has shown so much indifference and disobedience to the orders passed by this Court and settle the dispute pending for the last thirty years.2. Fourth respondent in WP.Nos.5038 of 2009 and 11428 of 2008 has filed these two separate appeals against the common order in the aforesaid writ petitio...
Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and Others Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1: Dr. Y. Padmavathi Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri M.A.K. Mukheed HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. AIR 195.Supreme Cour2. (1970) 1 Supreme Court Case3. AIR 195.Supreme Cour4. AIR 195.Supreme Cour5. AIR 195.A.P....
Mirza Khusru Ali Baig and Others Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 37621 o04. 01.2013 Mirza Khusru Ali Baig & others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, rep. by its Commissioner & another Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ashwani Kumar Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Dr. Y. Padmavathi Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri M.A.K. Mukheed HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. AIR 195.Supreme Cour2. (1970) 1 Supreme Court Case3. AIR 195.Supreme Cour4. AIR 195.Supreme Cour5. AIR 195.A.P....
B. Chandra Sekhar Reddy and Others Vs. K. Naga Raju Yadav and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.No.6251 o04. 01-2013 B. Chandra Sekhar Reddy and others K. Naga Raju Yadav and another Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Nagendra Reddy Counsel for Respondents: : Cases referred:1. 2010(2) ALD 4.(DB) 2. AIR 198.CALCUTTA 9 3. AIR 200.BOMBAY 39 4. (1999) 7 SC5. AIR 196.SC 22.6. (2012) 4 SCC 30.7. AIR 197.AP 5.8. AIR 198.AP 39.9. 1998 (1) ALD 45.= 1998(1) ALT 46.10. 2000(2) ALD 14.= 2000(2) ALT 60.ORDER: In this Civil Revision Petition (C.R.P.) assailed order dated 04-12- 2012 passed in I.A.No.175 of 2010 in I.A.No.1071 of 2009 in O.S.No.240 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal.2. The respondent herein, who is also the petitioner in the I.A. in question and plaintiff in the suit, filed that suit for permanent injunction on the ground that he got lease in respect of the quarry which is the subject matter of the suit whereas without any manner of right the petitioners involved in damaging the quarry ...
Manappuram Finance Ltd. Vs. Govt. of A.P., Dept. of Legal Metrology,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY W.P.No.35630 o04. 01.2013 Manappuram Finance Ltd. Govt. of A.P., Dept. of Legal Metrology,Rep. by Controller of Legal Metrology, And others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for Respondents: G.P., Civil Supplies HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred AIR 198.SC 61.Order: This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in applying the provisions of Memo No.5309/T1/2012 dated 16.08.2012, issued by the 1st respondent to the business activity of the petitioner, of using automatic weighing machines by its branches as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and for consequential directions to the respondents not to insist the petitioner and its branches to comply the instructions issued in the aforesaid Memo, while verifying and stamping of automatic weighing machines.2. Petitioner is a company, which is engaged in finance business. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated that petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »