Andhra Pradesh Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ediganeni Gurappa Naidu Vs. Bommisetty Satyanarayana Managing Partner ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) Aggrieved by the order in I.A.No.311/2009 in C.C(SR)No.2224/2009 on the file of District Forum, Nellore, the complainant preferred this appeal. 2) The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant filed the complaint with a petition to condone the delay of 4,870 days . he submitted that he joined as a member in the scheme under the name and style of Sri Mahaveer Real estate from June, 1989. The duration of the said scheme is for 60 months at the rate of Rs.250/- per month. The complainant submitted that as per the assurance of the opposite parties, they have to allot house plot to the complainant soon after expiry of 60 months period. The complainant submitted that as the respondents offered choice of plot preferred by member on payment of Rs.2,000/-, he paid Rs.2,000/- to the opposite parties in addition to the instalment amount in the month of December, 1989 and the opposite parties allotted plot No.887 in place of plot no....
M/S Radha Gardens, a Proprietary Concern, Rep. by Its Proprietress and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants. 2. The brief facts of the case as seen from the complaint are that the complainants booked Polo Car-Diesel version on 21.4.2010 by paying an amount of `50,000/-. On 9.7.2010, the opposite parties delivered Volkswagen Polo Diesel car with temporary Registration No.AP-10-TS-TR-8601. The choice of colour sought for by the complainants was Pepper Grey and they were compelled to accept the black colour car. After the delivery of the car the complainant no.3 drove the vehicle on 9.7.2010 and found that there was a rattling/cracking engine sound and mis-fire in engine. As it was Friday, the complainants were asked to drive the vehicle for two days and return on Monday the 12th July 2010 in case if the problem persists. As the problem was still subsisting the complainants visited the opposite parties on 12.7.2010 and complained of the problem. The opposite parties took a test drive of the car and...
M/S. Maytas Properties Ltd. Rep. by Its Managing Director Veruss Chinn ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
Oral Order: (Smt. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) These applications have been filed by the petitioner M/s. Maytas Properties Ltd (herein after called MPL) to dismiss the EAs filed by the complainants for non-compliance of orders of this Commission Dt. 27.4.2012 in which this Commission has directed the petitioner/MPL to refund the amounts paid by the complainants with interest @ 12% p.a., from respective dates till the date of payment along with compensation of Rs. 1 lakh, and costs of Rs. 10,000/-. 2) Aggrieved by the said order MPL preferred appeals in FA 353 of 2012 and batch before the National Commission and represented before the National Commission that they are ready to deliver the apartments/villas and ready to reasonably compensate the complainants and the National Commission by its order dt. 10.7.2012 directed the MPL to file affidavit with respect to dates of delivery of each apartment/villa and on the proposed compensation for delay in handing over the apartments/villas. The orde...
M/S Citibank Na Regional Head off Vs. M/S Patidar Exim Private Limited ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The appeal is challenge to the order of the District Forum whereby the appellant-bank is directed to pay a sum of `9,88,768/- along with interest and costs. 2. The facts of the case leading to filing of the appeal are that the respondents, the first respondent a company engaged in the business of import of Timber and the second respondent, a partnership firm engaged in the business of timber requested the appellant-bank to enhance their credit limit facility in the month of January,2008 and on being declined for enhancement of the credit limit facility, the respondents approached another Bank, Standard Chartered Bank which agreed to extend the facility to the respondents and requested the appellant-bank to furnish the particulars of the outstanding amount due from the respondents and the appellant-bank had furnished the particulars of the loan amount which included penal cum pre-payment charges of `9,...
Sunrise Park Owners Welfare Association Vs. M/S Sunrise Builders and D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-21-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is filed under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, complaining deficiency in service against the opposite parties no.1 and 2 and seeking direction to the opposite parties to reimburse a sum of `13,13,546/- towards the amount incurred for carrying out the pending work or in the alternative to provide 1.Fire Safety Equipment to the Building,2.solar fencing and rainwater harvesting pits, 3. Lightening arrester, 4. Electric cabling to each of the flats,5. Alternative bore well, 6. Automatic sprinklers in the parking area, 7. Jogging track, 8. Rainwater drainage lines in the cellar and plastering of the duct, 9. to construct rainwater drainage lines in the cellar and plastering of the duct; 10. To arrest water seepages and leakages of water in the flats and common areas, 11. To rectify the wall cracks developed in all the flats, 12. To carry out terrace water proofing works, 13. To fix sheets to the railing for the safe...
indo American Cancer Institute and Research Centre and Others Vs. Sri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-18-2013
Oral Order : (T. Ashok Kumar, Honble Member ) 01. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful opposite parties as against the orders dated 04.05.2011 in CC 909/2010 on the file of the District Consumer Forum-1, Hyderabad. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 02. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant approached opposite party hospital along with his wife and other family members on 30-6-2009 with a complaint of weakness and loss of appetite and on the advise of opposite party No.2 doctor he was admitted in the said hospital immediately. The opposite party No.2 subjected the complainant to several medical tests including Microlisa ;- HIV test at opposite party No.1 hospital for diagnosis. The opposite party No.3 Microbiologist of the opposite party No.1 hospital conducted Enzyme-linked Immuno Adsorbent Assay and gave the report that the complainant was found reactive to HIV 1 Ab test. Opposite party No.3 conduc...
N.V.S.J.Rama Rao Vs. Broadcasting Corporation of India, 2nd F
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.781 OF 201.09-01-2013 N.V.S.J.Rama Rao Broadcasting Corporation of India, 2nd Floor, PTI Building, Sansad Marg,New Delhi, and others. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner: Party-in-Person Counsel for respondents: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud,Assistant Solicitor General for India and Govt. Pleader for Home ?CASES REFERRED:1. [1973) 1 SCC 65.2) Alexander Meiklejohn (February 1, 1872 - December 17, 1964) was a philosopher, University administrator, and free-speech advocate. He served as the Dean of Brown University and President of Amherst College. 3) Felix Frankfurter, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. 4)(1988) 1 SCC 66.5) AIR 194.NAGPUR 1 1 [1973) 1 SCC 65.2 Alexander Meiklejohn (February 1, 1872 - December 17, 1964) was a philosopher, University administrator, and free-speech advocate. He served as the Dean of Brown University and President of Amherst College. 3 Felix Fr...
Jatoth Shanthi and Another Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation of India ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Jan-09-2013
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Honble Member) The unsuccessful complainants filed the above appeal against the order dt.29.7.2010 of the District Forum, Warangal made in C.C.No.68/2009. The claim under the complaint was to pay a sum of Rs.1 lakh towards the policy amount under policy no.687078871 with all benefits, to pay Rs.10,000/- towards damages to complainant no.1, to pay Rs.1,05,000/- towards another policy bearing no.687076306 with all benefits and Rs.10,000/- towards damages to the complainant no.2, with interest at 12% p.a. on the above policies and to pay costs. For the purpose of convenience the parties are described as they arrayed in the complaint. The brief case of the complainants as set out in the complaint is as follows: The complainant no.1 is the wife and the complainant no.2 is the son of the life assured Jatoth Gopi Chand. During his life time, he assured his life with the opposite party vide policy bearing no.687078871, which was issued for a sum of Rs.1 lakh and t...
D. Kasaiah Vs. Sunkara Srinivasulu Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NOs.1586; 1587 OF 201.4-1-2013 D. Kasaiah Sunkara Srinivasulu others COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Sri Vinay Kamisetty COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 to 4: Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.5: G.P. for Home COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.6: COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.8 and 9: Sri J.Janikirami Reddy GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 194.PC 1.2. AIR 196.SC 86.3. 1992 Supp (1)SCC 33.:1992. SCC (Cri4. (2005) 13 SCC 54.5. (1998) 8 SCC 72.6. (1990) Supp. SCC 68.7. (1995) 2 SCC 37.8. 2004 (6) ALT 75.= 2004(6) ALD 85.9. (1992) 3 SC 31.10. (2001) 6 SCC 18.11. 3 (1979) 2 SCC 32.COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice) 1. Whether, on the ground that there was manipulation of the First Information Report by Officer in charge of Police Station while registering a crime, the First Information Report as also the criminal proceedings commenced on the basis of a charge s...
M/S. Ibc Ltd.,represented by Its Ceo Mr. Vs. the A.P. Mineral Developm ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-04-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.375 o4. 1-2013 M/s. IBC Ltd.,Represented by its CEO Mr. Govindarajula Ashok, Chennai The A.P. Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.,Represented by its Vice-Chairman and Managing Director, Hyderabad HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri V. Ravinder Rao Counsel for respondent : Advocate-General ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 195.S.C....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »