Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalakoti Siva Reddy and Others Vs. the District Collector, Krishna at ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT APPEAL NO.941 OF 201.14-9-2012 Kalakoti Siva Reddy and others The District Collector, Krishna at Machilipatnam and others. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER: Sri M.V. Durga Prasad COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.1 & 3: G.P. FOR LAND ACQUISITION COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.2: SMT. K. ARUNA COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.4 to 6: G.P. FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.7 TO 43.SRI B.V. SUBBAIAH GIST HEAD NOTE: CITATIONS:1. (2011) 3 SC2. (2007) 6 SCC 29.3. AIR 200.SC 89.4. AIR 200.SC 3520(1) 5. (2012) 2 SCC 32.6. (1975) 4 SCC 28.7. (1999) 2 SCC 38.8. (2010) 7 SCC 12.JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice) This appeal is directed against the order dated 21st September, 2010 passed in Writ Petition No.2153 of 2010, whereby the learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners/appellants. 2) The writ petition was filed seeking a writ of ...
United India Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Mohd. HussaIn and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR C.M.A. No.369 OF 200.14.09.2012 United India Insurance Co. Ltd Mohd. Hussain and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Appellant: Sri E. Venugopal Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Sri Radhive Reddy ?Cases referred 1 (2008) 8 SCC 24.2 (2007) 7 SCC 5.3 (2003) 2 SCC 22.4 (2008) 1 ALD SC 8.= 2007 (11) SCC 75.5 (2010) 14 SCC 76.JUDGMENT:1. The United India Insurance Company preferred the present appeal is directed against the order dated 08.08.2003 passed in O.P.No.938 of 1997 on the file of Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - Additional District Judge, Nizamabad wherein a sum of Rs.5,84,000/- was awarded as compensation to the claimants on account of death of one Saleem (hereinafter referred to as 'the deceased'). 2 The facts in issue are that on the intervening night of 16/17.11.1997 the deceased was travelling in a TATA Van bearing not MH-26-8303 from Nizamabad to Hyderabad as owner of the goods. At about 2.00 AM when the van reached outskirts ...
Bojja Subba Rao. Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep.by
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO WRIT PETITION No.3602 OF 200.14.09.2012 Bojja Subba Rao. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,rep.by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department,Rural Development Wing, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.M.S.N.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1 (1) 1998(2) ALT 5 (SC) 1 AIR 196.SC 162.1 AIR 195.SC 3.1 (1997) 5 SCC 12.ORDER: This writ petition has filed by the petitioner challenging the proceedings of the second respondent in reference No.4829/RD.V(2)/99, dated 5.1.2000 and for consequential direction to the respondents to regularize his services forthwith from the date of his initial appointment in terms of G.O.Ms.No.212 (Finance and Planning (FW.PC.III) Dept dated 22.4.1994.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as Section Writer on 16.10.1986 on daily wage basis by the District Rural Development Agency, Prakasam Bhavan, Ongole, Prakasam District...
Md. Gulam Mohammed Vs. the Regional Manager, Apsrtc, Hyderabad
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 21234 o14. 09.2012 Md. Gulam Mohammed The Regional Manager, APSRTC, Hyderabad & others Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G. Damodar Reddy Counsel for the respondents : HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER : The petitioner, a conductor with the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), seeks a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the 1st respondent, the Regional Manager, APSRTC in not ordering reengagement with continuity of service benefit, as bad in law. The case of the petitioner is that after going through the process of selection necessary for making regular recruitment, he came to be appointed as a contract conductor on 22.12.2006 and was attached to Hyderabad Central University (HCU) Bus Depot. However, when the petitioner remained unauthorizedly absent from duty from 07.05.2007 up to 30.06.2007, the Depot Manager, HCU Bus Depot terminated his service, through his proceedings, dated 30.06.2007, without c...
R. Shankaraiah Vs. the Managing Director, Apsrtc, Musheerab
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND WRIT APPEAL No.867 OF 201.14.09.2012 R. Shankaraiah The Managing Director, APSRTC, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and 3 others Counsel for the appellant : Sri D. Arun Kumar (Amicus Curiae) Counsel for respondent: Sri Mahender Reddy, rep. the Smt. Sarala Reddy, SC for APSRTC Cases cited:1. (1995) 6 SCC 74.2 (1997) 7 SCC 46.3 (1999) 1 SCC 75.4 (1999) 5 SCC 76.5 (2000) 1 SCC 41.6 (2011) 4 SCC 58.7 (2003) 4 SCC 52.8 2012 (2) ALT (D.B.) JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini, J) The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.283 of 2004 is the appellant before us. The appellant/writ petitioner, while working as a Driver in the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for short, 'APSRTC') in Vakadu Depot, the bus bearing not AP-09-Z-5322 driven by him involved in a head-on-collision with another RTC bus bearing not AP-10-Z-4731 resulting in death of one lady passenger and injuries to 20 passengers and 3 crew members besides heavy damage to both the vehicles. Pursuant thereto, he was cha...
B.Vasudeva Chary and ors. Vs. K.Mohan Reddy and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5745 OF 201.14-09-2012 B.Vasudeva Chary & ors. K.Mohan Reddy & Anr. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri N. Ravi Prasad, Sri N.Vidya Prasad Counsel for the respondents: Sri D. Purnachandra Reddy for R-1 Addl. Public Prosecutor for R-2 : : ?CITATIONS :1. [1998] 1 Supreme Court Cases-692 2) [2005] 1 SCC 12.:2005. SCC [Crl3. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 33.:1992. SCC [Crl4. [2010] 7 Supreme Court Cases 667 ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in CC.No. 149 of 2006 on the file of the Court of II-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore.2. The petitioners-A1 to A4 are the officials of Nellore Municipality. The allegations against them made in the private complaint filed by the first respondent-complainant were that the petitioners trespassed into the premises of the house of the first respondent and demolished the compound wall on three days, beat the first respondent and...
G. Amrutha Rao and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-14-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34867 OF 201.14-09-2012 G. Amrutha Rao & Others Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Pulla Rao Yellanki Counsel for the Respondents:Government Pleader for Revenue : ?Cases referred:2008(5)ALT 313D.B.) ORDER: The petitioners 1 to 5 purchased plots of 200 square yards each, carved out of survey No.233 of Nizampet Village, Kukatpally, in the year 1989 and the 6th petitioner purchased a plot of similar size from the same survey number in the year 1991. The Deputy Collector & Tahsildar, Qutubullapur Mandal, 4th respondent herein, initiated proceedings under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfer) Act 1977 (for short 'the Act') against the petitioners and certain others. It was mentioned that an extent of Acs.4.00 each, in Sub- division Nos.24, 25 and 26 in Survey No.233 were assigned in favour of Seetharam Reddy, Yella Reddy and Ramakrishna Reddy, respectively, vide orders, date...
P. Dharma Rao and Others Vs. Sunkari Indira Das
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
Common Order: In all these revisions, the challenge is to the orders passed by the District Judge and Appellate Tribunal under A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956, Srikakulam in the appeals filed by the landholder, the respondent herein. The sole respondent in all these revisions filed A.T.C.No.2 of 2009 and batch before the Junior Civil Judge-cum-Special Officer, Tekkali pleading that the respective petitioners herein were inducted as tenants in different bits of land held by her mother and they refused to pay the rents even during the life time of her mother. It was also pleaded that several litigations persisted about the land among the family members and when she demanded rents, the petitioners did not pay the same and thereby, committed default. The petitioners filed counters denying the very title of the respondent. The Special Officer upheld the title of the respondent herein in respect of bits of land. However, it dismissed ...
Rachabthuni Krishna Murthy Vs. Rachabthuni Umasutam and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
The petitioner filed O.S.No.117 of 2007 in the Court of IX Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Guntur at Tenali against the respondents for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession of certain items of property. The parties to the suit are members of the same family. The petitioner placed reliance upon a document, dated 15.03.1983 said to be a deed of family settlement. Apart from other parties to the suit, 1st respondent herein i.e., 5th defendant filed a written statement. Based upon pleadings, the trial Court framed issues. Thereafter, trial of the suit commenced, and evidence on behalf of the petitioner i.e., plaintiff was closed. It appears that defendants 1 to 4 in the suit reported no evidence. Therefore, it is the turn of the 1st respondent herein i.e., 5th defendant to adduce evidence. At that stage, he filed I.A.No.1250 of 2011 under Rule 17 of Order VI C.P.C. with a prayer to permit him to amend the written statement. In the affidavit filed in ...
Dr. B. Devadas Vs. the Chairman-cum-managing Director, National Minera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
Aggrieved by the action of the respondents in imposing on him the punishment of removal from service, by proceedings dated 29.06.1999/02.07.1999 as confirmed in appeal by order dated 17.09.1999 and in revision by order dated 12.10.1999, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioner joined the respondent corporation as a Junior Medical Officer in January, 1980. He was promoted as a Medical Officer on 01.08.1983, and as a Senior Medical Officer on 07.01.1988. He was promoted as Deputy Chief Medical Officer on 08.01.1994 in which post he continued till he was removed from service. The petitioner was issued charge memo dated 25.11.1988 for having claimed wrong T.A. bills. The petitioner admitted his guilt, and requested that he be pardoned. It is his grievance that, instead of taking a lenient view, an enquiry officer was appointed vide proceedings dated 28.12.1998; an enquiry was held on 14.01.1999; and, even in the enquiry, he admitte...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »