Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments

National Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order:As all these Civil Revision Petitions arise out of separate but identical orders between the same parties, they are heard and being disposed of together. Respondent No.1 has entered appearance through Sri B.Gajendra Reddy, learned Counsel. At the hearing, he is not present. Even though notices have not been served on respondent Nos.2 and 3, as they are only driver and the owner of the vehicle insured with the petitioner- National Insurance Company Limited, Kakinada, and which has allegedly caused accident to respondent No.1, their presence for disposal of these Civil Revision Petitions is not necessary. Hence, this Court decided to dispose of these three Civil Revision Petitions without awaiting service of notices on the said respondents. Respondent No.1 filed OP.No.768 of 2009 claiming Rs.4 lakhs as compensation for the alleged amputation of his left leg due to the accident taken place on 28-12-2008. He has pleaded that the vehicle owned by respondent No.3 and driven by r...

Nareddi Mohan Reddy Vs. Siripuram Mallaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 02.03.2012, in I.A.No.1035 of 2011 in O.S.No.51 of 2010, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Karimnagar. I have heard Sri K.Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri S.R.Sanku, learned counsel for the petitioner. None appeared for the respondent, at the hearing. The petitioner is the defendant in the above-mentioned suit filed by the respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs.15,38,500/- along with future interest. During evidence, the respondent sought to mark the document, dated 25.07.2007, stated to have been executed by the petitioner in favour of the respondent. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1035 of 2011 to determine the true nature of the document in question and not to admit the same till the same is properly stamped and impounded. It is the pleaded case of the petitioner that the document in question is either a partnership deed or a surety bond and that in either case, it is not admissible in evidence for...

Electronics Corporation of India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This writ petition is moved by Electronics Corporation of India Limited (for short referred to as ECIL henceforth), a Government of India Enterprise, seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring that the respondents have no power or authority to administer the provisions of the Factories Act, 1948 to the petitioner. ECIL is incorporated as a company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, on 11.4.1967, having its registered office at Hyderabad. The entire share capital excepting three shares were held by the President of India acting through the Department of Atomic Energy and the three remaining shares were also held by the public servants of Government of India looking after the affairs in the Ministry. It is thus a fully owned Government of India company. As per the Memorandum of Association, the main objects behind establishing the company are : to acquire and take over the electronics production units of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay; to carry on in India and elsewhe...

M. Rosaiah Sweeper, Nbkr Institute of Science and Technology Vidyanaga ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(4)LLN579

The petitioner, a Sweeper working in the first respondent College sought for a Writ of Mandamus for declaring the action of the College in retiring the petitioner on 28.02.2009 on attaining the age of 58 years and not permitting him to work in the college up to the age of 60 years, as illegal and unjust and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service till he attains the age of 60 years. The petitioner was appointed as a Sweeper in the first respondent College, which is a private educational institution. He submits that his date of birth being 02.02.1951 and the age of superannuation for the last grade servants being 60 years, he is entitled to continue in the service till the end of February 2011, whereas, the respondents 1 and 2 sought to retire him from service on his attaining the age of 58 years. The case of the petitioner is that, in accordance with Section 3 of Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Regulation of Age of Superannuation) Act 1984, every ...

N. Suresh Vs. the Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Minis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The writ petitioner challenges the validity of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent - Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, Hydro Electric Project, Uri, Baramulla District, Jammu and Kashmir State modifying in turn the orders passed earlier by the Deputy Commandant of the Force at Uri imposing on him a punishment. He also challenges the validity of the orders passed by the 4th respondent - Deputy Inspector General, North Zone, New Delhi, in rejecting the appeal preferred by the writ petitioner against the orders passed by the Commandant noted supra. The writ petitioner was recruited as a Constable by the Central Industrial Security Force (henceforth `Force’ in short). While he was working under the supervision and control of the Force at Hydro Electric Project, Uri, Baramulla District, Jammu and Kashmir State, he was charge-sheeted on 10.8.1995 alleging certain irregularities said to have been committed by him. After following the necessary process of...

Kasarla Radha Kishan Rao Vs. the Special Collector (La) Srsp Project, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. In terms of the amended prayer, this writ petition is filed seeking mandamus declaring the notification issued under Section 4(1) of then Land Acquisition Act, 1894 vide G.O.Rt.No.284 Irrigation and Power (Projects Wing) dated 06.03.1979 and the subsequent proceedings Rc.No.C/36/79 dated 10.08.2009, including the award proceedings No.B2/1886/09 dated 25.03.2011, issued by the respondents, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he is the owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.1.24 guntas in Sy.No.597 and Ac.0.36 guntas in Sy.No.598, situated at Hanamkonda Revenue Village, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District within the limits of Warangal Municipal Corporation. The said lands are classified as agricultural lands and as the same are within Warangal urban agglomeration, he, along with his brothers, has filed declarations including the aforesaid lands, under the provisions of the Urban Land (Ceili...

Ms. P. Mounica Vs. the Vice-chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi University of Kno ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside letter, dated 08.08.2012, of respondent No.3. The petitioner joined 6-Year Integrated B.Tech., Program in Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies (RGUKT), Basara, Adilabad District in the year 2010. After completing her V Semester, she has entered VI Semester, which is an Introductory Semester for B.Tech., Engineering Course which commences from VII Semester. She was not permitted to pursue the B.Tech., Engineering Course from VII Semester onwards on the ground that in VI Semester, her attendance fell short of the prescribed attendance. She, has therefore, filed W.P.No.22560 of 2012 in this Court. The said writ petition was disposed of by order, dated 25.07.2012, and the material portion of the said order is as re-produced below: “A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner is a bright student with her G.P.A. consistently varying between 8.42 and 8.79. If the alleged severe back-ache is the only reason for he...

N.Suresh Vs. the Commandant, Central Industrial Secur

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 15303 OF 200.18-09-2012 N.Suresh The Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs, N.F.C., ECIL Post, Hyderabad 62 and 3 others Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.J.M.Naidu Counsel for the respondents: Mr.A.Rajasekhar Reddy, Ms.Nanda Standing Counsel for Central Government ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 200.SC 359.2. (1994) 4 SCC 71.ORDER: The writ petitioner challenges the validity of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent - Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force Unit, Hydro Electric Project, Uri, Baramulla District, Jammu and Kashmir State modifying in turn the orders passed earlier by the Deputy Commandant of the Force at Uri imposing on him a punishment. He also challenges the validity of the orders passed by the 4th respondent - Deputy Inspector General, North Zone, New Delhi, in rejecting the appeal preferred by the writ petitioner against the orders passed by the Commandant noted supra. The writ pe...

Mrs. G. Vanaja G. Shivajothi Vs. Mrs. V. Bhanumati and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(G. Krishna Mohan Reddy) 1. This appeal is preferred challenging order dated 14-03-2012 passed in Election O.P.No.508 of 2010 (O.P.) on the file of the Court of Chief Judge-cum-Election Tribunal, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short ‘Tribunal). 2. Whereas the petitioner herein is the first respondent, the first respondent herein is the petitioner and the remaining respondents herein are also are the respondents in the O.P. For the sake of convenience, we refer the parties as they are arrayed in the O.P. 3. The petitioner filed the O.P. under Section 71(2) r/w Section 79(2) (d) of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 as amended by Act No.14 of 2008 (for short ‘GHMC Act’) requesting to declare election of the first respondent (returned candidate) to the office of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation as Corporator from Ward No.108 of Boarabanda Division as void on the ground of disqualification under Section 21-B of the GHMC Act and consequently to ...

Mrs. G. Vanaja G. Shivajothi Vs. Mrs. V. Bhanumati and Others.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.M.A.No.275 o17. 09-2012 Mrs. G. Vanaja G. Shivajothi Mrs. V. Bhanumati and others. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Sri S. Srinivas Reddy Counsel for Respondents: Sri D.v. Seetharam, Senior counsel representing Sri Mir Masood Khan : ?Cases referred: AIR 200.SC 234.JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice G.Krishna Mohan Reddy) This appeal is preferred challenging order dated 14-03-2012 passed in Election O.P.No.508 of 2010 (O.P.) on the file of the Court of Chief Judge-cum-Election Tribunal, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short 'Tribunal).2. Whereas the petitioner herein is the first respondent, the first respondent herein is the petitioner and the remaining respondents herein are also are the respondents in the O.P. For the sake of convenience, we refer the parties as they are arrayed in the O.P.3. The petitioner filed the O.P. under Section 71(2) r/w Section 79...