Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Mahadeva Reddy Vs. the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
SK,J. Divergent opinions expressed by two Division Benches of this Court constrained a learned single Judge to direct this matter to be placed before a Division Bench to resolve the conflict. The Division Bench that heard the matter on 10.10.2007 was of the opinion that it deserved to be considered by a larger Bench. The matter was accordingly listed before this Full Bench. The petitioner was originally an employee of the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC). In its service, he ascended the promotional hierarchy and was a Mechanical Foreman when sent on deputation in March, 1990 to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD). His promotion to this post was from the feeder category of Assistant Mechanical Foreman in the APSRTC. While so, in the year 1992, the petitioner requested the TTD to absorb him in its service on regular basis. By Resolution No.723 dated 11.12.1992, the TTD resolved to absorb him in its service by downgrading the post of Depot Manager, Transport D...
J. Yadamma and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
The family of the ancestors of the petitioners own an extent of Acs.3.37 guntas of land in Survey Nos.551 and 552 of Uppal Bagath, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In the partition, the branch of the petitioners got an extent of Ac.0.39 guntas towards one-fourth share. The land is within the urban agglomeration of Hyderabad. Declarations were submitted under Section 6 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short ‘the Act’) by the respective branches. The declarations submitted by the petitioners were numbered as G2/8954/76 and G2/73/77. While the declarations submitted by the other branches were processed and some extents were declared as being in excess, of ceiling limits, those filed by the petitioners did not cross the stage of Section 8 (3), before the Act came to be repealed. The land of the petitioners along with that of many others was proposed to be acquired by Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, respondent No.2 herein, for Musi River...
Mudapaka Malleswarao (Died Per Lrs.) Vs. Chenchbinada Satyavathi and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
This appeal is filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.25 of 1986 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Peddapuram against the judgment and decree dated 29-9-1993 passed by the said Court. Defendant No.1 is the elder sister of the plaintiff, defendant no.2 is the daughter of defendant 1 and defendants 3 to 5 are the grand sons of D.1. The suit was filed by the plaintiff to declare his title to the plaint A and B Schedule property, for possession of the same after evicting the defendants therefrom, to direct the defendants 1 and 2 to render account of (a) the amount of Rs.500/- received by defendant no.1 in respect of the plaint C schedule property ; (b) for the amount allegedly sent by the plaintiff to the defendant no.1; (c) for the income of the plaint A and B Schedule property; (d) for payment of the amounts so found due to the plaintiff together with interest at 12 1/2 % per annum from the due dates till the date of payment; (e) for a permanent injunction restraining the defe...
V.Mahadeva Reddy Vs. the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams,rep.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM, THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.V.SEETHAPATHY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.27933 OF 199.25-09-2012 V.Mahadeva Reddy The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams,rep. by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District and others. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner: Sri M.Surender Rao Counsel for respondents: Sri M.Adinarayana Raju for R-1. CASES REFERRED:1. Writ Appeal No.1166 of 1986 dated 09.11.1987 2) AIR 197.SC 237.= (1976) 4 SCC 54.3) 1985 (1) SLR 25.(Cal-DB) 4) 1999 (1) ALD 41.5) Writ Appeal No.1933 of 1998 dated 29.10.2001 6) (1999) 4 SCC 65.7) (1997) 8 SCC 37.8) (2000) 5 SCC 36.9) 1990 (Supp) SCC 24.10) Writ Appeal No.1369 of 2004 dated 16.09.2004 11) (2012) 7 SCC 757. $The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, rep. by its Executive Officer, Tirupati, Chittoor District and others ORDER: (Per SK,J) Divergent opinions expressed by two Division Benches of this Court constrained a learned single Judge to direct this matter to be placed bef...
T. Madan Mohan Reddy and Others Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by the Princip ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.33217 o25. 09-2012 T. Madan Mohan Reddy & others State of A.P., rep. by the Principal Secretary to Revenue Department, Hyderabad & others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri C. Padmanabha Reddy, Senior Counsel Counsel for respondents : G.P for Revenue : Citations:2004. (2) ALD 45.(DB) ORDER: The petitioners 1 and 2 are the sons and the 3rd petitioner is the daughter of Sri T. Chandrasekhar Reddy. While practicing as an Advocate, in the year 1940, Chandrasekhar Reddy joined Satyagraha movement, started by Mahatma Gandhi for the Freedom of the Country. It is stated that he has undergone imprisonment for six months and paid fine of Rs.200/-, on being convicted for participation in the struggle. After the country became independent, he was allotted an extent of Ac.8.02 cents of land in Sy.No.33/5 of Kakkalapalli Village, Anantapur District, in the year 1949, in recognition of his services as Freedom Fighter. Sri Vinobha Bhave,...
Ch.Shankaraiah Vs. the Vice Chairman and Managing Director,ap
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.24325 o25. 09-2012 Ch.Shankaraiah The Vice Chairman & Managing Director,AP.State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., Somajiguda, Hyderabad and 2 others. ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.T.Mahender Rao !Counsel for the respondents: Mr.A.Ravinder Reddy, SC for APSCSC Ltd. : ?Cases referred:NIL Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceeding not PDS 2 / Movt. / FG 5(13) / 1878 / 2012-13, dated 01-08-2012, of respondent No.1. I have heard Mr.T.Mahender Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.A.Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, representing the respondents. The petitioner is a Stage- I Transport Contractor for Adilabad District and he has been operating the Stage- I contract under work order issued on 10- 05-2012 and agreement issued on 02-05-2012. The petitioner's function as Stage- I Contractor is to take delivery of the PDS ric...
K.A. Gani Vs. the Apsrtc, Rep by Its Managing Director
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.NO. 7274 OF 201.25.09.2012 K.A. Gani The APSRTC, rep by its Managing Director, Hyderabad and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioner : S.M. Subhan Counsel for Respondents: K.V. Subba Reddy, SC for APSRTC ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner, a contract Driver in the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), was initially removed from service by the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kurnool, under termination order dated 10.9.2008. The basis for this order was that the petitioner had caused a fatal accident on the service route Vellore to Kurnool on 6.8.2008. His review petition before the Regional Manager, APSRTC, Kurnool region, met with failure when it was rejected under order dated 1.11.2008. He thereupon approached this Court by way of W.P.No. 3026 of 2009. The said writ petition was allowed on 25.3.2009 taking note of the fact that the petitioner's services were terminated without holding an enquiry. The petitioner was accordingly di...
Smt. Buravilli Siva Madhuri Vs. Sri Buravilli Satya Venkata Lakshmana ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRL.P.NO.9612 OF 201.25.09.2012 Smt. Buravilli Siva Madhuri Sri Buravilli Satya Venkata Lakshmana Rao and others Counsel for the Petitioner : Smt N.(P) Anjanadevi Counsel for respondents 1 to 6 : Sri Venkateshwara Rao Gudapati ^Counsel for respondent No.7 : Additional Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: Cases referred:1. 1997 CRL L J 151.2 1999 AIR (SC3. 2009 AIR Jhar R 3-815 4 (2010)10 SCC 67.5 1992 SCC Crl.426 6 (2005) 1 SCC 12.7 (2010) 7 SCC 66.ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the Criminal Revision Petition No.33 of 2009 on the file of the IX Additional District and Sessions Judge (F.T.C), Visakhapatnam confirming the order of III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam in D.V.C.No.4 of 2009 and direct the III Metropolitan Magistrate, Visakhapatnam to take cognizance against the respondents 2 to 6 in D.V.C.No.4 of 2009 and dispose of the same after conducting enquiry as per law and pass nece...
Deepika Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Secretary, Home Department, Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN C.A.Nos.341 of 2009 (342 of 2009) 25.09.2012 Deepika Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. The Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. !Counsel for the Applicant: Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel. Counsel for the Respondent: GP for Home : ?Citations:1. AIR 197.SC 73.2. (1988) 2 GLR 104.3. 2004 (3) ALD 87.4. (1976) 46 Company Cases 279 COMMON ORDER: Company Application Nos.341 and 342 of 2009, in Company Petition No.197 of 2003, are filed seeking a direction from this Court to the respondent (Secretary, Home Department) to initiate necessary steps for withdrawing cases where the de facto complainants had sought to withdraw the complaint against the company and its Directors/managerial personnel; and to stay hearing of the complaints against the company and its Directors/managerial personnel. Company Petition Nos.196 and 197 of 2003 were filed before this Court, under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking its sanction for a schem...
Padala Pentaiah. Vs. the Joint Collector-i, R.R.District and
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No. 3815 o25. 09.2012 Padala Pentaiah. The Joint Collector-I, R.R.District and others. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Tulasi Das Counsel for respondents 1&2 : G.P. for Revenue ^Counsel for respondents 3 to 7: Sri M.Rama Rao HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. AIR 198.ANDHRA PRADESH 7 2.(1998) 9 SCC 18.ORDER: The petitioner and 12 others claiming to be the descendents of Baindla Balayya and Kadala Narsiga, filed separate applications under Section 32(1) and 40(2) of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short 'the Act') before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, 2nd respondent herein. It was pleaded that Balayya and Narsiga referred to above, were protected tenants in respect of about Ac.10.00 of land in Survey Nos.177, 178, 199, 326, 327 and 328 of Anmagal Village, Hayatnagar Mandal and after the death of the protected tenants, they have succeeded to the rights, in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »