Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Veeraju Vs. M.V. Reddy, Director of Animal Husbandry Department and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J. This contempt appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 19.12.2011 in C.C.No.519 of 2008 under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal and Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Rule 36 of the Rules framed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2. On 14.02.2012, when this appeal was preferred, the Registry raised certain objections, which were complied with and the counsel re-presented the appeal on 09.04.2012. Thereafter, the Registry has raised question of maintainability of the appeal as well as other objections regarding limitation and other procedural deficiencies and the appeal was returned for rectifying the deficiencies on 13.04.2012. Learned counsel for the appellant has, thereafter, re-presented the appeal on 16.04.2012 and the appeal, at this stage, was placed before the Court for consideration as to the maintainability of the appeal. 3. On 24.04.2012, the learned counsel for the appellant was heard and ...
Smt. V. Manjula and Others Vs. the Mandal Revenue Officer and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
The petitioners challenge the proceedings dated 29.08.2007 issued by the Tahsildar, Maklur Mandal, 1st respondent herein under Section 5-A of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short ‘the Act’) validating certain transactions in respect of an extent of Ac.1.25 guntas in Survey No.322 and Ac.0.37 guntas in Survey No.335 of Manik Bhandar Village, Maklur Mandal, Nizamabad District. Petitioners 1 and 2 are the daughters and the 3rd petitioner is the wife of one late Sri Vakeel Linga Reddy. He was the pattadar of the land referred to above. The petitioners contend that after the death of Linga Reddy, they succeeded to the land and approached the 1st respondent with a request to issue pattadar pass books and title deeds in their favour. Through a memo, dated 30.03.2012, the 1st respondent informed the petitioners that according to the information contained in the office records, Linga Reddy sold the said land through an agreement of s...
Smt. V.Manjula and Others. Vs. the Mandal Revenue Officer, Maklur Mand ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.12349 o26. 09.2012 Smt. V.Manjula and others. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Maklur Mandal and others. Counsel for the petitioners: M/s. B.Venkata Rama Rao Counsel for respondents: GP.for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioners challenge the proceedings dated 29.08.2007 issued by the Tahsildar, Maklur Mandal, 1st respondent herein under Section 5-A of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (for short 'the Act') validating certain transactions in respect of an extent of Ac.1.25 guntas in Survey No.322 and Ac.0.371/2 guntas in Survey No.335 of Manik Bhandar Village, Maklur Mandal, Nizamabad District. Petitioners 1 and 2 are the daughters and the 3rd petitioner is the wife of one late Sri Vakeel Linga Reddy. He was the pattadar of the land referred to above. The petitioners contend that after the death of Linga Reddy, they succeeded to the land and approached the 1st respondent with a request to ...
N. Veeraju. Vs. M.V.Reddy, Director of Animal Husbandry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CONTEMPT APPEAL (SR) No.941 o26. 9.2012 N. Veeraju. M.V.Reddy, Director of Animal Husbandry Department, Hyderabad and three others. Counsel for petitioner: MR. T. RAMAKRISHNA RAO Counsel for Respondents: ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) (2006) 5 SCC 39.2) (2009) 8 SCC 43.JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice Vilas V. Afzulpurkar) This contempt appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 19.12.2011 in C.C.No.519 of 2008 under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal and Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Rule 36 of the Rules framed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. 2. On 14.02.2012, when this appeal was preferred, the Registry raised certain objections, which were complied with and the counsel re-presented the appeal on 09.04.2012. Thereafter, the Registry has raised question of maintainability of the appeal as we...
T. Madan Mohan Reddy and Others Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by the Princip ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
The petitioners 1 and 2 are the sons and the 3rd petitioner is the daughter of Sri T. Chandrasekhar Reddy. While practicing as an Advocate, in the year 1940, Chandrasekhar Reddy joined Satyagraha movement, started by Mahatma Gandhi for the Freedom of the Country. It is stated that he has undergone imprisonment for six months and paid fine of Rs.200/-, on being convicted for participation in the struggle.After the country became independent, he was allotted an extent of Ac.8.02 cents of land in Sy.No.33/5 of Kakkalapalli Village, Anantapur District, in the year 1949, in recognition of his services as Freedom Fighter. Sri Vinobha Bhave, who launched the Bhoodan Yagna, visited the State of Andhra Pradesh in the year 1956. Chandrasekhar Reddy is said to have donated the land, that was allotted to him. Later on, he joined the A.P. Judicial Service. When the persons, who were given pattas by the A.P. Bhoodan Yagna Board (for short ‘the Board...
Deepika Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Secretary, Home Department, Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
Common order: Company Application Nos.341 and 342 of 2009, in Company Petition No.197 of 2003, are filed seeking a direction from this Court to the respondent (Secretary, Home Department) to initiate necessary steps for withdrawing cases where the de facto complainants had sought to withdraw the complaint against the company and its Directors/managerial personnel; and to stay hearing of the complaints against the company and its Directors/managerial personnel. Company Petition Nos.196 and 197 of 2003 were filed before this Court, under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking its sanction for a scheme of arrangement whereby the petitioner in C.P.No.196 of 2003 was to amalgamate with the petitioner in C.P.No.197 of 2003. The scheme also provided for payment, to the depositors/prized chit subscribers/creditors of both the companies, of a sum equal to the principal due, as reflected in the books of both the companies on the appointed date, together with interest at 4% per ...
Padala Pentaiah Vs. the Joint Collector-i and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
The petitioner and 12 others claiming to be the descendents of Baindla Balayya and Kadala Narsiga, filed separate applications under Section 32(1) and 40(2) of the A.P. (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (for short ‘the Act’) before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, 2nd respondent herein. It was pleaded that Balayya and Narsiga referred to above, were protected tenants in respect of about Ac.10.00 of land in Survey Nos.177, 178, 199, 326, 327 and 328 of Anmagal Village, Hayatnagar Mandal and after the death of the protected tenants, they have succeeded to the rights, in the land. They prayed for grant of succession under Section 40 of the Act. It was also pleaded that respondents 4 to 7 herein have dispossessed from the land, and accordingly, they made an application under Section 32 of the Act for restoration of the possession. The 2nd respondent passed an order, dated 08.03.2001 holding that apart from the 13 appli...
K.A. Gani Vs. the Apsrtc, Rep by Its Managing Director and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
The petitioner, a contract Driver in the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC), was initially removed from service by the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Kurnool, under termination order dated 10.9.2008. The basis for this order was that the petitioner had caused a fatal accident on the service route Vellore to Kurnool on 6.8.2008. His review petition before the Regional Manager, APSRTC, Kurnool region, met with failure when it was rejected under order dated 1.11.2008. He thereupon approached this Court by way of W.P.No. 3026 of 2009. The said writ petition was allowed on 25.3.2009 taking note of the fact that the petitioner's services were terminated without holding an enquiry. The petitioner was accordingly directed to be reinstated in service as a Driver on contract basis. The APSRTC was however given liberty to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner. The petitioner was reinstated in service by the Regional Manager, APSRTC, Kurnool, under proceedings date...
Ch.Shankaraiah Vs. the Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Ap.State C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceeding No.PDS 2 / Movt. / FG 5(13) / 1878 / 2012-13, dated 01-08-2012, of respondent No.1. I have heard Mr.T.Mahender Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.A.Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Andhra Pradesh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, representing the respondents. The petitioner is a Stage- I Transport Contractor for Adilabad District and he has been operating the Stage- I contract under work order issued on 10-05-2012 and agreement issued on 02-05-2012. The petitioner's function as Stage-I Contractor is to take delivery of the PDS rice at Food Corporation of India (FCI) Godown, Jammikunta, and deliver the same at various Multi Level Stock (MLS) points in the District. On 25-07-2012, the petitioner has taken delivery of 17 trucks of PDS rice and despatched them to various MLS points. As the petitioner's ill luck would have it, four trucks loaded with 83.299 Metric Tonnes of PDS rice intended ...
Thirumala theatre, Khammam, Rep. by Its Partner and Others Vs. Governm ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-25-2012
Common Order 1. In this batch of cases, the petitioners have questioned the validity of the orders passed by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.181, Home (General-Administration) Department, dated 11.07.2011. By the aforesaid order, the 1st respondent-Government, in exercise of powers under A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act of 1955 (Act 4 of 1955), has fixed the rates of admission in cinema theatres. In view of the common questions of law which arise for consideration on similar set of facts, all these writ petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. For the purpose of disposal, I refer to the facts as arise in W.P.No.20656 of 2011. 2. The petitioner is a partnership Firm engaged in running a cinema theatre in Khammam town in the name of “Thirumala Theatre”. The trade in cinema theatres is regulated by the provisions under the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act of 1955 (Act 4 of 1955) and the Rules made thereunder, viz., the A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »