Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tangudu Venkata Rao Vs. the Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Palakonda Depot, Sr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
This writ petition is preferred challenging the correctness and validity of the award passed on 4.1.1995 by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam, in ID No. 83 of 1993. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Conductor with the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short `APSRTC’) on 15.11.1986 and he was attached to Palakonda Depot in Srikakulam District. On 28.3.1993, he was conducting the bus plying between Palakonda to Srikakulam. The bus was inspected at Srikakulam by two Travelling Ticket Inspectors (TTIs). At the time of check, there were 27 passengers in the bus. The TTIs have seized the tickets carried by the passengers. 23 passengers were issued Rs.8/- denomination tickets while one passenger is carrying Rs.7/- denomination ticket. One of the passengers has just then got off the bus. The remaining two passengers did not possess any ticket. They stated that they have boarded the bus at Palakonda and they have tendered Rs.51/- to the conduc...
Tangudu Venkata Rao Vs. the Depot Manager,apsrtc, Palakonda Depo
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.15311 OF 200.27-09-2012 Tangudu Venkata Rao The Depot Manager,APSRTC, Palakonda Depot,Srikakulam District and another Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.Appa Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.Arun Kumar Lathker, Standing Counsel for APSRTC : ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This writ petition is preferred challenging the correctness and validity of the award passed on 4.1.1995 by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam, in ID No. 83 of 1993. The writ petitioner was appointed as a Conductor with the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short `APSRTC') on 15.11.1986 and he was attached to Palakonda Depot in Srikakulam District. On 28.3.1993, he was conducting the bus plying between Palakonda to Srikakulam. The bus was inspected at Srikakulam by two Travelling Ticket Inspectors (TTIs). At the time of check, there were 27 passengers in the bus. The TTIs have seized the tickets carried by the passengers. 23 pas...
V. Harinatha Reddy, S/O Nagireddy Presen Vs. the Assistant Director (A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.12438 OF 200.27-09-2012 V. Harinatha Reddy, S/o Nagireddy Presently working in D/105 BN, RAF/CRPF MSP Camp, Lari at Mallapuram Dist., Kerala State The Assistant Director (Admn)Directorate General, CRPF Lodhi Road, New Delhi003. And three others Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. A. Chaya Devi and Ms. P. Parimala, Counsel for the Respondents: Sri S.S. Varma, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel : ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 199.SC 170.ORDER: This writ petition is instituted by a constable of Central Reserved Police Force, seeking for declaring the action of the respondents in not sanctioning medical reimbursement amount of Rs.1,75,863/- incurred by him while securing treatment at a private hospital for bullet injury sustained by him as bad in law. The petitioner joined the service of the Central Reserved Police Force, henceforth referred to as 'force' in the year 1895, as a Constable. While he was working at Group Centre, Ranga ...
Chityal Gundameede Ramalakshmamma Vs. Ediga Rangamma and 6 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.28 o27. 09-2012 Chityal Gundameede Ramalakshmamma Ediga Rangamma and 6 others ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.U.Ramanjaneyulu !Counsel for the respondents: Mr.K.Sitaram : ?Cases referred:2006. (4) ALD 33.Order: Feeling aggrieved by Order, dated 19-12-2011, in IA.No.870 of 2011 in OS.No.349 of 2008, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Dhone, Kurnool District, the defendant in the suit filed this Civil Revision Petition. Heard Sri U.Ramanjaneyulyu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Sri K.Sitaram, learned Counsel for the respondents. The respondents filed the above-mentioned suit for specific performance of agreement of sale, dated 17-05-2003. In her written statement, the petitioner has taken the plea that the suit document marked as Ex.A.1 is a rank forgery and that the thumb impressions on the said document are not of her. After completion of the oral evidence on the plaintiff...
Nemuri Lakshminarayana Vs. K. Pushpalatha and Another.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.594 OF 201.27-09-2012 Nemuri Lakshminarayana K. Pushpalatha and another. Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri Srinivas Polavarapu Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V.V.N. Narasimham : ?Cases referred: NIL. ORDER: The 1st respondent filed O.S. No.546 of 2009 in the Court of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, for the relief of specific performance of an oral agreement of sale said to have been made on 05-08-2003 in respect of the suit schedule property. The petitioner figured as defendant No.2 and the 2nd respondent as 1st defendant. The petitioner filed I.A. No.114 of 2010 under Rule - 11 of Order VII - CPC with a prayer to reject the plaint. He pleaded that even according to the 1st respondent, the date of agreement is 05-08-2003 and the suit filed in the year 2009 is clearly barred by limitation. The application was opposed by the 1st respondent. According to her, the limitation started from the d...
Banka Kanaka Rao. Vs. Kandregula Sanjeev Kumar and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.667 o27. 09.2012 Banka Kanaka Rao. Kandregula Sanjeev Kumar and others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri M.Karuna Sagar Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2: Smt. Anjana Devi : : ?Cases Referred: ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.154 of 2008 in the Court of VII Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam against the respondents herein for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 16.03.2005 and perpetual injunction. While the relief of specific performance is claimed against respondents 1 to 6 herein, respondents 7 to 15 were added in the context of relief of perpetual injunction. Among them, the 15th respondent filed a written statement and the same was adopted by respondents 7 to14. Defendants 9 and 10 i.e., respondents 1 and 2 herein filed I.A.No.1034 of 2011 under Order 8 Rule 9 C.P.C. with a prayer to permit them to file an additional written statement. It was stated that the counsel, ...
Saleem Pasha and Others Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Endowments
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. Nos. 755 OF 201.and Batch 27.09.2012 Saleem Pasha and others The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Karimnagar and another Counsel for the Appellants: Sri P.Venkataswamy Counsel for Respondent No.1: G.P. for Endowments ^Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri Bankatlal Mandhani HEAD NOTE: Cases referred :1. AIR 196.SC 85.2) AIR 199.SC 111.3)(1995) 6 SCC 52.CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL Nos.755, 756, 759, 760, 761, 762, 767, 768, 793, 794, 795797. 798, 799, 800, 801, 817, 818 AND 81.OF 201.COMMON JUDGMENT: These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed against the common award in O.A. Nos.3015, 3008, 3007, 3006, 3017, 3018, 3014, 3011, 3016, 3023, 3022, 3024, 3013, 3020, 3026, 3025, 3019, 3012, 3010, 3021 of 2010 respectively dated 25-06- 2012 passed by the A.P. Endowments Tribunal, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the respondents were held to be "encroachers" under Section 83 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions & Endow...
Burra Venkatswamy Goud and Others Vs. the District Collector, Ranga Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1670 o27. 09.2012 Burra Venkatswamy Goud and others The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad and others ^Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri C.Hanumantha Rao !Counsel for the respondent: --- Head note: ?Cases referred: The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 03.02.2012, in I.A.No.704 of 2011 in O.S.No.326 of 2008, on the file of the learned Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Rajendranagar. The petitioners filed the above-mentioned suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. During the trial, the respondents filed I.A.No.704 of 2011 for receiving certain documents as enclosed in the list accompanying to the said application. Even though the petitioners have filed a counter affidavit, they were not represented at...
B.Ravi Kumar Reddy Vs. Shaik Masthan Vali
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.448 o27. 09-2012 B.Ravi Kumar Reddy Shaik Masthan Vali Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Venkateswarlu Sanisetty ^Counsel for Respondent Sri T.K. Basha Vali ?Citations ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.130 of 2006 in the Court of the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Ongole for recovery of amount from the respondent on the strength of Katha. The suit was decreed and the decree became final. Since the respondent did not comply with the decree, the petitioner filed E.P.No.495 of 2008 under Order 21 Rules 37 and 38 C.P.C. for arrest of the respondent and detain in civil prison. On receiving the notice in the E.P., the respondent entered appearance. He filed a counter denying the allegation of the petitioner. He stated that he has no means to discharge the decreetal amount and that he is dependant upon his father. He has also stated that he undertakes agriculture as and when instructed by his father. The executing Court dis...
K. Ganesh Vs. the Regional Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporat ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-26-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside proceedings No.O1/122(11)/2004-RM:KMM, dated 23-2-2012 of respondent No.1, whereby he has permitted respondent No.4 to change the line of business from Fruit Juice and Fast Food to “Medical Shop and Juice Point”. The petitioner was granted licence for running two stalls in the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for short “the Corporation”) Bus Stand, Khammam. Stall No.7 was given to him for running business in Books, Stationery and Pan Shop and stall No.8 for Medical, Fancy and Ayurvedic business. On 6-9-2005, respondent No.4 was granted licence in respect of stall No.6 for running Fruit Juice and Fast Food business. However, on his application, respondent No.3 has permitted respondent No.4 to change the line of business to “Medical Shop and Juice Point”. Feeling aggrieved by the said decision, the petitioner filed this Writ Petition. Separate counter-affidavits have been filed by respondent...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »