Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments

K.B. Sankara Kumar Vs. A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This writ petition is instituted seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the orders contained in Lr No.14349/Vig/A3/2006, dated 22.4.2010 of the 2nd respondent - Government of Andhra Pradesh and the consequential proceedings bearing No. 24431/PW/APIIC dated 5.11.2010 of the 1st respondent - APIIC Limited deciding to revert the petitioner from the post of Deputy Zonal Manager (DZM) - Asset Management (AM) to the next lower post of Manager (AM) illegal and contrary to APIIC Articles of Association, APIIC Staff Regulations and APIIC CDA Rules. The petitioner while was working as Manager (AM) at Visakhapatnam Zonal Office with the 1st respondent corporation, was promoted to the next higher post of DZM (AM) and was posted to Patancheru Zone through proceedings dated 7.6.2010 of the Executive Director of the 1st respondent corporation. Pursuant to the said orders, the petitioner joined and was serving as such from 9.6.2010 onwards. He was also placed on probation for a per...

Sri K.B. Sankara Kumar S/O Sri Rama Murt Vs. A.P. Industrial Infrastru ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.29413 OF 201.05-09-2012 Sri K.B. Sankara Kumar S/o Sri Rama Murthy Working as DZM (AM) in APIIC r/o G-1 Megna Residency Puppalavari Street, Manikonda Hyderabad A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd Parishrama Bhavan, 6th Floor Basheerbagh, Hyderabad Rep. by its Vice-Chairman & Managing Director and 2 others Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri G. Maloji Rao Counsel for the Respondents : Sri B.P. Mohan : ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 195.SC 34.2) (1998) 7 SCC 27.3) (1993) 4 SCC 11.4) (1980) 4 SCC 6.5) (1976) 1 SCC 67.ORDER: This writ petition is instituted seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the orders contained in Lr No.14349/Vig/A3/2006, dated 22.4.2010 of the 2nd respondent - Government of Andhra Pradesh and the consequential proceedings bearing No. 24431/PW/APIIC dated 5.11.2010 of the 1st respondent - APIIC Limited deciding to revert the petitioner from the post of Deputy Zonal Manager (DZM) - Asset Management (AM) to ...

islamia Educational Society, Represented by Its Secretary Khadar Khan ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Judgment This batch of Writ Petitions is filed by some of the Educational Institutions imparting B.Ed. education and the B.Ed. students, assailing the decision of respondent No.2-The Acharya Nagarjuna University (for short “the University”), to levy and collect “admission/registration/recognition /University Services Fee” from each student on annual basis to be collected by the Institutions and remitted to the latter. W.P.Nos.13609, 13679, 16594, 16598, 17072, 20197, 20198 and 21430 of 2012 have been filed by the B.Ed. students of various Institutions and the other Writ Petitions have been filed by the Educational Institutions running the B.Ed. course. In their pleadings, the petitioners have averred that respondent No.2-University has no power or authority to unilaterally fix the impugned fee for being collected from the students. They have averred that the provisions of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admissions and Prohibition of Capit...

Nimmaka Jaya Raj Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order: (Acting Chief Justice) 1. In these petitions, the challenge is to certain provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, relating to appointment of special officers to Panchayats and reservation to the offices of Mandal Praja Parishads and Zilla Praja Parishads. However, in PIL Nos.149 and 150 of 2012, the petitioner has challenged the definition of “Backward Classes” under the Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 and the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporations Act, 1994. Hence, all these petitions are clubbed together and are being disposed of by this common order. Writ Petition No.31639 of 2011 2. In this writ petition filed as public interest litigation, the petitioner prays for a writ of mandamus declaring sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section 143 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) as illegal and unconstitutional for being in violation of the Constitution (Seventy-third Amendment) Act,...

Smt. Sajida Begum Vs. State Bank of India, Sarc Nampally, Hyderabad, R ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Vilas V. Afzulpurkar, J. Petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 04.05.2012 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai dismissing the application filed by the petitioner, being I.A.No.1654 of 2010 in AIR(SA).No.1012 of 2010. 2. The aforesaid appeal and the interlocutory application were preferred before DRAT against order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II (DRT), Hyderabad in S.A.No.142 of 2010 dated 27.08.2010. In the said appeal before DRT, the petitioner had questioned the possession taken over by the respondents with regard to the secured asset i.e. house bearing No.18-12-419/941/A/1 situated at Hafez Baba Nagar, Kanchan Bagh, Hyderabad. Petitioner asserts that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the said house property by virtue of a registered gift deed dated 27.02.2009 executed by her husband, Mohd. Nazeer Khan, whereas the respondent bank asserts that it is a secured asset, which was mortgaged by Smt Khaiser Begum by depositing the registered...

K. Ravi Sankar Vs. the Inspector General of Police and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD156

N. Ravi Shankar, J. Petitioner is the applicant in O.A.No.5345 of 2005 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (Tribunal). He filed that OA challenging the order of the second respondent (Superintendent of Police, Guntur) dated 17.05.2005 and confirmed by the first respondent (Inspector General of Police, Guntur - appellate authority) by his order dated 01.09.2005 removing him from the job of Police Constable on the ground that he did not belong to Scheduled Tribe (ST) but was appointed in a vacancy reserved for STs on his misrepresentation. 2. The Tribunal, after a contest, dismissed the above OA by its order dated 22.11.2006. Questioning the correctness of the said order, the petitioner has come up with this petition under Article 226. Before we state the points which are raised in this writ petition, the factual background of the matter should be noted. 3. The petitioner was appointed as Police Constable by the second respondent through his proceed...

Smt Sajida Begum. Vs. State Bank of India, Sarc Nampally, Hyde

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONOURABLE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.22317 o04. 09.2012 Smt Sajida Begum. State Bank of India, SARC Nampally, Hyderabad, Rep. by its authorized officer. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. T.C. KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent: MR. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. AIR 201.MP 20.2. (2011) 6 SCC 73.3. 2012 (7) TMI 64.4. 2008 (4) MHLJ 42 = LAWS (BOM) 2008 (25. (2004) 11 SCC 47.6. (2004) 11 SCC 45.7. (1975) 4 SCC 2.8. AIR 199.SC 111.9. (2003) 8 SCC 43.10. IV (2009) BC 63.11. (2008) 14 SCC 44.12. (2009) 5 SCJ 77.13. (1995) 5 SCC 5 = AIR 199.SC 227.ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice Vilas V. Afzulpurkar) Petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 04.05.2012 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Chennai dismissing the application filed by the petitioner, being I.A.No.1654 of 2010 in AIR(SA).No.1012 of 2010.2. The aforesaid appeal and the interlocuto...

Nimmaka Jaya Raj Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Repres

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION Nos.31639 of 2011 and Batch (W.P. Nos.31639, 16560, 16473 and 31964 of 2011 and WRIT PETITION No.11036 of 2006, PIL Nos.149 and 150 OF 2012.04-09-2012 Nimmaka Jaya Raj The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri.B. Sesibushan Rao Counsel for the respondent No.1:G.P. for General Administration Department Counsel for the respondent Nos 2 and 6: G.P. for Panchayat Raj Counsel for the respondent Nos.3& 4: B. Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.5: V.V. Prabhakar Rao : CITATIONS:1. (2006) 8 SCC 35.2 (2010) 7 SCC 20.3 1987 (1) ALT 66.(FB) 4 AIR 197.SC 49.5 (2001) 1 ALT 13.(D.B) COMMON ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice) In these petitions, the challenge is to certain provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1994, ...

P. Manjula and Others Vs. the Government of A.P., Revenue Department, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioners purchased a plot of 750 sq.yards in Sy.No.101/17 of Nagole Revenue Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through sale deed dated 31-03-2010. They have traced the origin of title to the stage of a sale deed dated 19-10-1981, which, in turn was followed by two more sale deeds dated 16-05-1985 and 08-08-1990. Their vendor filed Writ Petition No.2966 of 2010, complaining that the respondents are trying to interfere with his possession. The writ petition was disposed of on 11-02-2010, directing that the respondents shall not interfere or otherwise dispossess the petitioner therein from the land, except by initiating the proceedings in accordance with law. The petitioners state that after the W.P.No.2966 of 2010 was disposed of, the Tahsildar, Uppal Mandal, 3rd respondent herein, issued a notice dated 29-05-2010 to their vendor, under Section 3 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short ‘the Act 7 of 77), read with Rule 3 of the Ru...

P. Manjula and Others Vs. the Government of A.P., Revenue Departme

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.22610 o03. 09-2012 P. Manjula & others The Government of A.P., Revenue Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P. Sriharsha Reddy Counsel for respondents : G.P for Revenue : ?Citations: ORDER: The petitioners purchased a plot of 750 sq.yards in Sy.No.101/17 of Nagole Revenue Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, through sale deed dated 31- 03-2010. They have traced the origin of title to the stage of a sale deed dated 19-10-1981, which, in turn was followed by two more sale deeds dated 16-05-1985 and 08-08-1990. Their vendor filed Writ Petition No.2966 of 2010, complaining that the respondents are trying to interfere with his possession. The writ petition was disposed of on 11-02-2010, directing that the respondents shall not interfere or otherwise dispossess the petitioner therein from the land, except by initiating the proceedings ...