Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Raja Reddy, Died Per Lrs and Others Vs. the Chairman and Managing D ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
Originally, this writ petition is instituted by four individuals. But however, of them, the first petitioner Sri G. Raja Reddy died and his legal representatives are thus brought on record as 5th and 6th petitioners. The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents to extend the pensionary benefits on par with similarly placed persons who were recruited under “Half a Million Job Programme” and who have been accorded the benefit of computing the training period spent by them beyond the initial nine months period of training, as qualifying service. The State Government with a view to augment the employment opportunities, has set apart a sum of Rs.2.50 crores for providing jobs to half a million people in various departments other than Industries Department. It is worthy to be noticed that, this was pursued by the State as a policy measure and hence, orders were passed through G.O.Ms.No.84 (Employment and Social Welfare Department) dated 10.07.1973 wherein, detailed instruc...
S. Daisy Sunanda Vs. Nizamand#8217;s Institute of Medical Sciences, Re ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in prescribing the qualification in EAMCET- 2012 for admissions into B.Sc (Nursing) course in respondent No.1- Institution, as illegal. I have heard Mr.C.Nageshwara Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs.S.Nanda, learned Standing Counsel for Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), appearing for the respondents. The petitioner completed her intermediate course with optionals of Botany, Zoology, Physics and Chemistry and applied to respondent No.1 for admission into B.Sc.(Nursing) course. When the petitioner was denied a seat on the ground that she could not secure the required rank in EAMCET- 2012, she has questioned such action of the respondents. The main basis on which the petitioner mounted the challenge on the action of the respondents for denying her seat is that their changing the policy during the academic year 2012-13. The petitioner pleaded that till the year 2010, the responden...
V. Suresh Reddy Vs. E. Surya Prakash
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
This Criminal Petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C by petitioner-V.Suresh Reddy, accused in C.C.No.16 of 2010 on the file of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram, Kadapa District to quash the proceeding therein. 2. 1st respondent-E.Surya Prakash Goud filed a complaint against the petitioner/accused in the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram alleging inter alia that the petitioner/accused borrowed an amount of Rs.4,50,000/- from him on 05.4.2009 agreeing to repay the same with interest and executed a promissory note in his favour. On the same day, the petitioner/accused issued a cheque bearing No.234540 drawn on Andhra Bank, Apollo Hospital, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad for Rs.4,50,000/- towards discharge of the pronote debt. He presented the cheque on 18.09.2009 for collection through State Bank of Hyderabad, Yerraguntla village, Kadapa District. The cheque came to be returned on 23.9.2009 on the ground...
Davuluri Malyadri and Another Vs. the Collector and District Election ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
1. Heard Sri M.Ravindranath Reddy, counsel for the writ petitioners, Government Pleader for Co-operation for respondents 1 to 3, Sri O.Manohar Reddy, counsel for the 4th respondent - Society and Sri Sitaram Chaparla, counsel for the impleaded respondents 5 to 12. 2. The 4th respondent is M/s Ponnaluru Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., Ponnaluru Village and Mandal, Prakasam District and it is represented by Person-in-charge. The 3rd respondent - Election Officer, issued election notification under Rule 22(b)(vi) of the A. P. Co-operative Societies Rules, 1964 on 31.01.2010 for conducting elections for constitution the Managing Committee of the 4th respondent - Society. Challenging the said election notification, the present writ petition is filed. 3. The grievance of the writ petitioners is that the 3rd respondent - Election Officer has not verified the voters list and without publishing the draft electoral list and inviting objections, publi...
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor Vs. K. Raghu Ra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
The Public Prosecutor seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.2832 of 2012 in Crime No.128 of 2012 by order dated 18.08.2012 to the respondent/A1. This crime relates to procuring of cell phone call list by A1 and enclosing the same to his writ petition filed in the High Court. The call list relates to cell phone having BSNL connectivity of V.V.Lakshminarayana / de facto complainant who is working as Joint Director in C.B.I., Hyderabad and who is incharge of investigation along with his team of officers in several major offences including Obulapuram Mining Case, EMMAR properties case and Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy’s case. Though the de facto complainant was incharge of the investigation in several major cases, it is alleged that A1 wanted to demoralize the de facto complainant and to offend the fundamental right of personal liberty enshrined under Article 20 of the Constitution of India. No doubt, the low...
V.Suresh Reddy S/O Rosi Reddy, Jubilee H Vs. E.Surya Prakash S/O Laksh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.6113 o11. 09-2012 V.Suresh Reddy S/o Rosi Reddy, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad E.Surya Prakash S/o Lakshman Goud and State Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. Vinesh Raj Counsel for Respondent No.1: K.Sudhakar Counsel for Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor : Cases referred:2010. CRIMES-4-50 2010-LAWS (BOM)-1-67 Crl. Petition No.376 of 2012 decided on 21.02.2012 Crl .Petition No.12066 of 2011 decided on 25.11.2011 (1999)7 SCC 51.ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C by petitioner-V.Suresh Reddy, accused in C.C.No.16 of 2010 on the file of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram, Kadapa District to quash the proceeding therein.2. 1st respondent-E.Surya Prakash Goud filed a complaint against the petitioner/accused in the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram alleging inter alia that the petitioner/accused borrowed an amount of R...
S.Daisy Sunanda Vs. Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, H
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.28476 o11. 09.2012 S.Daisy Sunanda Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar and another. ^Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.C.Nageshwara Rao !Counsel for the respondents : Mrs.S.Nanda, SC for NIMS : : ?Cases referred : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents, in prescribing the qualification in EAMCET- 2012 for admissions into B.Sc (Nursing) course in respondent No.1- Institution, as illegal. I have heard Mr.C.Nageshwara Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs.S.Nanda, learned Standing Counsel for Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences (NIMS), appearing for the respondents. The petitioner completed her intermediate course with optionals of Botany, Zoology, Physics and Chemistry and applied to respondent No.1 for admission into B.Sc.(Nursing) course. When the petitioner was denied a seat on the ground that she could not secure the required r...
M. Ramachander Rao Vs. the Member (Finance) and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
G. Rohini, J. The writ petitioner while working as Accounts Officer in the office of Telecom District Engineer, Ongole was imposed the penalty of withholding increment for a period of two years without cumulative effect vide proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 27.01.1997. Aggrieved by the same, he preferred an appeal before the 1st respondent. The appellate authority taking a lenient view reduced the duration of the penalty imposed by the disciplinary authority from two years to one year by order dated 30.06.1999. Challenging the said order, the writ petitioner filed O.A.No.980 of 2000 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench contending inter alia that the appellate authority committed a grave error in disposing of the appeal without giving him an opportunity of hearing as required under Rule 16 of the Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 (for short 'the Rules'). It was also contended that the appellate authority had disposed of the appeal without application...
Pallamkurthi China Appanna Vs. Yenumula Veerayya Dora (Died) and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
(Appeal under Section 100 of CPC against the decree in AS.No.45 of 1988, dt.17.01.1997 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Peddapuram, East Godavari District, preferred against the decree in OS.No.101 of 1982, dt.31.08.1988 on the file of the Court of the District Munsif, Prathipadu, East Godavari District.) The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.101 of 1982 on the file of the District Munsif, Prathipadu, is the appellant herein. 2. The suit was one filed for partition of the schedule property into four shares and for allotment of one such share to the plaintiff and also for profits. 3. According to the plaintiff, the 1st defendant borrowed some money from him and as the 1st defendant failed to discharge the said loan, he filed S.C.No.237 of 1968 and obtained a decree and in execution of the decree, he purchased the property and obtained a symbolic delivery of the property in E.A.No.983 of 1973 on 24.12.1973. After the said sale, the second defendant came into possession o...
Lakku Veera Vinodh and Others Vs. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2012
COMMON ORDER 1. The proceedings of the General Manager, TTD Transport, Tirupati, dated 03-08-2011, by which, in pursuance of the recommendations of the Technical Report submitted by the Committee on 01-08-2011, permission was accorded to allow Tirupati based Tempo Traveller vehicles, models of 2009 and later to ply on Tirumala-Tirupati ghat roads, while Tempo Travellers of the same model belonging to other States are not allowed due to lack of experience of these drivers on Ghat roads, are under challenge in all these writ petitions at the instance of either the owners of the motor vehicles or the drivers affected respectively. 2. The Joint Executive Officer, Tirumala appeared to have instructed the General Manager, TTD Transport and the Regional Transport Officer, Tirupati to inspect the Tempo Traveller vehicles and submit a Technical Report, as it was observed by the police and security department that the accidents involving such vehicles on Tirumala-Tirupati ghat roads are on the r...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »