Andhra Pradesh Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Vidyadhar Rao and Five Others Vs. Kvs Narayana Rao and Lanother
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Criminal Petition No.9302 o13. 09.2012 A.Vidyadhar Rao and five others KVS Narayana Rao and lanother Counsel for the petitioners:Sri T.Ravi Kumar Counsel for respondent No.1: Ms.N.Anula ^Counsel for respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 1988(1)SCC 69.2. 1992 SCC (Crl.3. 2005(1) SCC 12.4. (2010) 7 SCC 66.ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused 1 to 6 in P.R.C.No.11 of 2009 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Kovvur, Nellore District.2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused, the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent/de facto complainant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the second respondent/State.3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present criminal petition are as follows: According to the first respondent/de facto complainant, the ac...
P. Dharma Rao Vs. Sunkari Indira Das
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CRP Nos.219 of 2012 and Batch 13.09.2012 CRP No.219 of 2012 P. Dharma Rao Sunkari Indira Das Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V.L.N.G.K. Murthy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri K.V. Simhadri ?Citations CRP Nos.219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 235 and 236 of 2012 C.R.P. No.220 of 2012 G.Vasidevarao..Petitioner Sunkari Indira DasRespondent C.R.P. No.221 of 2012 B. Appala Swamy Petitioner Sunkari Indira Das ..Respondent C.R.P. No.222 of 2012 K.Appanna Petitioner Sunkari Indira Das Respondent C.R.P. No.223 of 2012 T. Kannayya Petitioner Sunkari Indira Das .. Respondent C.R.P. No.235 of 2012 P. Bhaghayam and another Petitioners Sunkari Indira Das Respondent C.R.P. No.236 of 2012 P. Basavayya . Petitioner Sunkari Indira Das .. Respondent COMMON ORDER: In all these revisions, the challenge is to the orders passed by the District Judge & Appellate Tribunal under A.P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy Act, 1956, Srikakulam in the appeals filed by the landholder, the res...
Smt.R.Latha Vs. G.Narayana and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.1632 o13. 09.2012 Smt.R.Latha G.Narayana and others ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Venkat Raghu Ramulu !Counsel for the respondents: --- Head note: ?Cases referred: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 28.02.2012, in E.P.No.45 of 2011 in O.S.No.2720 of 2004, on the file of the learned X Additional Junior Civil Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad. I have heard Sri Venkat Raghu Ramulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, and perused the record. Even though notice was served on respondent No.2, he has not entered appearance. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have entered appearance through an advocate. However, at the hearing, their counsel is not present. The petitioner filed the above mentioned suit for a decree to direct the respondents not to make any attempt to remove the common wall existing in between the properties of the petitioner and respondents and to restrain them from putting any ventilator...
P. Hanumantha Rao (Died) Per L.Rs. and O Vs. P. Satyanarayana (Died) P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.493 OF 201.13-09-2012 P. Hanumantha Rao (died) per L.Rs. and others P. Satyanarayana (died) per L.Rs. and another. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Kurra Srinivas Counsel for the Respondent: V.R. Machavaram : ?Cases referred: NIL. ORDER: This revision is the continuation of a prolonged litigation. The deceased 1st petitioner, by name, P. Hanumantha Rao filed O.S.No.63 of 1961 in the Court of the District Munsif, Ongole, against the deceased 1st respondent, by name, P. Satyanarayana for specific performance of an agreement of sale. The suit was dismissed with costs on 03-02-1967 and the decree became final. To recover the costs awarded in the suit, the 1st respondent filed E.P.No.33 of 1975. The 1st petitioner was entitled to half share in a house bearing Door No.50 of Koppolu Village, 6th Ward, Ongole. The undivided half share of the 1st petitioner was brought to sale in the execution and the 1st respondent emerged a...
Jonnalagadda Ravi Sankar. Vs. Jakka Rama Krishna Rao and Another.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.402 o13. 09.2012 Jonnalagadda Ravi Sankar. Jakka Rama Krishna Rao and another. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sai Gangadhar Charmarthy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri P.Venkat Rao : : ?Cases Referred: THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.402 of 2012 ORDER: The petitioner is the husband of the 2nd respondent and the 1st respondent is his father-in-law. It appears that the relationship between the petitioner and the respondent is strained. The petitioner filed O.S.No.41 of 2008 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda against the respondents for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 13.07.2003. According to him, the 1st respondent, who is the owner of the property, offered the same to the petitioner for a consideration of Rs.1,70,000/- and executed an agreement of sale, on receiving a sum of Rs.1,68,000/-. The respondents filed written statement opposing the suit. Iss...
The Secretary, Siddhartha Academy of Gen Vs. the Appellate Authority U ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITIONS No. 16325 of 2000 and Batch 13-09-2012 The Secretary, Siddhartha Academy of General and Technical Education, Vijayawada and another The Appellate Authority under the A.P. Payment of Gratuity Rules, 1972 And the Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Eluru, W.G. District and two others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Challa Gunjaranjan Counsel for the Respondents: Government Pleader for Labour Government Pleader for Finance and Planning Government Pleader for Technical Education Sri V. Subrahmanyam : ?CITATIONS:1. 1997 (4) ALT 33.(DB) 2. 2010 (4) ALT 48.(D.B) 3. AIR 193.Privy Counci4. AIR 194.PC 4.5. AIR 195.SC 90.6. (1848) 12 QB 12.7. AIR 192.PC 12.8. (1937) 1 All ER 11.(PC) 9. (1950) 2 All ER 52.10. AIR 196.SC 44.11. AIR 198.SC 84.12. (2010) 8 SCC 68.13. (2004) 1 SCC 75.14. (2006) 8 SCC 70.15. (2009) 7 SCC 67.16. (2009) 9 SCC 45.COMMON ORDER : All these Writ Petitions can be dealt with together and decided, as they raise a common q...
L. Rajendra Naidu Vs. A.K.Dass
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY C.R.P.No.1657 o13. 9-2012 L. Rajendra Naidu A.K.Dass Counsel for petitioner : Sri M. Rama Krishna for Sri A.K. Jayaprakash Rao Counsel for respondent : Sri Srinivas Ambati for Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 200.S.C....
Dangu @ Kadamenda Yellaiah and Others Vs. Ch.Sridhar Reddy and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.122 o13. 09.2012 Dangu @ Kadamenda Yellaiah and others Ch.Sridhar Reddy and another. Counsel for petitioners : Sri V.Hari Haran Counsel for Respondents : HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.152 of 2004 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar, against the respondents, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property. They placed reliance upon an unregistered sale deed, dated 08.06.1959, said to have been executed by one Mr.Gulam Rasool. The trial of the suit commenced. The petitioners intended to file a Photostat copy of the unregistered deed, dated 08.06.1959. According to them, the original of that document was presented for impounding before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Kadapa, (RDO), and after the document was impounded, it was lost in the year 2000. It was pleaded that the Office of the RDO, kept a Photostat copy of the or...
Rachabthuni Krishna Murthy. Vs. Rachabthuni Umasutam and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.No.341 o13. 09.2012 Rachabthuni Krishna Murthy. Rachabthuni Umasutam and others. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri V.R.N.Prashanth Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Venkateswarlu Chakkilam ^Counsel for the Respondent No.10 : Sri Sriman : : ?Cases Referred: ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.117 of 2007 in the Court of IX Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court), Guntur at Tenali against the respondents for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession of certain items of property. The parties to the suit are members of the same family. The petitioner placed reliance upon a document, dated 15.03.1983 said to be a deed of family settlement. Apart from other parties to the suit, 1st respondent herein i.e., 5th defendant filed a written statement. Based upon pleadings, the trial Court framed issues. Thereafter, trial of the suit commenced, and evidence on behalf of the petitioner i.e., plaintiff was closed. It appea...
Smt. Ch. Padmavathi Vs. Ch. Sai Babu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-2012
G. Krishna Mohan Reddy, J. This appeal is preferred challenging order dated 24-01-2008 passed in O.P.No.121 of 2005 (OP) on the file of the Judge, Family Court at Warangal upholding the plea of the respondent/petitioner in the OP to dissolve marriage between him and the appellant/respondent in the OP by a decree of divorce. 2. For the sake of convenience, we refer the parties hereinafter as they are arrayed in the OP. 3. The OP was allowed in favour of the petitioner coming to the conclusion that he could prove adultery between the respondent and one R. Narasimha Rao, a Shunter in Railways, by reason of which it was also held that her cruelty against the petitioner was also established consequently aggrieved by which the present appeal has been preferred. 4. It is necessary to note briefly the claims or allegations made by the petitioner and the respondent in the case for proper appreciation of the matter respectively. Admittedly, the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent took ...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »