Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments

The Depot Manager,A.P. State Road Transp Vs. the Labour Court, Anantha ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.20025 o23. 8-2012 The Depot Manager,A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kuppam Depot, Chittoor District. The Labour Court, Ananthapur and another Counsel for petitioner : Sri K.V. Subba Reddy Counsel for respondents : None appeared ?CASES REFERRED: Nil ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside award dated 27-12- 2000 in I.D.No.265/1999 on the file of respondent No.1-Labour Court, Anantapur. The petitioner is the Depot Manager of the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kuppam Depot, Chittoor District. Respondent No.2 has raised the above mentioned industrial dispute under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act") questioning his purported termination of services by the petitioner. Respondent No.2 averred in the claim petition that he was appointed as a casual worker in the petitioner-Corporation; that his services were utilized for over-stamping on the tickets and ticket-...

J.Chinna @ Naresh Kumar and 2 Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Pu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.10914 o23. 8-2012 J.Chinna @ Naresh Kumar and 2 others The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad and Yellia ... Respondent De facto Complainant Counsel for Petitioners: Sri A.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for the 1st Respondent: Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P. Counsel for the 2nd respondent: Sri G.Ashok Kumar Reddy : Cases referred: Nil. Order: The petitioners seek for the quashment of First Information Report in Crime No.353 of 2009 on the file of Narayanaguda Police Station, Hyderabad, whereunder case was registered under Section 354 IPC as well as under Sections 3 and 5 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (the Act, for short). The petitioners are the accused 1, 3 and 4. The 2nd respondent herein is the de facto complainant. He is said to be watchman of the building where the incident allegedly occurred on 14-9-2009. Inter alia, it is the cas...

Rakesh Gupta and Another Vs. State of Ap, Rep. by Public Prosecutor,

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.10815 o23. 8-2012 Rakesh Gupta and another State of AP, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through Station House Officer, Mahankali PS, Secunderabad P.N.M.Raju, Holding GPA on behalf of N.Suryanarayana Raju De facto Complainant Counsel for Petitioners: Smt. Pushpinder Kaur Counsel for the 1st Respondent: Sri K.Venkateswara Rao, Advocate, Rep.the Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P. Counsel for the 2nd respondent: None : Cases referred: Nil. Order: The 2nd respondent was served with notice, but no one appeared for the 2nd respondent. This petition is disposed of without hearing the 2nd respondent. The petitioners, who are the accused 1 and 2 in Crime No.274 of 2009 on the file of Mahankali Police Station, Secunderabad, seek for the quashment of the FIR. The 2nd respondent laid a complaint before the Police alleging that the petitioners have been interfering with the premises bearing Flat No.207, 2nd Floor, Chandralok Co...

K. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Secunderabad Vs. M/S. Omega Shelters Private Ltd ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Mrs. M. Shreesha, J. Member The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant, attracted by the publicity of opposite party, that it was developing a gated community under the name and style THE NEIGHBOURHOOD at Gundla Pochampally Village, Medchal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and would construct 390 independent houses of 3 different sizes (38 sq. yds. 281 sq. yds. and 218 sq. yds) and got HUDA sanction plan No.02/MP2/HUDA/07 dated 7-1-2007 and for multi-storeyed apartments vide permit No.3167/PLG/H/2007 dated 31-3-2007 along with recreation club, swimming pool, tennis court, open space for parks, overhead water tank, Tar roads, street lights, avenue plantation etc. the complainant intended to purchase an independent house and opposite party offered to sell plot No.25 admeasuring 358 sq. yds. for Rs.48,50,000/- and construction cost of the house would be Rs.46,50,000/- and after negotiations, opposite party reduced the cost of the plot to Rs.42,50,000/-. The complain...

Govind V. Shah and Another Vs. Smt. Anila J.Shah and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

G. Krishna Mohan Reddy, J. 1. This appeal and C.C.C.A.No.38 of 2006 are preferred against judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.329 of 1999 dated 19.9.2005 on the file of the Court of Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of communal offence cases-cum-VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-XXI Additional Chief Judge, Red Hills, Nampally, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the suit filed for partition and separate possession of the properties scheduled therein and other reliefs was decreed in favour of the plaintiff. 2. C.C.C.A.No.38 of 2006 is preferred by the defendants 1 and 2 and C.C.C.A.No.225 of 2008 is preferred by the defendants 3 and 4 in the said suit. For the sake of convenience, we refer the parties as arrayed in the suit. 3. The question now involved in the appeal at this stage is as to whether the defendants are liable to pay court fee with reference to the pleas taken in the plaint with regards to the subject matter of the suit or with reference to the ul...

Ch.Venkateswara Rao Vs. India Info Line Securities Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint seeking for recovery of `11,85,905/- with interest and costs. 2. The appellant entered into an agreement with the first respondent in the month of October,2005 for opening trading account as also Demat account. The first respondent allotted Demat account number 10559727 for credit and debit of share transactions. The appellant complained of non-receipt of statement of Demat account and confirmation slips for the transactions made and requested the first respondent on 28.11.2006 to furnish the particulars of the sub-broker , i.e., the seventh respondent such as his name, address and registration number. The appellant said to have come to know about purchase and sale transactions of shares without his knowledge and instructions. 3. The appellant complained to the first respondent that their agent Ganesh Naidu made unauthorized transactions and on receipt of t...

K. Raja Rao Vs. A.P. Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD38

This writ petition has been taken out by K.Raja Rao seeking a mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in initiating proceedings, dated 06.01.2000, under Revenue Recovery Act without deciding the liability of him as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction. 2. Facts in brief are: M/s.Rama Organics Private Limited availed term loan of Rs.56.80 Lakhs and seed capital of Rs.12.45 lakhs from the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation Limited-1st respondent. The assets of the company such as land, buildings, plant and machinery came to be mortgaged in favour of the 1st respondent-Corporation as a security for the loan availed by it. Apart from offering the fixed assets of the company as security, the promoter directors of the company executed personal guarantee bonds. Initially, P.Seshagiri Rao, Mr.Nageswara Rao and Dr.A.K.Chatterjee executed personal guarantee bonds. Subsequently, the petitioner was inducted in the place of Dr.A.K.Chatterjee as Director of the Company...

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh-i Vs. M/S.Bake Food Pro ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J. This appeal is filed under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") by the Revenue challenging the order dated 24-04-2000 in I.T.A.No.1699/Hyd/95 (Hyderabad 'A' Bench). 2. The facts giving rise in filing of this appeal are as under: (a) The respondent/assessee filed its return of income for the assessment year 1986-1987 on 30-06-1986 admitting a loss of Rs.16,27,167/-. Notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act was issued fixing the date of hearing on 01-11-1988. There was no response to this notice. A detailed letter was issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-III, Hyderabad (the assessing officer) on 07-12-1988 to the assessee stating that the return was not accompanied by the audited balance sheet and profit and loss account and sought an explanation from the assessee as to various discrepancies noticed in the books of accounts by 14.12.1988. This letter was served on the same date. The assessee...

Krishna Kilaru and Another Vs. Maytas Properties Limited Rep., by Its ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order C.P. Nos.172 of 2010 and batch are filed, under Section 433 (e) read with Section 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking winding up of the respondent company. The petitioners are all individuals who had sought allotment of flats in an apartment complex known as “Hill County” situated at Bachupally village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Rangareddy District. Agreements of sale were entered into, between the petitioners and the respondent, during the years 2006 to 2008. All the petitioners herein have admittedly paid a substantial part of the sale consideration running into several lakhs each. All of them also claim to have terminated the agreements of sale in accordance with the conditions stipulated therein. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Companies Act with its registered office at Hyderabad. Its authorized share capital is Rs.75 Crores divided into 75 lakh equity shares of Rs.100/- each. Its paid up capital is said to be Rupees Five lakhs co...

Patnala Venkata Ramakrishna and Others Vs. M/S. Midwest (India) Indust ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order These applications are yet another instance of abuse of the judicial process, and its subversion. Several orders passed by the Company Court, the Division Bench of this Court and the Supreme Court are being thwarted by repeated petitions/applications being filed only to drag on proceedings, and thereby prevent the property of “Midwest (India) Industries Limited” (for short the “company”), i.e., Ac.9-16 guntas in Survey No.451 of Puppalguda Village, from being sold and its proceeds utilized for repayment of the amounts deposited by the depositors of the “company” all of whom have been waiting for nearly a decade and a half to receive even the “principal” repayable to them. C.A.No.1598 of 2011 is filed by Sri P. Venkataramakrishna and two others seeking a direction from this Court to stay all further proceedings, including auction of the property of an extent of Ac.9-16 guntas in Survey No.451 of Puppalguda Village, Rajendranag...