Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
J. Chinna @ Naresh Kumar and Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Pub ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
The petitioners seek for the quashment of First Information Report in Crime No.353 of 2009 on the file of Narayanaguda Police Station, Hyderabad, whereunder case was registered under Section 354 IPC as well as under Sections 3 and 5 of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (the Act, for short). The petitioners are the accused 1, 3 and 4. The 2nd respondent herein is the de facto complainant. He is said to be watchman of the building where the incident allegedly occurred on 14-9-2009. Inter alia, it is the case of the 2nd respondent that the accused including the petitioners herein outraged the modesty of the wife of the 2nd respondent and also abused the 2nd respondent touching upon his community and making themselves liable for punishment for the offences under Sections 3 and 5 of the Act. 2. It may be noticed that it is the case of the 2nd respondent that the modesty of his wife Poola was outraged by the accused. He claimed that apart from...
Ch. Murali Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
The petitioner joined the service of erstwhile A.P. Electricity Board, as Wireman in the year 1969. Over the period, the transmission activity in the Board came to be entrusted to the Transmission Corporation of A.P. i.e., 1st respondent herein. Thereafter, the petitioner earned number of promotions and by the year 1993, he was working as Assistant Divisional Engineer. A charge memo was issued on 05.07.1996 with three charges alleging that the petitioner was responsible for the loss of huge quantities of copper and aluminium; that he indulged in the acts of subversion and manipulation of the records and that he violated the Regulations and thereby cheated the Corporation. The petitioner submitted explanation on 2.08.1996. Not satisfied with that, the respondents directed enquiry into the matter. The enquiry officer submitted his report holding that charge No.1 is proved and charge Nos.2 and 3 are not proved. The petitioner was issued a show cause not...
Krishna Reddy and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Publ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
The petitioners seek for the quashment of Crl.M.P.No.1815 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant. She filed a case against the petitioners as well as against her husband under Section 406 IPC as well as under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners, who are the accused 2 to 5 in the case, is that prima facie case is not made out against the petitioners and that the complaint inasmuch as it relates to the petitioners is liable to be dismissed. 2. The petitioners 1 to 4 are accused 2 to 5 in Crl.M.P.No.1815 of 2009. The 1st petitioner is the father-in-law of the 2nd respondent. The 2nd petitioner is the mother-in-law of the 2nd respondent. The 3rd petitioner is the sister-in-law of the 2nd respondent. The 4th petitioner is the husband of the 3rd petitioner. 3. Contending that the 2nd respondent lodged First Information Report i...
A. Pochaiah Vs. Labour Court-ii, Rep. by Its Presiding Officer and Oth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
The petitioner, who was unsuccessful before the Labour Court, which dismissed ID.No.103 of 1997 by rejecting his claim for reinstatement in the respondent-Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation'), filed this Writ Petition, feeling aggrieved by the decision of the Labour Court. I have heard Mr.A.K.Jaya Prakash Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner. No one entered appearance for the respondents. The facts in a nutshell are that the petitioner claimed that he was appointed as NMR on daily wage basis under the control of respondent No.3 in the year 1988 when Bhanswada Depot was under construction; that he has continuously worked right from the said time till completion of the construction and that after the commencement of operations in Bhanswada Depot, he was engaged as Sweeper in the year 1992 under the control of respondent No.2. It is his further case that his services were illegally terminated orally on 20-07-1997. The petitioner has raised...
Kanche Chandraiah @ Kusala Satyanaran Reddy Vs. Jaissingani Chandan an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation granted in O.P.No.251 of 2000 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-District Judge, at Karimnagar, the claimant has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 2. Facts, in brief, are:- The appellant is the claimant in O.P.No.251 of 2000 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-District Judge, Karimnagar ("the Tribunal", in short). He was Underground Trammer in 6-B Incline of Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Godavarikhani and was earning Rs.5,364/- per month. On 25.01.2009 at about 9 P.M., he was proceeding on a scooter as a pillion rider along with his friend Srinivas from Food Corporation of India Cross Road to his native place Veeralapalli and on reaching the outskirts of Kazipalli village, an auto bearing No.AP15-V-80 came in the opposite direction driven in a rash and negligent manner and dashed the scooter. As a result, he fell down and sustained fracture injuries to right leg apart from other injuries. He took tr...
The Depot Manager, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. the Labou ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to set-aside award dated 27-12-2000 in I.D.No.265/1999 on the file of respondent No.1-Labour Court, Anantapur. The petitioner is the Depot Manager of the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Kuppam Depot, Chittoor District. Respondent No.2 has raised the above mentioned industrial dispute under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act") questioning his purported termination of services by the petitioner. Respondent No.2 averred in the claim petition that he was appointed as a casual worker in the petitioner-Corporation; that his services were utilized for over-stamping on the tickets and ticket-cutting; that the Management of the petitioner-Corporation has issued appreciation letters to him for his work and that he was being paid Rs.6/- and Rs.10/- per day depending upon the work. Respondent No.2 further averred that he was a workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the Act; that his services were utili...
Nyayapathi Srinivas Raghavan Vs. Burra Adinarayana Sastry
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
1) Heard Sri Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the Respondent. 2) This revision petition is directed against the order, dated 23-02-2010 in I.A.No.2180 of 2009 in O.S.No.29 of 2007 allowing the petition filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order 7, Rule 14 (3) C.P.C. 3) The respondent herein filed O.S.No.29 of 2007 for specific performance against the petitioner herein. Approximately two years after the institution of the suit, the respondent-plaintiff filed the instant I.A. seeking leave of the Court under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) C.P.C. and to receive the documents enumerated in the petition with a prayer to condone the delay in filing the same. The petition was resisted by the petitioner-defendant inter alia on the ground that documents are sought to be filed in I.A. at a belated stage and the delay was not properly explained. 4) A perusal of the impugned order shows that the Court below allowed the petition by passing a...
Krishna Reddy and 3 Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Pu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR Criminal Petition No.10584 o23. 8-2012 Krishna Reddy and 3 others State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad and Smt. Chinta Shanti Shree ... Respondent/ De facto Complainant Counsel for Petitioners: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the 1st Respondent: Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. Counsel for the 2nd respondent: None : Cases referred: Nil. Order: The petitioners seek for the quashment of Crl.M.P.No.1815 of 2009 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Bodhan, Nizamabad District. The 2nd respondent is the de facto complainant. She filed a case against the petitioners as well as against her husband under Section 406 IPC as well as under Section 6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners, who are the accused 2 to 5 in the case, is that prima facie case is not made out against the petitioners and that the complaint inasmuch as it rel...
A.Pochaiah Vs. Labour Court-ii, Rep. by Its Presiding O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.19344 o23. 08-2012 A.Pochaiah Labour Court-II, rep. by its Presiding Officer, Chandravihar Building, 4th floor, MJ Road, Hyderabad and 2 others. ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.AK.Jayaprakash Rao !Counsel for the respondents: --- : ?Cases referred: Order: The petitioner, who was unsuccessful before the Labour Court, which dismissed ID.No.103 of 1997 by rejecting his claim for reinstatement in the respondent-Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short 'the Corporation'), filed this Writ Petition, feeling aggrieved by the decision of the Labour Court. I have heard Mr.A.K.Jaya Prakash Rao, learned Counsel for the petitioner. No one entered appearance for the respondents. The facts in a nutshell are that the petitioner claimed that he was appointed as NMR on daily wage basis under the control of respondent No.3 in the year 1988 when Bhanswada Depot was under construction; that he has continuously worked right from ...
Kanche Chandraiah @ Kusala Satyanaran Re Vs. Jaissingani Chandan and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-23-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4403 o23. 08.2012 Kanche Chandraiah @ Kusala Satyanaran Reddy Jaissingani Chandan and others Counsel for the Appellant: Sri A.Rajasekhar Reddy Counsel for 3rd Respondent: Smt.M.Bhaskar Lakshmi : : Cases referred: JUDGMENT: Dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation granted in O.P.No.251 of 2000 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-District Judge, at Karimnagar, the claimant has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Facts, in brief, are:- The appellant is the claimant in O.P.No.251 of 2000 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-District Judge, Karimnagar ("the Tribunal", in short). He was Underground Trammer in 6-B Incline of Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Godavarikhani and was earning Rs.5,364/- per month. On 25.01.2009 at about 9 P.M., he was proceeding on a scooter as a pillion rider along with his friend Srinivas from Food Corporation of India Cross Road to his native p...