Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Mappillai Vinayagar Spinning Mills Ltd. and Others Vs. State of P. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
The petitioners are accused in C.C.No.118 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Parchur, Prakasam District. The second respondent lodged a private complaint alleging that the petitioners issued cheques, that the cheques bounced when presented and that the petitioners are guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. The second respondent has been doing business in Cotton. The petitioners have been in the habit of purchasing cotton bales from the second respondent on credit basis. It would appear that the second petitioner on behalf of the first petitioner company issued cheques. 3. It is the case of the second respondent that when cheques bearing Nos.321874 dated 13.11.2006, 321871 dated 10.11.2006, cheque bearing No.321872 dated 18.11.2006 and cheque bearing No.321873 dated 25.11.2006 for Rs.3,00,000/- each and cheque bearing No.321875 dated 03.12.2006 for Rs.2,38,000/- were presented ...
Saligrama Tirunarayanacharyulu and Other Vs. the Executive Officer, Ti ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.7945 OF 200.30.08.2012 Saligrama Tirunarayanacharyulu and others The Executive Officer, TirumalaTirupathi Devasthanam, Tirupathi, Chittoor District and others Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V.Surendra Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1: Learned Standing Counsel for TTD Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Learned Government Pleader for Endowments : ?Citations: ORDER: Sri Pattabhi Ramaswamy Temple at Vayalapad, Chittoor District (for short, 'the Temple'), was brought under the purview of Tirumala Tirupathi Devastanam (for short, 'the Devasthanam') through the orders issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.704, Revenue (Endts-III), dated 22.08.1996. The petitioners herein were working as employees of the Temple by the time it was brought under the purview of the Devasthanam. As regards emoluments to be paid to them, there was some uncertainty, and repeated representations were being made. The grievance of the petitioners is that though m...
R. Srinivasa Reddy Vs. the Hon'ble Labour Court-ii, Hyderabad a
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.19371 o30. 08-2012 R. Srinivasa Reddy The Hon'ble Labour Court-II, Hyderabad and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. G. Ravi Mohan Counsel for respondent No.1 : None appeared ^Counsel for respondent No.2 : Mr. C.R. Sridharan ?CASES REFERRED:1. (2005) 3 SCC 19.2) (2005) SCC (L & S3. 1992) 4 SCC 71.4) 1997) 11 SCC 23.5) 2006 (2) SCC 58.6) 2007(5) ALT 62.(DB) 7) (2006) 1 SCC 43.The Court made the following : Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to quash award dated 21.05.2001 in I.D.No.14 of 1998 on the file of the Labour Court-II, Hyderabad, respondent No.1 herein. The petitioner was an employee of respondent No.2. In the year 1978, he was appointed as Operator. He was served with a charge sheet dated 06.02.1996 wherein he was charged as under: "It has been reported against you that on 6th February, 1996 in 'A' shift around 06-45 a.m. you have not followed the orders of your superior, use...
Chunduri Srinivasa Rao and ors Vs. Akasapu Nageswara Rao and anr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos. 9431; 9227 o30. 08-2012 Chunduri Srinivasa Rao and Ors Akasapu Nageswara Rao and Anr Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Purnachandra Reddy Smt.D.Sangeetha Reddy Counsel for the respondents: Sri D.Ramalingaswamy Addl.Public Prosecutor : : ?CITATIONS:2010. (2) ALD (Criminal) 963 (AP) COMMON ORDER : Criminal Petition No. 9431 of 2009 is filed by A-1 to A-4, whereas Criminal Petition No. 9227 of 2009 is filed by the defacto complainant in PRC.No. 37 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari district.2. Heard Sri Purnachandra Reddy representing Smt.D.Sangeetha Reddy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners-A1 to A4 in Crl.P.No. 9431 of 2009, Sri D. Ramalingaswamy, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner - defacto complainant in Criminal Petition No. 9227 of 2009 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.3. The short facts ...
Smt. Srugavarapu Rajyalakshmi Vs. Employees Provident Fund Organisatio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.20042 o30. 08-2012 Smt. Srugavarapu Rajyalakshmi Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Sub-Regional Office, Visakhapatnam and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the petitioner : Mr. Mohd. Islamuddin Ansari, for Mr. Rama Rao Ghanta Counsel for respondent No.1 : Mr. R.N. Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2 : None appeared CASES REFERRED:1. 1996 LAB. I. C....
Sri Mappillai Vinayagar Spinning Mills L Vs. State of P.A., Rep., by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.10479 o30. 08.2012 Sri Mappillai Vinayagar Spinning Mills Ltd., and 4 others State of P.A., rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., and another !Counsel for the Petitioenrs: Sri B. Srinivas Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Additional Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri K. Subba Rao : : ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioners are accused in C.C.No.118 of 2007 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Parchur, Prakasam District. The second respondent lodged a private complaint alleging that the petitioners issued cheques, that the cheques bounced when presented and that the petitioners are guilty of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act').2. The second respondent has been doing business in Cotton. The petitioners have been in the habit of purchasing cotton bales from the second respondent on credit basis. It would appear that the seco...
Padam Satyanarayana Vs. Smt. Ravula Varalakshmi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
The defendant in O.S.No.14 of 1994 on the file of the court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur is the appellant herein. 02. The suit was one filed for specific performance of contract of sale contending inter alia that the defendant has entered into an agreement of sale on 17-12-1993 and first plaintiff paid an advance of Rs.1,15,000/- and the balance of Rs.10,000/- is agreed to be paid by 17-03-1994. In case of default, interest shall be paid @ 18%. After the said transaction, as there was an offer for higher price, the defendant has issued a notice on 18-12-1993 with false allegations for which a proper reply was given. Consequently, the suit was filed for specific performance. 03. The defendant has denied the sale transaction and claimed that the son-in-law of the first plaintiff took the defendant to the house of the first plaintiff on 17-12-1993 and asked the defendant to sign on blank stamped papers and due to fear and threat, he signed on the said papers. During the pendency of the s...
B. Baig Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
This Writ Petition is instituted by a former driver of Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the proceedings, dated 14.07.2006 issued by the Depot Manager, Banswada advising him to pay the amount of Rs.1,96,349.40 Ps. towards HBA (House Building Advance) and interest thereon as illegal. The petitioner has filed W.P.M.P.No. 29857 of 2012 for hearing the Writ Petition on out of turn basis. Hence, the Writ Petition is heard with the consent of the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. Sri V. Narasimha Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner would urge that when the writ petitioner was in service, he availed the facility of house building advance in the year 1989. He was granted as loan a sum of Rs.99,220/- by the Regional Manager of APSRTC at Karimnagar on 24.11.1989. The amount thus advanced on behalf of the Corporation is to be recovered in 192 installments, at the rate of Rs.8...
Sri V. Baig Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 15998 o29. 08.2012 Sri V. Baig Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad & others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri V. Narasimha Goud Counsel for the respondents: Smt. B.G. Uma Devi HEAD NOTE: Cases referred ORDER : This Writ Petition is instituted by a former driver of Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (APSRTC) seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the proceedings, dated 14.07.2006 issued by the Depot Manager, Banswada advising him to pay the amount of Rs.1,96,349.40 Ps. towards HBA (House Building Advance) and interest thereon as illegal. The petitioner has filed W.P.M.P.No. 29857 of 2012 for hearing the Writ Petition on out of turn basis. Hence, the Writ Petition is heard with the consent of the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation. Sri V. Narasimha Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner would urge that when the writ petitioner was in servic...
Padam Satyanarayana Vs. Smt.Ravula Varalakshmi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-29-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.244 OF 201.29-08-2012 Padam Satyanarayana Smt.Ravula Varalakshmi and others Counsel for the Appellant : Sri K.Chidambaram Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana : : Cases referred:1. 1997-LAWS (PAT)-3-52 2. AIR 200.SC (SUPP3. 1984 (1) An.W.R.336 JUDGMENT:- The defendant in O.S.No.14 of 1994 on the file of the court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur is the appellant herein. 02. The suit was one filed for specific performance of contract of sale contending inter alia that the defendant has entered into an agreement of sale on 17-12-1993 and first plaintiff paid an advance of Rs.1,15,000/- and the balance of Rs.10,000/- is agreed to be paid by 17-03-1994. In case of default, interest shall be paid @ 18%. After the said transaction, as there was an offer for higher price, the defendant has issued a notice on 18-12-1993 with false allegations for which a proper reply was given. Consequently, the suit was filed ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »