Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Qureshi Internationl, Rep. by Its Managing Partner, Yousuf Mujahid ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ Mandamus or any other Writ, Order or direction declaring the actions of the 01th to 12th respondents herein are illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and unconstitutional, more particularly the actions of the 6’ respondent District Collector, Medak Dist., AP is illegal and unconstitutional in demolition of the compound wall of the petitioners industry on the 30th July, 2012 without any prior notice, in respect of the petitioners industrial unit situated in Survey No.25, in and around the extent of Acres 9-33 Gunts at Raipally Thanda, Parvathapur Village, Zahirabad Mandal, Medak Dist., AP., and consequently direct the respondents No.4 to 12 to pay the compensation and costs to the petitioner for causing the illegal demolition of the aforesaid...
The Commissioner Vs. Medachinni Sitaramulu and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
V. Eswaraiah, J. This writ petition is filed by the Commissioner of Gudivada Municipality, Krishna District, assailing the order dated 13.6.2011 in O.A. No. 5463 of 2011 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hydrabad (for short the Tribunal). The Original Application filed by the first respondent is allowed by the Tribunal directing the respondents therein to regularise the services of the applicant/first respondent notionally w.e.f. 25.11.1993 as per G.O.Ms.No. 212 dated 22.4.1994. The writ petitioner is the third respondent in the O.A. 2. This Court while issuing notice before admission by order dated 17.2.2012 granted interim suspension. The first respondent filed a vacate petition in W.V.M.P. No. 1498 of 2012 to vacate the said interim order; however, with the consent of the parties, the writ petition itself is taken up for hearing. 3. Briefly stated the facts are that the first respondent herein was appointed as Part Time Night Watchman by the writ petitioner ...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Veerasaram Bharati Rani @ Baby ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
Aggrieved by the judgment and decree in O.P. No.988 of 1999 dated 19-08-2003 passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Nizamabad, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal allowing the O.P. in part awarded a compensation of Rs.60,000/- to respondent No.1 - claimant as against her claim of Rs.1,00,000/-, the appellant - Oriental Insurance Company Limited preferred this appeal. 2. Appellant herein is the Insurance Company, which is insurer of the autorickshaw belonging to respondent No.2 herein in which respondent No.1 herein - claimant was stated to be travelling at the time of accident in question. 3. As the claimant is a minor, she is being represented by her mother Smt. Veerasaram Rukma @ Kummari Rukma. 4. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed before the Tribunal. 5. The case of the claimant before the Tribunal is as under: (a) On 30-04-1999, while the claimant, wh...
Mohd.Khaja Vs. K. Chandeshwar S/O. K. Sangappa and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
The petitioner in O.P. No.291 of 1999 assailing the impugned order dated 03.04.2003 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum- District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, filed this appeal seeking enhancement since he was awarded only Rs.1,52,500/-, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation, though he claimed a total compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- for the injuries and fractures sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the O.P. 3. The facts, in brief, are that on 26.7.1998, the petitioner - claimant after offering evening prayers 'Namaz' in the Masjid located by the side of the Police Station at Sanga Reddy, was proceeding on State High Way on his motor cycle bearing No.AP 23-6670 at about 7.30 p.m. towards new bus stand. When he reached near T-Junction, respondent No.2 who was driving Maruthi Car bearing No.AP-28-T-5060, came from Gues...
Gundala Yadaiah S/O. Papaiah Vs. 1) S.Shyam Prasad S/O. Sudharshan 2)t ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.4692 o06. 08.2012 Gundala Yadaiah s/o. Papaiah 1) S.Shyam Prasad s/o. Sudharshan 2)The National Insurance Co. Ltd., D.O. II, Somajiguda, Hyderabad, rep. by its Manager Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. K.Rajitha Counsel for Respondent No.2: Ms. S.N.Padmini GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?Cases referred : (2009) 6 SCC 12.JUDGMENT: The claimant seeking enhancement of compensation preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree in O.P. No.315 of 2002 dated 27.8.2003 passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nalgonda, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.59,200/- under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the MV Act') as against the claim of Rs.1,50,000/-.2. The appellant herein is claimant and the respondents are owner of the tempo van bearing not AP 2.- U - 4045 and its insurer respectively on which the claimant was said to be working as a cleaner on a monthly salary of Rs.3,00...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,thro Vs. Veerasaram Bharati Rani @ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.4751 OF 200.06-08-2012 The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,Through its Branch Office, Pratap Reddy Complex,Beside Hotel Mayur, Nizamabad Veerasaram Bharati Rani @ Baby Kummari Rani D/o. Yeeraiah @ Sailu, represented by her Mother, who is guardian and next friend,Smt. V. Rukma @ Kummari Rukma & another Counsel for the appellant:Smt. S.A.V. Ratnam Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri V. Tulasi Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2 : - JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the judgment and decree in O.P. No.988 of 1999 dated 19-08- 2003 passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Nizamabad, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal allowing the O.P. in part awarded a compensation of Rs.60,000/- to respondent No.1 - claimant as against her claim of Rs.1,00,000/-, the appellant - Oriental Insurance Company Limited preferred this appeal.2. Appellant herein is the Insurance Company, which is insurer...
Mohammed ArifuddIn Rahman Vs. the State of A.P., Rep by Public Prosecu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.5661 o06. 08.2012 Mohammed Arifuddin Rahman The State of A.P., rep by Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P., Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Prabhakar Sripada Counsel for the Respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor : : Cases referred:1. (2008) 3 Supreme Court Case2. 2000 CRI.L.J.4325 ORDER: The petitioner/A.3 questions order dated 10.04.2012 passed by the VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1046 of 2012 in Cr.No.268 of 2000 of Malakpet Police Station, Hyderabad. The petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 153-A IPC along with two others. He was arrested on 07.09.2011 by the Investigating Officer and the lower Court granted bail to the petitioner on 21.11.2011 under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Though in the impugned order, the lower Court stated that the passport was not seized in this case, the said observation is not cor...
Mohd.Khaja Vs. 1)k.Chandeshwar S/O. K.Sangappa
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No. 3038 o06. 08-2012 Mohd.Khaja 1)K.Chandeshwar s/o. K.Sangappa 2) K.Chandrakanth s/o.Chandeshwar 3) New India Assurance Company Limited, through its Divisional Manager, D.O.II, Madan Mohan Building, R.P.Road, Secunderabad. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Mohan Vinod & Associates Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri T.Ramulu JUDGMENT: The petitioner in O.P. No.291 of 1999 assailing the impugned order dated 03.04.2003 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum- District Judge, Medak at Sangareddy, filed this appeal seeking enhancement since he was awarded only Rs.1,52,500/-, with interest at 9% per annum from the date of petition till realisation, though he claimed a total compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- for the injuries and fractures sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the O.P.3. The facts, in brief, are that on 26.7.1998, the petit...
The Commissioner, Gudivada Municipality, Vs. Medachinni Sitaramulu and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.30408 o06. 08-2012 The Commissioner, Gudivada Municipality, Gudivada. Medachinni Sitaramulu and others. Counsel for the petitioner : Sri S. Nageswara Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri B. Kamalakar Rao Counsel for Respondent No.2 : G.P. for Services-I. Gist: Head Note: Cases referred:1. (2009) 8 SCC 48.2. (2009) 8 SCC 43.JUDGMENT : (Per Sri Justice V Eswaraiah) This writ petition is filed by the Commissioner of Gudivada Municipality, Krishna District, assailing the order dated 13.6.2011 in O.A. No. 5463 of 2011 on the file of the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hydrabad (for short the Tribunal). The Original Application filed by the first respondent is allowed by the Tribunal directing the respondents therein to regularise the services of the applicant/first respondent notionally w.e.f. 25.11.1993 as per G.O.Ms.No. 212 dated 22.4.1994. The writ petitioner is the third respondent in the O....
M/S Qureshi Internationl, Rep. by Its Ma Vs. the Director of Factories ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-06-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25219 o06. 08.2012 M/s Qureshi Internationl, rep. by its Managing Partner, Yousuf Mujahid. The Director of Factories,A.P., Hyderabad, and others Counsel for petitioner: Sri L.V. Uma Maheshwar Rao Counsel for Respondents : G.P. for Industries, for RRs 1 to 3 Sri P. Raghavender Reddy, for RRs 4 & 5 G.P for Revenue for RRs 6 to 9 G.P. for Home for RRs 10 & 11 Sri O. Manohar Reddy, for R12 HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner is partnership firm, involved in the activity of export and import. It feels aggrieved by the steps taken by the authorities of the Revenue Department in demolishing the foundation laid for compound wall around Ac.9.33 guntas of land in Sy.No.25 of Raipalli Tanda, Parvatapur Village, Zaheerabad Mandal, Medak District. The petitioner submits that it acquired Ac.9.33 guntas of land in Raipalli Tanda, and made applications to various authorities, seeking permission for establishment of a factor...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »