Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments

M/S. Venkata Narayana Filling Station, a Partnership Firm, Krishna Dis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD56

(Prayers: Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records in proceedings Rc.No. B2/250/2011 dt. 23.1.2012 issued by the 4th respondent and quash and set aside the same as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India as well as the A.P. Petroleum Products (Licensing and Regulation of Supplies) Order, 1980, and consequently, direct the 4th respondent to renew Form-B License in favour of the petitioner to carry on business WPMP NO. 2981 OF 2012: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the Circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to restore supplies of petroleum products to the petitioner so as to enable the petitioner t...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. C.Ramulu and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CMA NO. 229 OF 200.07.08.2012 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. C.Ramulu and another Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri T.Mahender Rao Counsel for respondents 1 : Sri S.Surender Reddy HEAD NOTE: Cases referred:1. (2001) 5 SCC172004. 5) ALT 1.S2007. LAWS(SC)-4-2011. ACJ 72.5 1(2012) ACC 52.(SC2004. ACJ 128.JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited challenging the order dated 07.08.2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum- District Judge, Adilabad in O.P.No.121 of 1999.2. I have heard Sri T.Mahender Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/claimant.3. On 04.07.1998 at about 06.00 AM while the first respondent/petitioner was driving the lorry bearing not AHK 949.from Hyderabad to Siddipet, he lost control over the vehicle, as a result, the said vehicle turned turtle. The first respondent, who received fractures to both legs wa...

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Duggi Ramanamma and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO C.M.A.No.1226 o07. 08.2012 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Duggi Ramanamma and others Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Kota Subba Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri A.V.S.Satishbabu HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 1994) 4 SCC 20.JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited challenging the order dated 11.09.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-II Additional District Judge, Nellore in O.P.No.120 of 1997.2. I have heard Sri Kota Subba Rao, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri A.V.S.Satishbabu, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1/claimant.3. The first respondent/claimant filed a claim case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation of Rs.1,25,000/- on account of the death of his father in a motor vehicle accident occurred on 13.04.1996 at Vaddipalem, Arundhatiyawada, Nellore District due to involvement of Suvega Moped bearing No. ATN 4202.4. The learned Tribuna...

M/S.Sri Venkata Narayana Filling Station Vs. 1.Indian Oil Corporation ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.2401 o07. 08-2012 M/s.Sri Venkata Narayana Filling Station, A partnership firm,Krishna District, rep. byits Partner I.Jaya Hari Rao. 1.Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.,Rep.by its Managing Director, Mumbai and 4 others ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Venugopal !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr.Deepak Bhattacharjee Counsel for respondent Nos.3 & 4: AGP for Civil Supplies Counsel for respondent No.5: Mrs.K.Hemalatha Gist: Head Note: Cases referred: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to quash the proceeding in Rc.B2/250/2011, dated 23-01-2012, of respondent No.4, whereby he has rejected the petitioner's application for renewal of its Form-B license to run the petroleum retail outlet. The petitioner is a partnership firm, of which one of the brothers of respondent No.5 viz., Dannapaneni Venu Gopala Murahari Rao is a partner. The father of the said Venu Gopala Murahari Rao and respondent No.5, during hi...

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Gaddam Swami Reddy and Ano ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO M.A.C.M.A.No.496 o07. 08.2012 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd. Rep. by its Branch Manager,Hyderabad Gaddam Swami Reddy and another Counsel for appellant: Sri T.Mahender Rao Counsel for first respondent: Sri Mahboob Hussain ^Counsel for 2nd respondent: None appeared. HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 2007-LAWS(SC)-4-7 2. 2011 ACJ 72.3. 1(2012) ACC 52.(SC) 4. 2004 ACJ 128.JUDGMENT: This appeal is filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited against the order dated 13-12-2010 passed in M.V.O.P.No.184 of 2006 by the IV-Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court),Karimnagar. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-Insurance Company and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent/claimant. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 19.12.2003 while the petitioner was returning from Godishalapeta village from Karimnagar driving the car bearing No. AP-15-N-6463 dashed a tree on the road side on the outski...

Dharma Teja and Another Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.2176 o07. 08.2012 Dharma Teja and another The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Division, at Attapur, Ranga Reddy District, and others Counsel for petitioners: Sri P. Govind Reddy Counsel for Respondents : G.P for Revenue Sri A. Pulla Reddy for R-3 GIST: HEAD NOTE: Cases referred AIR 200.A.P. 15 (F.B) ORDER: The petitioners purchased an extent of Ac.1.02 guntas of land in Sy.No.2/A of Nanakramguda Village, through a sale deed dated 07-11-2002 executed by, as many as 33 individuals, who are said to be the legal descendants of the original owner of the land. The names of the petitioners were entered in the revenue records, and it is stated that the petitioners are in possession and enjoyment of the property. The vendors 1 and 2, by name, P. Ravi Singh and P. Rajesh Singh are said to have entered into an agreement of sale with one, Sri R. Jairam Singh, the 3rd respondent herein, for sale of the said property on 13-06-2002. On ...

Bhimavarapu Giridhar Kumar Reddy Vs. the Union Government of India, De ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N. RAVI SHANKAR W.A.No.80 o07. 08.2012 Bhimavarapu Giridhar Kumar Reddy The Union Government of India, Department of Shipping Roads, Transport & Highways, represented by the Secretary, New Delhi and others Counsel for the Appellant: Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy for M/s.T. Sreedhar Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 : Sri S.S. Varma, S.C for NHAI Counsel for Respondent No.4 : G.P for Land Acquisition : Cases referred:1. ...

Smt.Rahimunnisa Begum Vs. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural Universi

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR WRIT APPEAL No.777 OF 201.07.08.2012 Smt. Rahimunnisa Begum Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Rep. by its Registrar, Rajendra Nagar, Hyderabad., and another Counsel for the petitioner : Sri S.Satyam Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sri T.Durga Reddy SC for ANGRAU ^ Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri Mohd. Adnan (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2006) 6 SCC 39.2 (2007) 11 SCR 50.JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini, J) The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.5628 of 2011 is the appellant herein. The said writ petition was filed questioning the selection and appointment of the 2nd respondent herein as Junior Assistant-cum-Typist in the 1st respondent University against the one post allotted for BC-E (women) category in Southern Telangana Zone, primarily on the ground that the 2nd respondent being a non- local candidate was not eligible for consideration against the said post. The contention advanced on behalf of th...

Gundala Yadaiah S/O. Papaiah Vs. S. Shyam Prasad S/O. Sudharshan and A ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The claimant seeking enhancement of compensation preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree in O.P. No.315 of 2002 dated 27.8.2003 passed by the learned Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Nalgonda, whereby and whereunder the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.59,200/- under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the MV Act’) as against the claim of Rs.1,50,000/-. 2. The appellant herein is claimant and the respondents are owner of the tempo van bearing No.AP 24 - U - 4045 and its insurer respectively on which the claimant was said to be working as a cleaner on a monthly salary of Rs.3,000/-. 3. The parties are referred to as they are arrayed before the Tribunal. 4. The case of the claimant is that on 23-01-2002 in the evening, while the tempo van, in which he was present as cleaner, transporting some load from Hyderabad to Nagarjunasagar, on the way at about 10.30 p.m. in the outskirts of Kurmeda village, the driver of...

Mohammed ArifuddIn Rahman Vs. the State of A.P., Rep by Public Prosecu ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Petition under Section 482 of Crl.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to quash the order in Crl.M.P.No.1046 of 2012 in Crime No.268 of 2000 passed by the VII Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad dt.10.4.2012.) The petitioner/A.3 questions order dated 10.04.2012 passed by the VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P.No.1046 of 2012 in Cr.No.268 of 2000 of Malakpet Police Station, Hyderabad. The petitioner is accused of offences punishable under Section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and Section 153-A IPC along with two others. He was arrested on 07.09.2011 by the Investigating Officer and the lower Court granted bail to the petitioner on 21.11.2011 under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. Though in the impugned order, the lower Court stated that the passport was not seized in this case, the said observation is not correct factually. The remand case dairy dated 07.09.2011 reads ...