Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments

Md.Mazhar Pasha, S/O.Sadath Ali, Vs. the State of A.P., and Another.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.8189 o13. 08-2012 Md.Mazhar Pasha, S/o.Sadath Ali, The State of A.P., and another. Counsel for The Petitioner: Mr. Nazir Ahmed Khan Counsel For Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor Counsel For Respondent No.2: M.Kalyana Ramakrishna : ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in Cr.No.306 of 2009, dated 23-09-2009 on the file of the Abid Road Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. 2. The petitioner herein is the accused and the 2nd respondent herein is the defacto-complainant in the Calender Case. For convenience, I refer them accordingly henceforth. 3. The defacto-complainant filed private complaint in the court of 2nd additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, against the accused with a request to refer the matter under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. for necessary investigation and report to the Police Station...

R. Siva Ramakrishna Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.1.23 cents of land, comprising different sub-divisions of Survey No.20 of Koppaka Village, Anakapalli Mandal, Visakhapatnam District through a sale deed, dated 28.03.2007, from Smt.Kandregula Kanayamma, respondent No.7 herein, and her children. It is stated that Ac.0.60 cents of that land was purchased by Kanayamma through sale deeds of the years 1968 and 1972 with her stridhana property, and the balance of Ac.0.63 cents, which was purchased by her husband, Sri K.Pothuraju, has devolved upon her and her children on the death of Pothuraju. The petitioner was issued pattadar pass book and title deed and his name was also entered in the revenue records. Sri Sakala Venkata Ramana, respondent No.6 herein, raised a plea that the land in question was attached by the Government for recovery of arrears, the same was brought to sale on 10.03.2000, that he emerged as the highest bidder therein, and that the same was confirmed in his favour. On noticing thi...

The Hyderabd Public School Society, Rep., by Its President and Others ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD80

(Prayer:  Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order, dated 28-09-2011 in WP: 20141 of 2008 on the file of the High Court.) G. Rohini, J. By order dated 28.9.2011 the learned Single Judge while allowing W.P.No.20141 of 2008 set aside the impugned order of termination of the services of the writ petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the Hyderabad Public School Society and two others, who are the respondents in the writ petition, filed this appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in the writ petition. In pursuance of a notification issued by the Hyderabad Public School Society inviting applications for filling up the vacancies in various posts, including the post of Vice-Principal - Administration for Hyderabad Public School, Begumpet, the writ petitioner (the respondent herein) had applied and he was selected and appointed by proceedings dated 17.06.2005. As per the appointment order, the petitione...

The Hyderabd Public School Society,rep., Vs. M.David Sam Roy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR WRIT APPEAL No.1409 OF 201.08.08.2012 The Hyderabd Public School Society,Rep.,by its President,Hyderabd and 2 others. M.David Sam Roy Counsel for the petitioner:Sri J.Sudheer Counsel for respondents: Sri Rajendaran Cases cited:1. AIR 196.SC 121.1 AIR 197.SC 219.1 AIR 198.SC 184.1 AIR 198.SC 28.1 AIR 198.SC 129.1 1 (2010) 8 SCC 15.JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini, J) By order dated 28.9.2011 the learned Single Judge while allowing W.P.No.20141 of 2008 set aside the impugned order of termination of the services of the writ petitioner. Aggrieved by the same, the Hyderabad Public School Society and two others, who are the respondents in the writ petition, filed this appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties shall hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in the writ petition. In pursuance of a notification issued by the Hyderabad Public School Society inviting applications for filling up the vacancies in variou...

M.P.Suresh Vs. State of Ap., Rep., by Inspector of Poli

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRLA NOS.1034; 1036 and 1087 OF 200.08.08.2012 Crl.A.No.1034 of 2005 M.P.Suresh Crl.A.No.1036 of 2005 V.Rama Mohan Rao Crl.A.No. 1087 of 2005 S.Raja State of AP., rep., by Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Buro,City Range, Hyderabad Counsel for the Appellants: Sri B.Vijaysen Reddy, Sri G.Ravi Mohan Counsel for the respondents: Sri R.Rama Chandra Reddy : ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 197.SC 140.2.1994 Jab LJ 24.3.(2011) 12 SCC 29.4.AIR 200.SC 48.5.(2006) 12 SCC 27.CRL.A.Nos.1034, 1036 & 1087 of 2005 COMMON JUDGMENT Heard Sri C.Padmanabha Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for A1 in Crl.A.No.1036 of 2005, Sri B.Vijaysen Reddy, learned counsel appearing for A2 in Crl.A.No.1034 of 2005, and Sri G.Ravi Mohan, learned counsel appearing for A3 in Crl.A.No.1087 of 2005 and Sri R.Rama Chandra Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for ACB appearing for respondent-State.2. Since all these appeals arise out of the judgment dated 24.6.2005 passed in C.C.No.1 of 1995 b...

The Superintending Engineer and Others Vs. Sree Ramulu and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order The subject-matter of this batch of writ petitions is similar. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. The petitioners are Superintending Engineer and Executive Engineer, respectively, of Public Works Department, working in the Priyadarshini Jurala Project, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District. The 1st respondent, in each of the wit petitions ((for short ‘the workmen), raised Industrial Disputes, under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’), before the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad. It was pleaded that they have been engaged as Man Mazdoor, on 26-03-1988, 26-02-1988 and 26-07-1988, respectively, on wages of Rs.14/- per day, and thereafter, the wages were increased to Rs.16.10 ps. It was also pleaded that they approached this Court complaining that their services have been terminated with effect from 28-06-1989, without following the procedure prescribed by law, though they have completed 240 days of continuous service...

A. Subbarami Reddy and Another Vs. G. Jayapal Reddy

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALT594; 2012(6)ALD30

(Prayer: Letter Patent Appeal under clause Under Clause 15 of Letter Patent against the order Dated 22-02-2012 in CC: 1807 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the High Court.) G. Rohini, J. This appeal is filed under Clause-15 of Letters Patent aggrieved by the order dated 22.02.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in Contempt Case No.1807 of 2011. We have heard Sri V. Venugopal Rao, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as Sri A. Chandraiah Naidu, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. As could be seen from the material available on record, the respondent herein, who was working as a Senior Mechanic in Sri Kalahasteeswara Institute of Technology, Sri Kalahasti, filed W.P.No.20987 of 2007 aggrieved by termination of his services by proceedings dated 9.9.2007. After hearing both the parties, the learned Single Judge by order dated 2.9.2010 while setting aside the impugned proceedings disposed of the writ petition directing reinstatement of the writ peti...

Dharma Teja @ Teja and Another Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD174

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in Appeal No.C/3420/2011 dt.17.12.2011 and the order passed by the 2nd respondent in Proc.No.B/545/2008 dt.18.07.2011 and quash the same.) WPMP No.2715 of 2012: (Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to make any construction or change the physical features of the land situated in Sy.No.2/ A and Sy.No.3 admeasuring Ac.1.02 guntas of Nanakramguda Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.) WPMP No.2716 of 2012: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleas...

Smt. Rahimunnisa Begum Vs. Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer:  Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Judgement dated 20-06-2011 in WP. No. 5628 of 2011 on the file of the High Court.) G. Rohini, J. The unsuccessful petitioner in W.P.No.5628 of 2011 is the appellant herein. The said writ petition was filed questioning the selection and appointment of the 2nd respondent herein as Junior Assistant-cum-Typist in the 1st respondent University against the one post allotted for BC-E (women) category in Southern Telangana Zone, primarily on the ground that the 2nd respondent being a non-local candidate was not eligible for consideration against the said post. The contention advanced on behalf of the writ petitioner that as per Para-7 of A.P. Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Presidential Order’), the respondent No.2 is a non-local candidate in relation to the local area covered by Southern Telangana Zone (Zone...

Bhimavarapu Giridhar Kumar Reddy Vs. the Union Government of India, De ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD58

(Prayer: Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Judgement/Order, dated 24-11-2011 in WP: 11324 of 2010 on the file of the High Court.) Goda Raghuram, J. The unsuccessful writ petitioner is the appellant. The writ petition seeking a declaration that the public notice dated 26-04-2010 issued by the 1st respondent under Section 3 - G of the National Highways Act, 1956 (the '1956 Act') is arbitrary and illegal was rejected by the judgment dated 24-11-2011. Hence this appeal. To the extent relevant and material the case of the appellant (the petitioner) as pleaded in the writ petition, may be noticed in brief: (a) The petitioner owns an agricultural land of an extent of Ac.6-15 cents in R.S.No.40 of Konthanapadu Village, Kunkipadu Mandal of Krishna District, situate to the West of National Highway No.9, leading from Machilipatnam to Vijayawada; (b) In August, 2007, without initiating acquisition proceedings the staff of the respondents trespassed into the petitioner's...