Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Venu Bende Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Prosecutor, High C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner-sole accused in C.C.No.95 of 2008 on the file of XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The brief facts of the case are that earlier to the present case which is sought to be quashed, the second respondent filed C.C.No.6 of 2002 on the file of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad against the petitioner alleging that the cheque issued by the petitioner for an amount of Rs.5 lakhs in satisfaction of the legally enforceable debt was bounced. When the said case was pending, the petitioner and the second respondent/complainant entered into an agreement wherein it was agreed upon between them that the petitioner-accused had to pay the second respondent/complainant an amount of Rs.1,75,000/- on or before 25.03.2004 and after receipt of the same, the second respondent had to withdraw the criminal ca...
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its Chief Secretary a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to grant an order, direction or writ more so in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the judgment dated 19.6.2012 in O.A.No.678 of 2011 on the file of Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, as being violative of the Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 2007 as amended by the Indian Police Service (Pay) Amendment Rules, 2008 and not in accordance with law and being violative of the Principles of Federalism enshrined in the Constitution of India and in the circumstances of the case. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directions more particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ and quash the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.678 of 2011 dated 19-6-2012 in ...
M/S.Hastalloy India Limited and Another Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
(ITTA.No.22 of 2000: Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act-1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad in IT.(SS).A.No.48/Vizag/97 for Assessment year, dt.21.09.1999 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam, dt.27.11.1997 in PNN/GIR.No.H-7). (ITTA.No.24 of 2000: Income Tax Tribunal Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act-1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench ‘B’, Hyderabad in IT(SS).A.No.48/Vizag/97 for dt.21.09.1999 preferred against the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam, dt.27.11.1997 in PNN/GIR.No.H-7). (Common Judgment: (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.) ITTA No.22 of 2000 filed by the assessee M/s.Hastalloy India Limited and ITTA No.24 of 2000 filed by the Revenue are appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging th...
Smt. D. Vasheeda W/O. Dudekula Bau and Others Vs. Smt. V. Babakka W/O. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
Dis-satisfied with the quantum of compensation granted in O.P.No.265 of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Anantapur, (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), the claimants 1 to 3 have filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 2. Facts in brief are: The appellants 1 to 3 herein are the claimants 1 to 3 in O.P.No.265 of 1998. They are widow and children of Dudekula Babu. On 02.12.1997 at about 12.15 P.M., Dudekula Babu, his brother-in-law PW.2 Chand Basha and one Rajagopal were going on a motorcycle and on reaching Melapuram Praja Parishad Crossing, Hindupur, a lorry bearing No. APA 5805 came in high speed and dashed the motorcycle from behind. As a result, Dudekula Babu received head injury. He was admitted in Hindupur Government Hospital for treatment, where he succumbed to the injuries at about 1.55 P.M. on that day. According to the appellants/claimants, the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the ...
Venu Bende Vs. the State of A.P. Rep. by Its Public Pro
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Criminal Petition No.9557 o16. 08.2012 Venu Bende The State of A.P. rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another Counsel for the petitioner : Sri H.Sudhakar Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor ^Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri R.N.Hemendranath Reddy HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings against the petitioner-sole accused in C.C.No.95 of 2008 on the file of XX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. 3. The brief facts of the case are that earlier to the present case which is sought to be quashed, the second respondent filed C.C.No.6 of 2002 on the file of the VI Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad against the petitioner alleging that the cheque issued by the petitioner for an amount of Rs.5 lakhs in satisfaction of the legally enforceable debt was bounced...
M/S.Hastalloy India Limited, Visakhapatn Vs. the Deputy Commissioner o ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO I.T.T.A.NO.22 OF 200.16.08.2012 M/s.Hastalloy India Limited, Visakhapatnam. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam. I.T.T.A.NO.24 OF 200.16.08.2012 The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Special Range-I, Visakhapatnam. M/s.Hastalloy India Limited, Visakhapatnam HEAD NOTE: Senior Counsel for the assessee (appellant in ITTA No.22 of 2000 and respondent in ITTA No.24 of 2000):Sri C.Kodandaram Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue(respondent in ITTA No.22 of 2000 and appellant in ITTA No.24 of 2000): Sri S.R.Ashok. Cases referred 1.2000 (6) S.C.C2. (1986 Supp. S.C.C. 110 = Volume 159 ITR page 78) 3 AIR 200.SC 142.4 2011 (1) S.C.C5. 1972 (83) I.T.R. page 187 = (1972) 4 S.C.C6. (2001) 3 S.C.C.179 7 (2011) 4 SCC 24.8 AIR 197.S.C. 87=(1973) 2 S.C.C9. AIR 199.S.C. 1984 = (1990) 4 S.C.C 59.10. (2011) 1 SCC 15.para 9 I.T.T.A.Nos.22 and 24 of 2000 COMMON JUDGMENT (per Hon'ble Sri Ju...
Smt.D.Vasheeda W/O.Dudekula Bau and ors. Vs. 1.Smt.V.Babakka W/O.V.Gan ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.4122 o16. 08-2012 Smt.D.Vasheeda W/o.Dudekula Bau & Ors. 1.Smt.V.Babakka W/o.V.Gangappa & Ors. COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: SRI K.MAHESWAR RAO COUNSEL FOR 2ND RESPONDENT:SRI M.JEEVAN REDDY : ?CITATIONS:1. 2004 ACJ 151.2) (2009) 6 SCC 12.JUDGMENT: Dis-satisfied with the quantum of compensation granted in O.P.No.265 of 1998 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Additional District Judge, Anantapur, (for short, 'the Tribunal'), the claimants 1 to 3 have filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. 2. Facts in brief are: The appellants 1 to 3 herein are the claimants 1 to 3 in O.P.No.265 of 1998. They are widow and children of Dudekula Babu. On 02.12.1997 at about 12.15 P.M., Dudekula Babu, his brother-in-law PW.2 Chand Basha and one Rajagopal were going on a motorcycle and on reaching Melapuram Praja Parishad Crossing, Hindupur, a lorry bearing No. APA 580.came in high speed and dashed the motorcycle f...
Pallapu Raju @ Pedda Raju Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Pub ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2012
(Criminal Appeal under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 16-06-2008 in S.C.No.355 of 2007 on the file of the Court of the Sessions Judge Ongole, Prakasam District.) P. Durga Prasad, J. This appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.355 of 2007 by the Sessions Judge, Prakasam District at Ongole on 16.06.2008.The appellant is the sole accused and he was prosecuted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”).According to the prosecution, the accused married the deceased Pallapu Venkata Ramana about five years back and they blessed with a male child and two female children and the accused is a mason by profession. Prior to the incident, both the accused and the deceased went to Godavarikhani near Ramagundam on masonry works and during their stay the accused used to suspect the character of the deceased and used to beat her now and then. Prior to three months of the incident, the dec...
R. Manohar Babu Vs. Nizamand#8217;s Institute of Medical Sciences Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2012
The petitioner was appointed to the judicial ministerial service as an Examiner by order dated 10.06.1987 of the District Judge, Krishna District. He was posted at Vijayawada. As his wife was working in the Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences (for brevity, ‘the NIMS’), Hyderabad, he was interested in seeking appointment in the same organization. He submitted an application through the District Judge, Krishna, to the Director of the NIMS to consider his case for being appointed as a Senior Assistant. He was accordingly called for an interview to assess his suitability for the post of a Legal Assistant on 11.11.1989. He was appointed as a Legal Assistant by proceedings dated 11.11.1989 of the NIMS in the pay-scale of Rs.910-1625. The petitioner was thereupon relieved from the post of Examiner at Vijayawada, and reported for duty as a Legal Assistant at the NIMS on 18.11.1989. He was placed on the higher scale of Rs.1100-2050 with effect from 01.03.1990. The NIMS issue...
Yelamanchili Chinnmai Sai Kiran @ Siva Kimar Vs. Syed Athwar Rahaman a ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-14-2012
(Prayers: Petition Under Section 482 of the Crl.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Petition/Affidavit/Memorandum of grounds filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 16 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Special Court for Land Grabbing Act-at L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition/Affidavit/Memorandum of grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri.Ravi Kumar Tolety, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Addl. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 and the Respondent No.1 not appearing in person or by Advocate.) 1. The petitioner/A.1 is accused of offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 IPC and Section 5 of the Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982. The 1st respondent is Deputy General Manager (H.R.), HMT Machine Tool Limited, Praga Division, Balanagar, Cyberabad. He gave report in his official capacity to the poli...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »