Andhra Pradesh Court August 2012 Judgments

K.Raja Rao S/O Nagabhushanam Vs. A.P.industrial Development Corporatio ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Writ Petition No.6842 o21. 08.2012 K.Raja Rao S/o Nagabhushanam A.P.Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. Counsel for Petitioner: Sri M.P.Chandramouli Counsel for 1st Respondent : Sri S.Sreenivas Reddy : : Cases referred: AIR 197.SC 10.AIR 197.AP 16.ORDER: This writ petition has been taken out by K.Raja Rao seeking a mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in initiating proceedings, dated 06.01.2000, under Revenue Recovery Act without deciding the liability of him as arbitrary, illegal and without jurisdiction.2. Facts in brief are: M/s.Rama Organics Private Limited availed term loan of Rs.56.80 Lakhs and seed capital of Rs.12.45 lakhs from the Andhra Pradesh Industrial Development Corporation Limited-1st respondent. The assets of the company such as land, buildings, plant and machinery came to be mortgaged in favour of the 1st respondent-Corporation as a security for the loan availed by it. Apart from offering the fixed assets of ...

Mohd.AliuddIn Vs. Director General of Civil Aviation and O

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR W.P.NO. 4421 OF 201.21.8.2012 Mohd. Aliuddin Director General of Civil Aviation and others Counsel for petitioner: Mr. S. Sridhar Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Ponnam Ashok Goud, Asst. Solicitor General of India, Mr. E. Madan Mohan Rao, Mr. B. Vijayasen Reddy Mr. P. Keshava Rao, Spl. C for CBI HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) (2005) 1 SCC 59.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Pinaki Chandra Ghose, ACJ) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging that the proceedings of approval/renewals granted by 1st respondent vide A.V.22011/5/95- FG (pt.2) dated 18.11.2010 AMO approval validity Ref.Q3/FAA/AMO-03 dated 31.7.2010, Q-3/FAA/568-69, CAR 14.maintenance approval Ref.1194/95-AI(2) and approval in CAR section 2 Airworthiness E Part VII Cat "G" in favour of 3rd respondent are arbitrary, illegal and in violation of the Aircraft Act 1934/Aircraft Rules 1937 and against the i...

Nimmaka Jaya Raju Vs. Janardhana That Raj Veera Vara Thodarama

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Election Petition No.10 o21. 08/2012 Nimmaka Jaya Raju Janardhana That Raj Veera Vara Thodaramala and others COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Sri Bojja Tarakam & Sri V. Raja Manohar COUNSEL FOR 1ST RESPONDENT: Sri D. Prakash Reddy & Sri P. Kesavarao ^COUNSEL FOR 2 TO 6 RESPONDENTS: -- ^COUNSEL FOR 7TH RESPONDENT: -- (Deleted from array of parties) Gist : CITATIONS:1. (1995) 4 SCC 3.2. AIR 195.SC 42.3. AIR 195.SC 13.4. (2008) 2 SCC 18.5. (1982) 2 SCC 20.6. AIR 198.AP 18.7. AIR 198.SC 179.8. (2006) 5 SCC 58.9. AIR 197.Karnatak10. A.I.R. 1927 Calcutt11. AIR 200.SC 223.12.(2003) 8 SCC 20.13.AIR 196.SC 141.14.AIR 197.SC 62.15.(1994) 6 SCC 24.16.(1997) 2 SCC 57.17.AIR 199.SC 119.18.AIR 199.SC 118.19.(1996) 4 SCC 43.20.AIR 196.SC 59.21.AIR 196.SC 126.22.AIR 196.SC 155.23.(1980) 3 SCC 16.24.1984 (Supp.) SCC 7.25.AIR 200.SC 39.26.(1996) 3 SCC 58.27.(1996) 3 SCC 57.28.(2008) 9 SCC 5.29.AIR 195.SC 131.30.2004(4) ALT 1.31.2005 AIR SCW 619.32.2006 (5) ALT 2...

A. Kreethi and Another Vs. Janachaitanya Housing Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The respondent started venture under the name and style of Sai Aditya and Sai surya at Guntur. The first appellant joined the scheme, Sai Aditya in the year 1998 and plot no.928 in MIG II to the extent of 200 sq.yards was allotted to her. The first appellant paid the consideration of `61,000/- in installments from 17.05.1998 till 4.01.2004. The first appellant paid entire sale consideration except incidental charges such as development charges, registration charges etc. The respondent-company issued passbook bearing number 548 in favour of the respondent. 2. The second appellant joined the scheme, Sai Surya in the year 1998 and plot no.637 in MIG II to the extent of 200 sq.yards was allotted to her. The second respondent paid the consideration of `1,07,800/- in installments from 15.05.1998 till 2.02.2004. The second respondent paid entire sale consideration except incidental charges such as development charges, registrati...

Andhra Bank, Represented by Its Manager, Akkayyapalem Branch, Visakhap ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per Sri R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The appellant is the appellant. 2. The case of the respondent as seen from the complaint is that the1st respondent the wife, respondents 2 and 3 are the minor daughters of late Ravi Kumar, a resident of Visakhapatnam. During his life time, Ravi Kumar was allotted a house under Rajiv Gruha Kalpa Scheme for which the Appellant Bank, sanctioned loan bearing account No.HLPS/01/20050062. Simultaneously an S.B. account bearing No.ABJ/1/00000973 was also opened by Ravi Kumar, under which his Sister Radha Bhai, who is none else than the mother of 1st respondent was shown as nominee. During his life time, monthly premiums towards insurance as well as EMIs for loan were paid by Ravi Kumar regularly. Ravi Kumar died on 29.8.2009 leaving behind the respondents. After the death of her husband, the 1st respondent approached the Bank officials, along with her mother Radha Bai, appraised them of the situation and requested them for set ...

M/S Guptha Computers Rep. by Its Proprietor Jithendra Guptha Court Roa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. It has filed complaint seeking for the refund of cost of inverter and UPS with future interest and compensation as also costs. 2. The appellant, a proprietary concern purchased from the respondent 500 VA inverter and 120 AH Amara Raja Battery for consideration of `9,500/- on 22.06.2009. The respondent offered warranty on the inverter and battery for one year. The appellant purchased 10 Nos of 600 VA computer UPS from the respondent for consideration of `14,040/-. On the next day of its installation i.e., 23.06.2009, the inverter stated to have posed trouble. 3. The appellant informed the respondent about the problem posed by the I 7 Nos of UPS and the respondent for a period of three months did not take any steps for rectification of the defect in the UPS. The appellant got it tested with a mechanic of Suraj Exide,Ananthpur on 16.08.2009. The mechanic issued report that the c...

K.R. Shankar Singh Vs. the Presiding Officer of the Industrial Tribuna ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD781

(Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order, dated 05-06-2012 in WP No.12902 of 2002 on the file of the High Court.) CPK, J. 1. The Writ Appeal is directed against an order dated 05.06.2012 passed in W.P.No.12902 of 2002 wherein the Hon’ble single Judge dismissed the writ petition on the ground of laches. 2. The facts which led to the filing of the present appeal are as follows: The appellant was initially appointed on 11.04.1980 as driver and was attached to Nizamabad depot of APSRTC. Subsequently he was transferred to Adilabad depot. On 21.09.1987, he was booked for duty for 20.30 hours for operating Hyderabad - Adilabad service. It appears that the appellant left the bus at Jubilee Bus Station picket and went away without informing the service conductor or to the point controller. On the basis of the report of the controller, Jubilee bus station, Hyderabad and also on the basis of report of station manager, Central Bus Station, Hyderaba...

Dr. Reddyand#8217;s Laboratories Limited and Others Vs. the Presidindg ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased (a) to call for the records pertaining to the Award dated October 07, 1999 passed by the Respondent No.1. Viz., Presiding Officer, Additional Industrial Tribunal-cum-Additional Labour Court, Hyderabad in I.D.No.173 of 1996, published in accordance with Section 17 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 by Respondent No.3 herein on December 17, 1999 by virtue of G.O.Rt.No.2183 dated November 26, 1999, (b) quash the same, insofar as it directs reinstatement of the Respondent No.2 workman with continuity of service, by the issuance of a Writ, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.) Common order: W.P.No.953 of 2000 is filed by Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, Hyderabad (herein after referred to as “the...

Madhura Krishnarjuna Rao Vs. Collector and District Magistrate, Khamma ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD653

(Prayer: Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstance stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF CERTIORARI calling for entire records connected to order dt. 12.07.2012 in Rc. No. E3/298/2012 passed by 1g respondent, examine the same and set it aside after declaring the same, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without jurisdiction, violative of provisions of Standing Order 15 of Andhra Pradesh Board of Revenue Standing Orders, principles of nature justice and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from landed property of Ac. 5.00 guntas covered by Survey Number 1228 of Aswaraopeta Revenue Village and Mandal, Khammam District ant to pass.) The petitioner is an Ex-serviceman. He was assigned an extent of 5 acres of land in Sy.No.1228 of Aswaraopet Village and Mandal, Khammam District, through proceeding...

M. Abdul Amjad Khan Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(6)ALD85

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 in not accepting the Petitioner’s Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificate No.D/620/2011 dated 02.05.2011 issued by the Tahsildar, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Medak District and not admitting the Petitioner into the post graduate medical course for the year 2012-13 under BC-E category quota and in further, demanding from the Petitioner a caste confirmation certificate issued by the District Collector, Medak, the 3rd Respondent herein and the further action of Respondents Nos.4 to 6 in not admitting the Petitioner into post graduate Medical Course in spite of the Report submitted by the 3rd Respondent vide Lr.No.C2/CV/2494/2012 dated 30.06.2012 certifying the g...