Andhra Pradesh Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R. Krishnaiah Vs. Union of India, Represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-28-2012
ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The challenge in this batch of writ petitions is to two Office Memoranda, both dated 22.12.2011. There is also challenge to a Resolution dated 22.12.2011 which relates to one of the Office Memoranda. 2. The first Office Memorandum (for short the first OM) and the accompanying Resolution concern the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CEI Act'). The first OM and the Resolution carve out, with effect from 1.1.2012, a sub-quota of 4.5% for socially and educationally backward class of citizens belonging to minorities, for reservation in admission in some central educational institutions. The carving out is from the 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) who are entitled to reservation in admission to central educational institutions. In other words, OBCs having 27% reservation have been broken up into two segments: one segment of 22.5% reservation for O...
R. Krishnaiah and Others Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secret ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-28-2012
Madan B. Lokur, CJ. 1. The challenge in this batch of writ petitions is to two Office Memoranda, both dated 22.12.2011. There is also challenge to a Resolution dated 22.12.2011 which relates to one of the Office Memoranda. 2. The first Office Memorandum (for short the first OM) and the accompanying Resolution concern the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CEI Act'). The first OM and the Resolution carve out, with effect from 1.1.2012, a sub-quota of 4.5% for socially and educationally backward class of citizens belonging to minorities, for reservation in admission in some central educational institutions. The carving out is from the 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) who are entitled to reservation in admission to central educational institutions. In other words, OBCs having 27% reservation have been broken up into two segments: one segment of 22.5% reservation for OBCs and the second or balance segment ...
R. Krishnaiah Vs. Union of India,represented by Its Secre
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-28-2012
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PIL Nos.56 o28. 05-2012 R. Krishnaiah Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, General Administration Department, New Delhi & others. Referred case2004. (5) ALT 63.2 (2008) 6 SC3. AIR 196.S4. 1994 Supp (1) SCC 32.5 AIR 197.SC 49.6 AIR 200.SC 16.7 (1974) 1 SCC 1.8 2010 (2) ALT 35.9 AIR 196.SC 194.10 AIR 199.SC 193.11 AIR 195.Keral12. AIR 195.SC 54.13 1995 (2) AL14. AIR 199.SC 47.15 See State of Assam v. Basanta Kumar Das, (1973) 1 SCC 46.and D.P. Das v. Union of India, (2011) 8 SCC 11.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Madan B. Lokur) The challenge in this batch of writ petitions is to two Office Memoranda, both dated 22.12.2011. There is also challenge to a Resolution dated 22.12.2011 which relates to one of the Office Memoranda.2. The first Office Memorandum (for short the first OM) and the accompanying Resolution concern the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission)...
R. Krishnaiah Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secre
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-28-2012
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR PIL Nos.22 o28. 05-2012 R. Krishnaiah Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, General Administration Department, New Delhi & others. ?Cases referre2004. (5) ALT 63.2 (2008) 6 SC3. AIR 196.S4. 1994 Supp (1) SCC 32.5 AIR 197.SC 49.6 AIR 200.SC 16.7 (1974) 1 SCC 1.8 2010 (2) ALT 35.9 AIR 196.SC 194.10 AIR 199.SC 193.11 AIR 195.Keral12. AIR 195.SC 54.13 1995 (2) AL14. AIR 199.SC 47.15 See State of Assam v. Basanta Kumar Das, (1973) 1 SCC 46.and D.P. Das v. Union of India, (2011) 8 SCC 11.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Madan B. Lokur) The challenge in this batch of writ petitions is to two Office Memoranda, both dated 22.12.2011. There is also challenge to a Resolution dated 22.12.2011 which relates to one of the Office Memoranda.2. The first Office Memorandum (for short the first OM) and the accompanying Resolution concern the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission...
R. Krishnaiah Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secre
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-28-2012
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MADAN B. LOKUR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY PIL Nos.1 o28. 05-2012 R. Krishnaiah Union of India, Represented by its Secretary,General Administration Department, New Delhi & others. !Name of the petitioner ^Name of the respondent ?Cases referre2004. (5) ALT 63.2 (2008) 6 SC3. AIR 196.S4. 1994 Supp (1) SCC 32.5 AIR 197.SC 49.6 AIR 200.SC 16.7 (1974) 1 SCC 1.8 2010 (2) ALT 35.9 AIR 196.SC 194.10 AIR 199.SC 193.11 AIR 195.Keral12. AIR 195.SC 54.13 1995 (2) AL14. AIR 199.SC 47.15 See State of Assam v. Basanta Kumar Das, (1973) 1 SCC 46.and D.P. Das v. Union of India, (2011) 8 SCC 11.ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Madan B. Lokur) The challenge in this batch of writ petitions is to two Office Memoranda, both dated 22.12.2011. There is also challenge to a Resolution dated 22.12.2011 which relates to one of the Office Memoranda.2. The first Office Memorandum (for short the first OM) and the accompanying Resolution concern the Central Educationa...
Hdfc Bank Limited, Rep. by Its Manager Vs. V. Suresh Kumar Yadav
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-16-2012
Oral Order (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.1076/2008 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, opposite party preferred this appeal The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant availed a vehicle loan vide loan A/c No.2334713 from the opposite party. After approval of the same, the complainant paid advance amount as down payment and purchased a two wheeler. The complainant submitted that the loan was sanctioned during Feb, 2006 and the balance amount has to be paid in monthly instalments @ Rs.1,477/- every month starting from March, 2006 for a period of 36 months. The complainant submitted that he had an account with HDFC Bank and the monthly EMIs were being deducted from his bank account every month from March, 2006 to April, 2007 without default. The complainant submitted that in April, 2007 he changed his bank account from HDFC bank to ICICI bank and also changed the ECS from HDFC to ICICI bank and ICICI informed him that...
The General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad and Others Vs ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-16-2012
(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the orders in C.C.No.140/2006 on the file of District Forum, Nellore, the complainants preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant i.e. South Central Railway is account holder-cum-customer of first opposite party i.e. State Bank of India, Gudur mainly for remittance of its collections pertaining to Gudur Railway Station. The complainant submitted that Head Booking clerk of third complainant namely, M.Mallikarjunam carried the day collection amount of Gudur Railway station dated 16-10-2002 amounting to Rs.3,14,736. in a cash bag for deposit of the same with first opposite party bank by 11-20 a.m. on 17-10-2002. Sk.Brahmaiah R.P.F. constable also accompanied as security on that day and they both the reached the Bank by auto and kept the cash bag inside the cash counter cabin of head cashier of 1st opposite party for depositing the same in the account of South Central Railway as per the usual ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Sr.Branch Manager Vs. M/S.She ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-16-2012
(Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the orders in C.C.No.720/2009 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant i.e. M/s.Sheetal Refineries Pvt. Ltd., has been a regular customer of the opposite party since 15 years and obtained policy under Marine Open Policy and Standard Fire and special perils policy. The complainant obtained a Fire insurance policy vide No.551701/11/07/3300000136(A-1) for a sum of Rs.35,50,00,000/- covering various assets as per the list submitted to the company valid from 7-1-2008 to 6-1-2009. The complainant submitted that during the regular course of business on 24-6-2008 at about 9.30 AM an accident occurred in the factory premises due to fall of branch of the tree on 33 KV HT line thereby causing huge spark with heavy sound and in consequence damaged all electronic systems of 50 KTs capacity of electronic weigh bridge and its selves, CCTV camer...
K. Devaiah and Others Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: May-09-2012
Common Order: This batch of writ petitions challenges the clause 12(3)(iii) of the recruitment notification dated 06.02.2012 issued by the Commissioner and Director of School Education in his capacity as Ex-Officio Project Director, Rashtriya Madhyamik Shikhsha Abhiyan (RMSA). 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that by virtue of the impugned clause recruitment for the posts of Principal, Post Graduate Teacher (PGT) and Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) was restricted to such of the candidates, who have studied in English medium. or the post of Principal it was stipulated that the candidates must have studied in English medium at any three levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation and for the posts of the PGT as well as TGT, one must have studied in English medium at any two levels of School/Junior College/Degree College/Post Graduation. All the petitioners claim that they are otherwise qualified as per the eligibility stipulated and only on account of the restrict...
D. Krishna Reddy Vs. the Chairman, Tafe Tractor and Fa Equi Pent Limit ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: May-09-2012
Oral Order (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.87/2009 on the file of District Forum, Mahaboobnagar, the complainant preferred this appeal The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant, an agriculturist and civil contractor, purchased a tractor vide invoice No.20003/2005 dated 15-9-2005 for a sum of Rs.5,03,850/- from opposite parties 3 and 4. The same was insured with National Insurance Company. After the tractor was put to use, the complainant found the following defects: i) 28-9-2005 steering failed for two days ii) Tractor was kept idle in workshop for 2 days on 30-9-2005 and30-10-2005. iii) Sump crack 30 LT oil leakage for 10 days from 25-10-2005. iv) For new chamber fittings kept at workshop for 6 days from 06-12-2005. v) New sump cracks within 3 days and it was kept for 5 days at workshop vi) Sump cracks modified in 12 days, 40 Lts. Oil leakage work stopped for 12 days vii) Dozer modified and fitting on 29-12-2005 and conti...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »