Andhra Pradesh Court April 2012 Judgments

United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Syed. Ashrimunnisa Begum and Anothe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This appeal is filed by the United India Insurance Company Limited against the award dated 23.11.2010 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District Judge), Khammam in O.P.No.936 of 2009. United India Insurance Company Limited which is the second respondent before the Tribunal below is the appellant herein.  Challenge to the award by the appellant is on the ground that the compensation granted to the claimants is exorbitant and not in accordance with the settled principles of law. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The claimants in the claim case filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act are the mother, the elder sister of the deceased Syed Rahmathulla and also his father, the 4th respondent who was subsequently added as respondent in the claim petition before the Tribunal.  The deceased was studying in Class III and was aged 8 years on the date...

Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Chief Secr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioner herein seeks a direction from this Court (1) to direct respondents 1 and 2, (i.e., the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Chief Secretary; and the Government of Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department), to transfer Crime No.53 of 2011 on the file of P.S. CID, Hyderabad to the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I) or to direct investigation of the said complaint under the supervision of an officer senior to Sri V. Dinesh Reddy, IPS, Director General of Police (DGP) (respondent No.4); (2) to direct CBI to enquire into the entire property transactions of the 4th respondent and his wife, and examine if Sri Y. Ravi Prasad and Sri A. Krishna Reddy are holding 542 properties as benamies of the 4th respondent and his wife; (3) to direct the Government of Andhra Pradesh and the Union of India to order an enquiry for initiating disciplinary action against the 4th respondent on the basis of the petitioner’s letters dated 08.03.201...

Smt. D. Varalakshmi Vs. the Joint Collector (Cs Wing), Kurnool and Oth ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The writ petitioner is an authorized fair price shop dealer of shop No. 9, Ratnapalli Village, H/o Veldurthy Village, Veldurthy Mandal, Kurnool District. On the ground that the Tahsildar, Veldurthy Mandal has filed an adverse report against her on 09.08.2011, complaining of certain irregularities in the matter of distribution of essential commodities, the authorization of the writ petitioner has been suspended by the Revenue Divisional Officer on 16.08.2011. Against the said order, the writ petitioner has preferred an appeal before the 1st respondent Joint Collector along with a stay application. Since no orders are passed thereon, the writ petitioner has instituted Writ Petition No. 27752 of 2011 in this Court. That Writ Petition was disposed of on 11.10.2011 with a direction to the 1st respondent Joint Collector, the appellate authority, to dispose of the appeal preferred by the writ petitioner on 25.08.2011 as expeditiously as possible, after giving an opportunity to the petitioner....

Mukthinuthalapati Ashok Kumar Vs. Mukthinuthalapati Anuradha

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Tjos civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 15.12.2011 in TOP No.861 of 2011, on the file of the Court of the learned District Judge, Guntur. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent.  The respondent filed HMOP.No.33 of 2008 in the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, for restitution of conjugal rights.  In the said OP, she has filed IA.No.232 of 2009 under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for interim maintenance.   She has also filed MC.No.41 of 2008 for monthly maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr.P.C.’), in the Court of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bapatla.  The petitioner filed the above transfer OP before the District Court, Guntur, for transferring MC.No.41 of 2008 from the Court of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Bapatla, to the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, for being tried along...

B. Pundarikam and Another Vs. the District Collector, Medak at Sangare ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: Both these Writ Petitions can be disposed of by a common order, as the question that falls for consideration is one and the same. The petitioners are the owners of vehicles, which were also seized due to their involvement in illegal transportation or intended transportation illegally of scheduled/essential commodities meant for public distribution as the case may be. Section 6-A (1)(c) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 empowers apart from seizure of any essential commodity, pursuant to an order passed under Section 3 of the Act, any animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance used in carrying such essential commodity also to be seized and later on, if the offence is held established, can be confiscated as well to the State. The second proviso incorporated to sub-section (1) is relevant and it reads as under: “Provided further that in the case of any animal, vehicle, vessel or other conveyance used for the carriage of goods or passengers for hire, the owner of s...

Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Dy. Superinten ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

In this Writ Petition, a Writ of Certiorari is sought to quash the order of the VI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P. No.3729 of 2011 in Cr. No.53 of 2011 dated 10.10.2011. 2. Facts, in brief, are that, on the basis of a complaint filed by the 1st respondent, Crime No.53 of 2011 was registered in CID Police Station on 25.08.2011. By his complaint letter/petition dated 25.08.2011, Sri M. Malla Reddy, DSP, CID, GOW, Hyderabad requested the Addl. DGP, CID, A.P., Hyderabad to order for necessary criminal action against Sri T. Sunil Reddy and others who had conspired together to commit the offence of forgery, using false documents as genuine etc., as per law. The said complaint letter of Sri M. Malla Reddy dated 25.08.2011 was the basis of FIR No.53 of 2011 dated 25.08.2011 for offences under Sections 471, 468 and 120-B I.P.C. Sri T. Sunil Reddy and two others, shown as accused in the said complaint, are alleged to have secured certified copies of registered document...

Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Public Pr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Criminal Petition No.12791 of 2011 is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to quash the charge sheet in C.C. No.555 of 2011, (later renumbered as C.C. No.846 of 2011) on the file of the Court of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. The case of the prosecution, as detailed in the charge sheet, is that a forged letter dated 22.04.2011 was sent in the name of Sri M.A. Khan (Rajya Sabha M.P.) to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India enclosing thereto a forged letter dated 19.4.2011 alleged to have been addressed to him by the All-India Banjara Seva Samithi, along with certified copies of a large number of documents. On receipt of the said complaint the Ministry of Home Affairs, vide letter dated 05.05.2011, called for a detailed report from the Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, marking a copy of the said letter to Sri M.A. Khan. On 23.05.2011 Sri M.A. Khan addressed a letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, marking...

Sri Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Dy.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.31927 OF 201.11-04-2012 Sri Umesh Kumar IPS The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Dy. Superintendent of Police, CID, GOW, Hyderabad and 4 others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Prabhakar Sripada, Counsel for respondents: GP for Home Smt. J.Vijayalakshmi, Sri K.V. Subba Reddy, Addl. Advocate General HEAD NOTE: Citations:1. (2002) 1 ALD (Crl.2. (2011) 9 SCC 47.3) 1986 (1) Crimes 432 (P &HC) 4) AIR 195.Pu5. 1963(3) Crl.L.J.547 6) 2012(1) SCC 50.7) AIR 196.SC 59.8) (1851) 5 Cox Cr. Ca9. (2007) 8 SCC 55.10) AIR 195.SC 49.11) (2007) 1 SCC 73.12) 2000 CRI.L.J.3487 13) AIR 195.MAD 72.14) (2000) 3 SCC 16.15) 1958 SCR 124.16) AIR 196.SC 47.17) (2010) 2 SCC 43.18) (2003) 6 SCC 67.19) 1958 SCR 59.20) (2008) 4 SCC 45.21) (1973) 1 SCC 75.ORDER: In this Writ Petition, a Writ of Certiorari is sought to quash the order of the VI Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in Crl.M.P. No.3729 of 2011 in Cr. No.53 of 2011 dated 10.10.2011....

Sri Umesh Kumar Ips Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION No.12791 OF 201.11-04-2012 Sri Umesh Kumar IPS The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P. Nageswara Rao, Counsel for respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?Citations:1. (2002) 3 SCC 8.2) AIR 199.SC 60.3) (2000) 2 SCC 63.4) (1977) 2 SCC 69.5) (1992) 4 SCC 30.6) AIR 196.S7. (1996) 8 SCC 16.8) 2011(2) ALD 94.(SC) 9) (1999) 3 SCC 25.10) (2006) 6 SCC 73.11) (1990) Supp. SCC 68.12) (1992) Supp.(1) SCC 22.13) (1995) 6 SCC 19.14) (1999) 2 SCC 65.15) (1996) 7 SCC 70.16) (1997) 2 SCC 39.17) (1999) 8 SCC 72.18) AIR 196.SC 52.19) 1997 CRI.L.J (SC20. 1903-1 Ch 728 at p21. 1963(2) Crl.L.J.434 (SC) 22) ILR 2.Mad 90 (Madras High Court DB) 23) (1960) 1 All ER 26.24) 2010 CRI.L.J.895 25) (1987) 2 SCC 1.26) 2000 CRI.L.J.3487 27) AIR 195.SC 57.28) AIR 195.SC 72.29) AIR 195.MAD 72.30) (1970) 2 SCC 74.31) (1984) 3 SCC 9.32) (1995) 4 SCC 4.33) AIR 200.S34. (1998) 5 SCC 74.35) (1998) 7 SCC 69.36) ...

Guttha Narsimha Reddy, Nalgonda Dist., and Others Vs. the Dist. Coop. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(4)ALD666

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstance stated in the Affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring that the present Board of Directors of 2nd respondent Milk Producers Mutually Aided Cooperation Society, Urumadla Village, Chityal Mandal, Nalgonda District cease to hold office as Directors and also incurred disqualification to contest elections as per Sections 23 and 21 (6) of Act 30 of 1985 and that the 4th respondent ceased to represent the 2nd respondent Primary Society before the 3rd respondent Federation and also contest any election in 3rd respondent Federation and consequently direct the 1st respondent to convene general Body meeting of 2nd respondent Society for appointing adhoc board for specific purpose of conducting elections to the entire Board of Directors and election of Chairman to the 2nd respondent Society.) Th...