Andhra Pradesh Court April 2012 Judgments

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by Its Principal Secretary, H ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: V.V.S. Rao, J. This batch of writ petitions with identical background facts, throws up similar question. There are three impugned orders passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (APAT or the tribunal). These followed an earlier order dated 20.12.2011 of the Hon’ble Vice Chairman (HVC) of the APAT, constituting as a Bench under Section 5(6) of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 (the Act), in O.A.Nos.10947 of 2009 and batch. The first respondent (hereafter, the applicants) in each of the cases was successful before the APAT. All of them entered caveat. After proper notice to their Counsel, the matter is heard finally at the stage of admission at length. This common order shall dispose of all the petitions. Background The State Level Police Recruitment Board (hereafter, the Board) issued a recruitment notification, dated 15.11.2008, inviting applications from eligible male and female candidates for limited recruitment to the posts of Stipendiary Cadet Tr...

Alekhya Yalamanchili Vs. the State of A.P., Through Sho, P.S., Jubilee ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

V.V.S.Rao, J. The petition is for Habeas Corpus directing respondents 1 and 2, namely, State of Andhra Pradesh through the Station House Officer, P.S., Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, and the Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh to trace the daughter of the petitioner Baby Sruthi, produce her before this Court and set her at liberty from wrongful custody from third respondent by giving custody to the petitioner. The ensuing short facts are necessary to consider the issues raised by the parties. The petitioner, now citizen of the United States of America (USA) with Person of Indian Origin (PIO) status, married third respondent, a citizen of the USA with PIO status - on 05.05.2002 at Hindu Temple in Huston, the State of Texas. Sruthi was born on 18.11.2005 in California. After spending two years in the USA, the couple moved to India. For the birth of Baby Sruthi, the petitioner travelled to Huston and that is how Sruthi is a citizen of the USA. The four year old marriage faced unrelentin...

ing Vysya Life Insurance Co.,ltd. Rep. by Its Director/Customer Servic ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order (As per Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. M/s ING Vysya Life Insurance Company Ltd is the appellant. The District Forum allowed the complaint filed by the first respondent directing the appellant bank to pay a sum of `3,15,000/- along with interest@9% from the date of repudiation of the claim and an amount of `3,000/- towards costs. 2. The respondent in order to obtain Freedom Plan Life Insurance Policy, submitted proposal on 26.07.2007 on the life of his wife, Shymantanthakamani and the appellants issued the insurance policy in favour of the respondents wife. The sum under the insurance policy was `3,15,000/-and the premium payable is `30,000/- per annum. The insured died on 15.12.2007. The appellants repudiated the claim on 3.06.2008. 3. The respondent submits that the deceased was healthy at the time of taking the policy and she did not suppress any material fact regarding her health as also that the panel doctor of the appellants examined the deceased and iss...

Suram Ramana Reddy and Another Vs. the Joint Sub-registrar-i, District ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD464

(Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction directing the 1st respondent not to Register any document relating to pending documents no. P.73/2010 to P.74/2010, and P.75/2010 and P.76/2010 of pertaining to Schedule-B property therein in Sy.No.339/B, 340/B Markapuram within the Jurisdiction of the 2nd respondent which are purchased by the petitioners under registered sale Deeds Doc No.792/2010, 6153/2010 and 6154/2010 dated 17.02.2010, 09-09-2010 and 09-09-2010 respectively, registered with the 2nd respondent.) The petitioners state that they have purchased different extents of land in Survey No.174/1 of Pitchukulagudipadu Village and Survey No.341/B of Markapur Town from the American Baptist Foreign Mission Society, 3rd respondent herein under three different sale deeds. The 4th respondent proposed to sell some of the properties situate...

Prop., M/S. Sri Saibaba Agency,h.P. Gas Dealer Vs. Hindustan Petroleum ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALT95; 2012(4)ALD569

(Prayer: Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstance stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in suspending the distribution ship of the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently set aside the proceedings dt. 19.09.2011 while declaring that the Corporation does not have power to suspend the HP Gas dealership distribution ship of the petitioner pending investigation.) The petitioner states that it was appointed as Distributor of L.P.G. at Bodhan, Nizamabad by M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, respondent No.1 herein, in the year 1985. It is stated that there were no complaints as regards its functioning and on the other hand, letters of appreciation were given on several occasions. The Distributorship Agreement (for short ‘the Agree...

M. Srinivas Vs. Apsrtc, Rep. by Its Managing Director Bus Bhavan, Rtc ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioner was working as a Mechanic in Kushaiguda Depot. On 02.02.2007 during day shift at about 10.30 AM while the petitioner was attending RG work of vehicle No.912, power steering oil leakage, suddenly a tree fell on the petitioner. He was sent to Tarnaka hospital by the mechanic supervising the work. Then, it appears that the petitioner was under treatment from 10.09.2008 at APSRTC hospital, Tarnaka. According to the petitioner, the doctors in APSRTC hospital, Tarnaka, advised him not to lift weights, take care of his back and take complete bed rest. Then it appears that the petitioner requested the respondents to send him for medical examination and to retire him on medical grounds. Then the petitioner was sent to APSRTC Hospital, Tarnaka, for medical examination. The doctors therein after examining found him unfit for M2 category vide MC No.0/101154, dated 24.03.2009. Then notice was issued to him informing that he was found unfit to the post of Mechanic and that he has to b...

Sri Manarupa Meadows Pvt. Ltd. Hyd Vs. Dist. Registrar, R.R. Dist. and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer : Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, declaring that the action of the respondents in not entertaining sale deeds and registering the same pertaining the sale transactions entered into by the petitioner in respect of the land in Sy.Nos. 103/40, 103/42, 103/43, 103/44, 103/51, 103/57, 103/59, 103/60, and 103/67 of Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary and illegal and consequently direct the respondents to entertain the sale deeds and release the registered documents to the petitioner and grant such other relief.) The petitioner is a private limited company.  One of its activities is to acquire properties and to develop them for real estate purposes.  It purchased about 45 acres of land in various sub-divisions of Sy.No.103 of Shamshabad Village and Mandal, Ranga R...

Kovvuri Ramakrishna Reddy Vs. Padala Satyanarayana Reddy and Another

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 29-12-2011 in I.A.No.1086/2011 in O.S.No.209/2006 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram. The petitioner filed the above mentioned suit for a declaration that he is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property and he is entitled for exclusive possession thereof.  He has also sought for delivery of vacant possession of the schedule property and for costs.  After completion of the trial, at the stage of arguments, the petitioner filed the above mentioned I.A. under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short "the Code") for amendment of the plaint for incorporating the relief of future profits.  This application was opposed by the respondents/defendants mainly on the ground that the same is belated and also that the amendment, if allowed, requires retrial of the suit.  The lower Court dismissed the said application.  Feeling aggrieved thereby, the petitio...

Sobhanadi Lakshminarasimha Swamy Varla Veda Pathasala, Agiripally Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This Writ Petition is filed by a Vedapatasala at Agiripally Village, Krishna District, challenging the correctness of the orders passed by the Commissioner of Endowments, Hyderabad on 18.01.2011 directing in turn, the Executive Officer, Sri Venkateswara Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Dwaraka Tirumala to take over the Patasala with immediate effect. It is stated that the petitioner Vedapatasala has been endowed with a total extent of Ac. 103.1 cents situate in various villages in Krishna and adjoining Guntur Districts. From out of the income so realized from these lands, the Vedapatasala is required to be run. It is further stated that the institution was established more than 100 years back by Sri Suri Markandeya Sastry and also got the endowments of the temple registered on 28.05.1913. The lands, which have been endowed to the Vedapatasala, are all highly fertile agricultural lands and taking advantage of the absence of the representative of the Vedapatasala in the village concerned, the loc...

i. Praveen Reddy and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: In this batch of writ petitions, the proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’) for acquisition of land in different survey numbers of Vattinagulapally Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District are challenged.  The notification under Section 4(1) of the Act was published on 16.03.2005.  It was mentioned that the land is needed for the public purpose of establishment of IT Park and other related projects by the A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for short ‘the Corporation’).  In the course of enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act, objection was raised to the acquisition on several grounds.  The principal ground urged by the petitioners was that the Government of A.P. in the Municipal Administration Department issued G.O.Ms.No.111 dated 08.03.1996 in respect of the catchment area of Osmansagar and Himayatsagar lakes, prohibiting development of any kind whatever within...