Andhra Pradesh Court April 2012 Judgments

K. Laxmi Prasanna Gouri Vs. the Rector, Andhra University, Visakhapatn ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioner is studying M.A.(Hindi) in Andhra University, Visakhapatnam. She was admitted into the course during the year 2010-11. She appeared for examinations for three semesters. Grievance of the petitioner is that she was not allowed to appear for fourth semester examination, i.e. 2nd semester of 2nd year by the respondents. Standing counsel for Andhra University on written instructions reports that the petitioner does not posses basic qualification of degree for admission into M.A.Course and that she did not put in required percentage of attendance during the semester and that therefore she was not allowed to appear for the examination. 2nd semester 2nd year M.A. Hindi examinations started on 19.04.2012. By now, it is informed that three examinations are over. As per information brochure of AURPGCET - 2010 furnished along with this writ petition, eligibility criteria for admission in M.A. Hindi in Andhra University are as follows: “Any bachelor degree in Arts, Scien...

Puvvada Suseelamma and Others Vs. the Ongole Municipality, Rep. by Its ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

G.Krishna Mohan Reddy, J. This Writ Petition is directed against Judgment and Decree passed in LGA No.34 of 1999 on the file of Special Court under A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 1982, (for short ‘the Act’) Hyderabad, confirming common Judgment and Decree passed in O.P.No.412 of 1992 and O.S.No.183 of 1992 on the file of Special Tribunal (District Court), Ongole under the Act, dated 30.11.1998. The petitioners herein are also the petitioners in the OP and defendants 1 to 6 in the suit and appellants in the LGA. For the sake of convenience, we refer them as arrayed in the OP/Writ Petition. The petitioners filed the OP under Section 7-A(1) of the Act for awarding compensation against the 1st respondent of not less than the amount equivalent to the market value of the petition schedule property i.e., vacant house site in T.S.Nos.18 and 20/1, Ward No.3, Block No.1, Municipal Ward No.12-A with assessment No.412-B and plot Nos.10 and 11 at Islampet, Ongole and also to dire...

Pl Shipping and Logistics Private Limited Vs. A.G.A. Publication Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Prayer: Application under Section 433 (e) and (f) and 439 (e) read with Rule 95 of the companies (court) Rules, 1959 of the Original side Rules, praying that this High Court may be pleased to pass on order that (a) A.G.A. Publications Limited, be wound up under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956; and (b) Such further order may be made in the circumstances as may be just and equitable.) 1. This company Petition is filed under section 433 (e) and (f), read with section 439 of the companies Act 1956 and Rule 95 of the Company (court) Rules, 1959, for winding up of the respondent company. The company petition was filed, on behalf of the petitioner, by its senior general manager Sri. S. Seshan. In the company petition it is stated that Sri. R. Seshan was duly empowered under the power of attorney dated 18.2.2011 to file the present winding up petition, and to do all acts, matters and things in relation thereto. 2. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 195...

Karnati Nageswara Rao Vs. the District Collector (Cs) Guntur, Guntur D ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This writ petition is instituted by a fair price shop dealer of Yarrabalem village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District challenging the correctness of the orders passed by the 3rd respondent - Revenue Divisional Officer, Guntur on 10.12.2009 cancelling the authorization of the writ petitioner for the alleged irregularities committed by him. In terms of clause 20(1) of the Public Distribution System Control Order, 2008, the writ petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the Joint Collector who by his order dated 3.3.2010 dismissed the appeal. The writ petitioner thereafter availed the remedy of revision available to him under Clause 21 of the PDS Control Order. The District Collector dismissed the said revision by his order dated 23.8.2010. The validity of these orders are under challenge in this writ petition. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Mangalagiri, filed a report against the petitioner on 3.5.2003 setting out that the petitioner has diverted 172.05 Quintals of rice meant f...

Axis Bank Limited Vs. Naturol Bioenergy Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: 1. C.A.No.1691 of 2011 is filed by M/s Naturol Bioenergy Limited (hereinafter called as ‘NBL’) to issue and publish notices for convening, holding and conducting of meetings of the creditors for approval of the proposed scheme of arrangement, and for the immediate implementation of the package. This Court, by order in C.A.No.1691 of 2011 dated 21.11.2011, directed that a meeting of the secured creditors of NBL be convened on 24.12.2011 at 10.30 A.M. at their registered office for the purpose of considering the reworked CDR Package, and for implementation of the MRA with NBL. Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran, an Advocate of this Court, was appointed as the Chairman of the meeting. This Court also directed that notice be given to each creditor, and an advertisement be published in “Business Standard” (English daily) Mumbai and Hyderabad editions and “Andhra Prabha” (Telugu daily) Hyderabad edition. In its order dated 22.11.2011 this Court noted the a...

S. Srinivasulu Naidu Vs. the Office of Sub-registrar, Palamaner and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(4)ALD661; 2012(5)ALT397

ORDER: The petitioner advanced certain amount to the 2nd respondent, by name Azam Pasha.  As a measure of security for repayment of the amount, the 2nd respondent executed a deed of mortgage on 05.05.2005 in respect of an item of immovable property.  However, thereafter, the 2nd respondent sold the said property in favour of the 3rd respondent through sale deed dated 04.03.2006.  The mortgage deed as well as the sale deed were registered with the 1st respondent herein.  The petitioner contends that the 1st respondent ought not to have registered the sale deed dated 04.03.2006, since the property is encumbered with mortgage and that mortgage deed is very much registered with his office. Heard Sri S.S.Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri N. Bharath Babu, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent. It is a matter of record that the 2nd respondent executed a deed of mortgage in favour of the p...

Kambala Sesharatnam and Others Vs. the A.P. Bhoodan Yagna Board and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: Though reliefs sought are different, the subject-matter is common and both the writ petitions are between the same parties. Hence they are heard together and decided by this common order. The petitioners are the sons and daughter of one Penkey Raghavulu who is stated to have purchased the land admeasuring Ac.9-51 cents in Sy.Nos.276/8, 276/23, 278/1 and 278/1-3 of Ramanaiahpeta Village of Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari District in the year 1962. It is pleaded that on the death of their father on 5.5.2010 the petitioners have succeeded to the said property and have been continuing in possession and enjoyment of the same. However, A.P. Bhoodan Yagna Board (for short, Bhoodan Board) claimed that the said land was donated to Bhoodan Board in the year 1964 by one Paida Suryanarayana Murthy and that the petitioners had illegally occupied the said land. At the instance of the Bhoodan Board when the resumption proceedings were initiated in the year 2007 under the A.P. Assig...

M/S. Sai Boda Hotels, Rep. by Its Managing Partner Vs. Deep Charan Aga ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD378

(Prayer: Appeal under Section 100 CPC against the decree dated 30/12/2011 in AS No. 231 of 2009 on the file of the Court of the XIII Additional Chief Judge Court (FTC), Hyderabad preferred against the decree dated 30/07/2009 in OS No. 564 of 2006 on the file of the court of IX Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad.) This second appeal is preferred by the appellant against the decree and judgment passed in A.S.No:231 of 2009 on 30th December, 2011 by the learned XIII Additional Chief Judge, (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad confirming the decree and judgment passed in O.S.No:564 of 2006 on 30th July, 2009 by the learned IX Senior Civil Judge, (FTC), City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The appellant is the defendant-tenant and the respondent is the plaintiff-landlord before the Court below. The status of the parties will be referred to as arrayed before the Court below for the sake of convenience. Originally, the plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No:564 of 2006 for rec...

Rukmini Sametha Pandurangaswamy Temple, Amaravathi Village and Mandal, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by the orders passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur on 18.01.2012 appointing the third respondent herein as a single trustee to Sri Rukmini Sametha Pandurangaswamy Temple, Amaravathi. It is not in dispute that the third respondent is presently functioning as an Executive Officer of Sri Amareswara Swamy Temple, Amaravathi Town. It is stated that the father of the deponent of the affidavit, filed in support of this writ petition, namely Sri Venkata Naga Bhushanam, got constructed Sri Rukmini Sametha Pandurangaswamy Temple at Amaravathi in a site purchased by him somewhere in the year 1949-1950. Sri Naga Bhushanam has maintained and managed the affairs of the Temple as a founder trustee and after the demise of Sri Naga Bhushanam, it is the case of the deponent that he is managing the affairs of the temple with utmost dedication and devotion without giving any scope for complaints. It is also stated that Sri Rukmini Sametha Pandurangasw...

Shankar Bukya Vs. the Secretary of Education, Government of Andhra Pra ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The petitioner is a student of M.D. Microbiology. He claims to be a person belonging to Scheduled Tribe. He is one of the failed students. According to the petitioner, out of 17 students who appeared for examination, only 4 students could pass the same. According to him, he requires 8 grace marks for his pass in M.D. Microbiology. He seeks writ of Mandamus in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution by directing the respondents to give him 8 grace marks by revaluing his answer sheets on the ground that he belongs to reserved category of scheduled tribes. The petitioner’s counsel placed reliance on Article 335 of the Indian Constitution in this regard. Article 335 reads as follows: “335. Claims of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to services and posts:- The claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Schedule Tribes shall be taken into consideration, consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration, in the making of appointment...