Andhra Pradesh Court April 2012 Judgments

Gargagaboyina Radhakrishnad and Another Vs. the District Registrar and ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(5)ALD228

ORDER: The petitioners and respondent No.4 are brothers. The 4th respondent owned premises bearing No.14-2-12, comprising of ground and first floors, at Anakapalle, Visakhapatnam District.  He executed a gift deed dated 05.01.2005 in favour of the 1st petitioner in respect of first floor and a gift deed dated 23.06.2005 in favour of the 2nd petitioner in respect of ground floor.  The petitioners state that possession of the property was delivered to them and that ever since then, they are in enjoyment of the same. The 4th respondent executed two deeds of cancellation on 18.12.2010 cancelling the gift deeds referred to above. They were registered by the Sub-Registrar, Anakapalle, 2nd respondent herein.  The petitioners challenge the action of the 2nd respondent in registering the said deeds of cancellation. They contend that the absolute title in respect of the property stood transferred in their favour with the execution of gift deeds and acceptance thereof and that the ...

Movva Venkateswara Rao and Another Vs. Vissampalli Chinaramayya (Died) ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON JUDGMENT: 1. A.S. No.2071 of 1999 is filed against the judgment in O.S. No.26 of 1989 dated 10.06.1999 and A.S. No.2181 of 1999 is filed against the judgment in O.S. No.27 of 1989 dated 10.06.1999 passed by the learned Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eluru. 2. In both the appeals, the appellants are the defendants - Movva Venkateshwara Rao and Movva Mallikarjuna Rao, and the respondents are the plaintiffs. However, the plaintiffs in both the suits are different i.e. Vissampalli Chinna Ramaiah (died), Vissampalli Pitchaiah and Vissampalli Venkateshwara Rao are plaintiffs in O.S. No.26 of 1989 and Nallanti Gopaiah is plaintiff in O.S. No.27 of 1989. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the suits before the trial Court. 4. Since the appellants in both the appeals are one and the same and the issues involved are intertwined, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 5. The brief facts of the appeals are as under: (i) The...

Smt. Devi Niket Pillai Vs. Niket N Pillai

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Judgment: (K.S.Appa Rao, J.) This Appeal is filed by the petitioner-wife against the order, dated 08-02-2011 passed in O.P.No.278 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar. The appellant herein is the petitioner in the said O.P. For convenience sake, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as they were arrayed in the O.P. 2. The petitioner-wife filed the said O.P. before the lower Court under Sections 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) to grant divorce by dissolving the marriage between herself and the respondent. The averments of the petition, which are necessary for the disposal of this appeal, read as follows: 3. The petitioner met the respondent in 1992 when they were living in opposite buildings. Subsequently, they got acquaintance and both of them wanted to marry, and accordingly, they got married on 09-02-1997 at Shiv Shankar Mangal Karyalaya, Maharshinagar, Pune -...

United India Insurance Company Limited, Visakhapatnam Vs. Smt. Dosapat ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The United India Insurance Company Limited has filed this appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner appointed under Workmen’s Compensation Act,1923 and Assistant of Labour, Circle-1, Visakhapatnam (for short ‘the Commissioner’) on 31.12.2003 wherein and whereunder the insurance company and the owner of the lorry bearing No. AP 9 U 2699 are directed to deposit an amount of Rs.3,00,927/- jointly and severally towards compensation. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in W.C.No.39 of 2003 before the Assistant Commissioner of Labour. 3. Applicants 1 to 4, who are wife, son and daughters of the deceased - D.Babji, had filed the W.C stating that the deceased was working as Driver of lorry bearing No. AP 9 U 2699 owned by Opposite Party No.1. While the lorry driven by the deceased was returning from Itchapuram to Samalkota, gunny bags were loaded in it at Kothavalasa to deliver at Kakinada, and when the lorry...

R. Yadaiah Vs. T. Balaiah and Others

Court: Andhra Pradesh

1. The Second Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2003 in A.S.No.339 of 2001 on the file of the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, (FTC), Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder the judgment and decree dated 22.12.1999 in O.S.No.2528 of 1990 on the file of the V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, was confirmed. 2. The appellant is the plaintiff and respondent No.1 (died per LR) was the defendant in the suit in O.S.No.2528 of 1990 on the file of the V Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The plaintiff filed the said suit seeking perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with the seri, 3 feet in width, running from north to south direction, forming part and parcel of premises No.2-2-527, situated in between premises Nos.2-2-526 and 2-2-527 at Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad. During the course of trial, plaintiff himself got examined as PW.1 and Exs.A.1 to A.5 were marked and on behalf of the defendant, defendant hims...

Smt. Chama Radamma and Others Vs. Sri Chama Venu Gopal Reddy and Other ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

The Second Appeal is listed under the caption “for admission”. However, at the request of both sides, the Second Appeal itself is taken up for disposal. 2. The unsuccessful plaintiffs in both the Courts below i.e., the trial Court as well as the first appellate Court filed this Second Appeal. 3. The appellants herein had filed suit in O.S.No.196 of 2000 on the file of the V Additional Senior Civil Judge, (Fast Track Court), Ranga Reddy District for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 2.10.1997 in respect of the suit schedule property and the same was dismissed on 31.7.2006. Aggrieved thereby the appellants had preferred appeal suit in A.S.No.215 of 2006 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, however, the same was dismissed by confirming the judgment of the trial Court on 26.9.2011. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants preferred this Second Appeal contending, inter alia, that both the Courts below had failed to appreciate the evid...

D.Rami Reddy and Others Vs. the Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati D ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Appellant, Duggandla Rami Reddy, represented by his power of attorney holder Duggandla Mohan Reddy, is the plaintiff in O.S.No.42 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati (trial court). He brought that suit for declaration of his title to the suit land and for recovery of possession of the same from the defendants. The trial court, after contest, dismissed that suit by its judgment and decree dated 3rd October 2001. Aggrieved by the same, he filed this appeal. 2. The first defendant is Sri Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD) and the second defendant is the Tirupati Municipality. The suit land is Acs.3-00 consisting of Ac.1-88 cents described in plaint ‘A’ schedule and Ac.1-12 cents described in plaint ‘B’ schedule with survey numbers in Tirupati Urban Mandal-Tirupati Town. To appreciate points in this first appeal, the respective cases of the parties and their contentions should be noted. Henceforth, ...

Peddapally Srinivas and Others Vs. the General Manager, South Central ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(4)ALD57

(Appeal under Section 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree dt.11.10.2006 in O.S.No.127 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal). The unsuccessful plaintiffs filed this appeal against the judgment in O.S. No.127 of 2004 dated 11-10-2006 passed by the learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Warangal. 2. Plaintiff No.1 is the husband of the deceased Peddapally Bhagyalakshmi and plaintiff Nos.2 to 5 are their children. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 herein, who are defendant Nos.1 and 2 respectively before the trial Court, are South Central Railway, Secunderabad and the Government of India, New Delhi. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed before the trial Court. 4. The case of the plaintiffs is that on 02-07-2003, while the deceased Bhagyalakshmi was selling fish near railway under-bridge, Warangal, some of the compartments (bhogies) of Golconda Express (Train No.7201) fell down from the railway bridge and one of th...

D.Rami Reddy and Others Vs. the Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.RAVI SHANKAR APPEAL SUIT No.2512 o02. 04-2012 D.Rami Reddy and others The Executive Officer, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and another Counsel for the Appellants:Sri K.V.Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondents:Sri M.Adinarayana Raju Spl. Govt. Pleader : : Cases referred 1. (2000) 7 SCC 54.2. 1991 Supp (2) Supreme Court Case3. (2003) 8 Supreme Court Case4. 1971 (1) AnWR 2.5. 1963 (2) AnWR 41.JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Appellant, Duggandla Rami Reddy, represented by his power of attorney holder Duggandla Mohan Reddy, is the plaintiff in O.S.No.42 of 1997 on the file of the Court of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati (trial court). He brought that suit for declaration of his title to the suit land and for recovery of possession of the same from the defendants. The trial court, after contest, dismissed that suit by its judgment and decree dated 3rd October 2001. Aggrieved by the same, he filed this appeal.2. The fi...

R.Yadaiah S/O. Laxmaiah,aged 78 Years, Vs. T. Balaiah S/O. T.Pentaiah, ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA S.A. No. 657 o02. 04.2012 R.Yadaiah s/o. Laxmaiah,aged 78 years, occ:business,r/o. H.No.2-2-527, Amberpet,Hyderabad. T. Balaiah s/o. T.Pentaiah, died per L.Rs 2) Putta Rukkamma w/o. late Balaiah, aged about 56 years, occ:household 3)Putta Sriramulu, s/o.late Balaiah, aged about 36 years, occ:business, 4)Putta Premraj s/o.late Balaiah, aged about 33 years, occ: business, All are resident residents of H.No.2-2-526, Bharath Nagar, Amberpet, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Damodar Mundra Counsel for Respondents: Sri K.Raghuveer Reddy GIST : HEAD NOTE : Cases referred :1. AIR 199.S.C....