Andhra Pradesh Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Satyam Reddy Vs. Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary, La
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.32893 OF 201.22-03-2012 S. Satyam Reddy Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Law and Justice,New Delhi and 3 others Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri S. SATYAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI PONNAM ASHOK GOUD - ASST. SOLICITOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR GAD Gist: Head Note: CITATIONS: ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) This writ petition is instituted for declaring Section 3(2)(a) and Section 21(2)(a) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, in so far as they restrict the choice of appointment for the offices of Chairperson of National Human Rights Commission and State Human Rights Commissions respectively to a retired Chief Justice of India and retired Chief Justice of High Court respectively as arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires Constitution of India and further to set- aside the appointment of the fourth respondent as Chairperson of the Andhra Pra...
Sreeram Ramamurthy. Vs. Andhra Bank, Rep. by Its Chairman and Mana
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.9069 o22. 03.2012 Sreeram Ramamurthy. Andhra Bank, rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director, Pattabhi Bhavan, Saifabad, Hyderabad and three others. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.S. RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondents: DR. K. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA ORDER: Heard, Mr. P.S. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel for the respondents.2. The question involved in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioner, who was compulsorily retired from service of the respondent - bank, is entitled to opt for pension scheme of the bank in terms of circular of the bank dated 01.09.2010.3. The brief facts are that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk-cum-Cashier in the respondent - bank on 25.05.1983 and reached the stage of Middle Management, Gr.II by June 2002. On the basis of the charge sheet dated 03.01.2008 alleging unauthorized absence for 242 days, petitioner suffered pu...
Bmw India Private Limited (A1), Represen Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9724 OF 201.22-03-2012 BMW India Private Limited (A1), represented by its President & Managing Director Peter Friedrich Kronschnabl, Building No.8, Tower B, 7th Floor, DLF Cyber City, Phase 2, Gurgaon - 122001 (Haryana) and four others The State of A.P., rep., by its Public Prosecutor and two others Counsel for Petitioner: Sri B. Mayur Reddy Counsel for Respondent1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent 2: Sri Diljit Singh Ahuwalia, Senior Advocate assisted by Shrireen Sethna Baria HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) (1972) 3 SCC 66.2) 1982 Crl.L.J.2266 3) AIR 195.SC 72.4) 1999 Crl.L.J 390.5) (2006) 6 SCC 73.6) (2008) 11 SCC 67.7) 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 33.8) (2009) 4 SCC 43.9) (2002) 1 SCC 55.10) (2002) 1 SCC 24.11) (2001) 2 SCC 1.12) (2011) 1 SCC 7.13) (2007) 3 SCC 69.14) (2008) 5 SCC 66.ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') seeking to quash the proce...
M/S. Mansions Today, Rep. by Its Managing Partner K.Srinivas Vs. M/S. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
Oral order: (Per Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member.) This application EA IA.No.760/12 in E.A.No.10/11 in C.D.15/1999 has been filed by the Respondent/O.P.1 for clarification of the order in EAIA 1131/2009 on 08-9-2011 and erroneously stated that an order was passed in EAIA No.1131/2011 on 30-8-2011. This application is dismissed as it has no bearing on the compliance of the order by the first respondent/O.P. in EA 19/2011 in EA 10/2011 and if there is any clarification sought with respect to the date of order as 30-8-2011 instead of 08-9-2011 he can as well obtain a certified copy from the Registry....
Mohammed Umar, I/C. Librarian, Urdu Academy Library Vs. the Director/S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
Oral Order (Per Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) Heard the appellant, party in person, who preferred this appeal against dismissal of his complaint filed under Right to Information Act along with it an application to condone the delay of 52 days on the ground that there was communication gap between him and Enquiry Officer, therefore, he could not prefer the appeal in time. Having heard the appellant, party in person and having perused the record, we are of the opinion that the matter can be disposed of at the stage of admission. The complainant filed a complaint under Consumer Protection Act, 1986, when information as required under Right to Information Act was not furnished by Public Information Officer, Urdu Academy and sought the documents to be furnished to him besides, Rs.2,00,000/- towards compensation. After hearing both sides, the District Forum dismissed the complaint opining that the information was furnished and therefore it cannot be termed as deficiency in servic...
K. Ramana Vs. K. Thirumala Reddy and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2012
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2/insurance company. 2. This appeal is filed by the injured claimant against the award dated 31.05.2005 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-VI Additional District Judge(Fast Tract Court), Ananthapur at Gooty in O.P.No.217 of 1995. 3. The claimant filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- on account of the injuries sustained by him in motor vehicle accident occurred on 05.04.1995 while working in tractor trailer bearing No.AP 02 4864 as hamali as the said vehicle turned turtle due to rash and negligent driving by its driver. There is no dispute about the involvement of the vehicle in the accident. There is also no dispute about the fact that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle by its driver. The injury sustained by the injured to the right leg resulted in amputation of...
M/S Icomm Tele Ltd., Rep. by Its Senior Manager (Secretarial Services) ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2012
This petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents 1 and 2 in awarding 11 works in favour of respondents 3 to 6 pursuant to tender notification No.2/2011-12 dated 21.06.2011, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to award the said 11 works to the petitioner whose price bid is lowest one. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondents 1 and 2 and learned counsel appearing for respondents 3 to 6. Perused the record. 3. The petitioner is a company primarily engaged in providing comprehensive infrastructure solutions in power, telecom, defence and other sectors. According to the petitioner, they achieved major mile stones in the last three years constructing over 2900 kms transmission lines up to the voltage ranges of 765 KV and also electrified more than 32520 village in Orissa, Jharkand, Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and is executing several projects in Mundra in Gujarat and Sasan in Mad...
Mrs. Ayesha Asma and Another Vs. Mrs. Abida Begum
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2012
(Prayer : Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution on India against the Order and decree dated 06-03-2012 in I.A.No. 176 of 2012 in O.S.No. 380 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the II ASSUSTANT. JUDGE (JR. CIVIL JUDGE), City Civil Court, Hyderabad) Order: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 06.03.2012, in I.A.No.176 of 2012 inO.S.No.380 of 2012, on the file of the learned II Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. I have heard Mr. Ali Farooque, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. R. A. Achuthanand, learned counsel for the respondent, and perused the record. The respondent is the plaintiff in the above-mentioned suit filed against the petitioners. As the petitioners are living abroad (Riyadh), Soudi Arabia, they have appointed one Syed Khaja Shakiruddin as their General Power of Attorney to represent them in the case. The said Power of Attorney was executed at Riyadh on 22.02.2012 and attested by the Embassy of India at Riyadh. The petition...
Tatineni Mayuri Vs. Edara Baldev
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2012
This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 13.03.2012, in F.C.O.P.No.95 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner and the respondent are the wife and husband. As their matrimonial life ran into rough weather, the petitioner filed the above-mentioned F.C.O.P. for grant of divorce. The respondent filed O.P.No.731 of 2011 for appointing him as guardian and also for custody of his minor girl child by name Jasmitha. It is not in dispute that both the O.Ps. were jointly tried and the evidence was closed. The cases were ripe for arguments. At this stage, the respondent filed I.A.No.208 of 2012 under Section 17(3) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (for short “the Act”) for examining his daughter in order to ascertain her preference. While the said I.A. was pending, the in charge Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, passed an order, dated 13.03.2012, wherein he has directed the petitioner to produce the minor girl child b...
M.Yerrappa (Died) by L.Rs. M.Satyanarayanappa and Others Vs. the Autho ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-21-2012
This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order, dated 21.07.2011, in I.A.No.3 of 2006 in L.R.A.No.4 of 2008 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Anantapur. The respondent is the appellant in L.R.A.No.4 of 2008 on the file of the Land Reforms Appellate Tribunal, Anantapur. The said appeal was filed against order, dated 19.10.2010, in C.C.No.4060 to 4069/75/RDG on the file of the Land Reforms Tribunal and R.D.O., Anantapur. As there was delay in filing the said appeal, the respondent filed I.A.No.3 of 2006 for condonation of delay of 1869 days in filing the appeal. The petitioners filed a counter affidavit opposing the said application. By order, dated 30.04.2008, the appellate Tribunal allowed the said application. Questioning the said order, the petitioners filed C.R.P.No.2764 of 2008 in this Court. The said Civil Revision Petition was allowed by this Court by order, dated 19.10.2010, whereby this Court had set aside the order of the appellate Tribunal and remanded the...