Andhra Pradesh Court March 2012 Judgments

Sreeram Ramamurthy. Vs. Andhra Bank, Rep. by Its Chairman

Court: Andhra Pradesh

ORDER: 1. Heard, Mr. P.S. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The question involved in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioner, who was compulsorily retired from service of the respondent - bank, is entitled to opt for pension scheme of the bank in terms of circular of the bank dated 01.09.2010. 3. The brief facts are that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk-cum-Cashier in the respondent - bank on 25.05.1983 and reached the stage of Middle Management, Gr.II by June 2002. On the basis of the charge sheet dated 03.01.2008 alleging unauthorized absence for 242 days, petitioner suffered punishment of compulsory retirement under proceedings of the respondent - bank dated 18.03.2009. Petitioner states that under the Andhra Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 vide Regulation 33, such employees, who are compulsorily retired from service on/after 01.11.1993, may be granted pension at no less th...

A.P. Housing Board, Represented by Its Vice-chairman and Housing Board ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed) These batch of writ appeals are preferred by the Housing Board, challenging the correctness of the Judgment rendered by the learned single Judge who allowed the writ petitions instituted by the workmen challenging the legality and validity of the notice dated 08.04.2005 issued by the appellant/housing board and ordering for their reinstatement with continuity of service, but without any backwages. 2. The case of the writ petitioner/workmen was that, some of them were employed on the work charged establishment of the housing board, while the others were employed on nominal muster rolls (NMR) basis. But however, they were in continuous employment of the housing board ranging from 15 to 30 plus years. It was also their case that, their services have been provincialized upon completion of ten years of continuous service. However, the appellant/housing board has issued on 08.04.2005 the following notice: NOTICE The following [As ...

Bmw India Private Limited (A1) and Others Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking to quash the proceedings in crime no.336 of 2009 of C.C.S., D.D., Hyderabad. 2. Basing on the report lodged by the second respondent/defacto complainant against the petitioners, who are A.1 to A.5, and against A.6, police registered the aforesaid crime for the offences punishable under Sections 418 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’). The allegations in the report, in brief, may be stated as follows: A.2 is the Managing Director, A.3 to A.5 are Directors, and A.6 is the authorized dealer, of A.1 company. On 25.09.2009, he purchased a BMW 7 series car bearing engine No.2007095 and Chassis No.WBAKM42010C232054 from A.6. On 29.09.2009, when he was driving the car on his way from Khammam, suddenly, wheels of the car turned at an angle and the steering wheel instead of being level, turned to another angle and a loud noise...

Eluguri Savithramma, Nalgonda District and Another Vs. the Land Acquis ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(4)ALD797

Through a notification dated 25-05-1993, published under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), the Government acquired 281 acres of land in various survey numbers of Rangareddygudem Village, P.A. Pally Manal, Nalgonda District for the purpose of construction of a filtration plant and pumping station, to supply water to the city of Hyderabad. The land of the petitioners in Sy.Nos.372, 374 and 389 of the said village was also included in the acquisition. The respondent herein passed an award dated 01-06-1994, fixing the market value at Rs.9,000/- per acre for dry lands and Rs.10,500/- for wet lands. At the instance of the owners of other bits of land, covered by the same notification, two references under Section 18 of the Act were made to the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nalgonda. They were taken up as O.P.Nos.61 and 62 of 1995. Through judgment dated 08-08-2000, the trial Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.12,000/- for the lands, covered u...

S. Satyam Reddy Vs. Union of India, Rep by Its Secretary, Law and Just ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

(Ghulam Mohammed) 1. This writ petition is instituted for declaring Section 3(2)(a) and Section 21(2)(a) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, in so far as they restrict the choice of appointment for the offices of Chairperson of National Human Rights Commission and State Human Rights Commissions respectively to a retired Chief Justice of India and retired Chief Justice of High Court respectively as arbitrary, illegal and ultra vires Constitution of India and further to set-aside the appointment of the fourth respondent as Chairperson of the Andhra Pradesh State Human Rights Commission, notified through G.O.M.S.No.622 General Administration Department (Human Rights Commission) dated 23.11.2011. 2. The writ petitioner is a respected senior member of the Bar. With a public spirit for securing broader choice for consideration for offices of Chairpersons of the National Human Rights Commission and State Human Rights Commissions, he has instituted the present writ petition. 3. Since ...

Sreeram Ramamurthy Vs. Andhra Bank, Rep. by Its Chairman and Managing ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Heard, Mr. P.S. Rajasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K. Lakshmi Narasimha, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The question involved in this writ petition is as to whether the petitioner, who was compulsorily retired from service of the respondent - bank, is entitled to opt for pension scheme of the bank in terms of circular of the bank dated 01.09.2010. 3. The brief facts are that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk-cum-Cashier in the respondent - bank on 25.05.1983 and reached the stage of Middle Management, Gr.II by June 2002. On the basis of the charge sheet dated 03.01.2008 alleging unauthorized absence for 242 days, petitioner suffered punishment of compulsory retirement under proceedings of the respondent - bank dated 18.03.2009. Petitioner states that under the Andhra Bank (Employees’) Pension Regulations, 1995 vide Regulation 33, such employees, who are compulsorily retired from service on/after 01.11.1993, may be granted pen...

Bmw India Private Limited (A1), Represented by Its President and Manag ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking to quash the proceedings in crime no.94 of 2010 of Trimulgherry police station, Hyderabad. 2. The second respondent/defacto complainant lodged a complaint against the petitioners/A.1 to A.5 stating as follows. A.1 company appointed the second respondent as its dealer in the state of Andhra Pradesh. A letter of intent was executed initially on 27.11.2005. Thereafter, dealership agreements were executed on 13.06.2007, 05.02.2008 and 05.01.2009. In addition to the above, Deferred Payment Agreement (DPA) was executed between the company, signed by A.2 and A.3, and the defacto complainant. Under the DPA, a credit line is given to a dealer by the Financial Services Division of A.1 company against which the dealer may then purchase vehicles from the Sales Division of A.1 company. The Dealer is liable for usage against the limit and therefore once set, this limit...

Shaik Akbar Ali Baig S/O Late M. Jeevan Baig Vs. State of A.P., Rep. b ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2012(1)ALD(Cri)987

ORDER: 1. This criminal petition has been taken out by the accused in C.C.No.758 of 2010 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kurnool to quash the proceeding therein. 2. The petitioner worked as B4 Clerk in Municipal Corporation, Kurnool from 2000 to 2005. The 2nd respondent-Syed Maqbul Basha worked as Lighting Superintendent in Engineering Section of Kurnool Municipal Corporation. He took two policies, viz., Jeevan Mitra policy bearing No.651430547, dt.11-07-2000 and Jeevan Anand Policy bearing No.652681498, dt.27-02-2002 for Rs.2,00,000/- and Rs.1,50,000/- respectively. Premiums under the said policies were being deducted from his salary. The 2nd respondent-de facto complainant was on medical leave for some time and thereafter, he was placed under suspension. According to him, insurance premiums from his salary to a tune of Rs.24,792/- were deducted but were not sent to the insurance companies. The petitioner allegedly misappropriated the insurance premiums deducted from t...

Tata Cellular Limited and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Common Order: 1. The petitioners in these three writ petitions are Cellular Phone Service Providers in the State. They are aggrieved by actions of the respective Inspectors of Legal Metrology (Weights and Measures) Department at various places. They seek Mandamus in these writ petitions declaring that sale of Freedom cards and recharge coupons by TATA Cellular Limited and sale of AIRTEL prepaid cards and recharge cards/coupons as well as post-paid cards and kits by Bharti Cellular Limited for providing Cellular Mobile telephone services to the respective subscribers do not require compliance of provisions of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (in short, the 1976 Act), Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act, 1985 (in short, the 1985 Act) and the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 (in short, the Rules) and consequently to quash seizures of such cards and coupons by the respective Inspectors of Legal Metrology (Weights and Measures) ...

Bmw India Private Limited (A1), Building Vs. the State of A.P., Rep., ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION No. 11025 OF 200.22-03-2012 BMW India Private Limited (A1), Building No.8, Tower B, 7th Floor, DLF Cyber City, Phase 2, Gurgaon - 122001 (Haryana) and four others The State of A.P., rep., by its Public Prosecutor and another Counsel for Petitioner: Sri B. Mayur Reddy Counsel for Respondent1: Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent 2: Sri A. Ramesh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri C. Raghu HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1) (1972) 3 SCC 66.2) 1982 Crl.L.J.2266 3) AIR 195.SC 72.4) 1999 Crl.L.J 390.5) (2006) 6 SCC 73.6) (2008) 11 SCC 67.7) 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 33.8) AIR 199.SC 121.9) JT 200.(3) SC 8.10) AIR 199.SC 137.11) (2009) 11 SCC 52.12) AIR 200.SC 301.13) (2007) 12 SCC 9.14) AIR (32) 1945 Privy Counci15. (2003) 2 SCC 64.16) (2005) 4 SCC 30.17) (2007) 3 SCC 69.18) (2008) 5 SCC 66.19) (2011) 1 SCC 7.THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11025 OF 200.ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of C...