Andhra Pradesh Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Dilli Babu Reddy Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
The Petitioner, a Publisher-cum-Chief Editor of a local news paper published from Tirupathi, challenges the legality and validity of the orders passed by the second respondent on 16.03.2012 declining to extend the period of license and requesting the petitioner to vacate the premises under his occupation within three days. 2. The writ petitioner who is a resident of Tirupathi town is a Publisher-cum-Chief Editor of an eveninger published from Tirupathi. The second respondent - Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (T.T.D. for short) was endowed with several buildings and immovable properties in and around Tirupati town, and one such building which is situate at Tilak Road, at Tirupati is known as ‘Sridevi Complex’. Room No.14, located in the II Floor of the said Sridevi Complex was allowed to be occupied by the writ petitioner pursuant to a license granted in his favour by the second respondent. The terms and conditions subject to which the license was accorded were placed a...
Kurumurthy Vs. the Ministry of Power, Government of India, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
1. Petitioner was a probationer appointed in the second respondent organization, Central Power Research Institute, under the control of the fourth respondent, by proceedings dated 22.06.2009 as Engineering Officer Grade - II. After expiry of his probation period of two years, he was issued order of termination dated 26.08.2011 impugned herein. The said order is questioned on the ground that no enquiry was conducted and the fact that the petitioner continued beyond the probation period for 54 days amounts to petitioner having been confirmed and therefore, the discharge simplicitor as per the impugned order is not sustainable. 2. Before approaching this Court, the petitioner herein filed O.A.No.891 of 2011 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad where initially the tribunal granted stay against the order of termination but later after the respondents filed counter raising the plea of jurisdiction of the tribunal, the petitioner withdrew the said OA on 22.11.2011 and f...
V. Saida Vs. G. Krishnaveni and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
Common Order: (K.G. Shankar) The petitioner is one of the respondents in O.A.No.412 of 2011 and one of the applicants in VMA No.1794 of 2011 in O.A.No.412 of 2011. He assailed the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal, for short) in the common orders in VMA No.1794 of 2011, VMA No.2082 of 2011 and VMA No.2147 of 2011 in O.A.No.412 of 2011 and VMA No.1795 of 2011 and VMA No.2149 of 2011 in O.A.No.7157 of 2011. The Tribunal dismissed the Vacate Miscellaneous Applications and made the interim order dated 17.02.2011 absolute. Assailing the same, the present writ petition is filed by the fourth respondent in VMA No.1794 of 2011 and other VMAs. The Tribunal granted interim relief restraining the competent authority from effecting promotions on the published tentative seniority list. Claiming that the interim relief is tantamount to a blatant ban on promotion of employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), the petitioner preferred ...
Shaik Bikkam Ali @ Gulam Mohd. Sarvar Vs. Wali Pasha and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
This second appeal is filed against the decree and judgment dated 25.08.2005 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Karimnagar in A.S.No.38 of 2003 reversing the decree and judgment dated 10.04.2003 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Karimnagar in O.S.No.84 of 1996. 2. I have heard Sri Vedula Venkata Ramanna, Senior Counsel representing Sri K.K. Mahender Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and of Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The plaintiff filed the present second appeal. He instituted the suit seeking declaration of title to the plaint schedule property and for consequential injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property. The learned trial Court after considering the entire material on record with reference to the pleadings of both parties, decreed the suit filed by the appellant. Feeling aggrieved, the respondents preferred A.S.No.38 of 200...
G. Mallesham and Others Vs. Apgenco, Hyderabad and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
COMMON ORDER: All the writ petitions are filed against the order of suspension as under: (a) WP.No.3503 of 2012 questions the order of suspension of the petitioner passed by the Chief General Manager (Administration) - first respondent dated 28.10.2011 on the ground that Cr.No.49 of 2011 is registered against the petitioner and he was under detention in police custody for 54 hours. (b) WP.No.1158 of 2012 questions the order of suspension of the petitioner passed by the second respondent dated 11.05.2011 on the ground that Cr.No.25 of 2011 is registered against the petitioner and he was under detention in policy custody for more than 48 hours. (c) WP.No.2743 of 2012 questions the order of suspension of the petitioner passed by the third respondent dated 16.11.2011 on the ground that Cr.No.421 of 2011 is registered against the petitioner and he was under detention in policy custody for five days. (d) WP.No.1628 of 2012 challenges the order of suspension of the petitioner dated 18.0...
P. Dilli Babu Reddy,publisher-cum-chief Vs. the Government of Andhra P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.8492 o30. 03.2012 P. Dilli Babu Reddy,Publisher-cum-Chief Editor of Asha Jyothi Evening Daily & Vice President, A.P. Working Journalists Federation (APWJF), Having its Office at Sridevi Complex, Tirupati Town, Tirupati Urban, Chittoor District. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Endowments (Revenue), Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and anothers Counsel for petitioner: Dama Seshadri Naidu. Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri Y.V. Ravi Prasad Counsel for Respondent Nos.1: -- : CITATIONS:1. (1993) Supp 3 SCC 29.2) (1991) 2 SCC 18.3) (1971) 1 SCC 27.4) (1960) 1 SCR 36.5) AIR 196.SCC 17.6) AIR 197.SCC 209.7) AIR 200.SC 460.ORDER: The Petitioner, a Publisher-cum-Chief Editor of a local news paper published from Tirupathi, challenges the legality and validity of the orders passed by the second respondent on 16.03.2012 declining to extend the period of license and requesting the petitioner to vacat...
Kurumurthy. Vs. the Ministry of Power, Government of Ind
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.30991 o30. 03.2012 Kurumurthy. The Ministry of Power, Government of India, Rep. by its Secretary, Sanskruthi Bhavan, Rafi Marg, New Delhi and three others. Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. CHANDRASEKHAR ILAPAKURTI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: MR. PONNAM ASHOK GOUD ^Counsel for the Respondents 2 to 4: MR. V.RAJAGOPAL REDDY HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1. 2000 (2) SLR 4.2. AIR 196.SC 121.3. AIR 199.SC 140.4. AIR 199.SC 75.5. (1998) 8 SCC 76.6. AIR 197.SC 181.7. 2000 AIR SCW 193.ORDER: Petitioner was a probationer appointed in the second respondent organization, Central Power Research Institute, under the control of the fourth respondent, by proceedings dated 22.06.2009 as Engineering Officer Grade - II. After expiry of his probation period of two years, he was issued order of termination dated 26.08.2011 impugned herein. The said order is questioned on the ground that no enquiry was conducted and the fact that the petitione...
V. Saida Vs. G. Krishnaveni and 17 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR WP No.32425; 32426 o30. 03.2012 V. Saida G. Krishnaveni and 17 others Counsel for the petitioner: B. Adinarayana Counsel for the Respondents: J.Sudhir for R-1. G.P. for GAD for R-3 & R-4 G.P. for Social Welfare for R-5 : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 200.SC 49.2. (2006) 8 SCC 21.3. (2011) 1 SCC 46.Writ Petition Nos.32425 and 32426 of 2011 COMMON ORDER (per Hon'ble Sri Justice K.G. Shankar): The petitioner is one of the respondents in O.A.No.412 of 2011 and one of the applicants in VMA No.1794 of 2011 in O.A.No.412 of 2011. He assailed the orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal, for short) in the common orders in VMA No.1794 of 2011, VMA No.2082 of 2011 and VMA No.2147 of 2011 in O.A.No.412 of 2011 and VMA No.1795 of 2011 and VMA No.2149 of 2011 in O.A.No.7157 of 2011. The Tribunal dismissed the Vacate Miscellaneous Applications and made the interim order dated 17.02.2011 absolute. Ass...
Pilli Rambabu Vs. Sirasani Srikanth Vinay Kumar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-29-2012
This Civil Revision Petition is filed against Order, dated 16-02-2012, in IA.No.80 of 2012 in OS.No.27 of 2012, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem. The petitioner is the defendant in the abovementioned suit filed by the respondent for recovery of money. Pending the suit, the respondent filed IA.No.80 of 2012 for attachment of the salary of the petitioner. By Order, dated 16-02-2012, the lower Court directed the garnishee i.e., the Depot Manager, APSRTC, Bhadrachalam Depot, to attach the petitioner’s salary subject to the provisions of Section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The petitioner has questioned this Order on the ground that the civil Court has no jurisdiction to issue an order of attachment straight away without following Rule 35 of the A.P.Agency Rules, 1924 (for short ‘the Rules’), as the petitioner is resident of agency area. After hearing Sri Nagesh Bhimapalka, learned Counsel for the petitioner, I am...
The Management of Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Ramagundam and Go ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-29-2012
Ghulam Mohammed, J. 1. This writ appeal is preferred by the Management of Singareni Collieries Company Limited, challenging the correctness of the order passed in W.P.No.11205 of 1993 instituted by it, questioning the validity of the orders passed by the Industrial Tribunal-I, Hyderabad, in rejecting M.P.No.115 of 1987 moved by it in I.D.No.56 of 1984. 2. Miscellaneous Petition No.115 of 1987 was moved by the Management of the Singareni Collieries Company Limited in terms of Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, for approving the action taken in dismissing the respondent/workman from service with effect from 14.05.1987. The relevant facts are that, the second respondent/workman was working as a coal cutter and he has been subjected to disciplinary enquiry whereat, he was found guilty of the misconduct falling under Rule 16(4) of the Companies Standing Orders. Hence, he has been inflicted with the punishment of dismissal from service with effect from 14.05.1984. The cas...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »