Andhra Pradesh Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Lavanya Enterprises Vs. Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvarla
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.5323 o28. 2.2012 M/s. Lavanya Enterprises Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvarla Devasthanam, Srisailam represented by its Executive Officer and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri W.B. Srinivas Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri V.T.M. Prasad rep. By Advocate General Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: G.P. for Endowments : : Cases referred: ORDER: The writ petitioner has mounted a challenge to the Notice inviting Tender (online version) floated by the 1st-respondent-Devasthanam for granting a licence for procurement of human hair through e-procurement-cum- Public auction. The 1st respondent-Devasthanam has floated Notice Inviting Tender (online version) (henceforth referred to as "N.I.T.") inviting bids for grant of licence for procurement of human hair through e-procurement-Cum-public auction for a period of one year commencing from 1.4.2012 upto 31.3.2013. The bid documents were allowed to be down- loaded fro...
Congress of Visakha Steel Workers, Regd. Vs. Government of A.P., Rep. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. BHAVANI PRASAD Writ Petition No.11459 of 2010 and W.P.M.P. No.16188 o28. 02/2012 Congress of Visakha Steel Workers, Regd. No.1367/93 rep. by its Secretary P. Rama Appa Rao Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Labour Department, Secretariat Buildings, Saifabad, Hyderabad and others COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Sri D. Ravishankar Rao COUNSEL FOR 1 TO 3 RESPONDENTS: Sri A. Ramesh, learned Assistant Government Pleader COUNSEL FOR 4TH RESPONDENT: Sri V. Hari Haran CITATIONS:1. 1995 (2) LLJ 27.= AIR 199.(SC2. (1989) 4 Supreme Court Cases 773 W.P.M.P. No.16188 of 2010: Steel Plant Employees Union, Visakhapatnam, Reg.No.597/82 rep. by its Deputy General Secretary V. Dhana Raju ... Petitioner/ Proposed respondent No.4 Vs. Congress of Visakha Steel Workers, Regd. No.1367/93 rep. by its Secretary P. Rama Apparao and others ...Respondents COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: Sri B. Adinarayana Rao & Sri V. Raghu COUNSEL FOR 1ST RESPONDENT: Sri D. Ravishankar Rao CO...
Smt.Anjali JaIn Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad an
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.25094 OF 201.28-02-2012 Smt.Anjali Jain The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad and 2 others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri M.V. Suresh Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Home; Sri P. Bhakthavastal Citations:1. AIR 197.SC 210.2) AIR 196.SC 29.3) AIR 195.SC 31.4) AIR 196.SC 130.5) (2010) 3 SCC 57.6) (2010) 12 SCC 25.7) (2010) 6 SC8. 1994 Supp (1) SCC 14.9) (2004) 4 SCC 15.10) (1972) 1 ALL ER 99.11) (2003)7 SCC 74.12) (2011) 10 SCC 19.13) (1970) 1 SCC 65.14) (1998) 5 SCC 22.15) (2008) 5 SCC 41.16) (2009) 1 SCC 44.17) (2009)6 SCC 33.18) (2009)7 SCC 68.19) AIR 19.SC 179.20) (1995) 1 SCC 42.ORDER: O.S. No.193 of 2008 was filed by a lady tenant of a flat seeking perpetual injunction against her landlord. The said suit was decreed in her favour. O.S. No.295 of 2008 filed by the landlord for eviction of the said lady tenant was dismissed. Thereafter, on the intervening night of 11th and 12th March, 2011, the tenant, (petitioner in this...
T.S. Rama Rao Vs. M/S. Honey Home Constructions and Developers, Rep. b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
(Typed to dictation of Smt.M.Shreesha, Honble Member) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.35/2009 on the file of Dist Forum-II, East Godavari Dist at Rajahmundry, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant paid full consideration of Rs.1,22,000/- towards the sale consideration for 35 sq.yards in 471.25 sq.yards owned by opposite party no.2 and got sale deed registered on 19.12.2007. Simultaneously opposite party no.1 entered into construction agreement for construction of flat no.1 in residential flats named WATER LILLY KIBBUTZ RESIDENTIAL BUILDING with the plinth area of 1025 sq. ft. at the cost of Rs.5,94,500/- on the same day i.e. 19.12.2007 and an advance of Rs.1000/- was paid at the time of execution of the agreement. The complainant submits that Clause I of the Construction Agreement specified that the opposite party no.1 obtained permission for construction of residential building from the Commissioner, Rajahmundry Mu...
Boya Ayyanna Vs. the District Collector, Civil Supplies,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-27-2012
O R D E R : 1. The writ petitioner was appointed as a fair price shop dealer for S. Lingamdinne Village, Gonegandla Mandal, Kurnool District, after due selection. His authorization was renewed from time to time. It is stated that he has been distributing the essential commodities, strictly in accordance with the provisions subject to which the authorization was accorded to him. It is averred that when lands belonging to the local temple are sought to be utilized for construction of a water tank, in spite of availability of other alternative lands, he opposed the said move, which, in turn, brought forth criminal cases booked against him, at the instance of the local Sarpanch. The authorization of the writ petitioner has been suspended initially by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni on 12.12.2006. Subsequently, a show cause notice was issued by the Revenue Divisional Officer on 19.03.2008, for which he has filed his reply on 04.04.2008 pleading that he was falsely implicated in the cr...
Ms.Plr Projects Pvt. Ltd.,represented B Vs. Government of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per SK,J) 1. Award of the contract relating to formation of a reservoir across Gangamma Sirassuvanka near Nalgampalle Village and a diversion system for supplying drinking water to Palamaner Town in Chittoor District, by the Government of Andhra Pradesh to M/s.BVSR Constructions Private Limited (hereinafter, 'BVSRCL') was called in question by the unsuccessful tenderer, 2. M/s.PLR Projects Private Limited (hereinafter, 'PLRPL'), in Writ Petition No.20878 of 2011. The ground of attack in the writ petition was that BVSRCL did not fulfill the eligibility criteria as it failed to furnish the requisite Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs.8,86,700/- as per the tender conditions, having submitted a demand draft for Rs.8,70,000/- only. By order dated 25.11.2011, a learned Judge of this Court held against PLRPL and dismissed its writ petition. The learned Judge, though he was of the opinion that BVSRCL had failed to comply with the mandatory tender condition of uploading a deman...
Commissioner of Income Tax ?iii, It Towe Vs. T.C. Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur) 1. The grievance of the Revenue is with regard to an order dt.29.12.2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench 'B', Hyderabad, in I.T.A. No.469/Hyd/2009, relevant for the assessment year 2005-2006. 2. The assessee is the proprietor of a Pharmaceutical Company. During the course of his business, he exported bulk drugs to Mexico through San Diego Port, California, United States of America (USA). The goods were cleared by the Indian customs authorities and reached California, USA. During the transit from California to Mexico, the goods were seized by the Customs and Border Protection Force of the USA for some statutory violations. 3. The assessee claimed business loss before the Assessing Officer as a bad debt and alternatively loss of stock in trade. The Assessing Officer decided against the assessee. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) also decided against the assessee which led him to file an ...
Sk. Sardar Vs. the Apsrtc and anr
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
ORDER: 1. The petitioner, in this writ petition, seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the second respondent Vide Proceedings No.L1/876(39)/05-RN(G) dated 04.09.2008 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to provide alternative employment to him as contemplated under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Driver in the APSRTC in the year 1989. Even as seen from the counter filed by the respondents not even a single memo was issued to him during his service. Thus, it appears that the contention of the petitioner that he worked to the utmost satisfaction of his superiors has to be accepted. The petitioner was directed to undergo medical examination. He was found unfit for the post of driver, vide MC No.17618, dated 09.10.2002, due to defective distant vision. According to the respondents, t...
N. Sudeshkumar, So. Sri Kishanlal, and Vs. the District Registrar - So ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
ORDER: 1. The petitioners presented a deed of cancellation, dated 19.05.2011, to the respondents for registration. Complaining that the respondents are refusing to admit the document for registration, they filed this Writ Petition. 2. The petitioners state that one T.V.S. Maheswara Rao got registered a sale deed, dated 07.06.2005, purported to have been executed by Smt. Rajakumari, W/o. Sri Kishanlal, the mother of the petitioners herein, in respect of the premises bearing No.5-1-595/6 admeasuring 84 Square Yards at Troop Bazar, Hyderabad. They submit that their mother died on 12.05.2003, much before the execution of the alleged sale deed. By citing this and other reasons, they wanted to cancel the sale deed dated 07.06.2005, by executing a deed of cancellation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the sale deed, dated 07.06.2005, is on the face of it, a forged one; and that the effort of his clients is to set the record right. He contends that the respondents ought to h...
Sk. Sardar Vs. the Apsrtc and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-24-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22767 o24. 02.2012 Sk. Sardar The APSRTC and another Counsel for the petitioner:Sri Bokka Satyanarayana Counsel for the Respondent:Sri K.Satyanarayana Murthy, Standing Counsel for APSRTC ORDER: The petitioner, in this writ petition, seeks a Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of the second respondent Vide Proceedings not L1/876(39)/05-RN(G) dated 04.09.2008 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to provide alternative employment to him as contemplated under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Driver in the APSRTC in the year 1989. Even as seen from the counter filed by the respondents not even a single memo was issued to him during his service. Thus, it appears that the contention of the petitioner that he worked to the utmost satisfactio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »