Andhra Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mangila Ajmeera and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.4617 o08. 11.2012 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Mangila Ajmeera and another Counsel for the Appellant: Naresh Byrapaneni Counsel for the Respondents: : ?Cases Referred: JUDGMENT:- This appeal has been filed by M/s. United India Insurance Company Limited, challenging the order dated 08.09.2003 passed in O.P.No.144 of 2000 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - District Judge, Adilabad. Learned counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company submitted that the claimant was an unauthorized passenger travelling in a lorry and that the Insurance Company is not liable to pay compensation to the unauthorized passengers and the Tribunal has committed an error in fastening liability on the Insurance Company. Learned counsel had read out the contents of the FIR. The contents of the FIR go to show that the claimant boarded the lorry on 12.08.1998 at about 08:00 P.M. along with his mother and also with some goods. Accor...
Pulipati Anjaneyulu. Vs. Polepalli Subbaiah and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No. 998 o08. 11.2012 Pulipati Anjaneyulu. Polepalli Subbaiah and others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Narasimha Rao Davuluri Counsel for respondents: Meherchand Noori HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.238 of 2000 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Markapur, against the respondents for recovery of certain amount. The 1st respondent is the father and respondents 2,3, and 4 are his sons. The suit was decreed and an item of immovable property viz., a house at Markapur was attached. Steps were initiated for sale of the property, by filing E.P.No.2 of 2010. The 1st respondent raised an objection in the E.P., stating that he filed I.P.No.1 of 2009 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Darsi to declare him as an insolvent and though the I.P. was dismissed by the trial Court, A.S.No.52 of 2009 filed in the Court of VI Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Markapur was allowed, thro...
Nalnaru Shanmugam Vs. Nalnaru Narayanaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3328 o08. 11-2012 Nalnaru Shanmugam Nalnaru Narayanaiah Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. S. Lakshminarayana Reddy for Mr. R. Chandra Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Mr. O. Uday Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order, dated 05.07.2012, in I.A.No.685 of 2012 in O.S.No.503 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupati. The respondent filed the above-mentioned suit for recovery of money on the foot of a promissory note marked as Ex.A1. After the trial was completed and the suit was posted for arguments, the petitioner has come out with the above- mentioned I.A. under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, (for short 'the Act') read with Section 151 of CPC for sending the suit promissory note- Ex.A1 and also Ex.B1, a Medical Certificate, for comparison with his signatures available in Vakalath and written statement filed in the suit. This application was...
Syed Ali Murtuza Quadri Vs. Syed Abdul Raoof Quadri and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.681 o08. 11.2012 Syed Ali Murtuza Quadri Syed Abdul Raoof Quadri and others. Counsel for petitioner: Sri Ghanshyamdas Mandani Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri A.M.Qureshi Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri Mashooq-e-Rabbani HEAD NOTE ?Cases referred ORDER: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.950 of 1983 in the Court of II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, for declaration to the effect that he is the Sajjadanashin in respect of Dargah Hazrat Masooq Rabbani at Warangal. The petitioner figured as defendant No.1 and respondents 2 to 5 as defendants 2 to 5, in the suit. After contest, the suit was dismissed, on 22.08.1991. Aggrieved by that, the 1st respondent filed A.S.No.71 of 1991 before the II Additional District Judge, Warangal. The appeal was allowed, on 10.06.1997. The petitioner filed S.A.No.847 of 1997 before this Court. The second appeal was allowed, on 04.10.2007, and the matter was remanded to the lower Appel...
Kalyani Gerdau Steels Ltd., Vs. Balireddygari Nagalakshmamma and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.3344 o08. 11.2012 Kalyani Gerdau Steels Ltd., Balireddygari Nagalakshmamma and others ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.Manjiri S.Ganu !Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: Sri N.Aswarthanarayana Head note: ?Cases referred: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 28.06.2012, in I.A.No.123 of 2010 in O.S.No.152 of 2008, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gooty. Respondent Nos.1 to 4 filed the above-mentioned suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule property. In the suit, the petitioner, who is defendant No.2, has filed written statement, wherein it was averred that the lands in Survey Nos.578 and 579-B correlated to item Nos.5 and 6 of the suit schedule property, are situated outside the existing wall. A few months after filing of the said written statement, the petitioner and respondent No.5/defendant No.1 filed I.A.No.123 of 2010 under Order VI Rul...
Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd., by Its Branch Manager Vs. Nandru P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The insurance company is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint seeking for indemnification to the extent of `64,150/- and compensation and costs. 2. The respondent obtained insurance policy bearing No.1803792339005274 for the period from 24.8.2009 to 23.8.2010 for his auto bearing NO.AP16TV0052 and the auto met with an accident on 13.8.2010 whereon the respondent lodged complaint with the police Vastsavai against the driver of the vehicle bearing No.AP 16DB 2072. The respondent contended that on it being intimated, the appellant insurance company deputed surveyor Brahmaiah who inspected the vehicle at the spot and thereafter he had taken the vehicle to Sri Sai Ramesh Enterprises, Jaggaiahpet where another surveyor by name Prasad inspected the vehicle on 29.8.2010 and 22.9.2010 where after the vehicle was repaired and his claim was repudiated on the ground that the vehicle was repaired without assessing the damage. 3. Th...
C. Surender Reddy Vs. M/S Magma Shrachi Finance Limited(Presently M/S ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed complaint seeking for payment of an amount of `1,58,394/- as also a sum of `50,000/- towards compensation and costs. 2. The appellant availed loan and entered into hypothecation agreement with the respondents for an amount of `4,50,000/- for purchase of the vehicle, Bolero and the loan amount is repayable in 36 monthly installments @`.15,151/- per month commencing from the month of February,2007. The respondent withheld an amount of `15,151/- towards the first installment . The vehicle was delivered to the appellant in the month of June,2007 and the appellant paid the premium of `27,598/- on 26.07.2007 and thereafter he paid 14 installments till the month of July,2008. 3. The appellant has contended that as per the terms of the agreement, he has to pay the first insurance premium and the respondent has to pay the remaining two insurance premiums. He has submitted that he p...
The Paryavarana Parirakshana Samithi, Ga Vs. the District Collector, M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23438 o07. 11.2012 The Paryavarana Parirakshana Samithi, Gajwel. The District Collector, Medak and others. Counsel for petitioner: Sri O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for Respondents : GP for Revenue and Sri T.Surya Karan Reddy, for R.12 to R.14. HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner is a society, registered mainly for the purpose of identifying common problems being faced by the residents of Gajwel Constituency in Medak District and to suggest solutions therefor. In this writ petition, the orders, dated 23.03.2012, passed by the Joint Collector, Sanga Reddy, the 2nd respondent herein, confirming the order, dated 27.01.2011, passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Siddipet, the 3rd respondent herein, permitting change of land use in respect of about 22 acres, in different survey numbers of Pragnapur Village, Gajwel Mandal, are challenged. The petitioner submits that the land, as regards which the permission was accorded by ...
Jasti Purna Chandra Lakshmi SujathA. Vs. the District Collector and Ot ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No. 7245 o07. 11.2012 Jasti Purna Chandra Lakshmi Sujatha. The District Collector and others. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri O.Manohar Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 to 4: G.P. for Revenue ^Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri A.Ramalingeswara Rao HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred: ORDER: The petitioner purchased a plot of 164 square yards in R.S.No.171 of Vatluru Village, Peddapadu Mandal, West Godavari District, through a sale deed, dated 07.03.2009. Her vendor in turn purchased that plot through sale deed, dated 09.07.2007. It is stated that when the 5th respondent sought to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the said land, she filed O.S.No.37of 2010 in the Court of I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Eluru and in I.A.No.40 of 2010 filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., the trial Court passed an order of ad interim injunction on 25.01.2010. The Tahsildar, Peddapadu Mandal, 3rd respondent herein executed a deed of can...
Katta Gopal Rao and Another Vs. 1. the State of A.P., Rep by Public Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU CRIMINAL PETITION No.7752 o06. 11.2012 Katta Gopal Rao and another 1. The State of A.P., rep by Public Prosecutor,High Court of A.P.,And another Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri M.Venkatram Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor : : Cases referred:1. AIR 201.Supreme Cour2. (2009) 3 Supreme Court Case3. 2009(3) Supreme Court Cases (Criminal4. 1993 Supplement Case5. (1974) 4 Supreme Court Case6. (2009) 16 Supreme Court Case7. (2010) 12 Supreme Court Case8. (2011) 4 Supreme Court Case9. (2012) 6 Supreme Court Cases 204 ORDER: The petitioners 1 and 2/A.1 and A.5 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 447, 427, 504 IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short, the Act). It is alleged that the de facto complainant belongs to 'lambada' caste which is scheduled tribe and that on 10.12.2011 morning A.1 to A.6 and some others came to the dispu...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »