Andhra Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kancharla Ramabrahmam and Others Vs. Visakhapatnam Urban Development A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.5630 o21. 11.2012 Kancharla Ramabrahmam and others Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority and others. Counsel for petitioners: Sri C.V.Mohan Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Smt. V.Preeti Reddy ^Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3: Advocate General HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred 1.(2000) 3 SCC 70.2.AIR 201.SC 55.JUDGMENT: The petitioners pray for a writ of Mandamus in the form a declaration to the effect that the action of the Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, the 1st respondent herein, in making allotment of Acs.2.53 cents of land in survey No.15/6 of Kurmannapalem Village, Gajuwaka Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, in favour of Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the 2nd respondent herein, as illegal and arbitrary. A consequential direction to the respondents not to interfere with their possession and enjoyment of the said land, is also prayed for. The petitioners submit that their parents owned Acs.45.85 ...
V.Rani Joshuva Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.31159 o21. 11.2012 V.Rani Joshuva The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its District Collector, Chittoor District and 2 others ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.V.Jagapathi !Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Land Acquisition : ?Cases referred: --- Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to quash award No.12/NH/2011, dated 24-08-2011, of respondent No.2 so far as it relates to the direction to deposit the compensation amount of Rs.23,35,021/- awarded in respect of lands admeasuring 1,497 square meters in Survey No.110/1C1 of Thukivakam Village accounts, Renigunta Mandal, Chittoor District, in the Court of the learned III Additional District Judge, Tirupathi. The above-mentioned land was acquired for widening and 4-laning of National Highway No.205 on the stretch of land from Km 274/800 to Km 304/170 (Tirupathi - Andhra Pradesh/Tamilnadu Border Section). The petitioner has participated in the award enquiry and ...
M/S. Degala Veerabhadra Rao Vs. Varanasi Laxminarayana
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.No.5708 o21. 11-2012 M/s. Degala Veerabhadra Rao Varanasi Laxminarayana Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri E.V.V.S. Ravi Kumar Counsel for Respondent: Sri S. Sridhar : ?Cases referred:1. 2004(3) ALT 1 SC 2.2008(4) ALT 14.(FB) 3. 2002 (1) ALD 51.(DB) 4. 1985(2) ALT 16.5. 1976 ALT 4.6. 1997(2) ALD 18.= 1997 (1) ALT 79.7. 1998(1) ALD 14.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 22 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short 'the Act') aggrieved by order dated 18-09-2012 passed in R.C.A.No.1 of 2012 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada (RCA) confirming order dated 15-12-2011 passed in R.C.C.No.25 of 2009 on the file of the Court of Rent Controller-cum- Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada (RCC).2. The petitioner herein is the appellant in the RCA and respondent in the RCC whereas the respondent herein is also the respondent in the RCA and petitioner in the RCC. Fo...
Asst.Postmaster General and Others Vs. Smt Sarthuka Kasubai
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite parties have filed the appeal challenging the order of the District Forum whereby they had been directed to pay half of the sum assured `50,000/- conferred on her by the rural postal life insurance policy issued by them in favour of the son of the respondent. 2. The respondents son Sarthukar Pandari during his life time obtained rural postal life insurance policy from the third appellant on 2.11.2007 on payment of `821/- towards first quarterly premium for the sum assured of `1,00,000/-. The respondents son, died on 11.6.2009 leaving behind him the respondent and his wife who was appointed as his nominee. The respondents son paid the premium for the month of May 2009 to July 2009 on 30.5.2009. After the death of her son the respondent submitted claim along with the relevant documents on 1.8.2009. The appellant no.1 had sent letter to her and the appellant no.2 on 24.12.2010 stating that the claim is not eligible fo...
Ms.Kolasani Rajya Lakshmi Vs. the Regional Passport Officer, Secundera
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.32985 o20. 11.2012 Ms.Kolasani Rajya Lakshmi The Regional Passport Officer, Secunderabad and 2 others ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Voosa Raghu !Counsel for respondent No.1: Mr.N.V.Ramanujam, Addl.Standing Counsel for Central Government : ?Cases referred: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent No.1, in seizing/impounding passport not F 5290528 belonging to respondent No.3, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr.Voosa Raghu, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr.M.V.Ramanujam, learned Additional Standing Counsel for Central Government, appearing for respondent No.1. The petitioner averred that she had a live-in relationship with respondent No.3 from the year 2009 and that having promised to marry her and live with her, respondent No.3 has deceived her by refusing to marry her. The petitioner has, therefore, lodged a report before respondent No.2, who registered the sam...
M/S. Scorpion Express Pvt. Ltd.,represen Vs. A. Vinay Kumar, Gandhinag ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.33558 o20. 11-2012 M/s. Scorpion Express Pvt. Ltd.,Represented by its Manager A. Vinay Kumar, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad $Union of India, through the Secretary,Ministry of Railways,Rail Bhawan, New Delhi and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri K. Venumadhav Counsel for respondents: Sri R. Kameswari for Sri T.S. Venkata Ramana ?CASES REFERRED: Nil ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not extending the period of contract pertaining to the lease of parcel van in Train No.12707/12708-A.P. Sampark Kranthi Express from Secunderabad to Hazrath Nizamuddin, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner entered into an agreement with the respondents on 6-10-2009 under which a parcel van was leased out to it in the above mentioned Train. The contract was for a period of three years, which expired on 5-10-2012. On the eve of expiry of the contract period, the petitioner applied to the respond...
Uppalapati Satyavathi Vs. Andhra Bank Rep. by Manager Gajuwaka Branch ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complainant has filed appeal contending that the District Forum has not considered her claim that the respondents had not settled the claim even after receiving final opinion and that the respondents had not chosen to adduce evidence as also that the non-settlement of claim by the respondents no.2 and 3 amounts to deficiency in service. 2. The appellants husband during his life time operated S.B.A/c with the respondent bank under Abhaya Gold Savings Scheme which covers an accident risk for `one lakh to the account holder in view of an agreement entered into, between the first respondent bank and the second respondent insurance company. Her husband, the owner of tanker bearing registration No.AP31T 4478 and he left in his lorry for Visakhapatnam on 13.7.2005 and when the lorry reached Jangareddygudem on the intervening night of 13/14.7.2005 some unknown offenders attacked the appellants husband and the cleaner, Kanchi Ashok ...
Smt.Konkala Amaravathi and 3 Others. Vs. the Sub-registrar, Madanapall ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.35570 o19. 11.2012 Smt.Konkala Amaravathi and 3 others. The Sub-Registrar, Madanapalle, Chittoor District and another ^Counsel for the petitioners: Mr.Nandigama Krishna Rao !Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Revenue : ?Cases referred: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in not entertaining the sale deeds submitted by the petitioners for registration in respect of land admeasuring Ac.1-87 cents in Survey No.673/4 at Kollabailu Village, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners purchased different parcels of properties forming part of the abovementioned land from one K.Krishna Reddy. A perusal of the record shows that the said K.Krishna Reddy has purchased the same in a public auction held by the Special Category Deputy Registrar-cum-Officer on Special Duty, Chittoor District Co-operative Central Bank Limited, Chittoor, vide Sale Ce...
Gollapelli Ponnam Vs. the Special Deputy Collector-la-unit, Si
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.35607 o19. 11.2012 Gollapelli Ponnam The Special Deputy Collector-LA-Unit, Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., Godavarikhani, Karimnagar District and 7 others ^Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Venkateshwar Varanasi !Counsel for respondent No.1: AGP for Land Acquisition : ?Cases referred: Order: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in not considering the petitioner's representation, dated 17-10- 2012, in respect of land admeasuring Acs.2-20 guntas in Survey No.186 of Ladnapur Village, Mutharam Mandal (Manthani), Karimnagar District, as illegal and arbitrary. I have heard Mr.Venkateshwar Varanasi, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition representing respondent No.1. In the view this Court is proposing to take, notice to the private respondents is not necessary. The petitioner claims to have purchased the abovementioned land...
Sriramagiri Spinning Mills Limited Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh,dep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.29621; 31777 o19. 11-2012 Sriramagiri Spinning Mills Limited The State of Andhra Pradesh,Department of Energy,and others Counsel for petitioner : Sri S. Ramachandra Rao, Senior Counselfor Sri K.R. Prabhakar Counsel for respondent No.1 : -- Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri O. Manohar Reddy, Standing Counsel Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Standing Counsel W.P.No.31777/2012: Mahadev Sitharam Cotton Mills India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh,Repby its Prl Secretary,Department of Energy, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents !Counsel for petitioners : Sri S. Niranjan Reddy ^Counsel for respondent No.1 : Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 : Sri O. Manohar Reddy,Standing Counsel Counsel for respondent No.4 : Sri P. Srinivasa Rao, Standing Counsel ?CASES REFERRED:1. AIR 195.S.C....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »