Andhra Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sangam Anantharavamma and Six Others Vs. Peesapati Amaravathanulu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.1371 o26. 11.2012 Sangam Anantharavamma and six others Peesapati Amaravathanulu Counsel for the Appellants: Sri R.N.Hemendra Nath Reddy, P.Rajani and Sri Darshana Counsel for Respondent: P.V.R.Sharma : : ?Cases referred: JUDGMENT: The defendants are the appellants. They are legal heirs of one Pedda Hanumareddy, who obtained Ex.B1 agreement for sale dated 05.06.1977 from the plaintiff in respect of the plaint schedule land. The rate of land was fixed at Rs.5,515/- per acre and total sale consideration was arrived at Rs.19,302.60ps. On the date of agreement, Hanumareddy paid earnest money or advance sale consideration of Rs.8,000/- to the plaintiff, undertaking to pay balance of consideration with interest at 12% per annum by 04.06.1978. On 22.06.1977, Hanumareddy paid another sum of Rs.2000/- under Ex.B3 endorsement on the back of the agreement. Subsequent to the due date of 04.06.1978, Hanumareddy paid another sum of Rs.1,...
Boya Pikkili Pedda Venkataswamy Vs. Boya Ramakrishnudu
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.No.1332 o26. 11-2012 Boya Pikkili Pedda Venkataswamy Boya Ramakrishnudu Counsel for the Appellant: Sri M. Radha Krishna Counsel for Respondents: Sri U. Ramanjaneyulu : ?Cases referred: AIR 200.SC 66.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 151 C.P.C. aggrieved by order dated 31-01-2012 passed I.A.No.11 of 2011 in A.S.No.1 of 2011 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur (I.A) which was filed against judgment and decree dated 01-12-2010 passed in O.S.No.184 of 2005 on the file of the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Nandikotkur (O.S).2. The petitioner herein is also the petitioner in the I.A. and first plaintiff in the O.S. whereas the respondent herein is also the respondent in the I.A. and defendant in the O.S. For convenience sake, I refer the parties as arrayed in the O.S.3. It is necessary to note the facts of the case for proper appreciation of the matter, they are as follows: According to the plainti...
Perla Partha Sarathi Reddy Vs. Sub-registrar, Kamalapuram, Ysr Kadapa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.21205 o26. 11-2012 Perla Partha Sarathi Reddy Sub-Registrar, Kamalapuram, YSR Kadapa District and others Counsel for Petitioner: Sri Vedula Srinivas Counsel for Respondents 1,2 and 4: AGP for Revenue Counsel for respondent No.3: Smt. Ch.Vedavani, Standing Counsel. HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in including the property situated in Sy.Nos.559/2, 3 and 4 of Yerraguntla Village and Mandal, Kadapa District, in the list of prohibited properties, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.1 to register and release the gift deed dated 07.07.2012 in respect of Ac.3.00 of land in the above said survey numbers, without reference to communication dated 09.04.2012 sent by respondent No.2. I have heard Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Rev...
S. Rajasekhar @ Babji Vs. M/S.Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) Heard. The complainant intends the matter to be transferred to District Forum, Vijayawada on the ground of territorial jurisdiction and alleged that he filed an application before the District Forum, Kadapa where the matter has been pending and that the Forum did not receive the said application. Therefore, he filed the revision. He also filed transfer application on the ground that the Forum has not received even application filed in this regard. When remarks are called for, the District Forum stated that it never declined to receive any petition. In fact, the date which the complainant had suggested to have been filed, the matter was not even posted on that day. Be that as it may, the District Forum itself observed that if the District Forum at Kadapa had no jurisdiction, necessarily the case had to be at Vijayawada where admittedly the Forum had jurisdiction by way of transfer. This Commission cannot confer jurisdiction on the D...
The Divisional Manager United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) This is an appeal preferred by the insurance company against the order of the District Forum directing them to pay Rs.35,000/- towards compensation together with costs of Rs.5,000/- and on failure to pay the same within one month, it would carry interest at 9% p.a. The complaint against opposite party No.1 was dismissed without costs. The case of the complainant in brief is that he opened an account with opposite party No.1, Andhra Bank, linked with an insurance policy valid from 07-11-2007 to 06-11-2008 issued by the appellants. Subsequently the said policy was renewed for the years, 2009 and 2010. While so on 18-3-2009, he suffered from omitting, fever and pain in abdomen. On that he went to Hightech Trauma hospital, Guntur where he was not admitted due to his paucity of funds. On that he went to his village and joined R.R.Nursing Home of Dr.Ranga Reddy, who treated him as inpatient from 31-3-2009 and on his advise, he had also t...
St. Mary S Engineering College, Rep. by Vs. the All India Council for ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HON'BLE WRIT APPEAL NO.1072 OF 201.AND BATCH 23 11-2012 St. Mary s Engineering College, Rep. by its Secretary and Correspondent K.V.K. Rao, and others The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE)and others COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS: Sri S. Sriram COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.1: Sri K. Ramakanth Reddy COUNSEL FOR RESPONDNT NO.2 : Additional Advocate General(Assisted by Government Pleader for Higher Education) COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NOs.:3 & 4: Sri M. Ravindranath Reddy GIST HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS:1. AIR 200.SC 203.2. AIR 200.SC 51.3. AIR 200.SC 203.4. (2009) 11 SCC 72.5. 2005 (5) ALT 54.6. 2003 (3) ALD 21.(DB) 7. (2007) 2 SCC 58.8. (2007) 8 SCC 41.9. (1980) 2 SCC 47.10. (1976) 1 SCC 67.11. (1970) 1 SCC 57.12. (1992) 1SCC 16.13. (2001) 8 SCC 42.14. (2010) 8 SCC 37.15. (2004) 6 SCC 66.16. AIR 200.SC 460.17. AIR 196.SC 108.18. AIR 196.SC 161.19. (1977) 2 SCC 57.20. (1995) 4 SCC 10.21. (1980) 3 SCC 41.22. (1984) 4 S...
B. Ravi Yadav Vs. Cherkula Uday Kumar and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.M.A.No.1376 o23. 11-2012 B. Ravi Yadav Cherkula Uday Kumar and others !Counsel for the Appellant Counsel for Respondents: Sri J.Prabhakar : ?Cases referred:1. 2010 (9) SCC 20.2. AIR 197.KARNATAKA 23 3. AIR 198.SC 179.4. (1999) 9 SCC 38.5. (2003) 8 SCC 74.6. AIR 198.SC 36.(1) 7. (2003) 8 SCC 67.8. (2005) 12 SCC 12.9. 2009(9) SCALE 1 10. (1998) 7 SCC 33.JUDGMENT: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice G.Krishna Mohan Reddy) In this appeal assailed order dated 28-11-2011 passed in E.O.P.No.638 of 2010 (O.P.) on the file of the Court of Chief Judge-cum-Election Tribunal, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad (for short 'Tribunal').2. The appellant herein is the fourth respondent, the first respondent herein is the petitioner and the respondents 2 to 11 herein are the remaining respondents in the O.P. For the sake of convenience, we refer the parties as arrayed in the O.P.3. The petitioner filed the O.P. under Sections 71 to 87 o...
The Branch Manager M/S Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. P.V. Ramana Murth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
Smt. M. Shreesha, Honble Member Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.139/2010 on the file of District Forum, Rangareddy District, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant submitted that he approached the opposite party for taking loan by pledging his gold chain weighing 48 grms and the opposite party provided an amount of Rs.25,000/- with interest @ 1.25 ps p.m. The complainant submitted that he paid two instalments during October, 2007 and November 2007 and could not pay the subsequent instalments and informed opposite party about his problems and requested not to dispose of the same without intimation to the complainant. The complainant submitted that the opposite party failed to comply the minimum guidelines of RBI before disposing of the chain, did not provide loan account balances and also did not inform of the auction conducted and disclose the amount obtained. The complainant submitted that this is unfair trade pr...
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Manger Warangal ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
ORAL ORDER: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 4,50,000/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a., from 24.2.2010 till the date of deposit together with costs of Rs. 500/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that her husband late Murali Krishna had taken an insurance policy for Rs. 4, 50,000/- wherein she was kept as nominee. While so, he died on 21.6.2009 and when she submitted the claim, it was repudiated on 24.9.2009 along with medical attendants certificate issued by Dr. M. Venkata Ramana of Hanumakonda alleging that he had history of end stage renal transplant. At the time of taking policy, he was hale and hearty. The certificate issued by Dr. M. Venkata Ramana shows that he was treated primarily for sepsis, vomiting and loose motions as secondary, and there was no ailment prior to 19.2.2008. Assailing the repudiation, she filed the complaint claim...
K.Ashok Kumar and 10 Others Vs. the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corpor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 35976 OF 201.22-11-2012 K.Ashok Kumar and 10 others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation represented by its Commissioner and another WRIT PETITION NO. 36053 OF 201.Dr.K.B.Chandra Mouli and 2 others The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation represented by its Commissioner and another Counsel for the petitioners: Mr. Peri Prabhakar Counsel for the respondents: Mr.R.Radhakrishna Reddy Standing Counsel for GHMC : ?CITATIONS: Writ Petition Nos. 35976 and 36053 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: Against a series of orders passed on 16.10.2012 by the Assistant City Planner for Circle No. VII of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, the petitioners instituted this writ petition crying foul of the contents of the said notice. All these orders are passed by the Assistant City Planner concerned in accordance with Section 636 of the HMC Act, 1955 directing the petitioners to voluntarily remove the unauthorized constructions made by them...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »