Andhra Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Panigrahi Prasad @ Panda Prasad. Vs. State of A.P., Rep. by Its Public ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.RAMANA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD Criminal Appeal Nos.1507 of 2008 and 26 o01. 11.2012 Panigrahi Prasad @ Panda Prasad. State of A.P., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Criminal Appeal No.26 of 2009: Mohd.Shadik (Mohd.Sadiq) State of A.P.,Rep. by its Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Appellant in Crl.A.No.1507 of 2008: Sri T.Prasanna Kumar Counsel for the Appellant in Crl.A.No.26 of 2009: Sri Syed Naimullah Shakeel Counsel for Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred (1) (2009) 13 Supreme Court Cases 647 (2) (2010) 9 Supreme Court Cases 1 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice N.V. Ramana) Both the appeals are directed against the conviction and sentence passed in S.C.No.70 of 2006 by the Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram, dated 21.11.2008. The appellant in Crl.A.No.1507 of 2008 is A.1 and the appellant in Crl.A.No.26 of 2009 is A.2 and they were prosecuted for the offence under Section 302 read with 34 IPC. According to the prosecution ...
Bhanoth Mangamma Vs. Chitla Ram Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1723 o01. 11-2012 Bhanoth Mangamma Chitla Ram Reddy Counsel for Petitioner: Mr.Ashok Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Dantu Srinivas HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS:2002. (6) ALT 21.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 13.03.2012 in I.A.No.538 of 2011 in O.S.No.112 of 2009 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Jangaon. I have heard Mr. Ashok Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Dantu Srinivas, learned counsel for the respondent. The respondent filed the above-mentioned suit for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner herein from interfering with the suit schedule property. He has later on filed I.A.No.538 of 2011 under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint in order to claim the relief of declaration of title, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction to demolish the structures. It is the pleaded case of the respondent that initially an order of st...
Kumari K.Pushpa Latha Vs. Bugga Sathyamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU C.M.A.Nos.645; 660 o01. 11.2012 C.M.A.No.645 of 2004: Kumari K.Pushpa Latha C.M.A.No.660 of 2004: Bugga Sathyamma $1. E.Murali Manohar Rao and another Counsel for the appellants: Sri Molugu Krishna Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Sri A.V.K.S. Prasad for R.2 in C.M.A.No.645 of 2012 and Mrs.Y.Kamala Rani, for R.2 in C.M.A.No.660 of 2004. : : ?Cases referred: COMMON JUDGMENT: The appellants in these two appeals are the injured. The lower Tribunal after assessing quantum of compensation payable to each of the injured deducted 50% thereof towards contributory negligence. Questioning the said disallowance, the injured filed these two appeals independently. 2. In this case, both the injured herein were travelling as pillion riders on motor cycle while another person was riding the motor cycle. The motor cycle was being driven at a speed of 40 kmph at the time of accident, as per evidence of the injured. Maruti Car bearing not AP 3.F 343.came from...
Chinnapareddy Subba Reddy Vs. Chinnapareddy Srinu and 2 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1773 o01. 11-2012 Chinnapareddy Subba Reddy Chinnapareddy Srinu and 2 others Counsel for Petitioner: Mrs. Nimmagadda Revathi for Mr. Nimmagadda Satyanarayana. Counsel for Respondents: Mrs. B.Prasanthi for Mr. Kotireddy Idamakanti. HEAD NOTE: CITATIONS: AIR 200.SC 336.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 05.03.2012 in I.A.No.687 of 2011 in O.S.No.92 of 2009 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Darsi. The petitioner filed the above-mentioned suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with his possession of the suit schedule property. He also filed I.A.No.419 of 2009 seeking temporary injunction. After enquiry, the said I.A. was dismissed by the lower Court by holding that the petitioner was not in possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Thereafter, the petitioner filed I.A.No.687 of 2011 under Order VI Rule 17 of C.P.C., seeking a...
Jangana Rajendra Kumar Vs. Basava Srinivas
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Civil Revision Petition No.1807 o01. 11-2012 Jangana Rajendra Kumar Basava Srinivas ^Counsel for the petitioner: Sri GVS.Kishore Kumar !Counsel for the respondent: --- : ?Cases referred:2009. 3) ALT 63.= 2009 (3) ALD 35.Order: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against Order, dated 28-02-2012, in IA.No.184 of 2011 in OS.No.99 of 2008, on the file of the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Yelamanchili. The petitioner is the defendant in the aforesaid suit filed by the respondent for recovery of money on the foot of a promissory note. After entering appearance in pursuance of the suit summons, he failed to file written statement. On 02-01-2009, the case was adjourned on costs of Rs.100/- for not filing written statement by the petitioner. Subsequently, as the petitioner did not file the written statement, and he was called absent, he was set ex parte. After the suit was adjourned on five occasions from 02-01-2009, the same was decreed ...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, Reptd by Vs. Bandari Lakkakula Gangara ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.358 o01. 11.2012 The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, Reptd by its Branch Manager, Nizamabad Bandari Lakkakula Gangaram and four others Counsel for the Appellant: Smt S.A.V.Ratnam Counsel for the respondents: : CITATIONS:1. 2001(2) ALT 8.2. 2004(1) ALD 62.3. 1994 ACJ 22.4. 1975 ACJ 44.JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the judgment and award, dated 27.05.2003, passed in O.P.No.663 of 1999 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge) at Nizamabad, the present appeal is filed by the insurance company. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the said O.P. The facts which led to the filing of the appeal are as follows: - On 27.01.1999 at about 11.30 am., the first petitioner was walking in front of Mobile Court, Nizamabad, and at that time, a scooter bearing not AP-25- B-7255 driven by its rider came from opposite direction in a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner...
The Collector Under Section 47a of India Vs. M/S Asrani Inns and Resor ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P.Nos. 2296; 2298; 3717 o01. 11.2012 C.R.P.No. 2296 of 2007 The Collector under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and District Registrar (R & S) Department, Hyderabad & another M/s Asrani Inns & Resorts (P) Limited, rep. By its Director Sachin J. Joshi, Secunderabad. Counsel for the petitioners : G.P. for Arbitration Counsel for the respondent : Sri S. Malla Rao HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.2296, 2298 and 3717 of 2007 COMMON ORDER: These three revisions arise under identical facts and between the same parties. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. One Sri Shafiuddin Babu Khan was the owner of very large extent of property at Tilak Road, Hyderabad. Through two sale deeds, dated 27.08.1988, he sold 2952 and 2950 square yards respectively in favour of M/s.Asrani Inns & Resorts Private Limited, sole respondent herein, and 11 of its shareholders. Through another sale deed, dated 31.07...
Sri Koneru Srinivas and Another Vs. Smt.G.Sarala Kumari
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1166 OF 201.01.11.2012 Sri Koneru Srinivas and another Smt.G.Sarala Kumari Counsel for petitioners: Sri B.Ram Mohan Reddy Counsel for Respondent: Sri Hari Sridhar HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioners filed O.S.No.739 of 2007 in the Court of X Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, against the respondent, for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 19.05.2004, and tripartite agreement, dated 11.04.2005. Briefly stated, the case of the petitioners was that, the 1st petitioner entered into an agreement, dated 19.05.2004, with the respondent for purchase of two Flats, bearing Nos.401 and 402 of NCL Homes, Krishna Apartments, Madhapur, Ranga Reddy District, for a consideration of Rs.40 lakhs, and out of it, a sum of Rs.20 lakhs was paid, on the date of agreement itself. It is stated that, on account of certain developments, the part...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›