Andhra Pradesh Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Syed Ali Moosvi Vs. ZainulabeddIn Moosvi and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY C.R.P.Nos.5498 of 2012 and batch 30-11-2012 C.R.P.No.5498 of 2012 Syed Ali Moosvi Zainulabeddin Moosvi and another Counsel for the Appellant: Sri ajmal Ahmed Counsel for Respondents: Sri Ali Farooq : ?Cases referred:1. AIR 200.AP 39.2. AIR 196.PATNA 21 C.R.P.Nos. 5498, 5502 and 5513 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: In these Civil Revision Petitions, common question of law and facts are involved, and the parties are also same, hence they are being disposed of by this common order.2. These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by orders dated 25-07-2012 passed I.A.Nos.522 of 2012, 523 of 2012 and 521 of 2012 in O.S.No.60 of 2007 on the file of the Court of IX Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court at Hyderabad (I.As).3. The revision petitioner in all the petitions is the petitioner in the I.As and plaintiff in the suit whereas the respondents in all the petitions are the respondents ...
M/S.Eci Engineering and Construction Com Vs. Andhra Pradesh Industrial ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE WRIT PETITION No.7332 OF 200.30-11-2012 M/S.ECI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED CHIKOTI GARDENS, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR K.VENKAT PHANI PLOT NO.87, ROAD NO.9, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED PARISHRAMA BHAVAN, 6TH FLOOR, 5-9-58/B, FATHEMAIDAN ROAD, HYDERABAD REP. BY ITS DEPUTY ZONAL MANAGER (D) AND OTHERS Counsel for the petitioner: SRI C.HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel for the respondents : SRI P.ROY REDDY : ?CITATIONS:1. (2009) 2 SCC 65.2. AIR 200.SC 11.3. AIR 200.SC 152.4. 2009(6) ALT 60.(DB) JUDGMENT:1. The Petitioner company -M/s ECI Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. dealing in manufacturing of metallurgical coke, Hyderabad filed this writ petition for a declaration that the letter No.151/D1/RO/VSP/76 dated 31.3.2003 issued by the 4th respondent - Zonal Manager, Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., Visakhapatnam intimati...
Soma Rama Chandram, S/O.Late Venkatachal Vs. the State of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.777 o30. 11.2012 Soma Rama Chandram, S/o.Late Venkatachalam And others The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Public Prosecutor, A.P. High Court, Hyderabad And others Counsel for the Petitioners: Mr.M.Damodar Reddy Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Mr. P.Venkanna : : ?Cases referred:1. FAO (OS) No.547/2011, dated 27.4.2012 2) AIR 200.SC 345.3) (1983) 4 SSC 41.4) (2009) 2 SSC 16.5) (2000) 6 SSC 25.6) (2010) 7 SSC 26.7) (2004) 12 SCC 67.8) (2008) 1 SCC 34.9) (1993) 1 MLJ 27.10) (1977) 1 SCC 50.11) FAO (OS) No.547/2011 12) (2010) 6 SCC 30.13) 1991 Supp (1) SCC 27.: AIR 199.SC 134.14) (2012) 5 SCC 37.:2012. (3) SCALE 55 15) 2010 (4) ALT 44.ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been preferred by the petitioner-accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) to quash order dated 16.7.2009 in Crl.M.P. No.89 of 2009 (Crl.M.P) on the file of...
Taranikanti Srinivas Vs. State Bank of India, Gandhi Nagar Branch
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.1282 o30. 11-2012 Taranikanti Srinivas State Bank of India, Gandhi Nagar Branch, Vijayawada Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the Respondent : None appeared : : ?Cases referred: JUDGMENT : The only substantial question of law which is sought to be raised by the appellant/defendant in this second appeal is on maintainability of the suit in view of Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short, SARFAESI Act). 2) The plaintiff/respondent-State Bank of India lent money to the defendant under house building loan after obtaining necessary security. When the defendant committed default in repayment of the said debt, the plaintiff- Bank invoked provisions of SARFAESI Act and brought the security property to sale, conducted auction and realised part of the loan amount. Even after the said exercise under the SARFAE...
Surada Tata Ra Vs. the Collector and District Magistrate, Vis
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34483 o29. 11-2012 Surada Tata Rao.... Petitioner The Collector & District Magistrate, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, and others.... Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Ms. M. Uma Devi for Mr. G. Rama Gopal Counsel for Respondents: AGP for Land Acquisition. HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS:2012. (9) SCALE ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside endorsement in Rc.No.18/11/E2/SW, dated 01.10.2011, of respondent No.2. I have heard Ms. M. Uma Devi, learned counsel representing Mr. G. Rama Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition. The petitioner was the owner of Ac.0.47 cents of land in Sy.No.34/3 of Chepalauppada Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. The said land was acquired by the Government in the year 1985 for the purpose of construction of houses to the weaker sections under the provisions of the Land Acquisition...
Kommineni Mohan Naidu and Another Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.34149 o29. 11-2012 Kommineni Mohan Naidu and another The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by the District Registrar, Chittoor District, Chittoor and 2 others Counsel for petitioners : Sri P. Hemachandra Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED : Nil ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in refusing to register simple mortgage deed dated 11-9- 2012 in respect of the petitioners' agricultural lands to an extent of Ac.31-00 in Sy.Nos.2196/3, 2196/2, 2196-1, 2195/1A 1B, 2195-2A, 2195-2B, 2195-2C, 2195/2D, 2195/1/C1, 2195/1/C2, 2194-A, 2194/B, 2187-8A, 21987-8b, 2187-8c, 2187- 9, 2193-2, 2834-1A, 1B, 1C and 2834-4A, 4B, 4C, situated at Damalacheruvu Revenue village, Pakala village, Chittoor District, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners sought for a consequential direction to respondent No.2 to receive and register the simple mort...
K.V. Ratnam Vs. the Vice-chairman and Managing Director Apsrtc, Bus Bh ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
ORAL ORDER: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the complainant dis-satisfied with the amount awarded. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he had travelled from Vijayawada to Hyderabad on 23.11.2011 at 5.30 p.m. in the bus bearing No. AP 11 Z 191 and paid charges of Rs. 149/-. On the way the vehicle hit a vehicle coming in opposite direction, and when he questioned the driver he informed that chassis was bent, and as such the trouble. The driver was going very slow with an explanation that the lights of the bus were very dull and having poor lighting. The bus was very old giving lot of noise. The conductor informed that he was on duty for 20 hours. The driver finally surrendered the vehicle at Kodad depot. They asked him to take another bus belonging to Ibrahimpatnam depot coming out of Kodad depot garage. The said bus was meant for moving in local villages, and headlights were suitable in order to ply in village roads. By then the...
Laxmanna and Another Vs. the State of A.P., Represented by Distri
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.33982 o28. 11-2012 Laxmanna and another The State of A.P., represented by District Collector, Mahaboobnagar and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioners : Sri G. Butchaiah Goud Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition ?CASES REFERRED: Nil ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in not referring the dispute raised by the petitioners for adjudication under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") in respect of property bearing No.17-35/1, 17-31 of Uddigadda village, Dharoor Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District, as illegal and arbitrary. An award was passed in respect of the above mentioned property by respondent No.2 on 28-3-1992. As there was a dispute as to the persons entitled to receive the compensation, the same was referred to the Court of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Gadwal (for short "the Civil Court") u...
Abdul Mazid and Others Vs. the District Panchayat Officer,krishna D
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P. No. 36366 o28. 11.2012 Abdul Mazid & others The District Panchayat Officer,Krishna District, Machilipatnam & another. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy Counsel for Respondent No.1 : GP for Panchayat Raj Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri G. Elisha HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioners herein seek a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the respondents in conducting public auction to grant licence/leasehold rights relating to the shops situate in the commercial complex of the 2nd respondent gram panchayat, without considering their request for extension of their leasehold rights, subject to enhancement of the rent by 33%, as arbitrary and illegal. The six petitioners assert that a commercial complex comprising of several shop rooms was got constructed by the 2nd respondent gram panchayat in the year 2006. The licence to carry on business therein, for a period of three years, was granted by...
Smt. Akshyapatra Subhadra Devi Vs. Smt. Nambula Venkata Ratnam (Died)k ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-28-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.285 OF 200.28.11.2012 Smt. Akshyapatra Subhadra Devi Smt. Nambula Venkata Ratnam (died)Khambhampati Nageswara Avadhanulu and four others Counsel for the Appellant: Sri P.R. Prasad Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri V.S. Anjaneyulu HEAD NOTE: Cases referred: -Nil- JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed assailing the judgment dated 22.03.2005 in A.S. No.60 of 2001 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, whereby and whereunder the judgment dated 28.09.2001 in O.S. No.511 of 1992 on the file of the Court of III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, was set-aside and remanded the matter back for fresh disposal.2. Appellant herein is 1st respondent in the A.S. and plaintiff in the O.S. Respondent No. 1 herein died during the pendency of the A.S., who is appellant No.1 in the A.S. and defendant No.2 in the O.S. Respondent No.2 herein is appellant No.2 in the A.S. and defendant No.3 in the O.S. Responde...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »