Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chanda Narender Vs. the Registrar, Osmania University, Hyder
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.25392 o15. 10-2012 Chanda Narender The Registrar, Osmania University, Hyderabad and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioners : Sri M.V. Raj Kumar Counsel for respondent : Smt. G. Jaya Reddy, Standing Counsel ORDER: The short issue that arises for consideration in this Writ Petition is whether the petitioner is a "local candidate" within the meaning of Clause I(B) of Annexure-I to the Rules of Admission in accordance with the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission) Order, 1974 (for short "the Order"). I have heard Sri M.V. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. G. Jaya Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the Osmania University representing the respondents. The petitioner appeared in the entrance test conducted by respondent No.2 for admission into the Master of Physical Education (M.P.Ed.). The petitioner averred that he obtained 15th rank with total aggregate of 67 marks and was called...
Patti Begari Ramaiah (Died)khanapuram Su Vs. the Ap High Court, Hydera ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.4597 o15. 10.2012 Patti Begari Ramaiah (died)Khanapuram Suresh and another The AP High Court, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar General and 4 others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioners: Sri Rakesh Sanghi Counsel for Respondents 1 to 4: Sri P.Venugopal Counsel for Respondent No.5: Sri S.R.Ashok ?Cases referred 1 This order is reported in Khanapuram Gandiah v. The Administrative Officer, Ranga Reddy... AIR 200.A.P.174 2 This order is reported in Khanapuram Gandiah Vs. Administrative Officer ... AIR 201.SC 61.3 AIR 199.S.C4. AIR 198.SC 138.5 AIR 200.S.C6. AIR 199.S.C7. 2006 (5) ALT 45.(D.B.) 8 (1998) 5 S.C.C9. (1995) 1 S.C.C10. (1978) 2 S.C.C11. (1978) 2 SCC 10.12 (2003) 8 SCC 11.13 (1998) 1 S.C.C14. (2000) 2 S.C.C15. (2010) 10 S.C.C16. (2009) 8 S.C.C17. AIR 198.S.C18. (1999) 7 S.C.C 73.19 (2005 ) 1 SCC 13.20 (2007) 4 S.C.C21. (1999) 7 S.C.C. 409 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram and Sri J...
Smt. Mandadi Koteshwaramma Vs. M/S Sahitya Housing Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
Oral Order ( Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) None appears for the respondent. Arguments of the learned counsel for the appellant heard. This is an appeal preferred by the complainant against the dismissal of the complaint for default. The complainant filed this appeal alleging that he could not appear on the said date when the matter was called as he was struck up in traffic jam at abids and could not file the affidavit evidence, and by the time he came the complaint was dismissed. Since the District Forum has no jurisdiction to set aside its own order, he preferred this appeal. Since the matter was dismissed of for default, we are of the opinion that one more chance could be given to the complainant in order adduce evidence and proceed with the matter. In the result this appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside. The District Forum is directed to restore the complaint to its file and give opportunity to both sides to adduce evidence and dispose ...
The Manager Claims, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd. and Anothe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
Oral Order (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. Feeling aggrieved by the order of the District Forum the opposite party-insurance company has filed the appeal assailing the findings recorded holding the repudiation of the claim arbitrary and unjustified and holding the respondent entitled to the sum assured under the insurance policy. 2. The respondent lodged claim with the appellant-insurance company stating that his motor cycle which was insured with the appellant-insurance company for the period from 16.10.2006 to 15.10.2007 for the sum assured of ` 33,865/- was caused theft of , while it was parked in front of his house at 10 A.M. on 22.12.2006 and he lodged complaint with the police, Nandyal P.S. on 17.01.2007 and the police issued FIR in Crime No. 14 of 2007 and he submitted the copy of the FIR and relevant documents to appellant-insurance company on 17.01.2007. He filed complaint stating that he submitted relevant documents to the appellant-insurance company on 17.01.2...
The Kuppam Co-operative Town Bank Ltd., Kuppam, Chittoor District, Rep ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
Oral Order: ( R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The first opposite party bank is the appellant. Its account holder, the complainant filed the complaint seeking direction to the appellant as also the other respondents for payment of an amount of `24,700/- with interest and `65,000/- towards compensation and `10,000/- towards costs. 2. The first respondent holds current A/c No.3581 and on 10.11.2008 he presented the cheque bearing No.630910 for a sum of `24,700/- with the appellant bank. The cheque was issued in his favour by the convenor ICET 2008 (Admissions) PGRR Centre for distance education, Osmania University, Hyderabad. The appellant bank informed the first respondent that it has sent the cheque for collection to the second respondent bank and the amount was not credited to his account. He got issued notice dated 26.3.2009 to the respondent no.2 and the appellant bank with a demand for payment of the amount covered under the cheque with interest and compensation. 3. The claim was ...
The Branch Manager Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vizian ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-15-2012
Oral Order: ( Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 35,000/- together with costs of Rs.2,000/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he insured his cargo car with the appellant insurance company covering the period from 21.8.2008 to 20.8.2009. While so on 1.5.2009 it met with an accident and was damaged while he was driving the car. Basing on report the police registered it as a case by way of GD entry dt. 2.5.2009 and a fine of Rs. 500/- was imposed against him. He had taken the vehicle to Avinash Automobiles and got it repaired by spending Rs. 70,049/-. When the claim was made it was repudiated on the ground that the complainant was not having valid driving license. Assailing the repudiation he filed the complaint claiming Rs. 70,049/- with interest @ 24% p.a., together with compensation and costs. 3) The appellant insurance company resisted ...
Alladi Narasimha Rao, S/O.Late Sri Alladi Yadagiri and Others Vs. M/S. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-2012
1. This Criminal Petition has been preferred by the petitioners (A1 to A8 in Crl.P.No.4976 of 2010) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) to quash proceedings in C.C. No.95 of 2010 (C.C) on the file of the Court of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad registered for offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act) in respect of dishonour of a cheque. 2. Whereas the petitioners herein are A1 to A8 the second respondent herein is the complainant in the C.C., who for convenience, be referred to as they are arrayed in the C.C. 3. It is necessary to note briefly the version of the complainant for proper appreciation of the petition. It is as follows. By virtue of a lease agreement dated 15.11.2007 the complainant became the lessee of the premises of A1 to A8 admeasuring 13,056 Square feet in Survey Nos.240, 242 and 243 situated Opposite to Hanuman Temple, China Thokatta, New Bowenpally, Secunderabad, for thr...
The National Insurance Company Limited, Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-2012
The 3rd respondent in M.A.C.M.A.No.2956 of 2005 laid the present review petition seeking to review the order of the Court passed on 12-11-2010. The order was passed by Sri Justice Ghulam Mohammed. As his Lordship had since laid down the office, the review came up before me. 2. Smt. M.Bhaskara Lakshmi, learned Standing Counsel for the review petitioner-insurer, submitted that the Tribunal determined the income of the deceased at Rs.2,500/- per month while Ex.A-6 Salary Certificate discloses the gross salary of the deceased at Rs.4,400/- and the net salary of the deceased at Rs.4,058/- per month and that the learned Judge by oversight determined the salary at Rs.6,000/- per month. The learned Standing Counsel on behalf of the review petitioner seeks to review this part of the judgment treating the salary of the deceased at Rs.4,400/- per month or Rs.4,058/- per month and to work out the amount of compensation. 3. Sri K.Venkata Rao, learned counsel for the claimants, attacked the review p...
N. Gurucharanam, S/O. Veeraiah Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Throug ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-2012
This Criminal Petition has been preferred by the petitioner- sole accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) to quash proceedings in Crime No.100 of 2008 on the file of the Court of XII Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad registered for offence punishable under Sections 406, 409, 417, 418, 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 477-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Whereas the petitioner herein is the sole accused, the second respondent herein is the defacto complainant in the Criminal Case. For convenience, I refer the parties as arrayed in the Criminal Case. The defacto complainant filed complaint dated 04.4.2008 before the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad which was referred to under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C for conducting investigation following which the CCS PS, Hyderabad registered the Crime. The case of the prosecution is as follows. The defacto complainant and others started partnership business i.e., transporting and handling of f...
M.A.V. Raghavacharyulu Vs. the District Collector and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-12-2012
The petitioner states that their great grand father was granted inam in respect of Ac.3.14 cents of land in Survey No.29/6A of Vadapalli Village, Atreyapuram Mandal, East Godavari District way back in the year 1865. At one stage, the land is said to have been claimed and occupied by the administration of Sri Venkateswara Swami Devasthanam of that Village and thereupon, the grand father of the petitioner filed O.S.No.222 of 1946 in the Court of District Munsif, Rajole. On the basis of the decree passed therein, the possession of the property was recovered on 17.07.1949. The petitioner states that consequent to the enactment of A.P. (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, an application under Section 7 of that Act was filed and through order dated 30.06.1972, ryotwari patta was granted in their favour. The petitioner submits that on account of the employment, they left the village and taking advantage of the same, third parties are claiming rights. With a view t...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »