Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A. Madhusudhan Rao Vs. the Assistant General Manager and Disciplinary ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for issue of a writ of certiorari to quash proceedings No.PRS/AGM/HYD/2002/48, dated 31-7-2002 of respondent No.1. The facts leading to the filing of this Writ Petition are briefly summarized as under: The petitioner, at the relevant time, was working as a Clerk in the Syndicate Bank, Bahadurpura branch, Hyderabad (for short “the Management”). Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him for the alleged misconduct leading to his suspension on 16-4-1998. Charge sheet dated 3-8-1998 was issued by respondent No.1 whereunder the following charges were framed against the petitioner: (ii) That you were working as a Clerk at our Bahadurpura Branch, Hyderabad from 7-10-1992 before you were placed under suspension by the then Disciplinary Authority on 13-4-1998 vide Memorandum No.701/254(7)/IRS, dated 13-4-1998. While working in your said position, you caused opening of an S.B. account No.9419 in the name of “Sri Shiva Sai Kumar” on 23-...
M/S. Pbr Select Infra Projects, Represented by Its Partner P. Bhaskar ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Respondent No.2 has floated tender bearing IFB No.09/RBLISP/2011-12, dated 24-3-2012 for construction of a Viaduct at K.M. 8.125 and earth work excavation and forming embankment from K.M. 7.500 to K.M. 9.000 of Low Level Right Main Canal of Sangambanda Balancing Reservoir, Sangambanda village, Makthal Mandal, Mahaboobnagar District. The estimated contract value is Rs.6,36,91,039/- and the period of completion of the work is prescribed as nine months. The tender process is in two stages, viz., technical evaluation and financial evaluation. The technical evaluation undertaken in the first stage pertains to the qualification and eligibility of tenderers and the financial bids of the qualified tenderers will be opened in the second stage. The petitioner and respondent No.3, among others, applied through e-Procurement and both of them were qualified in the first stage for opening of their price bids. On coming to know about the same, the petitioner addressed letters dated 19-5-2012 and 5-6-...
M/S. Pbr Select Infra Projects,represent Vs. the Commissioner of Tende ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.19517 o16. 10-2012 M/s. PBR Select Infra Projects,Represented by its partner P. Bhaskar Reddy The Commissioner of Tenders,Hyderabad and another HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : Sri C.V. Mohan Reddy for Sri P. Ananth Nageswar Rao Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Government Pleader for Irrigation and Command Area Development Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri Vemulapalli Prasad Rao ?CASES REFERRED:1. 2008(1) ALT 71.2. (1990) 2 SCC 48.3. AIR 197.S.C....
D. Tara Bai and Others Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by It
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.15095 o16. 10-2012 D. TARA BAI AND OTHERS Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue(UL.II) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. Counsel For the Petitioners: Sri A.K. Narasimha Rao rep Sri C. Rajendra Kumar Counsel For Respondents: Special G.P. for Assignment : Head Note : CITATIONS :1. 2006 (5) ALD 13.2. 2006 (7) SCC 36.3. (1995) 5 SCC 11.4. (2010) 11 SCC 27.5. 2006 (5) ALD 13.(DB) ORDER :1. Order of the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad, in proceedings not B1/6012/76, dated 20.12.1992 passed under Section 8(4) and Section 9 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for brevity 'the Act') is challenged in this writ petition, on the ground that the order was passed without following the mandatory procedure; and against a dead person, hence a nullity; and consequently to declare the orders passed under Section 10(1), 10(3), 10(5) and 10(6) of the Act, as illegal...
A. Madhusudhan Rao Vs. the Assistant General Manager and Discip
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.19488 o16. 10-2012 A. Madhusudhan Rao The Assistant General Manager and Disciplinary Authority, Syndicate Bank, IRS Zonal Office, Somajiguda, Hyderabad and another Counsel for petitioner : Sri J. Sudhir Counsel for respondents : Sri A. Ramakrishnam Raju HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED:1. 1999 LBESR-1-742 (Lucknow Bench) 2. 1996(9) SCC 39.3. 1998 Supp. SCC 47.4. 1991(1) SCC 60.5. 1996(4) ALT 60.6. 1999(1) SCC 626=AIR 199.S.C....
Balaji Residency Welfare Society Vs. Sri Balaji Constructions, Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Oral Order: ( Honble Justice Sri D. Appa Rao, President) This appeal is preferred by the complainant against the order of dismissal of its complaint for default. It alleges that it had noted the date of hearing wrongly as 06.08.2012 instead of 02.08.2012. Therefore, it was unaware when the complaint was dismissed. Later after coming to know of it, it filed the appeal. Since the matter pertains to the year 2012 and in the light of the plea that it had wrongly noted the date of hearing, we are of the opinion that one more chance could be given to it to agitate the matter. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside. The District Forum is directed to restore the complaint to its original file. Both parties are directed to appear before the District Forum on 01.11.2012 without insisting for fresh notice. The District Forum is directed to give opportunity to both sides to lead whatever evidence they intend to lead and dispose off the matter on meri...
Col.(Retd) S.P. Putchala B.E., Mba Vs. Mahindra Holidays and Resorts I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Oral Order (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking transportation charges of `1,80,000/-, `21,60,000/- towards loss of job offer, `37,000/- towards international call charges, `63,500/- towards compensation for advancement of his journey to India and for loss of opportunity to utilize the holiday resort, `42,000/- towards Deccan airline coupons, `5,23,600/- towards the flight charges from Melbourne to Hyderabad for his son, daughter and granddaughter, for direction to the first opposite party to issue membership card to him and co-membership card to his son, to co-ordinate with the second opposite party to get his six week package international weeks, to direct the first opposite party to pay an amount of `2,00,000/-towards his medical expenses, `30,000/- towards the expenses for air tickets and the stay of the complainant and his wife in Mumbai, to direct the second opposite party to pay `2,00,000/- towards damages for loss of opportunity to visit...
Sri Satya Traders Rep. by Its Proprietor N. Sampath Kumar and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) These appeals are filed against the order of the Dist. Forum directing the opposite parties 1 and 2 insurance company and bank respectively to pay jointly and severally Rs. 99,267/- towards damage of stocks, compensation of Rs. 10,000/- towards mental agony and Rs. 1,000/- towards costs. 2) Aggrieved by the said order the insurance company as well as the bank preferred F.A. 886/2011 and F.A. 254/2011 respectively against very award of compensation while the complainant filed F.A. 234/2011 against inadequacy of compensation. 3) Since all these appeals arise against the very same order, we dispose of them by a common order. 4) The parties are described as arrayed in the complaint for felicity of expression and avoid confusion. 5) The case of the complainant in brief is that he has been running the business in pulses, oils and flour etc., under the name and style Sri Satya Traders at 13/241, Mundy Bazar, Kurnool. He had taken shopkeep...
Master Shaik Nouman Faraz Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Rep. by Its Principal ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Oral Order (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The District Forum dismissed the complaint on the premise that the respondent-school had not rendered deficiency in service. 2. The appellant is the student of the respondent-school. At the relevant time he was studying in VIII class. On 24.08.2009 when the appellant was attending the class work along with his class master in the work experience period and when the teacher went out of the class room, one of his class mates, Govind Shoeb Shareef came from behind and beat him with school bag and with his hand as a result of which the appellant fell down and sustained injuries on his left elbow. The authorities of the respondent-school had sent him along with his younger brother who is studying in 6th class in the same school to their house without offering first aid to the appellant. 3. The appellant was taken to Ankit Hospital for first aid and from there to Uday Clinic, Orthopedic Centre, Hyde...
T. Subbarayudu Vs. the Branch Manager New India Assurance Company Ltd. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-16-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and having perused the material on record, we are of the opinion that the revision can be disposed of at the stage of admission. 2) This petition is filed to condone delay of 1122 days in filing revision against the order of the Dist. Forum in IA No. 13/2009 in CCSR No. 195/2009. 3) The facts leading to filing of this petition is that the complainant/revision petitioner filed a complaint against the respondent insurance company for a direction to pay Rs. 1 lakh together with interest, compensation and costs. He filed the complaint with a petition u/s 24A to condone delay of 585 days on the ground that he could not approach his counsel as he was taking treatment in a hospital. When he could not prove the said fact, the Dist. Forum dismissed the application by order dt. 21.3.2009. 4) Aggrieved by the said order, he preferred this revision along with it above application to condone ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »