Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhakar Kasireddy and Another Vs. M/S. Maytas Properties Ltd. Rep. by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
ORAL ORDER: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This complaint is filed against MAYTAS (herein after called the developer) praying to direct the developer to hand over the finished flat under sale by executing registered sale deed or in the alternative refund the sale consideration with interest, besides penalty amount @ Rs. 5/- per sft of the super built up area together compensation and costs and also against State Bank of India (herein after called the bank) for refund of the amount disbursed by the bank to the developer together with penal interest and credit into their loan account etc. u/s 17 of the Consumer Protection Act. 2) The case of the complainants in brief is that the developer floated a venture and agreed to sell apartments situated in Sy192/P to 198/P, 201/P and 282/P at Bachupally of Qutubullapur Mandal, in Ranga Reddy district in an extent of Ac. 85.36 Guntas of land. The developer represented that it had obtained layout permission from HUDA on 21-3-2006 fo...
Sri Harimaharalayam Company Rep. by Its Partner, Avs Guhan Vs. New Ind ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
Oral Order ( R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The appellant firm is the insured and filed both appeals against the same respondent insurance company. The only difference between the two cases is in regard to the two different insurance policies issued by the respondent insurance company and as such they have been taken for discussion and disposal of in view of F.A.No.748 is heard today i.e., 19.10.2012 and F.A.No.749 of 201 is posted for orders today. A perusal of the record revealed that the matter in F.A.No.748 of 2011 has bearing of the same facts obtained in F.A.No.749 of 2011. For convenience sake F.A.No.749 of 2011 is taken as lead case. 2. The complainant-firm filed appeal. The appeal is field challenging the order of the District Forum on the premise that it had filed along with the claim statement , the stock statement and other relevant documents and the surveyor not raised any objection that the appellant has not submitted relevant documents. It is contended that the appell...
Kuchibhotla Samba Siva Sastri S/O Muralidhara Sastri Manager, A.P. Co- ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
The writ petitioner joined the service of the respondent/ a Cooperative Bank, which was held to be State for purpose of Article 12 of the Constitution by this Court, as a Staff Assistant on 01.05.1976. He was subsequently promoted as an Assistant Development Officer/Manager (Legal) in the year 1993. While he was working as such, on 24.09.2008, the petitioner was called upon to furnish the details of the dates of birth and names of his children and also to inform as to whether the petitioner or his wife had undergone Sterilization surgery, a second time after the birth of his third child. The petitioner furnished the information called for by the respondent/Bank on 13.11.2008 setting out that his third child, a son, was born on 01.06.1984, inspite of his undergoing Vasectomy surgery on 05.08.1983. The petitioner has also informed the respondent/Bank that no further Sterilization surgery, a second time, had been undergone either by him or his wife. On 04.12.2008, an order was passed with...
G.N. Murthy and Others Vs. Kakatiya University and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
The writ petitioners, who are all non-teaching staff members, have all retired from the service of the 1st respondent - Kakatiya University on attaining the age of superannuation of 58 years on various dates. However, they seek a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent - University to treat the petitioners to have continued in service of the respondent University till they attained the age of 60 years and on that basis accord all consequential benefits including payment of salary and allowances as also terminal benefits, in accordance with law declared by the Supreme Court in the judgment rendered in CA No. 1107-08/1990 and Civil Appeal No. 641 of 1991. The writ petitioners submit that they were initially recruited to the service of the Osmania University at Hyderabad. At that time, the Post-Graduate Centre at Warangal was not only affiliated, but was also under the direct administrative control of the Osmania University. But, subsequently, by the Kakatiya University Act,...
A.Maddaiah and Others Vs. Viswanath and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.4659 o18. 10.2012 A.Maddaiah and others Viswanath and another Counsel for the petitioners: A.Jaysankara Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: N.S.Bhaskara Rao : : Cases Referred:1. 2012 (5) ALD 3.2. (2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 121 JUDGMENT:- The only point that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the major sons can be treated as legal representatives and are entitled for compensation for the death of their mother, who died in a motor accident.2. The appellants herein, who are the sons of deceased Thimmamma filed a claim petition claiming a total compensation of Rs.1,70,000/-. The I Additional District Judge - cum - Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Kurnool (hereafter, 'the Tribunal'), by its order dated 16.10.2003 in MVOP No.892 of 2002, though assessed the total compensation at Rs.1,30,000/-, but awarded only Rs.22,500/- as compensation under the heads of loss of love and effection, loss of estate, fun...
Gopireddy Prabhakar Reddy Vs. Gopireddy Suryanarayana Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3093 o18. 10-2012 Gopireddy Prabhakar Reddy Gopireddy Suryanarayana Reddy Counsel for Petitioner: Sri V. Nitesh Counsel for Respondent: --- HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 21.01.2012 in I.A.No.727 of 2011 in O.S.No.203 of 2008 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddatur. The petitioner filed the above-mentioned suit for permanent injunction against the respondent. After completion of the evidence on his side and after the cross-examination of DW.1, the petitioner came up with the above-mentioned application seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit for declaration of title and other reliefs. This application is dismissed by the trial Court. Under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC., the plaintiff can be permitted by the Court to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit if one or both of th...
Kuchibhotla Samba Siva Sastri S/O Murali Vs. Managing Director Andhra ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11148 OF 200.18-10-2012 Kuchibhotla Samba Siva Sastri S/o Muralidhara Sastri Manager, A.P. Cooperative Bank Ltd. Troop Bazaar, Hyderabad Managing Director Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Limited Troop Bazar Hyderabad Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt.Bobba Vijayalakshmi Counsel for the Respondents : Sri A.H. Ramakrishna Rao : CITATIONS: ORDER: The writ petitioner joined the service of the respondent/ a Cooperative Bank, which was held to be State for purpose of Article 12 of the Constitution by this Court, as a Staff Assistant on 01.05.1976. He was subsequently promoted as an Assistant Development Officer/Manager (Legal) in the year 1993. While he was working as such, on 24.09.2008, the petitioner was called upon to furnish the details of the dates of birth and names of his children and also to inform as to whether the petitioner or his wife had undergone Sterilization surgery, a second time after the birth of his third ...
G.Prayag Raj Vs. Smt. Sreevani @ Vani
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3117 o18. 10-2012 G.Prayag Raj Smt. Sreevani @ Vani Counsel for Petitioner: Sri A.H.Chakravarthy Counsel for Respondent: Sri Rakesh Sanghi HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: AIR 200.SC 345.ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 11.05.2012 in I.A.No.214 of 2012 in O.P.No.806 of 2010 on the file of the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. The petitioner has filed the above-mentioned O.P. for restitution of conjugal rights against the respondent. Initially, the respondent has taken the stand that as the petitioner suffers from impotency, she will join him after its cure, in case the same is curable. However, later she filed a counter claim for grant of decree for restitution of conjugal rights in case the petitioner withdraws the O.P. But, subsequently she has got the counter claim amended by claiming divorce on the ground of impotency. Several interlocutory applications were filed by either...
Sri Maram Reddy Vs. Vangala Bali Reddy
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6188 OF 200.18.10.2012 Sri Maram Reddy Vangala Bali Reddy Counsel for petitioner: Sri P.Veera Reddy Counsel for Respondent : HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: The petitioner filed O.S.No.113 of 2003 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Jammalamadugu, against the respondent, for recovery of a sum of Rs.80,000/-, on the strength of a promissory note. The suit was decreed and the decree became final. Since the respondent did not comply with the decree, the petitioner filed E.P.No.147 of 2005. The respondent filed O.S.No.206 of 2002 in the same Court against one Smt.Bavamma for recovery of certain amount. Bhavamma died and her daughter - Laxmi Devi was brought on record as legal representative. Laxmi Devi and the respondent herein entered into a compromise, wherein a sum of Rs.29,500/- was to be paid to the respondent from out of the retirement benefits of Bhavamma. A memo was filed on 09.11.2004 to that effect, and Rs.29,5...
Talasila Suresh Vs. Naarla Srinivasa Chakravathi and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6335 OF 200.18.10.2012 Talasila Suresh Naarla Srinivasa Chakravathi and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarthy Counsel for respondents: : Citations: AIR 198.Calcutta 294 ORDER: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.381 of 2003 in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Avanigadda, against the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4 for recovery of amount on the strength of a promissory note, said to have been executed by late Rama Mohana Rao, the father of the petitioner. The suit was decreed and after the decree became final, the 1st respondent filed E.P.No.107 of 2007 against the petitioner and respondent No.2, his mother, and respondents 3 and 4, his sisters. In the course of trial of the E.P., the 1st respondent wanted to mark the deposition of the petitioner herein in O.S.No.60 of 2003 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Avanigadda. The petitioner raised an objection to it by making...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »