Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Banoth Ramesh and Another Vs. the Joint Collector and Addl. Distri ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.25276 o01. 10-2012 Sri Banoth Ramesh and another The Joint Collector & Addl. District Magistrate, Khammam District & others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy Counsel for respondents : G.P. for Revenue for RRs 1 to 3 Sri B. Mayur Reddy, for R-4 : Citations: ORDER: The 1st petitioner is the owner of land in Sy.No.711/AA of Edulla Bayyaram Village, Pinapaka Mandal, Khammam District. The village is within the scheduled area. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, the 4th respondent herein, issued notification, inviting applications for selection of a retail dealer of petroleum products at Edulla Bayyaram Village, on a highway. The petitioners herein submitted a joint application. They were found to have fulfilled the criteria and came to be selected provisionally for the dealer. A letter of intent was also issued on 04-05-2011. While the 1st petitioner retained complete ownership of the land with...
Gumpenapalli SulochanA. Vs. the Tahsildar, Burgamaphad, Khammam Dist
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.30704 o01. 10.2012 Gumpenapalli Sulochana. The Tahsildar, Burgamaphad, Khammam District and others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P.V.Ramana Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: G.P. for Revenue ^Counsel for the Respondent No.5: G.P. for Home : : ?Cases Referred: ORDER: The petitioner prays for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 to 5 in interfering with the civil disputes and forcing him to vacate the land admeasuring Ac.17.00 in Survey Nos.249/1 and 250 of Sarapaka Village, Burgampahad Mandal, Khammam District as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to S.T. Community and that she purchased Ac.11.36 cents in the Survey Numbers referred to above from one Sri Toleti Rama Rao represented by his G.P.A., by name Sri P.Ramachander Rao in the year 2001. It is also stated that another extent of Acs.6.00 adjoining the said land has been developed by her. By referring to various proceedings,...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›