Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Konaki Satyanarayanamma Vs. the Branch Manager State Bank of India Old ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The complainant and her relative, G.Rama Krishna deposited in the name of the complainants grandchildren, Suryateja and Yashitha each an amount of `5,50,000/- with the respondent-bank and as per the terms of the deposit receipt the appellant is entitled to withdraw the monthly interest payable on the deposit amount. The respondent-bank credited the interest on the deposits for two months to the credit of the appellants S/B account bearing number 30805947410 and thereafter the respondent-bank failed to credit the interest to the appellants account citing objection from G.Ramakrishna for adjusting the interest to the account of the appellant. The notice got issued by the appellant had not drawn any response from the respondent-bank. 2. The respondent-bank resisted the claim on the premise that it had credited the interest on the deposits to the account of the appellant for few mo...
M/S Visakha Hospital and Diagnostics Ltd. (Care Hospital), Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The first opposite party is the appellant. The complainant filed the complaint claiming reimbursement of medical expenses of `1,84,857/- with interest and `50,000/- towards damages and costs. 2. The complainant was admitted to the first opposite party-hospital on 13.09.2009 with the complaint of chest pain and for the treatment of CAD- Mild LV dysfunction and he was discharged on 23.09.2009 and the complainant paid the bill for an amount of `1,84,857/-. The complainant contended that the opposite parties no.2 and 3 issued Arogyasri card to him and the first opposite party-hospital at the time of his admission informed him that he need not pay any amount and at the time of discharge the first opposite party collected the amount from him and the opposite parties are liable to repay the amount to him. 3. The claim is resisted on behalf of the first opposite party on the premise that the complainants son informed the first opposite...
Shri Ashok Kumar Mishra Vs. the Apollo Hospital Jubilee Hills and Othe ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complainants filed the complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, complaining deficiency in service against the opposite parties no.1 and 2 seeking direction to the opposite parties to pay an amount of `43,24,899/- under various heads such as medical expenses, future expenses for angioplasty and compensation etc., 2. The complainant, a teacher by profession suffered from angina for the first time in the month of August,1997 and he was admitted to Lashkare Hospital in Betul and thereafter he contacted Dr.P.C.Manoria, cardiologist in Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal on whose advise he approached the first opposite party-hospital on 23.12.1997 where the second opposite party performed coronary angiography on him on 24.12.1997 and the complainant was discharged on 12.01.1998 from the first opposite party-hospital. In the discharge summary two contradictory findings as to critical long lesion and retrograde filling...
Indian Telecom Service Association, Ap Chapter, Rep. by Its Joint Secr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
G. Rohini, J. The 1st petitioner is an Association of The Indian Telecommunication Service Group-A Officers and the 2nd petitioner is one of its members. They filed O.A.No.465 of 2012 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 challenging the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 19.3.2012 as well as the Memo dated 27.12.2011 issued by the 3rd respondent and seeking a consequential direction to the 2nd respondent to take necessary steps for placing the Cadre Review Proposal of Indian Telecommunication Service before the Cadre Review Committee in accordance with the procedure envisaged in the Memo dated 14.12.2010. The said O.A. was admitted and by order dated 26.4.2012 the impugned order dated 27.12.2011 was suspended. While so, the respondents 1 to 6 herein filed a Transfer Petition being P.T.No.114 of 2012 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi under Section 25 of the Adminis...
State of A.P. Rep. by Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderab ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
The preliminary objection raised by Sri Challa Sitaramaiah, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri B. Rajendra and M. Narender Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents, is that the present appeal is not maintainable since the appellants herein i.e., State of Andhra Pradesh have not challenged the common findings in O.S. Nos.274 and 276 of 1983, but challenged only the findings in O.S. No.141 of 1984 and, therefore, this appeal is hit by the principle of Res judicata. The brief facts of the case are as follows. One Ghulam Ahmed Khan filed O.S. No.274 of 1983 claiming title to an extent of Ac.6.08 guntas in Survey No.9/13, Khairatabad village, within the specified boundaries seeking declaration of title and for injunction. One Mohd. Osman filed O.S. No.276 of 1983 claiming title to an extent of Ac.3.00 guntas in Survey No.9/13 of Khairatabad village within the specified boundaries. One Ranga Reddy, Vijaya Reddy and 7 others filed O.S. No.141 of 1984 claiming title to an extent of Ac....
Banoth Ramesh and Another Vs. the Joint Collector and Addl. District M ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
The 1st petitioner is the owner of land in Sy.No.711/AA of Edulla Bayyaram Village, Pinapaka Mandal, Khammam District. The village is within the scheduled area. The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, the 4th respondent herein, issued notification, inviting applications for selection of a retail dealer of petroleum products at Edulla Bayyaram Village, on a highway. The petitioners herein submitted a joint application. They were found to have fulfilled the criteria and came to be selected provisionally for the dealer. A letter of intent was also issued on 04-05-2011. While the 1st petitioner retained complete ownership of the land with him, the 2nd petitioner agreed to provide the necessary finances, and that was to result in 75% of share for the 1st petitioner and 25%, for the 2nd petitioner. One of the conditions to be complied by the petitioners was that they must obtain a ‘No Objection Certificate’ from the revenue authorities, for installation of the outlet in the ...
Yerragogu Mrutyunjaya Rao Vs. Marni Kumara Veeraswamy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 26.08.1998 made in O.S. No.83 of 1987 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, at Eluru, West Godavari District, whereby and whereunder the suit filed by the first respondent/plaintiff for specific performance has been decreed, the third defendant in the lower Court preferred this appeal. The parties, hereinafter, will be referred to as they are arrayed before the lower Court for the sake of convenience. The first defendant Yerragogu Satyavathi was the original owner of the suit schedule property. Defendants 3, 7 and 8 are the sons of defendant No.1, defendants 4, 9 and 10 are the daughters of defendant No.1. The specific case of the plaintiff is that defendant No.1 agreed to sell the suit schedule land admeasuring Ac.4-56 cents at Rs.69,000/- per acre and having received an amount of Rs.50,000/- executed an agreement of sale in Ex.A1 on 19.05.1986. The further case of the plaintiff is that Exs.A3, A4 and A5 are the title deeds of def...
Gumpenapalli Sulochana Vs. the Tahsildar and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
The petitioner prays for a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondents 1 to 5 in interfering with the civil disputes and forcing him to vacate the land admeasuring Ac.17.00 in Survey Nos.249/1 and 250 of Sarapaka Village, Burgampahad Mandal, Khammam District as illegal and arbitrary. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to S.T. Community and that she purchased Ac.11.36 cents in the Survey Numbers referred to above from one Sri Toleti Rama Rao represented by his G.P.A., by name Sri P.Ramachander Rao in the year 2001. It is also stated that another extent of Acs.6.00 adjoining the said land has been developed by her. By referring to various proceedings, that ensued before different authorities in respect of the said land, the petitioner contends that Toleti Rama Rao filed O.S.No.49 of 1999 in the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem against the respondents herein for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the said land and O.S.No.242 of 2005 in the Co...
Indian Telecom Service Association, Ap C Vs. Union of India, Rep. by I ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.22756 OF 201.01.10.2012 Indian Telecom Service Association, AP Chapter, rep. By its Joint Secretary K. Raja Sekhar, Hyderabad and another Union of India, rep. By its Secretary,Department of Pension & Pensioners' Welfare, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market,New Delhi 003. and 7 others Counsel for the petitioners: Smt. G. Jhansi Counsel for respondents:Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud Asst. Solicitor General of India (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2012) 4 SCC 21.2 (2005) 1 SCC 7.3 (2009) 6 SCC 26.4 AIR 200.SC 329.ORDER: (Per G. Rohini, J) The 1st petitioner is an Association of The Indian Telecommunication Service Group-A Officers and the 2nd petitioner is one of its members. They filed O.A.No.465 of 2012 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 challenging the ...
State of A.P. Rep. by Collector, Hyderab Vs. B. Ranga Reddy and Others ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.CHANDRA KUMAR C.C.C.A. No.194 o01. 10.2012 State of A.P. rep. by Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad and others B. Ranga Reddy and others. Counsel for the Appellants:Sri A. Sudershan Reddy, Advocate-General Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Challa Sitaramaiah, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri B. Rajendra and M. Narender Reddy : : Cases Referred:1. (1974) 2 SCC 15.2. (1979) 4 SCC 16.3. (2005) 6 SCC 30.4. 1993 Supp(2) SCC 14.5. 1993 Supp(2) SCC 14.6. 1995(2)ALT 122(DB) 7. AIR 196.SC 133.8. (2010) 7 SCC 71.9. AIR 199.Karnatak10. (1974) 2 SCC 39.11. (1995) 6 SCC 73.12. (2007) 11 SCC 7.13. (2001) 8 SCC 17.14. AIR 199.Madra15. AIR 199.SC 120.16. (2004) 1 SCC 71.17. (2002) 2 SCC 8.18. (2003) SCC 3.19. (2003) 9 SCC 60.Order: The preliminary objection raised by Sri Challa Sitaramaiah, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri B. Rajendra and M. Narender Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents, is that the present appeal is not maintainable si...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »