Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Tata Capital Ltd. Vs. Mrs Chinnam Swathi
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-31-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite party in the complaint is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint seeking for release of the vehicle, Tata Innova bearing registration number AP09BR 4269 along with cash, jewelry, documents and other valuables and compensation to the extent of `1,00,000/- and costs. 2. The respondent purchased Tata Innova bearing registration number AP09BR 4269 by raising loan from the appellant-company. The appellant-company issued loan repayment schedule of EMI @ `18,018/- for 60 months ending on 8.06.2013. 3. The version of the respondent is that she was not aware of the fact that she fell due the EMIs for the period from August,2009 till Novemebr,2009 and the recovery agents of the appellant-company without issuing prior notice forcibly seized the vehicle along with prescriptions, valuable documents and cash while she was proceeding to a hospital on 24.04.2009. The appellant-company furnished payment particulars to the re...
Angishetty Chandra Shekar Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
This Criminal Petition is laid under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). The two petitioners seek for the quashing of C.C.No.176 of 2009 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad. The charge sheet was laid by the police alleging that the two petitioners are the accused and that they committed the offence u/s.420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). 2. The case of the second respondent-de facto complainant is: a) The petitioners herein approached the second respondent and others through an intermediary by name Manchukonda Raghu and offer to sell Ac.2.15 guntas of agricultural land situate at Mohobatnagar, Maheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District at Rs.1 crore per acre. On 28.04.2006 the petitioners went to the house of the second respondent and received an advance of Rs.60 lakhs from the second respondent and executed an agreement of sale. b) The second respondent later came to know that there was a dispute regarding the title of the land. The sec...
Boya Chennappa Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, K
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33629 o30. 10-2012 Boya Chennappa The Revenue Divisional Officer, Adoni, Kurnool District,and others. Counsel for Petitioner: Sri K.V. Raghuveer Counsel for Respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies HEAD NOTE: CITATIONS: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside proceedings in RC(M).No.312/2012, dated 28.09.2012, of respondent No.1, whereby he has purported to suspend the petitioner's fair price shop authorization. I have heard Mr. K.V. Raghuveer, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies. A perusal of the impugned order shows that respondent No.1 has framed three charges and called for the petitioner's explanation thereto. Accordingly, the petitioner has submitted his explanation on 15.03.2012. Purporting to consider the petitioner's explanation, respondent No.1 has passed the impugned order suspending the petitioner's authorization and directing res...
Chippa Raghuramulu Vs. 1.The Joint Collector-i, R.R. District,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY C.R.P.Nos.3927 of 2011; 583, 610 and 809 o30. 10-2012 C.R.P.No.3927 of 2011: Chippa Raghuramulu 1.The Joint Collector-I, R.R. District, Khairatabad, Hyderabad & Ors. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS: SRI B.VENKATA RAMA RAO COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 2 TO 8.SRI VEDULA VENKATA RAMANA, SENIOR COUNSEL COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: GOVT. PLEADER FOR REVENUE : ?CITATIONS:1. (1998) 9 SCC 18.2) 1988 (1) A.L.T3. 2002 (6) ALD 35.COMMON ORDER: In all these Civil Revision Petitions filed under Section 91 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, (for short, 'the Tenancy Act'), the petitioners and the respondents are the same. By a common order, dated 04.02.2011, in Case Nos.F2/2269/2006; F2/2270/2006; F2/2271/2006 and F2/2272/2006, the Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioners and thereby confirmed the orders passed by the Special Grade Deputy Collector and Revenue Divisional...
1. the Divisional Manager, South Central Vs. P.Bhaskar Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.10710 OF 200.30.10.2012 1. The Divisional Manager, South Central Railway,Hyderabad Division, Secunderabad, and 2 others. P.Bhaskar Rao Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Bhaskar Polluri Counsel for respondent:Sri Shiva GIST: HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. AIR 200.SC 76.2 AIR 196.SC 95.3 AIR 197.SC 221.In W.P.No.10710 of 2008: Between 2. The Divisional Manager, South Central Railway, Hyderabad Division, Secunderabad., and 2 others.... Petitioners And P. Bhaskar Rao... Respondent In W.P.No.12355 2008: Between 1. The Divisional Manager, South Central Railway, Hyderabad Division, Secunderabad., and 2 others.... Petitioners And P. Bhaskar Rao ... Respondent In W.P.No.20590 of 2012: Between 1. Union of India, rep. by Secretary, Railway Board,Ministry of Railways, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi;and 4 others.... Petitioners And P. Bhaskar Rao... Respondent WRIT PETITION No.10710 OF 2008.WRIT PETITION No.12355 OF 20...
Erroju Brahmachary S/O.Ramachandram, Age Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY WP Nos.24352 of 2009; 2596 and 13077 o30. 10-2012 W.P.No.24352 of 2009 Erroju Brahmachary S/o.Ramachandram, aged 46 years, Occu:Employee, R/o.Mancherial, Adilabad District & Ors. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District & Ors. COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS: SRI V.RAVI KIRAN RAO (in WP Nos.24352 of 2009 and 2596 of 2010) COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONERS:SRI A.L.RAJU (in W.P.No.13077 of 2010) COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: ASST. GOVT. PLEADER FOR REVENUE COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT NO.3: SRI M.R.S.SRINIVAS : ?CITATIONS:1. 2003 (1) ALT 688(DB) 2) 2003 (5) ALD 65.(DB) 3) 2003 (1) ALD 56.(DB) 4) 2005 (2) ALD 83.5) 2004 (4) ALD 7.Writ Petition No.2596 of 2010: Between: K.V.Pratap S/o.K.V.Ramanaiah ..... Petitioner AND The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mancherial, Adilabad District & Ors. .....Respondents Writ Petition No.13077 of 2010: Between: M/s.Bharathi Educational Society rep. by its President Smt.Bharathi Murthy & Anr...
Sri Angishetty Chandra Shekar Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR Crl. Petition No.10714 o30. 10.2012 Sri Angishetty Chandra Shekar The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, and another Counsel for the Appellant: A.H. Chakravarthy Counsel for the Respondents:S. Ashok Anand Kumar for R-2 Asst.Public Prosecutor for R-1 : Cases referred:1. 2010 (2) ALD (Crl.) 363 (AP) 2. 2010 (2) ALD (Crl.) 373 (AP) 3. 2010 (2) ALD (Crl.) 584 (SC) 4. 2010 (2) ALD (Crl.5. AIR 199.SC 60.6. 2006 (2) APLJ 2 (SN) ORDER: This Criminal Petition is laid under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.). The two petitioners seek for the quashing of C.C.No.176 of 2009 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad. The charge sheet was laid by the police alleging that the two petitioners are the accused and that they committed the offence u/s.420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).2. The case of the second respondent-de facto complainant is: a) The petitioners herein approache...
The Branch Manager Shriram Life Insurance Co.Ltd. and Another Vs. Smt ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The opposite-party insurance company is the appellant. The respondents son during his life time obtained insurance policy of Shri Laab Plus with the appellant , vide insurance policy bearing number LN80800142769 with its commencement from 21.08.2008 for a sum assured amount of `2,50,000/- and the premium is single premium for Rs.50,000/-.The respondents son died on 12.10.2009. After the death of her son , the respondent filed claim with the appellant insurance company which refused to settle the claim on the ground that the Form B was not duly filled up by the medical attendant. 2. The respondent contended that the deceased did not suppress any fact in regard to his health at the time of submitting the proposal. 3. The appellant-insurance company resisted the claim on the premise that its investigator handed over claim forms A,B and C and the respondent submitted the forms except Form B which was submitted in blank. The investi...
T. Sivanagappa Vs. M/S Shiridi Sai Estates, Rep. by Tis Managing Direc ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
Oral Order: (Sri R.Lakshminarasimha Rao, Honble Member) 1. The complainant has filed appeal challenging the order of the District Forum whereby his complaint was dismissed on the premise that the appellant was not allotted plot number and the complaint was not filed within the period of limitation. 2. The appellant got enrolled as a member in the venture Sri Shirdi Sai Estates in the year,1995, floated by the respondents. The respondents allotted membership nos. 1591 and 1592 in favour of the appellant. The scheme was commenced on 17.02.1995 and its duration is for a period of 60 months. The appellant paid all the installments amounting to `42,000/- and the respondents acknowledging receipt of the amount, issued receipt in favour of the appellant. 3. The respondents allotted plot number 36 admeasuring 5.5 cents in the venture in favour of the appellant. The appellant has got issued notice dated 14.09.2009 calling upon the respondents to execute sale deed or in the alternative to pay an...
G. Kalpana Vs. Vrl Logistics Ltd. Rajahmundry Rep. by Its Manager and ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-30-2012
ORAL ORDER: (Honble Sri Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) Appellant is un-successful complainant. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that she booked a consignment of clothes to Chinnamma Talli Cloth Stores, Mahagaon through respondent transport company from Rajahmundry to Narasannapeta on 19.12.2007 at its Rajahmundry office. As per the rules unless original receipt was produced the respondent transport company should not deliver the goods to the consignee. As the disputes arose between them, she did not send the original receipt to the consignee and also requested the respondent to re-book the consignment to her agreeing to bear the necessary charges for re-booking by her letter dt. 24.4.2008. Instead of re-booking the consignment, in collusion with consignee, the respondent delivered the consignment. Alleging it amounts to deficiency in service, she filed the complaint claiming Rs. 52,387/- towards value of the consignment together with compensation of Rs. 1 lakh and costs o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »