Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nallapati Balaramaiah Vs. Manugoti Sri Lakshmi,rep. by Special Pow
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.75 OF 201.04-10-2012 Sri E. Padma Rao @ vadla Padma Rao & 2 others Vijay Kumar & another Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri A.H. Chakravarthy Counsel for the Respondents: -- : ?Cases referred :2002. 3) ALD 32.AIR 200.AP 39.2010 (1) ALD 24.ORDER: The petitioners executed an agreement of sale on 28-01-2001 in favour of the respondents for sale of an extent of Acs.4.00 Guntas of land in survey No.79 & 80 of Qutbhullapur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The parties agreed to divide the land into plots and the petitioners have undertaken to execute sale deeds in respect of the plots in the lay out in favour of the persons that may be nominated by the respondents. It is stated that the substantial extent of property was sold as contemplated under the agreement. However, disputes have arisen as regards the execution of sale deeds in respect of above plots.2. The respondents filed O.S. No.545 of 2006 in th...
Medi Koteswara Prasad Vs. Medi Manemma and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION No.9385 o04. 10-2012 Medi Koteswara Prasad Medi Manemma and others Counsel for the petitioner:Sri K. Chaidambaram Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Sri Siva Sankara Rao Borra Counsel for Respondent No.3: Public Prosecutor : ?Cases referred: NIL ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings in D.V.C.No.12 of 2010 (DVC) on the file of the Court of II Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tenali, Guntur District. 2. The petitioner herein is the respondent and the respondents herein are the petitioners in the DVC. For the sake of convenience, I refer the parties as arrayed in the DVC. 3. The complaint was filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short 'the Act'), for granting the following reliefs under Sections 19, 20 and 22 of the Act:1. Residence order i.e., alternate accommodation/rent of the same level at Rs.1,000/- per ...
Athapuram Raghuramaiah and Another. Vs. Dyava Ramaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3989 o04. 10-2012 Athapuram Raghuramaiah and another. Dyava Ramaiah Counsel for the petitioners : Sri P.V. Narayana Rao Counsel for Respondent : Sri V.V. Ramana Rao : Cases referred:1. AIR 200.SC 63.2. 2011 (2) ALD 7.3. AnWR 196.AP 46.4. 2004(3) ALD 18.ORDER : This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 02.03.2010 in O.S.No.43 of 2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, wherein it has been held that Exs.B-1 to B-3 documents marked through D.W.1 were deficiently stamped and accordingly directed the concerned party to take steps for impounding the documents either before the Court or before the concerned authorities.2. The respondent herein filed suit O.S.No.43 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, impleading the petitioners herein as defendants seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining them from entering into and interfe...
Sri V.Basavaiah Vs. Sri Ch.Lakshmi and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.879 o04. 10.2012 Sri V.Basavaiah Sri Ch.Lakshmi and another Counsel for petitioner: Sri Ch.Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent No.1 : Sri Gade Venkateswara Rao HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred AIR 196.SC 119.ORDER: The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.1822 of 2006 in the Court of II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, for recovery of certain amount, on the strength of a promissory note. An ex parte decree was passed, on 18-11-2008. Thereafter the 1st respondent obtained a precept and filed E.P.No.90 of 2009 in the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. The petitioner states that he filed I.A.No.88 of 2012 in the trial Court, under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C., with a prayer to set aside the ex parte decree and since there was delay in filing the said application, he filed I.A.No.87 of 2012, under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The application is said to be...
Sri E. Padma Rao @ Vadla Padma Rao and 2 O Vs. Vijay Kumar and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.75 OF 201.04-10-2012 Sri E. Padma Rao @ vadla Padma Rao & 2 others Vijay Kumar & another Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri A.H. Chakravarthy Counsel for the Respondents: -- : ?Cases referred :2002. 3) ALD 32.AIR 200.AP 39.2010 (1) ALD 24.ORDER: The petitioners executed an agreement of sale on 28-01-2001 in favour of the respondents for sale of an extent of Acs.4.00 Guntas of land in survey No.79 & 80 of Qutbhullapur Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The parties agreed to divide the land into plots and the petitioners have undertaken to execute sale deeds in respect of the plots in the lay out in favour of the persons that may be nominated by the respondents. It is stated that the substantial extent of property was sold as contemplated under the agreement. However, disputes have arisen as regards the execution of sale deeds in respect of above plots.2. The respondents filed O.S. No.545 of 2006 in th...
Gowri Seepana Vs. M/S Aviva Life Insurance Co.,ltd. Rep. by Its Author ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed in the complaint. 3. The brief facts as seen from the complaint is that on 15.03.2008 the complainants mother Rajeswari, insured her life under East Life Plus unit linked scheme by paying half yearly premium of `5,000/-. The sum assured on the policy was `1,00,000/-. The complainant was a nominee. While the policy was in force, the policy holder died on 02.04.2008 due to heart-attack. On 30.04.2008, the complainant made a claim by submitting all documents. The opposite parties postponed the settlement of claim on some pretext or other. Non settlement of claim amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite parties. The complainant got issued notice dated 10.3.2010 to the opposite parties. The opposite parties inspite of receipt of notice did not respond. Therefore, the complainant filed the complaint befo...
The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited and Ano ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The District Forum has passed the order directing the appellant company to pay an amount of `3,15,818/- with interest @ 9% per annum. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed in the complaint. 3. The brief facts as seen from the complaint are that the complainant insured his Jeep bearing registration No.AP-22 D-1819 with the opposite party insurance company for `3,15,818/- under policy No.051104/31/01/31907 valid from 29-10-2001 to 28-10-2002. On 28-6-2002 the complainants Jeep was stolen away by some unknown offenders when it was parked at Ossian Lodge at Mahabubnagar. The complainant submitted the claim with the opposite parties by submitting required documents. The opposite parties repudiated the claim on the ground that the vehicle was let on hire. Thereupon the complainant got issued notice dated 24-12-2010 to the opposite parties. The opposite parties gave r...
United India Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice Sri D.Appa Rao, President) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party-Insurance Company directing it to pay Rs.8,28,065/-, besides compensation of Rs.5,000/- and costs of Rs.1,000/-. 2. The case of the complainant in brief is that he has been doing timber business at Door No.2/2 of Mamidalapadu Village, Kurnool District on a loan taken from the Syndicate Bank, Kurnool, which in turn had taken Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy for a sum of Rs.11,00,000/- covering the period from 28.01.2009 to 27.01.2010. While so, on 02.10.2009 there were floods in Thunga Bhadra and Hundri rivers due to which the entire timber depot was inundated and the entire timber was damaged. On a complaint, the Insurance Company appointed a surveyor, M.R.Srinivasan who in turn estimated the loss at Rs.8,58,065/-. Despite his request, the Insurance Company repudiated the claim on the ground that the location differs and therefore the claim was not admissible. Assailing t...
T. Venkata Ramanaiah Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Heard Sri Raja Reddy Koneti, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri P.C. Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments for respondents 1 to 4, Sri V.T.M. Prasad, learned standing counsel for Endowments for the 5th respondent and Sri V. Venugopal Rao, learned counsel for the 6th respondent. The petitioner claims to be a hereditary Archaka of Sri Eswara and Veerabhadra Swamy temple, Nallagatla village, Allagadda Mandal, Kurnool District since 1992 along with his brother and the petitioner and his brother are claimed to be in possession of Ac.20.18 cents as per the order of the Joint Commissioner, Endowments, Department, dated 02-05-1974. The temple possessed another extent of Ac.29.41 cents fetching an annual income of Rs.1,59,000/- as per the review meeting conducted by the Additional Commissioner-I, Endowments, Hyderabad dated 21-04-2011. The petitioner claims it to be unnecessary to appoint an Executive Officer for Section 6 (c) temple and as per the various Government o...
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by Its Managing ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Common Judgment: (Per G. Rohini, J) W.A.Nos.1069, 1070 and 1071 of 2012 are filed by the respondents in W.P.Nos.22369, 22370 and 22832 of 2012 (A.P. State Road Transport Corporation) aggrieved by the common order dated 6.8.2012 passed by a learned Single Judge granting interim suspension of the orders impugned in the said writ petitions. Since the issue involved in the writ appeals and the writ petitions is one and the same and the pleadings in all the writ petitions are complete, we thought it appropriate to hear and dispose of the writ petitions also along with the writ appeals. Accordingly, with the consent of the learned counsel for both the parties, all the writ appeals and writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment. Brief facts:- The writ petitioners who are the employees of the A.P. State Road Transport Corporation (for short, 'Corporation') were placed under suspension pending enquiry in public interest by separate orders dated 16.7.2012. On 16.7.2012 itself c...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »