Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nallapati Balaramaiah Vs. Manugoti Sri Lakshmi, Rep. by Special Power ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
Common Order: These three Civil Revision Petitions arise out of a single suit between the same parties. Hence, they are heard and being disposed of together. The petitioner is the defendant in OS.No.49 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, Guntur District. The said suit was filed by the respondent for permanent injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with her possession of the suit schedule property. The trial in the case was commenced in the year 2009. After both the parties have examined their respective witnesses i.e., four on each side, the suit was posted for arguments on 27-11-2009. Thereafter, the respondent has filed three IAs viz., IA.No.683 of 2010 for reopening the plaintiff’s side evidence, IA.No.684 of 2010 for recalling PW.1 and IA.No.685 of 2010 for marking six documents. The petitioner resisted the said applications. However, the lower Court, by separate Orders, allowed all the IAs. Feeling aggrieved by these ...
Nanduri Ramakrishna and Another Vs. Penakati Narasimha Murthy @ Avatha ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
The petitioners filed O.S. No.27 of 2011 in the Court of the principal Senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry against the respondent for recovery of a sum of Rs.4,24,906/- on the strength of two promissory notes, dated 30-12-2007. The respondent filed a written statement stating inter alia that his signatures were obtained on the blank promissory notes by the petitioners at the time of registration of a document in respect of an item of immovable property. The trial of the suit commenced. The affidavit in lieu of chief examination of PW-1 was filed. At this stage, the respondent filed I.A. No.2110 of 2011 under Section 151 CPC praying that the cross examination of PW-1 be deferred till the affidavits in lieu of chief examination of all other witnesses, to be examined on behalf of the petitioners herein, are filed. The petitioners opposed the application on the grounds of facts and law. 2. The trial Court, however, allowed the I.A. through its order, dated 13-12-2011. Hence, this revision. 3. ...
Buyyana Sriramulu Vs. Golla Venkataratnam
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 16-3-2012 in E.A.No.767/2012 in E.P.No.54/2012 in O.S.No.4/2009 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kothagudem. The petitioner suffered a decree for perpetual injunction in the above mentioned suit filed by the respondent. The respondent filed E.P.No.54/2012 for execution of the decree. In the said E.P. he has filed E.A.No.767/2012 seeking the Police aid. The lower Court, by its order dated 16-3-2012, straightaway gave a direction to the Police to grant necessary aid for implementation of the decree upto 26-3-2012. Even though, the period for which the direction was given has expired, I feel it necessary to observe that the lower Court has committed a serious error in granting exparte order of the Police aid. When an application for the Police aid is filed, the Court is bound to issue notice to the other party before considering grant of such relief in favour of the applicant, for the relief of the Police aid m...
Musam Hari Prasad and Another Vs. Pattana Padmashali Sangam and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred assailing the order dated 15.09.2011 in I.A. No.937 of 2010 in O.P. No.183 of 2009 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet. The appellants herein are the petitioners and the respondents herein are the respondents in the I.A. as well as in the O.P. 2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the I.A. as well as in the O.P. 3. The O.P. is filed under Section 23 of Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 before the trial Court seeking a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to furnish correct audited accounts of respondent No.1 society from the period of their taking charge, convene the general body meeting and to conduct the elections, and if finds any misappropriation, respondents 2 and 3 may be directed to make good of the amounts by depositing the same with interest in the account of respondent No.1- society. However, the O.P. was dismissed for non-prosecut...
Urumula Yellamma W/O.Late Venkatappa Red Vs. 1)pullapati Raja Rao, 2)p ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.437 o04. 10.2012 Urumula Yellamma w/o.late Venkatappa Reddy 1)Pullapati Raja Rao, 2)Pullapati Rupadhar, 3) Pullapati Lata, 4)Pullapati Usharani Counsel for the Appellant: Sri K.S.Murthy Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri P.Thirumala Rao ^Counsel for Respondents 2 to 4 : Sri Upendra Chakravarthy GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?Cases referred : JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred assailing the order dated 11.03.2005 in I.A. No.1205 of 2004 in O.S. No.497 of 2004 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur.2. The appellant herein is the petitioner - plaintiff and the respondents herein are the respondents - defendants in the I.A. Suit is filed for declaration and for consequential injunction restraining the respondents - defendants, their men from interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner - plaintiff over the suit schedule property.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to a...
Uppalapati Ramanamma W/O.Seshaiah Vs. Ravella Pitchaiah and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.R.P. No. 3628 o04. 10.2012 Uppalapati Ramanamma w/o.Seshaiah Ravella Pitchaiah and others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri S.Venkateswarlu Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 and 6: Sri M.Sudhir Kumar GIST : HEAD NOTE : Cases referred : -Nil- ORDER: This revision is filed against the order dated 02.06.2010 in I.A. No.631 of 2010 in O.S. No.349 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole.2. The revision petitioner is defendant No.1 and the respondents are the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 2 to 4. The suit is filed for partition of the suit schedule property. The plaintiffs filed the present I.A. No.631 of 2010 under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') for amendment of the plaint and the plaint schedule.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the I.A. To give more clarity, the revision petitioner, who is respondent No.1 (defendant No.1) in the I.A, is hereinafter ref...
Mohd. Azmath and Another Vs. Nemuri Ramesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY C.R.P. No.905 o04. 10-2012 Mohd. Azmath and another Nemuri Ramesh Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy Counsel for respondent : -- : Citations: ORDER: The respondent filed O.S.No.173 of 2007 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Medchal, Ranga Reddy District, against the petitioners for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The trial of the suit commenced, and it has progressed to a substantial extent. At that stage, the respondent filed I.A.No.1366 of 2011, under Rule 17 of Order VI C.P.C., with a prayer to permit him to amend the plaint, including the prayer, in the suit. The basis was that, during the pendency of the suit, the petitioners entered the suit schedule property on 13-09-2011, claiming rights under document dated 10- 05-2004, and thereby, the necessity has arisen to amend the suit, in such a way, that the prayer for declaration of title and recovery of possession is incorpor...
Ashwini Kumar Agarwal and Others. Vs. Smt.N.Sunitha and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.850 o04. 10.2012 Ashwini Kumar Agarwal and others. Smt.N.Sunitha and others Counsel for petitioners: Sri V.Hari Haran Counsel for Respondents 1 and 2: Sri C.Raghu HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred ORDER: Respondents 3 and 4 herein filed O.S.No.479 of 2009 in the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar, against the petitioners and respondent No.5 for cancellation of a sale deed, dated 01.08.1961, executed in their favour in respect of the suit schedule property. During the pendency of the suit, the 2nd plaintiff, the 4th respondent herein, is said to have entered into a compromise with the petitioners. It is also stated that a sum of Rs.15 lakhs was paid to her by the petitioners. A memorandum of compromise was filed, but the same is yet to be recorded. At that stage, respondents 1 and 2 claiming to be the children of the 4th respondent filed an application, being I.A...
1)musam Hari Prasad, 2) Ravirala Mallaia Vs. 1) Pattana Padmashali San ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.54 OF 201.04.10.2012 1)Musam Hari Prasad, 2) Ravirala Mallaiah 1) Pattana Padmashali Sangam, 2) Appam Srinivas, 3) Yelagadula Sudarshan Counsel for the Appellants: Sri K.Narasimha Chari Counsel for Respondents : Sri K.Mahipathy Rao GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?Cases referred : JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred assailing the order dated 15.09.2011 in I.A. No.937 of 2010 in O.P. No.183 of 2009 on the file of the Court of II Additional District Judge, Nalgonda at Suryapet. The appellants herein are the petitioners and the respondents herein are the respondents in the I.A. as well as in the O.P.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the I.A. as well as in the O.P.3. The O.P. is filed under Section 23 of Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 before the trial Court seeking a direction to respondents 2 and 3 to furnish correct audited accounts of respondent No.1 society from the...
Sri Ravula Krishna Vs. 1)smt. Lakshmamma
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M. A. No.496 OF 200.04.10.2012 Sri Ravula Krishna 1)Smt. Lakshmamma 2)The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Sri K.Jagathpal Reddy Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri G.Purushotham Rao GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?Cases referred : -Nil- JUDGMENT: The applicant in W.C.No.210 of 2004 assailing the impugned order dated 21.06.2005 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I, Hyderabad filed this C.M.A. seeking enhancement since he was awarded only Rs.3,02,803/- though he claimed a total compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the grievous injuries and fractures sustained by him in the accident out of and during the course of employment with opposite party No.1.2. The parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the W.C.3. The brief facts of the case of the applicant are that he was working as driver of auto trolley bearing not AP 2.T 219.belonging to opposite Party No.1 and he was paid ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »