Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vasa Hariprasada Reddy Vs. the State of A.P. Represented by Its Pub
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9602 OF 201.05-10-2012 Vasa Hariprasada Reddy The State of A.P. Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court of A.P.Hyd.and Anr. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri C. Subodh Counsel for the Respondents: Addl.Public Prosecutor for R-1Smt. M.Suguna for R-2 : ?CITATIONS: ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash CC.No. 794 of 2007 on the file of the Court of II-Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, Nellore district. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the first respondent-State. None appears for the second respondent-defacto complainant. 3. The brief facts disclosed from the complaint-petition filed by the second respondent before the learned Magistrate are the following: The second respondent, A1 and A2 entered into a partnership deed on 30-9- 2003 to carry on the business in purchase and sale of Acqua ...
Branch Manager, Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Situated at Hero ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) The opposite party, insurance company, preferred the appeal against the order of the District Forum directing it to pay Rs.3,91,791/- covered under the policy. The case of the complainant in brief is that her husband, C.Mallela Bali Reddy, took life insurance policy for a sum of Rs.3,91,790/- commencing from 30-7-2008. While so he died on 20-12-2008 due to brain Haemorrhage. The said fact was informed to the insurance company and the required documents were submitted. However, it was repudiated on the ground that the assured was suffering from hypertension from 16-1-2008 and it was suppressed and therefore she was not entitled to the amount and refunded an amount of Rs.9,271.76 ps. paid towards premium amount. Assailing the said repudiation, she filed the complaint to pay the maturity value of Rs.3,91,791/- i.e. together with interest at 18%, compensation of Rs.50,000/- and costs. The insurance company resisted the case. It alleged...
M/S Sairam Fruit Company General Fruit Commission Agent Rep. by Its Pr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Oral Order: (R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The respondent filed complaint seeking for a sum of `36,000/- towards compensation and interest thereon and costs. 2, The appellant is a wholesale general fruit commission agent and running the business under the name and style of Sairam Fruit Company at Gaddiannaram, Kothapet, R.R. District. The respondent approached the appellant on 25.06.2009 with a request to sell cheene fruits(battai fruits) weighing 7,370/- kgs and the appellant assured him that the respondent would get the amount between `10,000/- to `13,000/- . The appellant without following the procedure to sell the fruits commenced auction starting with lowest price at `46,000/- and after deducting commission for labour and other expenses the appellant paid an amount of `40,100/- to the respondent. The respondent stating that the appellant played unfair trade practice and caused loss to the tune of `36,000/- which he claimed from the appellant by filing the complaint. 3. The app...
S. Madhavi Vs. Sunil Kumar the Contractor for Necklace Road Parking an ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. She along with her cousin Neelima and her children went to necklace road in her car bearing registration number AP 9 N 3981. She parked the vehicle at the parking area and the respondent no.1 collected from her an amount of `10/- towards parking charges and to the effect issued receipt. The appellant and her relatives came back to the car after visiting the exhibition and found the front portion of the car damaged which might have occurred by hit by another vehicle. The appellant enquired about the damage to her car with the employee of the first respondent and she along with her friend s husband, Shailesh reported the matter to the Police. 2. The employee of the first respondent contacted him on phone and promised that they would get the car repaired and they came to V.R.M.Auto Works where the car was taken for the repairs and instructed the garage owner Asif to repair the car. The car was n...
Urumula Yellamma Vs. Pullapati Raja Rao and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred assailing the order dated 11.03.2005 in I.A. No.1205 of 2004 in O.S. No.497 of 2004 on the file of the Court of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Guntur. 2. The appellant herein is the petitioner - plaintiff and the respondents herein are the respondents - defendants in the I.A. Suit is filed for declaration and for consequential injunction restraining the respondents - defendants, their men from interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioner - plaintiff over the suit schedule property. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the I.A. 4. The petitioner filed the present I.A. under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘CPC’) for temporary injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents etc. in any way interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the petition schedule property or from entering into an...
Athapuram Raghuramaiah and Another Vs. Dyava Ramaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 02.03.2010 in O.S.No.43 of 2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, wherein it has been held that Exs.B-1 to B-3 documents marked through D.W.1 were deficiently stamped and accordingly directed the concerned party to take steps for impounding the documents either before the Court or before the concerned authorities. 2. The respondent herein filed suit O.S.No.43 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, impleading the petitioners herein as defendants seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining them from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property measuring Ac.0.04 gts of land in Sy.No.43/A situated at Kurikyala Village, Gangadhar Mandal, Karimnagar District. According to the plaint averments, the respondent-plaintiff is the absolute owner and is in exclusive possession of the said proper...
S. Balaji Kumar Vs. K. Muralidhar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 20-4-2012 in I.A.No.109/2011 in O.S.No.12/2009 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Hindupur. The petitioner is the defendant in the suit filed by the respondent for recovery of certain amount on the foot of a promissory note. Initially, the respondent filed a Memo to permit him to reserve his right to examine his side witnesses after the defendant leads his evidence. This request was however rejected by the lower Court. After closure of the trial and when the suit was coming up for arguments, the respondent has filed the above noted I.A. to reopen the suit for examining one of the attestors of the suit pronote. This application was allowed by the lower Court. Upon considering the reasons assigned by the lower Court, I am of the opinion that it has exercised sound discretion in allowing the application of the respondent. The rejection of the earlier Memo of the respondent filed for reserving his right to lead...
Uppalapati Ramanamma W/O. Seshaiah Vs. Ravella Pitchaiah and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
This revision is filed against the order dated 02.06.2010 in I.A. No.631 of 2010 in O.S. No.349 of 2005 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Ongole. 2. The revision petitioner is defendant No.1 and the respondents are the plaintiffs and defendant Nos. 2 to 4. The suit is filed for partition of the suit schedule property. The plaintiffs filed the present I.A. No.631 of 2010 under Order 6 Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure (for short ‘CPC’) for amendment of the plaint and the plaint schedule. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the I.A. To give more clarity, the revision petitioner, who is respondent No.1 (defendant No.1) in the I.A, is hereinafter referred to as the respondent. 4. The case of the petitioners is that in the plaint the extent of the plaint schedule property was wrongly shown as Ac.3-30 cents bearing Survey Nos.164, 168,169/1,169/3 and 170/1. In fact, the extent of Ac.1-18 cents from out of Ac.3-30 ...
Satti Subrahmanyam Vs. Goluguri Ramakrishna Reddy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
The petitioner filed O.S.No.168 of 1997 in the Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, against the respondents for the relief of injunction in relation to the water use of an irrigation channel. The suit was dismissed on 07.11.2002 after contest. A.S.No.35 of 2004 filed against the decree therein is pending in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem. The petitioner filed O.S.No.334 of 2007 for the relief of declaration of title and recovery of possession of the irrigation channel, which incidentally was the subject matter of O.S.No.168 of 1997. In that suit, he filed I.A.No.2300 of 2011 with a prayer to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner, so that he can cause survey of the schedule channel with the help of surveyor and submit a report. The application was opposed by the respondents, on several grounds, including the one that similar exercise was undertaken in the earlier suit. The trial Court dismissed the I.A. through order, dated 27.01.2012. Hence, this revision....
Ravula Krishna Vs. Smt. Lakshmamma and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-2012
The applicant in W.C.No.210 of 2004 assailing the impugned order dated 21.06.2005 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-I, Hyderabad filed this C.M.A. seeking enhancement since he was awarded only Rs.3,02,803/- though he claimed a total compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- for the grievous injuries and fractures sustained by him in the accident out of and during the course of employment with opposite party No.1. 2. The parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed in the W.C. 3. The brief facts of the case of the applicant are that he was working as driver of auto trolley bearing No.AP 29 T 2193 belonging to opposite Party No.1 and he was paid monthly salary at the rate of Rs.4,000/-; that on 31.08.2004, while he was proceeding in the said auto trolley from Hyderabad towards Vijayawada, at about 3.30 p.m., near Toopranpet village, a lorry was coming in high speed and was trying to overtake a bus and he tried to avoid head on co...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »