Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V. Venkateswar Rao (V.V. Rao) Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Ge ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SRI PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR Writ Petition No.32542 o5. 10.2012 V. Venkateswar Rao (V.V. Rao) The Government of Andhra Pradesh, General Administration Department Represented by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad and others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G. Mohan Rao Counsel for Respondents: Advocate General : : ?Cases referred:1. (2001) 7 SCC 12.2. (2004) 8 SCC 78.3. (2005) 2 SCC 9.4. (2006) 2 SC5. AIR 199.SC 191.= (1994) 3 SC6. (2006) 8 SCC 20.7. (2011) 4 SC8. (2010) 11 SCC 37.9. 1982 An.WR 25.10. AIR 195.Cal.799 11. AIR 196.ALLAHABD 30 12. AIR 196.PATNA 32 13. AIR 197.SC 110.JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice) 1. In this Writ Petition filed as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner, who claims to be Convener of Forum for Social Audit Council on Information Right and actively campaigning on issues of public importance challenges the validity of the Notification issued by the State G...
T. Satyanarayana Vs. Y. Lakshma Reddy @ Lachi Reddy and 6 Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.644 OF 201.05-10-2012 T. Satyanarayana Y. Lakshma Reddy @ Lachi Reddy & 6 others Counsel for the appellant: Sri K. Mallikarjuna Rao(481) Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4: Sri Resu Mahender Reddy(910) Counsel for respondent No.5: Sri K. Rathanagapani Reddy (C-4414) HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED: C/15 JUDGMENT: This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred against the dismissal of I.A. No.559 of 2012, a petition for grant of temporary injunction for the schedule of property, in O.S. No.163 of 2012 vide order dated 07-06-2012 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. The original suit is filed seeking permanent injunction.2. The appellant herein is the petitioner - plaintiff and the respondents are respondents - defendants in the impugned application before the trial Court.3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed in the suit.4. The case of the pla...
The National Insurance Co. Ltd.,rep.by I Vs. Vempada Ramu and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR MA CMA Nos.60 of 2011 and Batch 05.10.2012 MA CMA No.60 of 2011: The National Insurance Co. Ltd.,rep.by its Divisional Manager, D.O.II, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam Vempada Ramu and another Counsel for the Appellant: K. Subba Rao Counsel for the Respondents: S.N.K. Mahanthi : ?Cases referred:1. 2008 ACJ 26.2. 2008 ACJ 214.3. 2009 ACJ 92.4. 2009 ACJ 234.5. 2008 (1) ALD 8.(SC) 6. 2012 (4) ALD 48.7. 2012 (4) ALD 53.8. 2010 ACJ 160.9. L.C.ACR 201.(8) S.C10. AIR 200.SC 163.(1) 11. 2011 ACJ 91.12. 2006 (2) T.A.C. 483 (SC) 13. (2004) 3 SCC 29.MA CMA No.62 of 2011: Between: The National Insurance Co. Ltd.,rep.by its Divisional Manager, D.O.II, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ... Appellant/ R-2 AND Veeramallu Kumari, and 3 others.... Respondents MA CMA No.63 of 2011: Between: The National Insurance Co. Ltd., rep.by its Divisional Manager, D.O.II, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam. ... Appellant/ R-2 AND Gantyada Devi and 3 others ... Respondents MA CMA No.67 of 2011: B...
The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs. Banoth Gopal and 2 Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.1050 OF 201.05-10-2012 The New India Assurance Company Limited,rep. by its Branch Manager, Habsiguda Branch,Hyderabad Banoth Gopal & 2 others Counsel for the appellant: Sri T. Ramulu(1053) Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Sri C. Vikram Chandra (5380) Counsel for respondent No.3: - HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED: C/15 JUDGMENT: Aggrieved by the order in W.C. No.116 of 2004 dated 05-03-2005 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour - III, Hyderabad, whereby and whereunder, the learned commissioner allowing the W.C. in part awarded a compensation of Rs.2,56,999/- to respondent Nos.1 and 2 - applicants under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as against their claim of Rs.4,00,000/-, the appellant - the New India Assurance Company Limited preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Appellant herein is insurer of the tractor bearing not AP24 - V - 1760 be...
Central Bureau of Investigation, Rep. by Vs. Dr.G.Venkateshwar Rao S/O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.8003 o05. 10.2012 Central Bureau of Investigation, rep. by Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad Dr.G.Venkateshwar Rao S/o late G.Gopal Rao Naidu, Secunderbad Counsel for the petitioner: Sri P.Keshava Rao SC for CBI Cases Counsel for respondent : Sri K.Srinivasa Kumar : ?Cases referred: AIR 200.SUPREME COURT 66 (1998) 1 Supreme Court Cases 226 AIR 198.SC 195.(1985 Cri LJ 516.AIR 200.SC 66.ORDER: Challenge in this criminal petition is the order dated 12.03.2010 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad in S.R.No.948 of 2010, whereby and whereunder, the learned Special Judge referred the complaint filed by the respondent to the C.B.I, Hyderabad, for investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.2. Respondent-Dr.G.Venkateshwar Rao is the complainant in S.R.No.948 of 2010. He filed the complaint against Dr.Seyed E Hasnain S/o late Sri Seyed Mohd. Hasnain and sixteen others complaining various acts of misappropriation of ...
M/S. Air India Limited Formerly National Vs. S.P.D. Sudhakar
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT APPEAL No.1107 OF 201.and Batch 05.10.2012 In W.A.No.1107 OF 2012.M/s. Air India Limited formerly National Aviation Company of India Limited) (a Central Government Corporation), rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Office at Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai, and another. S.P.D. Sudhakar In W.A.No.1110 of 2012:1. M/s. Air India Limited (formerly National Aviation Company of India Limited) (a Central Government Corporation), rep. By its Chairman and Managing Director, Corporate Office at Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai, and another. And Y.V. Raju Counsel for the petitioners : Mrs. V.Uma Devi Counsel for respondent : Sri M.Surendar Rao (GIST: (HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2006) 11 SCC 6.1 (1995) 4 SCC 73.WRIT APPEAL No.1107 OF 201.AND WRIT APPEAL No.1110 OF 201.COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per G. Rohini, J) The Executive Director (SR) of M/s. Air India Limited, Chennai, by his proceed...
State Bank of Hyderabad, Msme Branch,war Vs. the Tahsildar, Hanamkonda ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY WP Nos.27987 of 2012 and Batch 05-10-2012 State Bank of Hyderabad, MSME Branch,Warangal The Tahsildar, Hanamkonda Mandal, Warangal District & others Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Addepally Suryanarayana andSri A. Krishnam Raju Counsel for respondents:G.P.for Revenue for RRs 1&2 Sri A. Ravinder Reddy for R-3 : ?Citations:1. 1997(6) ALD 72.(DB) 2)(2009)4 SCC 9.3)(1995)2 SCC 1.Writ Petition Nos.27987, 11101 and 11102 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: The subject-matter of these writ petitions is common. Hence, they are disposed of through a common order. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in W.P.No.27987 of 2012. All the three writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner. While in W.P.Nos.11101 and 11102 of 2012, two notices dated 02-04-2012 and 09-04-2012 issued by the Tahsildar, Dharmasagar Mandal, the 1st respondent herein, under Section 22 of the A.P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 (for short 'the Act') are chall...
Aijaz Ali Qureshi and Others Vs. the State of A.P. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G. KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION No.154 o05. 10-2012 Aijaz Ali Qureshi and others The State of A.P. and another Counsel for the Appellant: Sri M. Layeeq Khan Counsel for Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor : ?Cases referred:2007. CRI.L.J.1877 ORDER:1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) to set aside order dated 03.5.2012 passed in Transfer Crl.M.P.No.202 of 2012 (Crl.M.P.) on the file of the Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, transferring C.C.No.725 of 2009 (C.C) on the file of the Court of VIII Additioinal Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, to try and dispose of along with S.C.No.540 of 2011 on the file of the latter Court under Section 408 Cr.P.C.2. Whereas the petitioners herein are the respondents in the Crl.M.P. and A1 to A8 in the C.C., the second respondent herein is the petitioner in the Crl.M.P. and defacto complainant in the C.C. For convenience sake, I re...
Bandi Venkateswarlu Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA and THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD Criminal Appeal No. 921 of 2011 and Referred Trial No. 3 o05. 10-2012 Bandi Venkateswarlu State of A.P. rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. Counsel for the Appellant: Smt D. Sangeetha Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred 1 (2011) 13 SCC 70.2(1980) 2 SCC 68.3 (1998) 7 SCC 17.4(2002) 4 SCC 67.5 (2009) 15 SCC 55.6 1994 (4) SCC 47.Criminal Appeal No. 921 of 2011 and Referred Trial No. 3 of 2012 Judgment: (Per Justice Sri. N.V. Ramana) The appellant-accused filed the Criminal Appeal questioning the judgment dated 24.03.2008 passed in S.C. No. 223 of 2010 by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-I), Markapur, Prakasham District, convicting him and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for a period of ten years for the offence under Section 307 I.P.C. and sentencing him to death for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. While t...
Boddu Yohan Vs. the Sub Inspector of Police,chinthalapud
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Criminal Petition No. 1950 o05. 10-2012 Boddu Yohan The Sub Inspector of Police,Chinthalapudi Police Station, West Godavari District,And another. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri P. Govind Reddy Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor HEAD NOTE: Cases referre1997. Laws (Raj2. AIR 197.SC 260.= 1972 (2) SCC 68.Criminal Petition No. 1950 of 2008 Order: The petitioner, who is accused No. 1, in C.C. No. 107 of 2006 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chintalapudi, West Godavari District, has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to quash the said proceedings against him. Briefly stated the facts of the case are, on 22.11.2005, respondent No.2 filed a private complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chintalapudi, West Godavari District, stating that the petitioner, namely Boddu Yohan and another, namely T.D. Kargilin, are working as Secretary and Treasurer respectively of Church of South India, Krishna-Godav...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »