Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G. Krishna Murthy @ Kedimi Krishna Murthy Vs. the Branch Manager Shrir ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. He has filed the appeal challenging the order of the District Forum whereby the complaint was partly allowed against the third respondent directing it to pay interest @12% p.a. on the amount of `2,06,573/-from 01.06.2008 to 28.02.2009 and costs of `2,000/-. The complaint against the respondents no.1 and 2 was dismissed. 2. The appellants son was an employee with the first respondent-company and he was a member of the second respondent-club and he paid subscription of Rs.2,500/- to the second respondent through the first respondent. The respondents no. 1 and 2 issued insurance certificate pertaining to the third respondent-insurance company for the period from 7.11.2006 to 6.11.2007 . The appellant is appointed as his nominee by his son. On 3.05.2007, the insured while proceeding on his motor cycle bearing registration number AP-02-P9-203 along with the branch manager of the first respondent-company during...
Kethireddy Dhiraj Redy and Another Vs. Registrar, Kle University, Belg ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Sri Justice D.Appa Rao, President) The appellants are unsuccessful complainants. The case of the complainants in brief is that the first complainant had applied Under Graduate All India Entrace Test-2009 (KLE UGAIET-2009) for MBBS course on the advertisement given by opposite party No.1, Registrar, KLE University. He received hall ticket to appear for examination at opposite party No.2 college at Tirupathi. The first complainant received the counselling date along with rank card, and at the time of counselling handed over the three D.Ds. for Rs.3,52,000/- to opposite party No.1. Despite the fact that he had paid the amount, he was not given a seat and opposite party No.1 returned all the documents but did not refund the amount. When contacted,he could know that opposite party No.1 had encashed the D.Ds. on 30-7-2009 for Rs.3,50,000/- and third draft for Rs.2,000/- on 31-7-2009. Since opposite party No.1 had received the amount and did not provide a seat, it was boun...
The Asst.General Manager Region-v, State Bank of India Office of the R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The complainant filed the appeal seeking direction to the opposite parties for furnishing information required as per application dated 17.12.2010, to pay compensation of `50,000/- and costs. 2. The brief facts of the complaint as seen are that the complainant obtained loan under IRDPA Scheme during the year 2004 and that the loan was waived off. The complainant was one of the beneficiaries among the small and marginal farmers. The complainant requested the opposite party to furnish information under RTI Act 2005 to furnish particulars of the loan sanctioned under IRDPA in Jami Mandal since 01-01-1999 and list of beneficiaries who were granted the subsidy for the loans availed under IRDPA. The opposite party acknowledged the application on 24-12-2010. As per the RTI Act the opposite parties have to give information within 30 days. The opposite parties failed to furnish the information and als...
V. Venkateswar Rao Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh, General Admin ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Acting Chief Justice 1. In this Writ Petition filed as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner, who claims to be Convener of Forum for Social Audit Council on Information Right and actively campaigning on issues of public importance challenges the validity of the Notification issued by the State Government in G.O.Ms.No.280, General Administration (Elecs.F) Department dated 28.5.2011, whereby, the Governor of the State, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-clause (e) of Clause (3) of Article 171 of the Constitution of India, read with Clause (5) thereof, has nominated respondents 4 to 8 as members to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council, and, seeks a writ of mandamus declaring the nominations of respondents 4 to 8 as Members of A.P. legislative Council as arbitrary, illegal, mala fide, colourable exercise of power, unconstitutional and ultra vires Article 171(3)(e) and (5) of the Constitution of India and to set aside the same. 2. By the afore-stated notification, while 1. Sr...
M/S. Jmc Products (India) Ltd Vs. Bhagyanagar Infrastructure Ltd
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
JMC Projects (India) Ltd (hereinafter called “the petitioner”) seeks winding up of Bhagyanagar Infrastructure Limited (hereinafter called “the 1st respondent), under Sections 433 (e) and (f) read with Sections 434(1)(a) and (c) and Section 439(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956. Sri S. Ramachandra Rao, Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, would submit that the petitioner is not seeking winding up of the first respondent under Section 433(f), and it would suffice if this Court were to examine his contentions under Section 433(e) of the Act. The petitioner, a company established in the year 1982, undertakes civil and structural works for commercial and residential buildings, industrial, infrastructure and power projects at various locations in India. It claims to be one of the few construction companies to be certified under ISO 9001:2008 quality system, ISO 14000:2004 etc. The 1st respondent was incorporated as a public limited company on 7.7.200...
Aijaz Ali Quresh and Others Vs. the State of A.P. and Another
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 407 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) to set aside order dated 03.5.2012 passed in Transfer Crl.M.P.No.202 of 2012 (Crl.M.P.) on the file of the Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, transferring C.C.No.725 of 2009 (C.C) on the file of the Court of VIII Additioinal Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, to try and dispose of along with S.C.No.540 of 2011 on the file of the latter Court under Section 408 Cr.P.C. 2. Whereas the petitioners herein are the respondents in the Crl.M.P. and A1 to A8 in the C.C., the second respondent herein is the petitioner in the Crl.M.P. and defacto complainant in the C.C. For convenience sake, I refer the parties as arrayed in the Crl.M.P. from here afterwards. 3. The question raised here is whether by virtue of clause (iii) of Section 407(1)(c) Cr.P.C., the Sessions Judge got authority to transfer the case as was done in this case. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents would con...
T. Satyanarayana Vs. Y. Lakshma Reddy @ Lachi Reddy and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred against the dismissal of I.A. No.559 of 2012, a petition for grant of temporary injunction for the schedule of property, in O.S. No.163 of 2012 vide order dated 07-06-2012 by the learned II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad. The original suit is filed seeking permanent injunction. 2. The appellant herein is the petitioner - plaintiff and the respondents are respondents - defendants in the impugned application before the trial Court. 3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they arrayed in the suit. 4. The case of the plaintiff is that he is tenant, oral tenancy, of defendant Nos.6 and 7 in the schedule of property wherein he is carrying on bamboo business for the past several years periodically and paying rents to defendant Nos.6 and 7 regularly. However, defendant Nos.1 to 5 are trying to interfere with his peaceful possession and enjoyment in the schedule property, for which he gave report to ...
M/S. Air India Limited (Formerly National Aviation Company of India Li ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Common Judgment: (G. Rohini, J.) The Executive Director (SR) of M/s. Air India Limited, Chennai, by his proceedings dated 26.5.2010, informed the respondents in these two appeals that their services were terminated with immediate effect under Regulation 13 (a) of the Service Regulations of Indian Airlines (for short, ‘Service Regulations’). The said communication was admittedly based on the order dated 26.5.2010 passed by the Chairman and Managing Director of the National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL) terminating the service of the respondents herein on the ground that the respondents, who are the office bearers of All India Aircraft Engineers Association (AIAEA), had destabilised the functioning of the company by instigating and leading the other employees to join the strike on a flimsy ground and that the company had lost confidence in them due to their actions and the potential to cause harm to the company in future as well. Aggrieved by the same, the respond...
Bandi Venkateswarlu Vs. State of A.P. Rep. by Public Prosecutor
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
N.V. Ramana, J. The appellant-accused filed the Criminal Appeal questioning the judgment dated 24.03.2008 passed in S.C. No. 223 of 2010 by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-I), Markapur, Prakasham District, convicting him and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for a period of ten years for the offence under Section 307 I.P.C. and sentencing him to death for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. While the referred trial, under Section 366 Cr.P.C. is sent by the VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, for confirmation of sentence of death imposed by him against the appellant-accused for the offence under Section 302 I.P.C. The case of the prosecution, briefly stated is that P.W.1, namely Bandi Rama Devi is a native of Gannepalli village, Ardhaveedu Mandal. She was given in marriage to the elder brother of the accused, namely Bandi Srinivasulu, who is working in Army at Nasik. They were blessed with two children-deceased, namely Pallavi and Jaswanth, w...
The National Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its Divisional Manager Vs. Ve ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-05-2012
Common Judgment: In a ghastly accident that occurred on 13.02.2004, when lorry bearing registration No.AP 31T 9698 fell from Simhachalam Hill, Visakhapatnam into the Valley, as many as 19 persons suffered from the accident. While 11 persons died in the accident, seven persons including a child of four years old sustained injuries. Various claimants, either as the injured or as dependents of the deceased filed cases under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (M.V. Act, for short) or under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act seeking compensation for the injuries that they sustained or for the death that their relatives. Some cases under the provisions of the M.V. Act came up before the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. Some other cases came up before the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge [Fast Tract Court (FTC)], Visakhapatnam. Each Tribunal disposed of the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »