Andhra Pradesh Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Popuri Srirama Nagabhushana Rao Former Director MerifIn (India) Ltd. V ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party no.2 is the appellant. 2. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant is trading account holder with the opposite party no.1. As per oral instructions/written instruction of the complainant, the opposite parties would trade i.e., purchase/sell the shares of the complainant in stock market after deducting brokerage and other charges. Believing the opposite parties, the complainant started trading in shares through his account NO.93. The complainant sold 1000 shares belonging to JSW Steel Zindal VIJ @ `601/- per share through the opposite party no.1 as per contract note for the settlement No.1432. The opposite parties have to pay an amount of `5,96,897.97 ps after deducting brokerage. The opposite parties no.2 and 3 issued cheque for `5,96,897.97 ps dated 23.06.2009. The cheque was bounced for insufficiency of funds and subsequently failed to pay the amount. Despite several demands the opposite par...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Its Manager and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 22,200/- with interest @ 9% p.a., from the date of repudiation till the date of payment together with costs of Rs. 500/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he got his tractor-trailer (commercial vehicle) insured with the appellant insurance company for Rs. 3,10,000/- covering the period from 29.9.2008 to 28.9.2009. While so it met with an accident on 17.8.2009 when the empty tractor-trailer was being driven by one B. Rajendra Reddy, and that the driver of a jeep was driving in a rash and negligent manner dashed against it resulting in extensive damage to the tractor-trailer. When claim was made it was repudiated on the ground that the driver was not having driving license to drive the commercial vehicle. In fact, at the time of accident the driver was having non-transport driving license. It...
The National Insurance Company Ltd. Rep. by Senior Divisional Manager ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Oral Order: (Honble Justice D. Appa Rao, President) 1) This is an appeal preferred by the insurance company against the order of the Dist. Forum directing it to pay Rs. 1,97,675/- with interest @ 7.5% p.a., from the date of complaint till the date of realization together with costs of Rs. 500/-. 2) The case of the complainant in brief is that he purchased an oil tanker having availed finance and got the vehicle insured with the appellant insurance company from 5.4.2008 to 4.4.2009. While so, on 10.12.2008 it met with an accident. Basing on which a case in crime No. 104/2008 u/s 337 IPC was registered. On intimation the insurance company appointed a surveyor and loss assessor who estimated the damage at Rs. 1,63,082/-. However, it was repudiated on the ground that the driver was not having valid and requisite driving license. Alleging that it amounts to deficiency, he claimed Rs. 2,42,000/- towards expenses and repairs, Rs. 1,31,200/- towards loss of income, Rs. 25,000/- towards transpo...
M/S Kapil Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager Kadiri Branch Vs. M. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. M/s Kapil Chit Funds Pvt Ltd is the appellant. The appeal is directed against the order of the District Forum whereby the appellant was directed to `4,69,500/- with interest @12% p.a. from the date of complaint till payment and cost of `5,000/-. 2. The respondent subscribed to the chit group bearing number KITOIJ-8 for chit value of `5,00,000/- conducted by the appellant company and the chit period was for 50 months on monthly subscription @ `10,000/-. The chit was commenced in the month of April,2007 and the respondent participated in the auction conducted on 27.09.2009 . The respondent was declared successful bidder. The respondent claimed that he furnished the sureties as required by the appellant company and the appellant company informed him that the surety forms were sent to its regional office and that the prize amount was deposited in an approved bank. 3. The respondent contended that the appellant-company informed him through let...
S.M. Rajeshwar Rao Vs. Union of India, Rep. by Its Under Secretary, De ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
G. Rohini, J. The writ petitioner is working as Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise at Kadapa. His name was empanelled for consideration for appointment to the Indian Administrative Service of AP cadre from amongst Non-State Civil Service Officers against the one vacancy determined for the year 2009 and was recommended by the State Government by proceedings dated 16.12.2009. However the Selection Committee did not meet and by proceedings dated 12.01.2010 the Union Public Service Commission declared in exercise of the powers conferred by proviso (c) to Regulation 5 of Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Selection) Regulations, 1997 that it was not practicable to hold the meeting of the Selection Committee for the year 2009 for selection of Non-State Service Officers. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed O.A.No.226 of 2010 in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench with a prayer to declare the ...
B. Gopal Reddy Vs. the A.P. Transco, Represented by Its Chief Managing ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare proceedings in Lr.No.CE/KDPZ/KDP/ADE-T3/AE-T5/F.O.andM/D.N.1713/12, dated 29-6-2012 of respondent No.2 whereby he has awarded the contracts of maintenance of 132 and 220 KV sub-stations, each at Rayadurg and Shahpuram respectively, to respondent No.4 and 132 KV sub-station at Uravakonda to respondent No.5, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to consider his tender for grant of the maintenance contracts. Even though notices were served on respondent Nos.4 and 5, they have not entered appearance. I have heard Sri Kasa Jagan Mohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.V. Ramana, learned Counsel appearing for Sri O. Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel representing respondent Nos.1 to 3. In response to the notification issued by respondent No.2 inviting tenders for carrying out operation and maintenance works including house keeping, gardening, ward and watch,...
K.Emanuel Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh Through Inspecto
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6368 OF 201.08.10.2012 K.Emanuel State of Andhra Pradesh through Inspector of Police, Begumpet P.S., Secunderabad through Public Prosectuor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for Petitioner: Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma Counsel for Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor ?Cases referred 1. 2005 (1) ALD (Crl.) 549 (SC) 2. 2007 AIR SCW 481.ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.58 of 2007 on the file of the Court of XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad. I have heard Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner-A1 and the learned Additional Public Prosecution representing the State. The brief facts of the case, as could be seen from the report lodged by the Chief Manager, Andhra Bank, Prakasham Nagar, Hyderabad, are the following. On the application made by the petitioner for grant of housing loan, the bank sanctioned an amoun...
S.M.Rajeshwar Rao Vs. 1. Union of India, Rep. by Its Under Sec
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
THE HON'BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.26417 o08. 10.2012 S.M. Rajeshwar Rao 1. Union of India, rep. by its Under Secretary,Department of Personal and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Central Secretariat, New Delhi,and others. Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Siva Counsel for respondent No.1 : Sri J.P. Srikanth for Ponnam Ashok Goud, Assistant Solicitor General of India Counsel for respondent No.2: Sri K.G. Krishna Murthy,Additional Advocate General Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri B. Narasimha Sarma,Standing Counsel for UPSC Counsel for respondent No.4 : - GIST: HEAD NOTE: Cases cited:1. (2008) 2 SCC 25.2 (2012) 6 SCC 31.3 (1996) 3 SCC 70.4 AIR 195.SC 73.5 1994 (4) SCC 2.6 (1990) 2 SCC 70.7 (1991) 3 SCC 4.8 (2006) 3 SCC 33.9 2012 (1) ALD 63.10 (2004) 7 SCC 70.11 (2010) 4 SCC 29.12 (1996) 6 SCC 72.13 1993 Supp (3) SCC 57.ORDER: (Per G. Rohini, J) The writ petitioner is working as Deputy Commissioner...
B. Gopal Reddy Vs. the A.P. Transco, Represented by Its Chi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.20054 o8. 10-2012 B. Gopal Reddy The A.P. Transco, represented by its Chief Managing Director,Vidyuth Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyerabad and others Counsel for petitioner : Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Sri S.V. Ramana for Sri O. Manohar Reddy, Standing Counsel Counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5 : None appeared ?CASES REFERRED: Nil ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare proceedings in Lr.not CE/KDPZ/KDP/ADE-T3/AE-T5/F.O.&M/D.N.1713/12, dated 29-6-2012 of respondent No.2 whereby he has awarded the contracts of maintenance of 132 and 220 KV sub- stations, each at Rayadurg and Shahpuram respectively, to respondent No.4 and 132 KV sub-station at Uravakonda to respondent No.5, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner sought for a consequential direction to the respondents to consider his tender for grant of the maintenance contracts. Even though notices were served on respondent Nos.4 a...
Prakasam District Praja Sankshema Seva S Vs. the State of A.P. and Oth ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-08-2012
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY Writ Petition No.7981 o08. 10.2012 Prakasam District Praja Sankshema Seva Sangam The State of A.P. and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Bokka Satyanarayana Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.6: Smt. Shanthi Neelam : ?Citations ORDER: Before the country became independent, there was perfect mechanism to protect the lakes, tanks and other water bodies wherever they existed. Even when cities or villages were expanded, the submergence areas of water bodies up to their full tank level were protected. It is only after independence, that the disappearance of tanks particularly in and around Hyderabad took place, thanks to the "progressive administration" of the State after merger of the States of Andhra and Hyderabad. The deplorable condition was depicted in a counter- affidavit filed in a writ petition, wherein it was said that the water in Miralam Tank, which was the source for the drinking w...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »